Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2311.08194 · The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics

On the Quantum Chromatic Numbers of Small Graphs

Olivier Lalonde

Published Feb 14, 2025• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We make two contributions pertaining to the study of the quantum chromatic numbers of small graphs. Firstly, in an elegant paper, Mančinska and Roberson [Baltic Journal on Modern Computing, 4(4), 846-859, 2016] gave an example of a graph $G_{14}$ on 14 vertices with quantum chromatic number 4 and classical chromatic number 5, and conjectured that this is the smallest graph exhibiting a separation between the two parameters. We describe a computer-assisted proof of this conjecture, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem in quantum graph theory. Our second contribution pertains to the study of the rank-$r$ quantum chromatic numbers. While it can now be shown that for every $r$, $\chi_q$ and $\chi^{(r)}_q$ are distinct, few small examples of separations between these parameters are known. We give the smallest known example of such a separation in the form of a graph $G_{21}$ on 21 vertices with $\chi_q(G_{21}) = \chi^{(2)}_q(G_{21}) = 4$ and $ \xi(G_{21}) = \chi^{(1)}_q(G_{21}) = \chi(G_{21}) = 5$. The previous record was held by a graph $G_{msg}$ on 57 vertices that was first considered in the aforementioned paper of Mančinska and Roberson and which satisfies $\chi_q(G_{msg}) = 3$ and $\chi^{(1)}_q(G_{msg}) = 4$. In addition, $G_{21}$ provides the first provable separation between the parameters $\chi^{(1)}_q$ and $\chi^{(2)}_q$. We believe that our techniques for constructing $G_{21}$ and lower bounding its orthogonal rank could be of independent interest.

DOI
10.37236/12506

Related papers

Oddities of Quantum Colorings

Laura Mančinska, David E. Roberson

The main purpose of this work is to collect some interesting facts related to quantum graph coloring.We consider the orthogonality graph of the three-dimensional vectors with entries from the set {-1, 0, 1}.If we ignore the overall sign of the vectors, this yields a graph on thirteen vertices, which we denote by G13.It turns out that G13 (or the graph obtained from this by adding an apex vertex) is the smallest known example which exhibits separations between several graph parameters.We are particularly interested in using G13 to separate quantum graph parameters from their classical counterparts.We give a proof that G13 is not quantum 3-colorable, which shows that its orthogonal rank is strictly less than its quantum chromatic number.This also proves, along with other previously known results, that adding an apex vertex to G13 does not change its quantum chromatic number.The graph G13 is the first and only known graph with either of these properties.Lastly, we investigate a graph construction used for taking instances of 3-SAT to instances of 3-COLORING.We show that any graph constructed in this manner has an orthogonal representation in dimension three if and only if it is 3-colorable.Since it has been previously shown that there are such graphs with quantum 3-colorings but no classical 3-colorings, it follows that quantum chromatic number can be strictly less than orthogonal rank.Together with the above, this proves that orthogonal rank and quantum chromatic number are not comparable as graph parameters.

arXiv:1801.03542•Baltic Journal of Modern Computing•Dec 19, 2016•2 citations

On the Quantum Chromatic Number of a Graph

Peter J‎. Cameron, Ashley Montanaro, Michael Newman +2 more

We investigate the notion of quantum chromatic number of a graph, which is the minimal number of colours necessary in a protocol in which two separated provers can convince a referee that they have a colouring of the graph.After discussing this notion from first principles, we go on to establish relations with the clique number and orthogonal representations of the graph. We also prove several general facts about this graph parameter and find large separations between the clique number and the quantum chromatic number by looking at random graphs. Finally, we show that there can be no separation between classical and quantum chromatic number if the latter is $2$, nor if it is $3$ in a restricted quantum model; on the other hand, we exhibit a graph on $18$ vertices and $44$ edges with chromatic number $5$ and quantum chromatic number $4$.

