Quantum query complexity has several nice properties with respect to composition. First, bounded-error quantum query algorithms can be composed without incurring log factors through error reduction e x a c t n e s s . Second, through careful accounting t h r i f t i n e s s , the total query complexity is smaller if subroutines are mostly run on cheaper inputs -- a property that is much less obvious in quantum algorithms than in their classical counterparts. While these properties were previously seen through the model of span programs (alternatively, the dual adversary bound), a recent work by two of the authors (Belovs, Yolcu 2023) showed how to achieve these benefits without converting to span programs, by defining quantum Las Vegas query complexity . Independently, recent works, including by one of the authors (Jeffery 2022), have worked towards bringing thriftiness to the more practically significant setting of quantum t i m e complexity.In this work, we show how to achieve both exactness and thriftiness in the setting of time complexity. We generalize the quantum subroutine composition results of Jeffery 2022 so that, in particular, no error reduction is needed. We give a time complexity version of the well-known result in quantum query complexity, Q ( f ∘ g ) = O ( Q ( f ) ⋅ Q ( g ) ) , without log factors.We achieve this by employing a novel approach to the design of quantum algorithms based on what we call t r a n s d u c e r s , and which we think is of large independent interest. While a span program is a completely different computational model, a transducer is a direct generalisation of a quantum algorithm, which allows for much greater transparency and control. Transducers naturally characterize general state conversion, rather than only decision problems; provide a very simple treatment of other quantum primitives such as quantum walks; and lend themselves well to time complexity analysis.
Quantum query complexity has several nice properties with respect to composition. First, bounded-error quantum query algorithms can be composed without incurring log factors through error reduction e x a c t n e s s . Second, through careful accounting t h r i f t i n e s s , the total query complexity is smaller if subroutines are mostly run on cheaper inputs -- a property that is much less obvious in quantum algorithms than in their classical counterparts. While these properties were previously seen through the model of span programs (alternatively, the dual adversary bound), a recent work by two of the authors (Belovs, Yolcu 2023) showed how to achieve these benefits without converting to span programs, by defining quantum Las Vegas query complexity . Independently, recent works, including by one of the authors (Jeffery 2022), have worked towards bringing thriftiness to the more practically significant setting of quantum t i m e complexity.In this work, we show how to achieve both exactness and thriftiness in the setting of time complexity. We generalize the quantum subroutine composition results of Jeffery 2022 so that, in particular, no error reduction is needed. We give a time complexity version of the well-known result in quantum query complexity, Q ( f ∘ g ) = O ( Q ( f ) ⋅ Q ( g ) ) , without log factors.We achieve this by employing a novel approach to the design of quantum algorithms based on what we call t r a n s d u c e r s , and which we think is of large independent interest. While a span program is a completely different computational model, a transducer is a direct generalisation of a quantum algorithm, which allows for much greater transparency and control. Transducers naturally characterize general state conversion, rather than only decision problems; provide a very simple treatment of other quantum primitives such as quantum walks; and lend themselves well to time complexity analysis.
Span programs are an important model of quantum computation due to their tight correspondence with quantum query complexity. For any decision problem f, the minimum complexity of a span program for f is equal, up to a constant factor, to the quantum query complexity of f. Moreover, this correspondence is constructive. A span program for f with complexity C can be compiled into a bounded error quantum algorithm for f with query complexity O(C), and vice versa. In this work, we prove an analogous connection for quantum time complexity. In particular, we show how to convert a quantum algorithm for f with time complexity T into a span program for f such that it compiles back into a quantum algorithm for f with time complexity O(T). While the query complexity of quantum algorithms obtained from span programs is well-understood, it is not generally clear how to implement certain query-independent operations in a time-efficient manner. We show that for span programs derived from algorithms with a time-efficient implementation, we can preserve the time efficiency when implementing the span program. This means in particular that span programs not only fully capture quantum query complexity, but also quantum time complexity. One practical advantage of being able to convert quantum algorithms to span programs in a way that preserves time complexity is that span programs compose very nicely. We demonstrate this by improving Ambainis's variable-time quantum search result using our construction through a span program composition for the OR function.
Quantum query complexity enjoys a variety of pleasing joint computation properties: for example, a composition theorem asserting Q(f∘g)=Θ(Q(f)Q(g)) for all Boolean functions f and g; a direct sum theorem asserting that computing k copies of a function (or search problem) costs Ω(k) times as much as the cost of computing one copy; and a direct product theorem asserting that for Boolean functions, even succeeding at the direct sum problem with exponentially small probability still requires Ω(k) times the cost of computing one copy to bounded error.
However, all of these results are strictly for worst-case quantum query complexity. For example, if we have a fixed distribution μ over inputs, the direct sum theorem says nothing about the quantum query complexity of computing k copies of f when the input comes from the product distribution μk instead of being worst-case. (Note that while a standard Yao-type minimax theorem guarantees a hard distribution for the direct sum problem, there's no guarantee that this hard distribution is a product distribution.) A similar problem occurs for the direct product theorem and the composition theorem: none of these results respect distributions.
