Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2312.06104

On the approximability of random-hypergraph MAX-3-XORSAT problems with quantum algorithms

Eliot Kapit, Brandon Barton, Sean Feeney, George Grattan, Pratik Patnaik, Jacob Sagal, Lincoln D. Carr, Vadim Oganesyan

Published Dec 11, 2023• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A canonical feature of the constraint satisfaction problems in NP is approximation hardness, where in the worst case, finding sufficient-quality approximate solutions is exponentially hard for all known methods. Fundamentally, the lack of any guided local minimum escape method ensures both exact and approximate classical approximation hardness, but the equivalent mechanism(s) for quantum algorithms are poorly understood. For algorithms based on Hamiltonian time evolution, we explore this question through the prototypically hard MAX-3-XORSAT problem class. We conclude that the mechanisms for quantum exact and approximation hardness are fundamentally distinct. We review known results from the literature, and identify mechanisms that make conventional quantum methods (such as Adiabatic Quantum Computing) weak approximation algorithms in the worst case. We construct a family of spectrally filtered quantum algorithms that escape these issues, and develop analytical theories for their performance. We show that, for random hypergraphs in the approximation-hard regime, if we define the energy to be $E = N_{\mathrm{unsat}}-N_{\mathrm{sat}}$, spectrally filtered quantum optimization will return states with $E \leq q_m E_{\mathrm{GS}}$ (where $E_{\rm GS}$ is the ground state energy) in sub-quadratic time, where conservatively, $q_m \simeq 0.59$. This is in contrast to $q_m \to 0$ for the hardest instances with classical searches. We test all of these claims with extensive numerical simulations. We do not claim that this approximation guarantee holds for all possible hypergraphs, though our algorithm's mechanism can likely generalize widely. These results suggest that quantum computers are more powerful for approximate optimization than had been previously assumed.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2312.06104

Related papers

The Quantum Overlap Gap Property and Algorithmic Hardness for the Quantum Hypergraph Max-Cut Problem

Mikhail Mints, Eric R. Anschuetz

In this work, we analyze the average-case hardness of approximation for the Quantum Hypergraph Max-Cut problem using the theoretical framework of the Quantum Overlap Gap Property (QOGP). We establish two main results. Our first result applies to a wide class of stable quantum algorithms, satisfying a Lipschitz property with respect to the quantum Wasserstein distance of order $2$. We show a weak hardness result, demonstrating that for any Lipschitz constant $L$, there is some $k$ such that $L$-stable algorithms cannot approximate the optimal solution to Quantum Hypergraph Max-Cut on $k$-uniform hypergraphs in the average case. Additionally, we establish a strong hardness result where $k$ is independent of $L$, but only for a more restricted class of local quantum algorithms defined using the quantum Wasserstein distance of order $\infty$. We apply these results to establish concrete depth lower bounds for popular quantum algorithms for preparing near-optimal states for this problem.

quant-pharXiv:2609.10838•Sep 11, 2026•0 citations

Beating Random Assignment for Approximating Quantum 2-Local Hamiltonian Problems.

Ojas Parekh, Kevin Thompson

The quantum k-Local Hamiltonian problem is a natural generalization of classical constraint satisfaction problems (k-CSP) and is complete for QMA, a quantum analog of NP. Although the complexity of k-Local Hamiltonian problems has been well studied, only a handful of approximation results are known. For Max 2-Local Hamiltonian where each term is a rank 3 projector, a natural quantum generalization of classical Max 2-SAT, the best known approximation algorithm was the trivial random assignment, yielding a 0.75-approximation. We present the first approximation algorithm beating this bound, a classical polynomial-time 0.764-approximation. For strictly quadratic instances, which are maximally entangled instances, we provide a 0.801 approximation algorithm, and numerically demonstrate that our algorithm is likely a 0.821-approximation. We conjecture these are the hardest instances to approximate. We also give improved approximations for quantum generalizations of other related classical 2-CSPs. Finally, we exploit quantum connections to a generalization of the Grothendieck problem to obtain a classical constant-factor approximation for the physically relevant special case of strictly quadratic traceless 2-Local Hamiltonians on bipartite interaction graphs, where a inverse logarithmic approximation was the best previously known (for general interaction graphs). Our work employs recently developed techniques for analyzing classical approximations of CSPs and is intended to be accessible to both quantum information scientists and classical computer scientists.

