Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2312.10277 · Physical Review Applied

Incoherent approximation of leakage in quantum error correction

Jeffrey Marshall, Dvir Kafri

Published May 9, 2025• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum error-correcting codes typically do not account for quantum state transitions---leakage---out of the computational subspace. Since these errors can last for multiple detection rounds, they can significantly contribute to logical errors. It is therefore important to understand how to numerically model them efficiently. Fully quantum simulations of leakage require more levels per leaked qubit, which substantially limits the system sizes that may be simulated. To address this, we introduce a subspace twirling approximation (STA) on quantum channels that preserves the incoherence between the computational and leakage subspaces. The assumption of incoherence enables the quantum simulation of leakage at little computational overhead. We motivate the approximation's validity by showing that incoherence is achieved naturally during repeated stabilizer measurements. Additionally, we provide various simulation results which show that the STA yields accurate error-correction statistics in the repetition and surface codes with physical error parameters.

DOI
10.1103/physrevapplied.23.054025

Related papers

Robust characterization of leakage errors

Joel J. Wallman, Marie Barnhill, Joseph Emerson

Leakage errors arise when the quantum state leaks out of some subspace of interest, for example, the two-level subspace of a multi-level system defining a computational `qubit' or the logical code space defined by some quantum error-correcting code or decoherence-free subspace. Leakage errors pose a distinct challenge to quantum control relative to the more well-studied decoherence errors and can be a limiting factor to achieving fault-tolerant quantum computation. Here we present scalable and robust randomized benchmarking protocols for quickly estimating the rates of both coherent and incoherent leakage, allowing for practical minimization of the leakage rate by varying over control methods. We illustrate the reliability of the protocol through numerical simulations with physically-relevant error models.

arXiv:1412.4126•New Journal of Physics•Apr 15, 2016•65 citations

Efficient simulation of leakage errors in quantum error correcting codes using tensor network methods

Hidetaka Manabe, Yasunari Suzuki, Andrew S. Darmawan

Abstract Leakage errors, in which a qubit is excited to a level outside the qubit subspace, represent a significant obstacle in the development of robust quantum computers. We present a computationally efficient simulation methodology for studying leakage errors in quantum error correcting codes (QECCs) using tensor network methods, specifically matrix product states. Our approach enables the simulation of various leakage processes, including thermal noise and coherent errors, without approximations (such as the Pauli twirling approximation) that can lead to errors in the estimation of the logical error rate. We apply our method to two QECCs: the one-dimensional repetition code and a thin 3 × d surface code. By leveraging the small amount of entanglement generated during the error correction process, we are able to study large systems, up to a few hundred qudits, over many code cycles. We consider a realistic noise model of leakage relevant to superconducting qubits to evaluate code performance and a variety of leakage removal strategies. Our numerical results suggest that appropriate leakage removal is crucial, especially when the code distance is large.

arXiv:2308.08186•New Journal of Physics•Oct 20, 2025•2 citations

Accurate modeling of noise in quantum error correcting circuits

Mauricio Gutierrez Arguedas

A universal, scalable quantum computer will require the use of quantum error correction in order to achieve fault tolerance. The assessment and comparison of error-correcting strategies is performed by classical simulation. However, due to the prohibitive exponential scaling of general quantum circuits, simulations are restrained to specific subsets of quantum operations. This creates a gap between accuracy and efficiency which is particularly problematic when modeling noise, because most realistic noise models are not efficiently simulable on a classical computer. We have introduced extensions to the Pauli channel, the traditional error channel employed to model noise in simulations of quantum circuits. These expanded error channels are still computationally tractable to simulate, but result in more accurate approximations to realistic error channels at the single qubit level. Using the Steane [[7,1,3]] code, we have also investigated the behavior of these expanded channels at the logical error-corrected level. We have found that it depends strongly on whether the error is incoherent or coherent. In general, the Pauli channel will be an excellent approximation to incoherent channels, but an unsatisfactory one for coherent channels, especially because it severely underestimates the magnitude of the error. Finally, we also studied the honesty and accuracy of the expanded channels at the logical level. Our results suggest that these measures can be employed to generate lower and upper bounds to a quantum code's threshold under the influence of a specific error channel.

