Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2311.16913 · Empirical Software Engineering

Quantum circuit mutants: Empirical analysis and recommendations

Eñaut Mendiluze Usandizaga, Shaukat Ali, Tao Yue, Paolo Arcaini

Published Apr 16, 2025• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract As a new research area, quantum software testing lacks systematic testing benchmarks to assess testing techniques’ effectiveness. Recently, some open-source benchmarks and mutation analysis tools have emerged. However, there is insufficient evidence on how various quantum circuit characteristics (e.g., circuit depth, number of quantum gates), algorithms (e.g., Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm), and mutation characteristics (e.g., mutation operators) affect the detection of mutants in quantum circuits. Studying such relations is important to systematically design faulty benchmarks with varied attributes (e.g., the difficulty in detecting a seeded fault) to facilitate assessing the cost-effectiveness of quantum software testing techniques efficiently. To this end, we present a large-scale empirical evaluation with more than 700K faulty benchmarks (quantum circuits) generated by mutating 382 real-world quantum circuits. Based on the results, we provide valuable insights for researchers to define systematic quantum mutation analysis techniques. We also provide a tool to recommend mutants to users based on chosen characteristics (e.g., a quantum algorithm type) and the required difficulty of detecting mutants. Finally, we also provide faulty benchmarks that can already be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of quantum software testing techniques.

DOI
10.1007/s10664-025-10643-z

Related papers

QMutBench: A Dataset of Quantum Circuit Mutants

Eñaut Mendiluze Usandizaga, Thomas Laurent, Paolo Arcaini +1 more

Quantum software testing has attracted interest in recent years, prompting the development of various techniques to automate the testing of quantum software. These techniques generate test cases that must be assessed for their effectiveness in detecting faults. Such an assessment requires benchmarks of faulty programs. However, there is a lack of benchmarks containing faults. In this data showcase, we propose QMutBench, a dataset that contains over 700,000 quantum circuit mutants representing different faults. The dataset is accessible via an online interface with selection criteria, such as the original quantum circuit(s) from which mutants are generated, the desired survival rate of the selected mutants, and other mutation characteristics (e.g., the type of faulty quantum gate). QMutBench provides quantum software developers and testers with an accessible online dataset to obtain benchmarks of mutants necessary to assess either the quality of the test cases generated by their testing technique or to compare different testing techniques. It also enables the development of new mutation-guided quantum software testing techniques.

arXiv:2604.15870•Apr 17, 2026•0 citations

Efficient Mutation Testing of Quantum Machine Learning Models

Emma Andrews, Prabhat Mishra

Quantum machine learning integrates the strengths of quantum computing and machine learning, enabling models to learn complex features using fewer parameters than their classical counterparts. Due to the increasing complexity of quantum machine learning models, it is necessary to verify that the implementation of these models satisfy the design specification and be free of bugs and faults. Mutation testing is a promising avenue to identify faulty quantum circuits that do not meet design specifications or contain defects by intentionally inserting faults into the quantum circuit. It is necessary to define mutation operations to inject faults into quantum circuits to ensure that a test suite is robust enough to evaluate an implementation against its design specification. In this paper, we extend mutation testing to quantum machine learning applications, primarily quantum neural network models. Specifically, this paper makes two important contributions. We define new mutation operations for efficient fault insertion compared to state-of-the-art approaches. We also present a directed mutation generation technique to reduce redundant mutant circuits. Extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that our approach generates a more diverse and representative set of mutants, effectively addressing faults that traditional techniques fail to expose.

quant-pharXiv:2605.00107•May 4, 2026•0 citations

Robust Mutation Analysis of Quantum Programs Under Noise

Sophie Fortz, Eñaut Mendiluze Usandizaga, Shaukat Ali +2 more

Mutation analysis has long been used in classical software testing and has recently been adopted for assessing the robustness of quantum software testing techniques. However, existing studies assume ideal, noiseless execution, overlooking the impact of quantum hardware noise. In this paper, we present an empirical study of noise-aware mutation analysis for quantum programs. We analyze how noise affects mutant detection using 41 quantum programs, executed on noiseless and noisy simulators emulating three IBM devices with different noise profiles. We compare several distance metrics and thresholding strategies to evaluate mutant detection under realistic noise. Our results show that noise significantly alters the behavioral distance between programs and mutants, making equivalent mutants harder to distinguish from real faults. Density-matrix metrics achieve the best discrimination, with misclassification rates up to 16.77%, but are not accessible on real hardware. Among practical alternatives, output-distribution metrics reach up to 73.03% accuracy and 74.89% F1-score. Noise-specific thresholds further improve detection compared to noiseless thresholds. We also find that noise effects correlate more with algorithm and circuit characteristics than with mutation types. Overall, our results highlight the need to adapt mutation analysis, and more generally quantum program comparison, to the noise profiles of target quantum devices.