arXiv:2012.12347•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Aug 1, 2021•5 citations

Approximability limits for bounded-degree max-LINSAT and implications for decoded quantum interferometry

Maximilian J. Kramer, Carsten Schubert, Jens Eisert

For general max-k-XORSAT with $k \geq 3$, no polynomial-time algorithm can do substantially better than random guessing on worst-case instances unless $\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}$: approximating beyond the random-assignment value of $1/2$ is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. The picture changes when each variable appears in at most $D$ constraints. In that bounded-degree setting, polynomial-time algorithms can provably beat the random baseline by an additive amount of order $1/\sqrt{D}$. For Boolean instances, this scaling is known to be optimal: the matching hardness result is due to Trevisan, while the corresponding algorithmic guarantee was established by Barak et al. Whether the same holds over general finite fields, and what it implies for quantum algorithms, has not been established. We make this connection explicit and extend the hardness to max-E$k$-LINSAT$(q,r)$ with bounded degree $D$ and over arbitrary finite fields $\mathbb{F}_q$, proving that it is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard to exceed $r/q + \mathcal{O}_{q,r}(1/\sqrt{D})$. These results provide the complexity-theoretic benchmark for the bounded-degree instances targeted by decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), QAOA, and classical heuristics. Any quantum advantage on bounded-degree instances is therefore confined to the constant prefactor. We further show that in the context of DQI and on $(k,D)$-regular instances, this prefactor is sensitive to the nature of the decoder: DQI with classical decoders faces an information-theoretic $1/\sqrt{D \log D}$ barrier that prevents it from matching the hardness scaling, while DQI with quantum decoders is compatible with the $1/\sqrt{D}$ scaling -- identifying quantum decoding as the key ingredient for matching the complexity-theoretic scaling with DQI.

quant-pharXiv:2606.13570•Jun 12, 2026•0 citations

Performance and limitations of the QAOA at constant levels on large sparse hypergraphs and spin glass models

Joao Basso, David Gamarnik, Song Mei +1 more

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a general purpose quantum algorithm designed for combinatorial optimization. We analyze its expected performance and prove concentration properties at any constant level (number of layers) on ensembles of random combinatorial optimization problems in the infinite size limit. These ensembles include mixed spin models and Max-q-XORSAT on sparse random hypergraphs. Our analysis can be understood via a saddlepoint approximation of a sum-over-paths integral. This is made rigorous by proving a generalization of the multinomial theorem, which is a technical result of independent interest. We then show that the performance of the QAOA at constant levels for the pure q-spin model matches asymptotically the ones for Max-q XORSAT on random sparse Erdôs-Rényi hypergraphs and every large-girth regular hypergraph. Through this correspondence, we establish that the average-case value produced by the QAOA at constant levels is bounded away from optimality for pure q-spin models when $q\geq 4$ and is even. This limitation gives a hardness of approximation result for quantum algorithms in a new regime where the whole graph is seen.

arXiv:2204.10306•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Oct 1, 2022•24 citations

