Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2312.05837 · Journal of the Franklin Institute

Fast numerical solver of Ising optimization problems via pruning and domain selection

Langyu Li, Daoyi Dong, Yu Pan

Published Aug 5, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.jfranklin.2025.107945

Related papers

Ising machines as hardware solvers of combinatorial optimization problems

Naeimeh Mohseni, Peter L. McMahon, Tim Byrnes

Nature Reviews Physics•May 4, 2022•549 citations

An FPGA Implementation of Fast 2D-Ising-Model Solver for the Max-Cut Problem

英範 業天, 正之 廣本, 高史 佐藤

IEICE technical report. Speech•Feb 29, 2016•2 citations

An FPGA Implementation of Fast 2D-Ising-Model Solver for the Max-Cut Problem

Hidenori Gyoten, Masayuki Hiromoto, Satō Takashi

IEICE Technical Report; IEICE Tech. Rep.•Feb 22, 2016•2 citations

Solving complex optimization problems with a coherent Ising machine

Hiroki Takesue, Takahiro Inagaki, Toshimori Honjo

SPIE Newsroom•Jul 19, 2017•0 citations

A Predictive Approach for Selecting the Best Quantum Solver for an Optimization Problem

Deborah Volpe, Nils Quetschlich, Mariagrazia Graziano +2 more

Leveraging quantum computers for optimization problems holds promise across various application domains. Nevertheless, utilizing respective quantum computing solvers requires describing the optimization problem according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism and selecting a proper solver for the application of interest with a reasonable setting. Both demand significant proficiency in quantum computing, QUBO formulation, and quantum solvers, a background that usually cannot be assumed by end users who are domain experts rather than quantum computing specialists. While tools aid in QUBO formulations, support for selecting the best-solving approach remains absent. This becomes even more challenging because selecting the best solver for a problem heavily depends on the problem itself. In this work, we are accepting this challenge and propose a predictive selection approach, which aids end users in this task. To this end, the solver selection task is first formulated as a classification task that is suitable to be solved by supervised machine learning. Based on that, we then propose strategies for adjusting solver parameters based on problem size and characteristics. Experimental evaluations, considering more than 500 different QUBO problems, confirm the benefits of the proposed solution. In fact, we show that in more than 70% of the cases, the best solver is selected, and in about 90% of the problems, a solver in the top two, i.e., the best or its closest suboptimum, is selected. This exploration proves the potential of machine learning in quantum solver selection and lays the foundations for its automation, broadening access to quantum optimization for a wider range of users. The pre-trained classifier is integrated into the MQT Quantum Auto Optimizer (MQT QAO) framework, publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qao) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).

arXiv:2408.03613•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 15, 2024•5 citations

Photonic Ising machines for combinatorial optimization problems

Yuan Gao, Guanyu Chen, Qi Luo +3 more

The demand for efficient solvers of complicated combinatorial optimization problems, especially those classified as NP-complete or NP-hard, has recently led to increased exploration of novel computing architectures. One prominent collective state computing paradigm embodied in the so-called Ising machines has recently attracted considerable research attention due to its ability to optimize complex problems with large numbers of interacting variables. Ising model-inspired solvers, thus named due to mathematical similarities to the well-known model from solid-state physics, represent a promising alternative to traditional von Neumann computer architectures due to their high degree of inherent parallelism. While there are many possible physical realizations of Ising solvers, just as there are many possible implementations of any binary computer, photonic Ising machines (PIMs) use primarily optical components for computation, taking advantage of features like lower power consumption, fast calculation speeds, the leveraging of physical optics to perform the calculations themselves, possessing decent scalability and noise tolerance. Photonic computing in the form of PIMs may offer certain computational advantages that are not easily achieved with non-photonic approaches and is nonetheless an altogether fascinating application of photonics to computing. In this review, we provide an overview of Ising machines generally, introducing why they are useful, what types of problems they can tackle, and how different Ising solvers can be compared and benchmarked. We delineate their various operational mechanisms, advantages, and limitations vis-à-vis non-photonic Ising machines. We describe their scalability, interconnectivity, performance, and physical dimensions. As research in PIMs continues to progress, there is a potential that photonic computing could well emerge as a way to handle large and challenging optimization problems across diverse domains. This review serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding capabilities and potential of PIMs in addressing such complex optimization problems.

Applied Physics Reviews•Oct 14, 2024•34 citations
Leveraging quantum computers for optimization problems holds promise across various application domains. Nevertheless, utilizing respective quantum computing solvers requires describing the optimization problem according to the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formalism and selecting a proper solver for the application of interest with a reasonable setting. Both demand significant proficiency in quantum computing, QUBO formulation, and quantum solvers, a background that usually cannot be assumed by end users who are domain experts rather than quantum computing specialists. While tools aid in QUBO formulations, support for selecting the best-solving approach remains absent. This becomes even more challenging because selecting the best solver for a problem heavily depends on the problem itself. In this work, we are accepting this challenge and propose a predictive selection approach, which aids end users in this task. To this end, the solver selection task is first formulated as a classification task that is suitable to be solved by supervised machine learning. Based on that, we then propose strategies for adjusting solver parameters based on problem size and characteristics. Experimental evaluations, considering more than 500 different QUBO problems, confirm the benefits of the proposed solution. In fact, we show that in more than 70% of the cases, the best solver is selected, and in about 90% of the problems, a solver in the top two, i.e., the best or its closest suboptimum, is selected. This exploration proves the potential of machine learning in quantum solver selection and lays the foundations for its automation, broadening access to quantum optimization for a wider range of users. The pre-trained classifier is integrated into the MQT Quantum Auto Optimizer (MQT QAO) framework, publicly available on GitHub (https://github.com/cda-tum/mqt-qao) as part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
The demand for efficient solvers of complicated combinatorial optimization problems, especially those classified as NP-complete or NP-hard, has recently led to increased exploration of novel computing architectures. One prominent collective state computing paradigm embodied in the so-called Ising machines has recently attracted considerable research attention due to its ability to optimize complex problems with large numbers of interacting variables. Ising model-inspired solvers, thus named due to mathematical similarities to the well-known model from solid-state physics, represent a promising alternative to traditional von Neumann computer architectures due to their high degree of inherent parallelism. While there are many possible physical realizations of Ising solvers, just as there are many possible implementations of any binary computer, photonic Ising machines (PIMs) use primarily optical components for computation, taking advantage of features like lower power consumption, fast calculation speeds, the leveraging of physical optics to perform the calculations themselves, possessing decent scalability and noise tolerance. Photonic computing in the form of PIMs may offer certain computational advantages that are not easily achieved with non-photonic approaches and is nonetheless an altogether fascinating application of photonics to computing. In this review, we provide an overview of Ising machines generally, introducing why they are useful, what types of problems they can tackle, and how different Ising solvers can be compared and benchmarked. We delineate their various operational mechanisms, advantages, and limitations vis-à-vis non-photonic Ising machines. We describe their scalability, interconnectivity, performance, and physical dimensions. As research in PIMs continues to progress, there is a potential that photonic computing could well emerge as a way to handle large and challenging optimization problems across diverse domains. This review serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers and practitioners interested in understanding capabilities and potential of PIMs in addressing such complex optimization problems.