The solution of linear systems of equations is the basis of many other quantum algorithms, and recent results provided an algorithm with optimal scaling in both the condition number κ and the allowable error ϵ \cite{CostaAnYuvalEtAl2022}. That work was based on the discrete adiabatic theorem, and worked out an explicit constant factor for an upper bound on the complexity. Here we show via numerical testing on random matrices that the constant factor is in practice about 1,200 times smaller than the upper bound found numerically in the previous results. That means that this approach is far more efficient than might naively be expected from the upper bound. In particular, it is about an order of magnitude more efficient than using a randomised approach from \cite{jennings2023efficient} that claimed to be more efficient.
The solution of linear systems of equations is the basis of many other quantum algorithms, and recent results provided an algorithm with optimal scaling in both the condition number κ and the allowable error ϵ \cite{CostaAnYuvalEtAl2022}. That work was based on the discrete adiabatic theorem, and worked out an explicit constant factor for an upper bound on the complexity. Here we show via numerical testing on random matrices that the constant factor is in practice about 1,200 times smaller than the upper bound found numerically in the previous results. That means that this approach is far more efficient than might naively be expected from the upper bound. In particular, it is about an order of magnitude more efficient than using a randomised approach from \cite{jennings2023efficient} that claimed to be more efficient.
Optimal quantum linear equation solvers provide complexity O(κlog(1/ε)), where κ is the condition number and ε is the allowable error. The optimal solver using a discrete adiabatic approach [PRX Quantum 3, 040303 (2022)] has large analytically proven constant factors for the upper bound on the complexity. The constant factors were later found to be about 1,200 times smaller in numerical testing [Quantum 9, 1887 (2025)]. This meant it is about an order of magnitude more efficient than using a randomised approach from [PRX Quantum 6, 040373 (2025)], which has far smaller analytically proven constant factors. Recently, a ``Shortcut'' method has been found to provide an optimal solver which also has small proven constant factors. In the present work, we conduct a comprehensive numerical analysis comparing this method with the adiabatic solver for two families of random linear systems. We find that, in the case where the solution norm is unknown, the adiabatic solver provides slightly better performance. If the solution norm is known, then the shortcut method provides significantly better performance for non-Hermitian matrices.
Solving linear systems of equations is a fundamental problem with a wide variety of applications across many fields of science, and there is increasing effort to develop quantum linear solver algorithms. Subaşı . [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 060504 (2019)] proposed a randomized algorithm inspired by adiabatic quantum computing, based on a sequence of random Hamiltonian simulation steps, with suboptimal scaling in the condition number κ of the linear system and the target error ϵ . Here we go beyond these results in several ways. Firstly, using filtering [Lin and Tong, Quantum 4, 361 (2020)] and Poissonization techniques [Cunningham and Roland, ArXiv:2406.03972 (2024)], the algorithm complexity is improved to the optimal scaling O ( κ log ( 1 / ϵ ) ) —an exponential improvement in ϵ , and a shaving of a log κ scaling factor in κ . Secondly, the algorithm is further modified to achieve constant factor improvements, which are vital as we progress towards hardware implementations on fault-tolerant devices. We introduce a cheaper randomized walk operator method replacing Hamiltonian simulation—which also removes the need for potentially challenging classical precomputations; randomized routines are sampled over optimized random variables; circuit constructions are improved. We obtain a closed formula rigorously upper bounding the expected number of times one needs to apply a block-encoding of the linear system matrix to output a quantum state encoding the solution to the linear system. The upper bound is 837 κ at ϵ = 10 − 10 for Hermitian matrices.
Recently, several approaches to solving linear systems on a quantum computer have been formulated in terms of the quantum adiabatic theorem for a continuously varying Hamiltonian.Such approaches have enabled near-linear scaling in the condition number κ of the linear system, without requiring a complicated variable-time amplitude amplification procedure.However, the most efficient of those procedures is still asymptotically suboptimal by a factor of log(κ).Here, we prove a rigorous form of the adiabatic theorem that bounds the error in terms of the spectral gap for intrinsically discrete-time evolutions.In combination with the qubitized quantum walk, our discrete adiabatic theorem gives a speed-up for all adiabatic algorithms.Here, we use this combination to develop a quantum algorithm for solving linear systems that is asymptotically optimal, in the sense that the complexity is strictly linear in κ, matching a known lower bound on the complexity.Our O[κ log(1/ )] complexity is also optimal in terms of the combined scaling in κ and the precision .Compared to existing suboptimal methods, our algorithm is simpler and easier to implement.Moreover, we determine the constant factors in the algorithm, which would be suitable for determining the complexity in terms of gate counts for specific applications.