Quantum Approximation Complexity of Classical Optimization Problems

Stuart Hadfield

Classical approximation complexity asks what solution quality can be guaranteed with polynomial-time computation. The classes APX, PTAS, and FPTAS distinguish a fixed approximation ratio, approximation to any fixed accuracy, and approximation schemes whose running time is also polynomial in inverse accuracy. Their randomized counterparts are R-APX, R-PTAS, and R-FPTAS. We define bounded-error quantum counterparts BQ-APX, BQ-PTAS, and BQ-FPTAS. Membership requires a uniform quantum algorithm that, on every input, returns a feasible classical solution achieving at least the claimed approximation ratio with probability at least 2/3. Scores (objective values) must be efficiently classically computable. Running time includes parameter selection, preparation, measurement, decoding, and repetition. Many quantum optimization methods are used heuristically, and high benchmark scores alone do not establish these guarantees. We further establish a conditional hierarchy for logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential approximation factors. Assuming NP $\nsubseteq$ BQP, the quantum classes form a strict hierarchy. Problems based on prime factorization and discrete logarithms give conditional quantum-classical separations. Certified Maximum Order has an exact quantum algorithm, while any randomized polynomial-time algorithm guaranteeing at least an inverse-polynomial approximation ratio on every input would yield efficient factoring. Discrete-Logarithm Fitting has an exact quantum algorithm and a deterministic one-half approximation, but any fixed improvement over one half would give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for the safe-prime discrete logarithm problem. Our results show, under explicit complexity assumptions, that quantum computation can improve worst-case approximation guarantees. A quantum-classical gap for common problems such as MaxCut or MaxSAT remains open.

quant-pharXiv:2610.09584•Oct 8, 2026•0 citations

On the power of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Sami Boulebnane

The main object of study of this work is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) —the best-known heuristic quantum algorithm for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its popularity, QAOA poses major challenges. Namely, its performance remains poorly understood, especially in the low depth regime most relevant to near-term quantum computing. Besides, the algorithm is of variational nature, relying on several hyperparameters to be classically trained. In this work, we contribute to addressing these issues by developing techniques to understand the performance of QAOA at low depth, and deducing from these pretrained hyperparameters, thereby eliminating or considerably reducing the need for a classical optimization loop. We first consider applying QAOA to constraint satisfaction problems with the goal of maximizing the algorithm’s approximation ratio (fraction of satisfied constraints). As a particular example, we consider QAOA applied to MAXCUT on non-regular graphs, showing how analytic techniques provide good guess hyperparameters in this setting. Next, we analyze the performance of QAOA on a well-studied constraint satisfaction problem: random k-SAT. In this case, the performance is measured by the probability of finding an assignment satisfying all constraints (“success probability”). To estimate this quantity, we develop new techniques, mapping quantum expectation values of the QAOA circuits to classical spin models. We further show how these techniques can be generalized to a larger family of random constraint satisfaction problems. We conclude the work by two feasibility studies inspired by real-world use cases encountered in collaborations with industrial partners: peptide sampling, and solving flow problems. These problems are naturally phrased by encoding combinatorial variables in qudits, a relatively unexplored setting in the existing literature. We present partial analytic and numerical results for optimal QAOA hyperparameters and the scaling of its success probability in this framework, underlining potential specific difficulties when using QAOA with qudits.

