Quantum kernel methods are promising candidates for achieving a practical quantum advantage for certain machine learning tasks. Similar to classical machine learning, an exact form of a quantum kernel is expected to have a great impact on the model performance. In this work we combine all trace-induced quantum kernels, including the commonly-used global fidelity and local projected quantum kernels, into a common framework. We show how generalized trace-induced quantum kernels can be constructed as combinations of the fundamental building blocks we coin "Lego" kernels, which impose an inductive bias on the resulting quantum models. We relate the expressive power and generalization ability to the number of non-zero weight Lego kernels and propose a systematic approach to increase the complexity of a quantum kernel model, leading to a new form of the local projected kernels that require fewer quantum resources in terms of the number of quantum gates and measurement shots. We show numerically that models based on local projected kernels can achieve comparable performance to the global fidelity quantum kernel. Our work unifies existing quantum kernels and provides a systematic framework to compare their properties.
Quantum kernel methods are promising candidates for achieving a practical quantum advantage for certain machine learning tasks. Similar to classical machine learning, an exact form of a quantum kernel is expected to have a great impact on the model performance. In this work we combine all trace-induced quantum kernels, including the commonly-used global fidelity and local projected quantum kernels, into a common framework. We show how generalized trace-induced quantum kernels can be constructed as combinations of the fundamental building blocks we coin "Lego" kernels, which impose an inductive bias on the resulting quantum models. We relate the expressive power and generalization ability to the number of non-zero weight Lego kernels and propose a systematic approach to increase the complexity of a quantum kernel model, leading to a new form of the local projected kernels that require fewer quantum resources in terms of the number of quantum gates and measurement shots. We show numerically that models based on local projected kernels can achieve comparable performance to the global fidelity quantum kernel. Our work unifies existing quantum kernels and provides a systematic framework to compare their properties.
Abstract Since the entry of kernel theory in the field of quantum machine learning, quantum kernel methods (QKMs) have gained increasing attention with regard to both probing promising applications and delivering intriguing research insights. Benchmarking these methods is crucial to gain robust insights and to understand their practical utility. In this work, we present a comprehensive large-scale study examining QKMs based on fidelity quantum kernels (FQKs) and projected quantum kernels (PQKs) across a manifold of design choices. Our investigation encompasses both classification and regression tasks for five dataset families and 64 datasets, systematically comparing the use of FQKs and PQKs quantum support vector machines and kernel ridge regression. This resulted in over 20,000 models that were trained and optimized using a state-of-the-art hyperparameter search to ensure robust and comprehensive insights. We delve into the importance of hyperparameters on model performance scores and support our findings through rigorous correlation analyses. Additionally, we provide an in-depth analysis addressing the design freedom of PQKs and explore the underlying principles responsible for learning. Our goal is not to identify the best-performing model for a specific task but to uncover the mechanisms that lead to effective QKMs and reveal universal patterns.
Kernel methods compare inputs through feature maps. Quantum kernels follow the same principle: input data are encoded into quantum states, which define quantum feature representations in Hilbert spaces. Kernel values are then obtained by estimating inner products between these states using suitable quantum circuit measurements. As a result, quantum kernels may be intractable to compute classically while remaining efficiently computable on quantum hardware, potentially leading to a quantum advantage. However, designing effective quantum kernels remains a major challenge. Many quantum kernels, such as the fidelity kernel, suffer from exponential concentration. This results in near-identity kernel matrices that fail to capture meaningful data correlations and lead to overfitting and poor generalization. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy for constructing quantum kernels that achieve good generalization performance, drawing inspiration from benign overfitting in classical machine learning. We introduce the concept of Local-Global quantum kernels, which combine two components: a local quantum kernel based on measurements of small subsystems, and a global quantum kernel derived from full-system measurements. To support the effectiveness of the proposed construction, we show theoretically and empirically that Local-Global quantum kernels exhibit benign overfitting.