•Nov 16, 2015•0 citations

Embedding Stabilizer Codes and Leakage Correction in Multilevel Quantum Systems

Ali Abu-Nada, Lian-Ao Wu

Leakage beyond the computational subspace is a major source of error in multilevel quantum hardware. We show that any \( [[n,k,d]] \) stabilizer code can be embedded isometrically into a single \(D\)-dimensional system while preserving its complete error-correcting structure. We further derive a necessary and sufficient condition for exact leakage correction, proving that leakage is correctable precisely when it does not distinguish between logical states. These results establish a unified framework for quantum error correction in multilevel quantum systems.

quant-pharXiv:2608.12450•Aug 13, 2026•0 citations

Errors and pseudothresholds for incoherent and coherent noise

Mauricio Gutiérrez, Conor Smith, Livia Lulushi +2 more

We compare the effect of single qubit incoherent and coherent errors on the logical error rate of the Steane [[7,1,3]] quantum error correction code by performing an exact full-density-matrix simulation of an error correction step. We find that the effective 1-qubit process matrix at the logical level reveals the key differences between the error models and provides insight into why the Pauli twirling approximation is a good approximation for incoherent errors and a poor approximation for coherent ones. Approximate channels composed of Clifford operations and Pauli measurement operators that are pessimistic at the physical level result in pessimistic error rates at the logical level. In addition, we observe that the pseudothreshold can differ by a factor of 5 depending on whether the error is calculated using the fidelity or the distance.

arXiv:1605.03604•Physical Review A•Oct 24, 2016•57 citations

Understanding the effects of leakage in superconducting quantum-error-detection circuits

Joydip Ghosh, Austin G. Fowler, John M. Martinis +1 more

The majority of quantum-error-detection and correction protocols assume that the population in a qubit does not leak outside of its computational subspace. For many existing approaches, however, the physical qubits do possess more than two energy levels and consequently are prone to such leakage events. Analyzing the effects of leakage is therefore essential to devise optimal protocols for quantum gates, measurement, and error correction. In this article, we present a detailed study of leakage in a two-qubit superconducting stabilizer measurement circuit. We simulate the repeated ancilla-assisted measurement of a single ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{z}$ operator for a data qubit, record the outcome at the end of each measurement cycle, and explore the signature of leakage events in the obtained readout statistics. An analytic model is also developed that closely approximates the results of our numerical simulations. We find that leakage leads to destructive features in the quantum-error-detection scheme, making additional hardware and software protocols necessary.