•Nov 28, 2024•0 citations
A canonical feature of the constraint satisfaction problems in NP is approximation hardness, where in the worst case, finding sufficient-quality approximate solutions is exponentially hard for all known methods. Fundamentally, the lack of any guided local minimum escape method ensures both exact and approximate classical approximation hardness, but the equivalent mechanism(s) for quantum algorithms are poorly understood. For algorithms based on Hamiltonian time evolution, we explore this question through the prototypically hard MAX-3-XORSAT problem class. We conclude that the mechanisms for quantum exact and approximation hardness are fundamentally distinct. We review known results from the literature, and identify mechanisms that make conventional quantum methods (such as Adiabatic Quantum Computing) weak approximation algorithms in the worst case. We construct a family of spectrally filtered quantum algorithms that escape these issues, and develop analytical theories for their performance. We show that, for random hypergraphs in the approximation-hard regime, if we define the energy to be E=Nunsat−NsatE = N_{\mathrm{unsat}}-N_{\mathrm{sat}}E=Nunsat​−Nsat​, spectrally filtered quantum optimization will return states with E≤qmEGSE \leq q_m E_{\mathrm{GS}}E≤qm​EGS​ (where EGSE_{\rm GS}EGS​ is the ground state energy) in sub-quadratic time, where conservatively, qm≃0.59q_m \simeq 0.59qm​≃0.59. This is in contrast to qm→0q_m \to 0qm​→0 for the hardest instances with classical searches. We test all of these claims with extensive numerical simulations. We do not claim that this approximation guarantee holds for all possible hypergraphs, though our algorithm's mechanism can likely generalize widely. These results suggest that quantum computers are more powerful for approximate optimization than had been previously assumed.
In this work, we analyze the average-case hardness of approximation for the Quantum Hypergraph Max-Cut problem using the theoretical framework of the Quantum Overlap Gap Property (QOGP). We establish two main results. Our first result applies to a wide class of stable quantum algorithms, satisfying a Lipschitz property with respect to the quantum Wasserstein distance of order 222. We show a weak hardness result, demonstrating that for any Lipschitz constant LLL, there is some kkk such that LLL-stable algorithms cannot approximate the optimal solution to Quantum Hypergraph Max-Cut on kkk-uniform hypergraphs in the average case. Additionally, we establish a strong hardness result where kkk is independent of LLL, but only for a more restricted class of local quantum algorithms defined using the quantum Wasserstein distance of order ∞\infty∞. We apply these results to establish concrete depth lower bounds for popular quantum algorithms for preparing near-optimal states for this problem.
The quantum k-Local Hamiltonian problem is a natural generalization of classical constraint satisfaction problems (k-CSP) and is complete for QMA, a quantum analog of NP. Although the complexity of k-Local Hamiltonian problems has been well studied, only a handful of approximation results are known. For Max 2-Local Hamiltonian where each term is a rank 3 projector, a natural quantum generalization of classical Max 2-SAT, the best known approximation algorithm was the trivial random assignment, yielding a 0.75-approximation. We present the first approximation algorithm beating this bound, a classical polynomial-time 0.764-approximation. For strictly quadratic instances, which are maximally entangled instances, we provide a 0.801 approximation algorithm, and numerically demonstrate that our algorithm is likely a 0.821-approximation. We conjecture these are the hardest instances to approximate. We also give improved approximations for quantum generalizations of other related classical 2-CSPs. Finally, we exploit quantum connections to a generalization of the Grothendieck problem to obtain a classical constant-factor approximation for the physically relevant special case of strictly quadratic traceless 2-Local Hamiltonians on bipartite interaction graphs, where a inverse logarithmic approximation was the best previously known (for general interaction graphs). Our work employs recently developed techniques for analyzing classical approximations of CSPs and is intended to be accessible to both quantum information scientists and classical computer scientists.
For general max-k-XORSAT with k≥3k \geq 3k≥3, no polynomial-time algorithm can do substantially better than random guessing on worst-case instances unless P=NP\mathsf{P} = \mathsf{NP}P=NP: approximating beyond the random-assignment value of 1/21/21/2 is NP\mathsf{NP}NP-hard. The picture changes when each variable appears in at most DDD constraints. In that bounded-degree setting, polynomial-time algorithms can provably beat the random baseline by an additive amount of order 1/D1/\sqrt{D}1/D​. For Boolean instances, this scaling is known to be optimal: the matching hardness result is due to Trevisan, while the corresponding algorithmic guarantee was established by Barak et al. Whether the same holds over general finite fields, and what it implies for quantum algorithms, has not been established. We make this connection explicit and extend the hardness to max-Ekkk-LINSAT(q,r)(q,r)(q,r) with bounded degree DDD and over arbitrary finite fields Fq\mathbb{F}_qFq​, proving that it is NP\mathsf{NP}NP-hard to exceed r/q+Oq,r(1/D)r/q + \mathcal{O}_{q,r}(1/\sqrt{D})r/q+Oq,r​(1/D​). These results provide the complexity-theoretic benchmark for the bounded-degree instances targeted by decoded quantum interferometry (DQI), QAOA, and classical heuristics. Any quantum advantage on bounded-degree instances is therefore confined to the constant prefactor. We further show that in the context of DQI and on (k,D)(k,D)(k,D)-regular instances, this prefactor is sensitive to the nature of the decoder: DQI with classical decoders faces an information-theoretic 1/Dlog⁡D1/\sqrt{D \log D}1/DlogD​ barrier that prevents it from matching the hardness scaling, while DQI with quantum decoders is compatible with the 1/D1/\sqrt{D}1/D​ scaling -- identifying quantum decoding as the key ingredient for matching the complexity-theoretic scaling with DQI.