The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics•Nov 28, 2007•100 citations

On the quantum chromatic number of a graph

Peter J‎. Cameron, Ashley Montanaro, Michael Newman +2 more

We investigate the notion of quantum chromatic number of a graph, which is the minimal number of colours necessary in a protocol in which two separated provers can convince an interrogator with certainty that they have a colouring of the graph. After discussing this notion from first principles, we go on to establish relations with the clique number and orthogonal representations of the graph. We also prove several general facts about this graph parameter and find large separations between the clique number and the quantum chromatic number by looking at random graphs. Finally, we show that there can be no separation between classical and quantum chromatic number if the latter is 2, nor if it is 3 in a restricted quantum model; on the other hand, we exhibit a graph on 18 vertices and 44 edges with chromatic number 5 and quantum chromatic number 4.

arXiv:quant-ph/0608016•Aug 1, 2006•3 citations

A counterexample to the quantum Hedetniemi conjecture

Julius A. Zeiss

Godsil, Roberson, Šámal and Severini conjectured that the quantum chromatic number of the categorical product of two graphs equals the minimum of the quantum chromatic numbers of the factors. We disprove this conjecture: we construct explicit finite graphs $G,H$ with \[ χ(G\times H) \leq 1538 < 1539 = \min(χ_q(G),χ_q(H)).\]The graphs are obtained from Zhu's counterexample to Hedetniemi's conjecture by using a base graph for which the Lovász theta number of the complement, and not only the fractional chromatic number, is large. The lower bound for the first factor is the theta bound. For the second factor we adapt Zhu's argument to projections that do not commute: the step that fixes the colors of a clique is replaced by identities between operators. Both lower bounds hold for colorings by projections in an arbitrary nonzero unital $C^*$-algebra. Hence the conjecture also fails for the spatial, approximate, commuting-operator and $C^*$-algebraic variants of the quantum chromatic number. We also give smaller counterexamples certified by exact integer data. The graph constructions, the certificates and the counterexample statements in the projective formulation are formalized in Lean~4.

math.COCross-listedarXiv:2609.20690•Sep 18, 2026•0 citations

Quantum chromatic numbers of some graphs in Hamming schemes

Xiwang Cao, Keqin Feng, Ying-Ying Tan

The study of quantum chromatic numbers of graphs is a hot research topic in recent years. However, the infinite family of graphs with known quantum chromatic numbers are rare, as far as we know, the only known such graphs (except for complete graphs, cycles, bipartite graphs and some trivial cases) are the Hadamard graphs $H_n$ with $2^n$ vertices and $n$ a multiple of $4$. In this paper, we consider the graphs in Hamming schemes, we determined the quantum chromatic numbers of one class of such graphs. Notably, this is the second known family of graphs whose quantum chromatic numbers are explicitly determined except for some cases aforementioned. We also provide some bounds for the quantum chromatic numbers of some other graphs in Hamming schemes. Consequently, we can obtain the quantum chromatic numbers of products of some graphs.

arXiv:2412.09904•Dec 13, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Graph Theory by Example

Gian Luca Spitzer, Ion Nechita

Quantum graphs have been introduced by Duan, Severini, and Winter to describe the zero-error behaviour of quantum channels. Since then, quantum graph theory has become a field of study in its own right. A substantial source of difficulty in working with quantum graphs compared to classical graphs stems from the fact that they are no longer discrete objects. This makes it generally difficult to construct insightful, non-trivial examples. We present a collection of non-trivial quantum graphs that can be thought of in discrete terms, and that can be expressed in the diagrammatic formalism introduced by Musto, Reutter, and Verdon. The examples arise as the quantum graphs acted on by increasingly smaller classical matrix groups, and are parametrised by triples of matrices $(A, B, C)$. The parametrisation reveals a clean decomposition of quantum graph structure into classical and genuinely quantum components: $A$ and $C$ are described by a classical weighted graph called the strange graph, while $B$ provides a purely quantum contribution with no classical analogue. Based on this model, we give exact formulas or establish bounds for quantum graph parameters, such as the number of connected components, the chromatic number, the independence number, and the clique number. Our results provide the first large, parametric families of quantum graphs for which standard graph parameters can be computed analytically.