Kernel methods in Quantum Machine Learning (QML) have recently gained significant attention as a potential candidate for achieving a quantum advantage in data analysis. Among other attractive properties, when training a kernel-based model one is guaranteed to find the optimal model's parameters due to the convexity of the training landscape. However, this is based on the assumption that the quantum kernel can be efficiently obtained from quantum hardware. In this work we study the performance of quantum kernel models from the perspective of the resources needed to accurately estimate kernel values. We show that, under certain conditions, values of quantum kernels over different input data can be exponentially concentrated (in the number of qubits) towards some fixed value. Thus on training with a polynomial number of measurements, one ends up with a trivial model where the predictions on unseen inputs are independent of the input data. We identify four sources that can lead to concentration including expressivity of data embedding, global measurements, entanglement and noise. For each source, an associated concentration bound of quantum kernels is analytically derived. Lastly, we show that when dealing with classical data, training a parametrized data embedding with a kernel alignment method is also susceptible to exponential concentration. Our results are verified through numerical simulations for several QML tasks. Altogether, we provide guidelines indicating that certain features should be avoided to ensure the efficient evaluation of quantum kernels and so the performance of quantum kernel methods.
Quantum machine learning techniques are commonly considered one of the most promising candidates for demonstrating practical quantum advantage. In particular, quantum kernel methods have been demonstrated to be able to learn certain classically intractable functions efficiently if the kernel is well aligned with the target function. In the more general case, quantum kernels are known to suffer from exponential ``flattening'' of the spectrum as the number of qubits grows, preventing generalization and necessitating the control of the inductive bias by hyperparameters. We show that the general-purpose hyperparameter-tuning techniques proposed to improve the generalization of quantum kernels lead to the kernel becoming well approximated by a classical kernel, removing the possibility of quantum advantage. We provide extensive numerical evidence for this phenomenon utilizing multiple previously studied quantum feature maps and both synthetic and real data. Our results show that unless novel techniques are developed to control the inductive bias of quantum kernels, they are unlikely to provide a quantum advantage on classical data that lacks special structure.
Abstract Quantum kernel methods are a promising method in quantum machine learning thanks to the guarantees connected to them. Their accessibility for analytic considerations also opens up the possibility of prescreening datasets based on their potential for a quantum advantage. To do so, earlier works developed the geometric difference, which can be understood as a closeness measure between two kernel-based machine learning approaches, most importantly between a quantum kernel and a classical kernel. This metric links the quantum and classical model complexities, and it was developed to bound generalization error. Therefore, it raises the question of how this metric behaves in an empirical setting. In this work, we investigate the effects of hyperparameter choice on the model performance and the generalization gap between classical and quantum kernels. The importance of hyperparameters is well known also for classical machine learning. Of special interest are hyperparameters associated with the quantum Hamiltonian evolution feature map, as well as the number of qubits to trace out before computing a projected quantum kernel. We conduct a thorough investigation of the hyperparameters across 11 datasets, and we identify certain aspects that can be exploited. Analyzing the effects of certain hyperparameter settings on the empirical performance, as measured by cross validation accuracy, and generalization ability, as measured by geometric difference described above, brings us one step closer to understanding the potential of quantum kernel methods on classical datasets.
The quantum kernel method is one of the key approaches to quantum machine learning, which has the advantage of not requiring optimization and its theoretical simplicity. By virtue of these properties, several experimental demonstrations and discussions of the potential advantages have been developed so far. However, as is the case in classical machine learning, not all quantum machine learning models could be regarded as kernel methods. In this work, we explore a quantum machine learning model with a deep parametrized quantum circuit and aim to go beyond the conventional quantum kernel method. In this case, the expressive power and performance are expected to be enhanced, while the training process might be a bottleneck because of the barren plateaus. Moreover, the high computational cost of gradient-based optimization and the large search space of the gradient-free optimization directly make the training intractable. However, we find that parameters of a deep enough quantum circuit do not move much from their initial values during training, allowing for a first-order expansion with respect to the parameters. This behavior is similar to that of the neural tangent kernel in classical machine learning, and such a quantum machine learning with deep variational quantum circuits can be described by another emergent kernel, the . We show that the proposed quantum tangent kernel has the potential to outperform the conventional quantum kernel method by performing a classification task on an ansatz-generated dataset. This work provides a different direction beyond the conventional quantum kernel method and explores the potential power of quantum machine learning with deep parametrized quantum circuits. Published by the American Physical Society 2024