In this work, we give distributional joint computation lower bounds for the composition, direct sum, and direct product problems. Along the way, we introduce some new tools for handling quantum query lower bounds, including (a) a new ``multiplicative'' variant of the γ2 norm (which we use in place of the multiplicative adversary method for proving the direct product theorem), and (b) a new ``Shaltiel-free'' measure of quantum query complexity, which we show characterizes the composition behavior of distributional quantum query complexity and satisfies pleasing properties.
An important tool in algorithm design is the ability to build algorithms from other algorithms that run as subroutines. In the case of quantum algorithms, a subroutine may be called on a superposition of different inputs, which complicates things. For example, a classical algorithm that calls a subroutine Q times, where the average probability of querying the subroutine on input i is pi, and the cost of the subroutine on input i is Ti, incurs expected cost Q∑ipiE[Ti] from all subroutine queries. While this statement is obvious for classical algorithms, for quantum algorithms, it is much less so, since naively, if we run a quantum subroutine on a superposition of inputs, we need to wait for all branches of the superposition to terminate before we can apply the next operation. We nonetheless show an analogous quantum statement (*): If qi is the average query weight on i over all queries, the cost from all quantum subroutine queries is Q∑iqiE[Ti]. Here the query weight on i for a particular query is the probability of measuring i in the input register if we were to measure right before the query. We prove this result using the technique of multidimensional quantum walks, recently introduced in arXiv:2208.13492. We present a more general version of their quantum walk edge composition result, which yields variable-time quantum walks, generalizing variable-time quantum search, by, for example, replacing the update cost with ∑u,vπuPu,vE[Tu,v2], where Tu,v is the cost to move from vertex u to vertex v. The same technique that allows us to compose quantum subroutines in quantum walks can also be used to compose in any quantum algorithm, which is how we prove (*).
Quantum span program algorithms for function evaluation sometimes have reduced query complexity when promised that the input has a certain structure. We design a modified span program algorithm to show these improvements persist even without a promise ahead of time, and we extend this approach to the more general problem of state conversion. As an application, we prove exponential and superpolynomial quantum advantages in average query complexity for several search problems, generalizing Montanaro's Search with Advice [Montanaro, TQC 2010].
Transducers (Belovs, Jeffery and Yolcu, 2024) are a quantum computing framework describing a quantum algorithm as a unitary converting an input state into a target state using a catalyst, an auxiliary vector that is left unchanged. They are a powerful tool in quantum algorithm design, especially in the context of quantum query complexity: feasible points of the (dual) adversary semidefinite program directly translate into transducers and the optimal transduction complexity is equal to the adversary bound, i.e. the Las Vegas complexity, which is known to characterize bounded-error quantum query complexity. Moreover, contrary to bounded-error algorithms, transducers compose exactly, which limits overheads due to controlling errors in algorithms constructed by composition. Constructing efficient, let alone optimal, transducers in terms of quantum query complexity nevertheless remains a hard task since it still requires solving the adversary SDP and constructing the unitary to obtain an explicit algorithm. In this paper, we show how using the symmetry group of state-conversion problems simplifies both steps. First, using a symmetrization argument, we prove an optimal catalyst can always be chosen covariant under a representation of the symmetry group. Second, we prove that the transducer intertwines two different representations of the group and can thus be chosen block diagonal in the isotypic decomposition of the Hilbert space. Using those methods, we then derive optimal transducers, with optimal constants, for different widely used quantum algorithmic primitives, such as unstructured search, amplitude amplification and amplitude estimation. Our approach extends previous work on the use of representation theory to compute adversary lower bounds (Høyer, Lee, and {\v S}palek, 2007; Ambainis, Magnin, Roetteler and Roland, 2011) to the systematic construction of optimal algorithms.
In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the time complexity of quantum divide and conquer (QD&C) algorithms for classical problems, and propose a general framework for their analysis. We establish generic conditions under which search and minimization problems with classical divide and conquer algorithms are amenable to quantum speedup, and apply these theorems to various problems involving strings, integers, and geometric objects. These include Longest Distinct Substring, Klee's Coverage, several optimization problems on stock transactions, and k-Increasing Subsequence. For most of these problems our quantum time upper bounds match the quantum query lower bounds, up to polylogarithmic factors. We give a structured framework for describing and classifying a wide variety of QD&C algorithms so that quantum speedups can be more easily identified and applied, and prove general statements on QD&C time complexity covering a range of cases, accounting for the time required for all operations. In particular, we explicitly account for memory access operations in the commonly used QRAM (read-only) and QRAG (read-write) models, which are assumed to take unit time in the query model, and which require careful analysis when involved in recursion. Our generic QD&C theorems have several nice features. 1) To apply them, it suffices to come up with a classical divide and conquer algorithm satisfying the conditions of the theorem. The quantization of the algorithm is then completely handled by the theorem. This can make it easier to find applications which admit a quantum speedup, and contrast with dynamic programming algorithms which can be difficult to quantize due to their highly sequential nature. 2) As these theorems give bounds on time complexity, they can be applied to a greater range of problems than those based on query complexity, e.g., where the best-known quantum algorithms require super-linear time. 3) It can handle minimization problems as well as boolean functions, which allows us to improve on the query complexity result of Childs et al. [Childs et al., 2025] for k-Increasing Subsequence by a logarithmic factor.