math.OACross-listedarXiv:2603.23651•Quantum•Mar 26, 2026•0 citations
We make two contributions pertaining to the study of the quantum chromatic numbers of small graphs. Firstly, in an elegant paper, Mančinska and Roberson [Baltic Journal on Modern Computing, 4(4), 846-859, 2016] gave an example of a graph G14G_{14}G14​ on 14 vertices with quantum chromatic number 4 and classical chromatic number 5, and conjectured that this is the smallest graph exhibiting a separation between the two parameters. We describe a computer-assisted proof of this conjecture, thereby resolving a longstanding open problem in quantum graph theory. Our second contribution pertains to the study of the rank-rrr quantum chromatic numbers. While it can now be shown that for every rrr, χq\chi_qχq​ and χq(r)\chi^{(r)}_qχq(r)​ are distinct, few small examples of separations between these parameters are known. We give the smallest known example of such a separation in the form of a graph G21G_{21}G21​ on 21 vertices with χq(G21)=χq(2)(G21)=4\chi_q(G_{21}) = \chi^{(2)}_q(G_{21}) = 4χq​(G21​)=χq(2)​(G21​)=4 and ξ(G21)=χq(1)(G21)=χ(G21)=5 \xi(G_{21}) = \chi^{(1)}_q(G_{21}) = \chi(G_{21}) = 5ξ(G21​)=χq(1)​(G21​)=χ(G21​)=5. The previous record was held by a graph GmsgG_{msg}Gmsg​ on 57 vertices that was first considered in the aforementioned paper of Mančinska and Roberson and which satisfies χq(Gmsg)=3\chi_q(G_{msg}) = 3χq​(Gmsg​)=3 and χq(1)(Gmsg)=4\chi^{(1)}_q(G_{msg}) = 4χq(1)​(Gmsg​)=4. In addition, G21G_{21}G21​ provides the first provable separation between the parameters χq(1)\chi^{(1)}_qχq(1)​ and χq(2)\chi^{(2)}_qχq(2)​. We believe that our techniques for constructing G21G_{21}G21​ and lower bounding its orthogonal rank could be of independent interest.
The main purpose of this work is to collect some interesting facts related to quantum graph coloring.We consider the orthogonality graph of the three-dimensional vectors with entries from the set {-1, 0, 1}.If we ignore the overall sign of the vectors, this yields a graph on thirteen vertices, which we denote by G13.It turns out that G13 (or the graph obtained from this by adding an apex vertex) is the smallest known example which exhibits separations between several graph parameters.We are particularly interested in using G13 to separate quantum graph parameters from their classical counterparts.We give a proof that G13 is not quantum 3-colorable, which shows that its orthogonal rank is strictly less than its quantum chromatic number.This also proves, along with other previously known results, that adding an apex vertex to G13 does not change its quantum chromatic number.The graph G13 is the first and only known graph with either of these properties.Lastly, we investigate a graph construction used for taking instances of 3-SAT to instances of 3-COLORING.We show that any graph constructed in this manner has an orthogonal representation in dimension three if and only if it is 3-colorable.Since it has been previously shown that there are such graphs with quantum 3-colorings but no classical 3-colorings, it follows that quantum chromatic number can be strictly less than orthogonal rank.Together with the above, this proves that orthogonal rank and quantum chromatic number are not comparable as graph parameters.
We investigate the notion of quantum chromatic number of a graph, which is the minimal number of colours necessary in a protocol in which two separated provers can convince a referee that they have a colouring of the graph.After discussing this notion from first principles, we go on to establish relations with the clique number and orthogonal representations of the graph. We also prove several general facts about this graph parameter and find large separations between the clique number and the quantum chromatic number by looking at random graphs. Finally, we show that there can be no separation between classical and quantum chromatic number if the latter is 222, nor if it is 333 in a restricted quantum model; on the other hand, we exhibit a graph on 181818 vertices and 444444 edges with chromatic number 555 and quantum chromatic number 444.