arXiv:2605.13279•May 13, 2026•0 citations

Development of a Tool for Finding Equivalent Mutants in Quantum Program: A Perspective to Measure the Quality of Quantum Software

Ajay Kumar, Prisha Kwatra, Sunita Garhwal

Abstract Software testing is an important activity to ensure the software's quality. Mutation testing is a fault-based technique for checking the effectiveness of test cases for the verification and validation of software. Testing quantum programs is challenging due to the involvement of quantum mechanics concepts (such as superposition and entanglement ) and the probabilistic nature of the outcome. In this paper, We will propose the modified mutation testing approach for quantum program. The proposed approach will help to reduce the cost, time, and effort of performing the mutation testing. Moreover, we also propose a method for determining the equivalent mutant and developing a tool to check whether the mutated and original quantum program behave semantically equivalent or differently.

•May 30, 2023•1 citation

Development of a Tool for Finding Equivalent Mutants in Quantum Program: A Perspective to Measure the Quality of Quantum Software

Ajay Kumar, Prisha Kwatra, Sunita Garhwal

Abstract Software testing is an important activity to ensure the software's quality. Mutation testing is a fault-based technique for checking the effectiveness of test cases for the verification and validation of software. Testing quantum programs is challenging due to the involvement of quantum mechanics concepts (such as superposition and entanglement ) and the probabilistic nature of the outcome. In this paper, We will propose the modified mutation testing approach for quantum program. The proposed approach will help to reduce the cost, time, and effort of performing the mutation testing. Moreover, we also propose a method for determining the equivalent mutant and developing a tool to check whether the mutated and original quantum program behave semantically equivalent or differently.

•Dec 9, 2022•2 citations

Are We Testing the Wrong Quantum Bugs? A Study of Fault Representation Gaps in Quantum Software Testing

Asif Mohammed Saad, Ahsanul Ameen Sabit, Jonah Brandenburgh +3 more

Quantum software relies on compilers, intermediate representations, and execution frameworks that transform programs before execution. Faults in these components can change the behavior of otherwise correct quantum programs. Yet quantum testing techniques are often evaluated using mutation-generated faults and curated bug benchmarks. We investigate how well the faults represented by these artifacts reflect those encountered in modern quantum software. We audit four quantum mutation-testing tools and three curated bug benchmarks, and collect 410 verified bugs from ten quantum software repositories over two years. We classify faults from all three sources into a common taxonomy of 56 bug families and compare their representation across mutation operators, curated benchmarks, and recent real-world bugs. The mutation tools support 20 bug families, and curated benchmarks add 15 more. Yet only 56 of the 410 real-world bugs (13.7%) belong to families represented by either source; the remaining 354 (86.3%) belong to families absent from both. The largest unrepresented families concern compiler transformations (66 bugs), type handling (53), and input validation (47). Unlike local gate or statement changes, these faults often depend on intermediate representations, compiler pipelines, input types, or dependency versions. Existing mutation operators primarily modify circuits and program constructs, whereas many real-world faults arise in the compilers, representations, and framework interfaces that process them. Addressing this gap requires looking beyond circuit-level faults toward testing semantic preservation across compiler transformations, correctness at representation boundaries, and interactions between software components. Our study provides empirical evidence to guide fault models and benchmarks that capture these mechanisms and preserve the contexts needed to reproduce them.