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a general purpose quantum algorithm designed for combinatorial optimization. We analyze its expected performance and prove concentration properties at any constant level (number of layers) on ensembles of random combinatorial optimization problems in the infinite size limit. These ensembles include mixed spin models and Max-q-XORSAT on sparse random hypergraphs. Our analysis can be understood via a saddlepoint approximation of a sum-over-paths integral. This is made rigorous by proving a generalization of the multinomial theorem, which is a technical result of independent interest. We then show that the performance of the QAOA at constant levels for the pure q-spin model matches asymptotically the ones for Max-q XORSAT on random sparse Erdôs-Rényi hypergraphs and every large-girth regular hypergraph. Through this correspondence, we establish that the average-case value produced by the QAOA at constant levels is bounded away from optimality for pure q-spin models when q≥4q\geq 4q≥4 and is even. This limitation gives a hardness of approximation result for quantum algorithms in a new regime where the whole graph is seen.
Classical approximation complexity asks what solution quality can be guaranteed with polynomial-time computation. The classes APX, PTAS, and FPTAS distinguish a fixed approximation ratio, approximation to any fixed accuracy, and approximation schemes whose running time is also polynomial in inverse accuracy. Their randomized counterparts are R-APX, R-PTAS, and R-FPTAS. We define bounded-error quantum counterparts BQ-APX, BQ-PTAS, and BQ-FPTAS. Membership requires a uniform quantum algorithm that, on every input, returns a feasible classical solution achieving at least the claimed approximation ratio with probability at least 2/3. Scores (objective values) must be efficiently classically computable. Running time includes parameter selection, preparation, measurement, decoding, and repetition. Many quantum optimization methods are used heuristically, and high benchmark scores alone do not establish these guarantees. We further establish a conditional hierarchy for logarithmic, polynomial, and exponential approximation factors. Assuming NP ⊈\nsubseteq⊈ BQP, the quantum classes form a strict hierarchy. Problems based on prime factorization and discrete logarithms give conditional quantum-classical separations. Certified Maximum Order has an exact quantum algorithm, while any randomized polynomial-time algorithm guaranteeing at least an inverse-polynomial approximation ratio on every input would yield efficient factoring. Discrete-Logarithm Fitting has an exact quantum algorithm and a deterministic one-half approximation, but any fixed improvement over one half would give a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for the safe-prime discrete logarithm problem. Our results show, under explicit complexity assumptions, that quantum computation can improve worst-case approximation guarantees. A quantum-classical gap for common problems such as MaxCut or MaxSAT remains open.
The main object of study of this work is the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) —the best-known heuristic quantum algorithm for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. Despite its popularity, QAOA poses major challenges. Namely, its performance remains poorly understood, especially in the low depth regime most relevant to near-term quantum computing. Besides, the algorithm is of variational nature, relying on several hyperparameters to be classically trained. In this work, we contribute to addressing these issues by developing techniques to understand the performance of QAOA at low depth, and deducing from these pretrained hyperparameters, thereby eliminating or considerably reducing the need for a classical optimization loop. We first consider applying QAOA to constraint satisfaction problems with the goal of maximizing the algorithm’s approximation ratio (fraction of satisfied constraints). As a particular example, we consider QAOA applied to MAXCUT on non-regular graphs, showing how analytic techniques provide good guess hyperparameters in this setting. Next, we analyze the performance of QAOA on a well-studied constraint satisfaction problem: random k-SAT. In this case, the performance is measured by the probability of finding an assignment satisfying all constraints (“success probability”). To estimate this quantity, we develop new techniques, mapping quantum expectation values of the QAOA circuits to classical spin models. We further show how these techniques can be generalized to a larger family of random constraint satisfaction problems. We conclude the work by two feasibility studies inspired by real-world use cases encountered in collaborations with industrial partners: peptide sampling, and solving flow problems. These problems are naturally phrased by encoding combinatorial variables in qudits, a relatively unexplored setting in the existing literature. We present partial analytic and numerical results for optimal QAOA hyperparameters and the scaling of its success probability in this framework, underlining potential specific difficulties when using QAOA with qudits.