We investigate the notion of quantum chromatic number of a graph, which is the minimal number of colours necessary in a protocol in which two separated provers can convince an interrogator with certainty that they have a colouring of the graph. After discussing this notion from first principles, we go on to establish relations with the clique number and orthogonal representations of the graph. We also prove several general facts about this graph parameter and find large separations between the clique number and the quantum chromatic number by looking at random graphs. Finally, we show that there can be no separation between classical and quantum chromatic number if the latter is 2, nor if it is 3 in a restricted quantum model; on the other hand, we exhibit a graph on 18 vertices and 44 edges with chromatic number 5 and quantum chromatic number 4.
Godsil, Roberson, Šámal and Severini conjectured that the quantum chromatic number of the categorical product of two graphs equals the minimum of the quantum chromatic numbers of the factors. We disprove this conjecture: we construct explicit finite graphs G,HG,HG,H with χ(G×H)≤1538<1539=min⁡(χq(G),χq(H)). χ(G\times H) \leq 1538 < 1539 = \min(χ_q(G),χ_q(H)).χ(G×H)≤1538<1539=min(χq​(G),χq​(H)).The graphs are obtained from Zhu's counterexample to Hedetniemi's conjecture by using a base graph for which the Lovász theta number of the complement, and not only the fractional chromatic number, is large. The lower bound for the first factor is the theta bound. For the second factor we adapt Zhu's argument to projections that do not commute: the step that fixes the colors of a clique is replaced by identities between operators. Both lower bounds hold for colorings by projections in an arbitrary nonzero unital C∗C^*C∗-algebra. Hence the conjecture also fails for the spatial, approximate, commuting-operator and C∗C^*C∗-algebraic variants of the quantum chromatic number. We also give smaller counterexamples certified by exact integer data. The graph constructions, the certificates and the counterexample statements in the projective formulation are formalized in Lean~4.
The study of quantum chromatic numbers of graphs is a hot research topic in recent years. However, the infinite family of graphs with known quantum chromatic numbers are rare, as far as we know, the only known such graphs (except for complete graphs, cycles, bipartite graphs and some trivial cases) are the Hadamard graphs HnH_nHn​ with 2n2^n2n vertices and nnn a multiple of 444. In this paper, we consider the graphs in Hamming schemes, we determined the quantum chromatic numbers of one class of such graphs. Notably, this is the second known family of graphs whose quantum chromatic numbers are explicitly determined except for some cases aforementioned. We also provide some bounds for the quantum chromatic numbers of some other graphs in Hamming schemes. Consequently, we can obtain the quantum chromatic numbers of products of some graphs.
Quantum graphs have been introduced by Duan, Severini, and Winter to describe the zero-error behaviour of quantum channels. Since then, quantum graph theory has become a field of study in its own right. A substantial source of difficulty in working with quantum graphs compared to classical graphs stems from the fact that they are no longer discrete objects. This makes it generally difficult to construct insightful, non-trivial examples. We present a collection of non-trivial quantum graphs that can be thought of in discrete terms, and that can be expressed in the diagrammatic formalism introduced by Musto, Reutter, and Verdon. The examples arise as the quantum graphs acted on by increasingly smaller classical matrix groups, and are parametrised by triples of matrices (A,B,C)(A, B, C)(A,B,C). The parametrisation reveals a clean decomposition of quantum graph structure into classical and genuinely quantum components: AAA and CCC are described by a classical weighted graph called the strange graph, while BBB provides a purely quantum contribution with no classical analogue. Based on this model, we give exact formulas or establish bounds for quantum graph parameters, such as the number of connected components, the chromatic number, the independence number, and the clique number. Our results provide the first large, parametric families of quantum graphs for which standard graph parameters can be computed analytically.