arXiv:2610.22089•Oct 15, 2026•0 citations
Abstract As a new research area, quantum software testing lacks systematic testing benchmarks to assess testing techniques’ effectiveness. Recently, some open-source benchmarks and mutation analysis tools have emerged. However, there is insufficient evidence on how various quantum circuit characteristics (e.g., circuit depth, number of quantum gates), algorithms (e.g., Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm), and mutation characteristics (e.g., mutation operators) affect the detection of mutants in quantum circuits. Studying such relations is important to systematically design faulty benchmarks with varied attributes (e.g., the difficulty in detecting a seeded fault) to facilitate assessing the cost-effectiveness of quantum software testing techniques efficiently. To this end, we present a large-scale empirical evaluation with more than 700K faulty benchmarks (quantum circuits) generated by mutating 382 real-world quantum circuits. Based on the results, we provide valuable insights for researchers to define systematic quantum mutation analysis techniques. We also provide a tool to recommend mutants to users based on chosen characteristics (e.g., a quantum algorithm type) and the required difficulty of detecting mutants. Finally, we also provide faulty benchmarks that can already be used to assess the cost-effectiveness of quantum software testing techniques.
Quantum software testing has attracted interest in recent years, prompting the development of various techniques to automate the testing of quantum software. These techniques generate test cases that must be assessed for their effectiveness in detecting faults. Such an assessment requires benchmarks of faulty programs. However, there is a lack of benchmarks containing faults. In this data showcase, we propose QMutBench, a dataset that contains over 700,000 quantum circuit mutants representing different faults. The dataset is accessible via an online interface with selection criteria, such as the original quantum circuit(s) from which mutants are generated, the desired survival rate of the selected mutants, and other mutation characteristics (e.g., the type of faulty quantum gate). QMutBench provides quantum software developers and testers with an accessible online dataset to obtain benchmarks of mutants necessary to assess either the quality of the test cases generated by their testing technique or to compare different testing techniques. It also enables the development of new mutation-guided quantum software testing techniques.
Quantum machine learning integrates the strengths of quantum computing and machine learning, enabling models to learn complex features using fewer parameters than their classical counterparts. Due to the increasing complexity of quantum machine learning models, it is necessary to verify that the implementation of these models satisfy the design specification and be free of bugs and faults. Mutation testing is a promising avenue to identify faulty quantum circuits that do not meet design specifications or contain defects by intentionally inserting faults into the quantum circuit. It is necessary to define mutation operations to inject faults into quantum circuits to ensure that a test suite is robust enough to evaluate an implementation against its design specification. In this paper, we extend mutation testing to quantum machine learning applications, primarily quantum neural network models. Specifically, this paper makes two important contributions. We define new mutation operations for efficient fault insertion compared to state-of-the-art approaches. We also present a directed mutation generation technique to reduce redundant mutant circuits. Extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates that our approach generates a more diverse and representative set of mutants, effectively addressing faults that traditional techniques fail to expose.
Mutation analysis has long been used in classical software testing and has recently been adopted for assessing the robustness of quantum software testing techniques. However, existing studies assume ideal, noiseless execution, overlooking the impact of quantum hardware noise. In this paper, we present an empirical study of noise-aware mutation analysis for quantum programs. We analyze how noise affects mutant detection using 41 quantum programs, executed on noiseless and noisy simulators emulating three IBM devices with different noise profiles. We compare several distance metrics and thresholding strategies to evaluate mutant detection under realistic noise. Our results show that noise significantly alters the behavioral distance between programs and mutants, making equivalent mutants harder to distinguish from real faults. Density-matrix metrics achieve the best discrimination, with misclassification rates up to 16.77%, but are not accessible on real hardware. Among practical alternatives, output-distribution metrics reach up to 73.03% accuracy and 74.89% F1-score. Noise-specific thresholds further improve detection compared to noiseless thresholds. We also find that noise effects correlate more with algorithm and circuit characteristics than with mutation types. Overall, our results highlight the need to adapt mutation analysis, and more generally quantum program comparison, to the noise profiles of target quantum devices.
Abstract Software testing is an important activity to ensure the software's quality. Mutation testing is a fault-based technique for checking the effectiveness of test cases for the verification and validation of software. Testing quantum programs is challenging due to the involvement of quantum mechanics concepts (such as superposition and entanglement ) and the probabilistic nature of the outcome. In this paper, We will propose the modified mutation testing approach for quantum program. The proposed approach will help to reduce the cost, time, and effort of performing the mutation testing. Moreover, we also propose a method for determining the equivalent mutant and developing a tool to check whether the mutated and original quantum program behave semantically equivalent or differently.
Abstract Software testing is an important activity to ensure the software's quality. Mutation testing is a fault-based technique for checking the effectiveness of test cases for the verification and validation of software. Testing quantum programs is challenging due to the involvement of quantum mechanics concepts (such as superposition and entanglement ) and the probabilistic nature of the outcome. In this paper, We will propose the modified mutation testing approach for quantum program. The proposed approach will help to reduce the cost, time, and effort of performing the mutation testing. Moreover, we also propose a method for determining the equivalent mutant and developing a tool to check whether the mutated and original quantum program behave semantically equivalent or differently.
Quantum software relies on compilers, intermediate representations, and execution frameworks that transform programs before execution. Faults in these components can change the behavior of otherwise correct quantum programs. Yet quantum testing techniques are often evaluated using mutation-generated faults and curated bug benchmarks. We investigate how well the faults represented by these artifacts reflect those encountered in modern quantum software. We audit four quantum mutation-testing tools and three curated bug benchmarks, and collect 410 verified bugs from ten quantum software repositories over two years. We classify faults from all three sources into a common taxonomy of 56 bug families and compare their representation across mutation operators, curated benchmarks, and recent real-world bugs. The mutation tools support 20 bug families, and curated benchmarks add 15 more. Yet only 56 of the 410 real-world bugs (13.7%) belong to families represented by either source; the remaining 354 (86.3%) belong to families absent from both. The largest unrepresented families concern compiler transformations (66 bugs), type handling (53), and input validation (47). Unlike local gate or statement changes, these faults often depend on intermediate representations, compiler pipelines, input types, or dependency versions. Existing mutation operators primarily modify circuits and program constructs, whereas many real-world faults arise in the compilers, representations, and framework interfaces that process them. Addressing this gap requires looking beyond circuit-level faults toward testing semantic preservation across compiler transformations, correctness at representation boundaries, and interactions between software components. Our study provides empirical evidence to guide fault models and benchmarks that capture these mechanisms and preserve the contexts needed to reproduce them.