The spectral condition number is a widely adopted measure of worst-case cost for quantum linear system solvers. Yet it can significantly overestimate the actual runtime for a typical problem instance. We present two quantum algorithms that produce the normalized solution ∣x⟩ of linear system Ax=∣b⟩ to accuracy ε with complexity independent of the condition number κ=∥A−1∥. We focus on the standard input model where A is accessed through a block encoding and ∣b⟩ is prepared by a unitary. But we also introduce an affine dilation model that encodes A and ∣b⟩ jointly, allowing further refinements of the query complexity. Our truncation-based solver makes an optimal number of queries to ∣b⟩ and O(κeffpolylog(εκeff)) queries to A. We prove a family of upper bounds on the effective condition number, including κeff≤ε1/t∥(A†A)−t/2∣x⟩∥1/t for positive even integer t and κeff≤ε1/t∥A−1†(A†A)−(t−1)/2∣x⟩∥1/t for positive odd t, overcoming the κ-barrier. Our filtering-based solver is extremely simple with a favorable runtime prefactor. In particular, the solver has query complexity 3ε∥A−1†∣x⟩∥ to leading order when the solution norm is known. We then present a similarly simple solution norm estimator with the same asymptotic cost up to logarithmic factors. Our quantum linear system solvers thus substantially improve a recent algorithm of Li, enabling faster quantum linear system solving beyond the condition number.
Given a linear system of equations Ax=b, quantum linear system solvers (QLSSs) approximately prepare a quantum state ∣x⟩ for which the amplitudes are proportional to the solution vector x. Asymptotically optimal QLSSs have query complexity O(κlog(1/ε)), where κ is the condition number of A, and ε is the approximation error. However, runtime guarantees for existing optimal and near-optimal QLSSs do not have favorable constant prefactors, in part because they rely on complex or difficult-to-analyze techniques like variable-time amplitude amplification and adiabatic path-following. Here, we give a conceptually simple QLSS that does not use these techniques. If the solution norm ∥x∥ is known exactly, our QLSS requires only a single application of kernel reflection (a straightforward extension of the eigenstate filtering (EF) technique of previous work) and the query complexity of the QLSS is (1+O(ε))κln(22/ε). If the norm is unknown, our method allows it to be estimated up to a constant factor using O(loglog(κ)) applications of kernel projection (a direct generalization of EF) yielding a straightforward QLSS with near-optimal O(κloglog(κ)logloglog(κ)+κlog(1/ε)) total complexity. Alternatively, by reintroducing a concept from the adiabatic path-following technique, we show that O(κ) complexity can be achieved for norm estimation, yielding an optimal QLSS with O(κlog(1/ε)) complexity while still avoiding the need to invoke the adiabatic theorem. Finally, we compute an explicit upper bound of 56κ+1.05κln(1/ε)+o(κ) for the complexity of our optimal QLSS.
In adiabatic quantum computing the aim is to track an eigenstate as the Hamiltonian changes. In the usual setup this is achieved using the natural time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution of the system and the main technical tool is the adiabatic theorem. We propose several alternative processes that achieve the same goal, but can easily be implemented on a gate-based quantum computer without the overhead of simulating time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution. We give a general framework for deriving `adiabatic' theorems for these processes.
As an application, we give various algorithms for solving the Quantum Linear Systems Problem (QLSP) with optimal scaling in the condition number. One of these algorithms was previously developed in [Cunningham, Roland 2024] and another can be seen as a randomised version of the discrete adiabatic algorithm of [Costa et al. 2022].
We also describe versions of Trotterisation in our framework, which allows several results from [An et al. 2025] to be reproduced in a randomised setting. In particular, bounds on the Trotter error in terms of the fidelity are obtained that are asymptotically better than the standard bounds.