arXiv:1306.0925•Physical Review A•Dec 23, 2013•70 citations
Quantum error-correcting codes typically do not account for quantum state transitions---leakage---out of the computational subspace. Since these errors can last for multiple detection rounds, they can significantly contribute to logical errors. It is therefore important to understand how to numerically model them efficiently. Fully quantum simulations of leakage require more levels per leaked qubit, which substantially limits the system sizes that may be simulated. To address this, we introduce a subspace twirling approximation (STA) on quantum channels that preserves the incoherence between the computational and leakage subspaces. The assumption of incoherence enables the quantum simulation of leakage at little computational overhead. We motivate the approximation's validity by showing that incoherence is achieved naturally during repeated stabilizer measurements. Additionally, we provide various simulation results which show that the STA yields accurate error-correction statistics in the repetition and surface codes with physical error parameters.
Leakage errors arise when the quantum state leaks out of some subspace of interest, for example, the two-level subspace of a multi-level system defining a computational `qubit' or the logical code space defined by some quantum error-correcting code or decoherence-free subspace. Leakage errors pose a distinct challenge to quantum control relative to the more well-studied decoherence errors and can be a limiting factor to achieving fault-tolerant quantum computation. Here we present scalable and robust randomized benchmarking protocols for quickly estimating the rates of both coherent and incoherent leakage, allowing for practical minimization of the leakage rate by varying over control methods. We illustrate the reliability of the protocol through numerical simulations with physically-relevant error models.
Abstract Leakage errors, in which a qubit is excited to a level outside the qubit subspace, represent a significant obstacle in the development of robust quantum computers. We present a computationally efficient simulation methodology for studying leakage errors in quantum error correcting codes (QECCs) using tensor network methods, specifically matrix product states. Our approach enables the simulation of various leakage processes, including thermal noise and coherent errors, without approximations (such as the Pauli twirling approximation) that can lead to errors in the estimation of the logical error rate. We apply our method to two QECCs: the one-dimensional repetition code and a thin 3 × d surface code. By leveraging the small amount of entanglement generated during the error correction process, we are able to study large systems, up to a few hundred qudits, over many code cycles. We consider a realistic noise model of leakage relevant to superconducting qubits to evaluate code performance and a variety of leakage removal strategies. Our numerical results suggest that appropriate leakage removal is crucial, especially when the code distance is large.
A universal, scalable quantum computer will require the use of quantum error correction in order to achieve fault tolerance. The assessment and comparison of error-correcting strategies is performed by classical simulation. However, due to the prohibitive exponential scaling of general quantum circuits, simulations are restrained to specific subsets of quantum operations. This creates a gap between accuracy and efficiency which is particularly problematic when modeling noise, because most realistic noise models are not efficiently simulable on a classical computer. We have introduced extensions to the Pauli channel, the traditional error channel employed to model noise in simulations of quantum circuits. These expanded error channels are still computationally tractable to simulate, but result in more accurate approximations to realistic error channels at the single qubit level. Using the Steane [[7,1,3]] code, we have also investigated the behavior of these expanded channels at the logical error-corrected level. We have found that it depends strongly on whether the error is incoherent or coherent. In general, the Pauli channel will be an excellent approximation to incoherent channels, but an unsatisfactory one for coherent channels, especially because it severely underestimates the magnitude of the error. Finally, we also studied the honesty and accuracy of the expanded channels at the logical level. Our results suggest that these measures can be employed to generate lower and upper bounds to a quantum code's threshold under the influence of a specific error channel.
Leakage beyond the computational subspace is a major source of error in multilevel quantum hardware. We show that any [[n,k,d]] [[n,k,d]] [[n,k,d]] stabilizer code can be embedded isometrically into a single DDD-dimensional system while preserving its complete error-correcting structure. We further derive a necessary and sufficient condition for exact leakage correction, proving that leakage is correctable precisely when it does not distinguish between logical states. These results establish a unified framework for quantum error correction in multilevel quantum systems.
We compare the effect of single qubit incoherent and coherent errors on the logical error rate of the Steane [[7,1,3]] quantum error correction code by performing an exact full-density-matrix simulation of an error correction step. We find that the effective 1-qubit process matrix at the logical level reveals the key differences between the error models and provides insight into why the Pauli twirling approximation is a good approximation for incoherent errors and a poor approximation for coherent ones. Approximate channels composed of Clifford operations and Pauli measurement operators that are pessimistic at the physical level result in pessimistic error rates at the logical level. In addition, we observe that the pseudothreshold can differ by a factor of 5 depending on whether the error is calculated using the fidelity or the distance.
The majority of quantum-error-detection and correction protocols assume that the population in a qubit does not leak outside of its computational subspace. For many existing approaches, however, the physical qubits do possess more than two energy levels and consequently are prone to such leakage events. Analyzing the effects of leakage is therefore essential to devise optimal protocols for quantum gates, measurement, and error correction. In this article, we present a detailed study of leakage in a two-qubit superconducting stabilizer measurement circuit. We simulate the repeated ancilla-assisted measurement of a single ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}^{z}$ operator for a data qubit, record the outcome at the end of each measurement cycle, and explore the signature of leakage events in the obtained readout statistics. An analytic model is also developed that closely approximates the results of our numerical simulations. We find that leakage leads to destructive features in the quantum-error-detection scheme, making additional hardware and software protocols necessary.