Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2311.04282 · New Journal of Physics

Counterdiabatic optimized driving in quantum phase sensitive models

Francesco Pio Barone, Oriel Kiss, Michele Grossi, Sofia Vallecorsa, Antonio Mandarino

Published Mar 1, 2024• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract State preparation plays a pivotal role in numerous quantum algorithms, including quantum phase estimation. This paper extends and benchmarks counterdiabatic driving protocols across three one-dimensional spin systems characterized by phase transitions: the axial next-nearest neighbor Ising, XXZ, and Haldane–Shastry models. We perform a shallow quantum optimal control over the counterdiabatic protocols by optimizing an energy cost function. Moreover, we provide a code package for computing symbolically various adiabatic gauge potentials. This protocol consistently surpasses standard annealing schedules, often achieving performance improvements of several orders of magnitude. The axial next-nearest neighbor Ising model stands out as a notable example, where fidelities exceeding 0.5 are attainable in most cases. Furthermore, the optimized paths exhibit promising generalization capabilities to higher-dimensional systems, allowing for the extension of parameters from smaller models. Nevertheless, our investigations reveal limitations in the case of the XXZ and Haldane–Shastry models, particularly when transitioning away from the ferromagnetic phase. This suggests that finding optimal diabatic gauge potentials for specific systems remains an important research direction.

DOI
10.1088/1367-2630/ad313e

Related papers

Quantum counterdiabatic driving enhanced by two-stage local control

Changhao Li, Jiayu Shen, Ruslan Shaydulin +1 more

Abstract Counterdiabatic driving can suppress diabatic losses during adiabatic ground state preparation. As its implementation necessitates the generation of an adiabatic gauge potential, which requires knowledge of the spectral gap of instantaneous Hamiltonians and involves highly non-local controls in many-body systems, local counterdiabatic driving with approximate adiabatic gauge potential has been widely adopted. In this work, using transverse-field Ising model as an example, we present an in-depth study of the performance of local counterdiabatic protocols and provide a closed-form analysis of ground-state-fidelity optimization. We then propose a two-stage protocol based on local counterdiabatic and simple local single-body control to further improve the performance. The practical implementation of these protocols does not require diagonalization of instantaneous Hamiltonians or spectral gaps, and only additional local single-body driving is involved. To benchmark their performance, we experimentally implement digitized adiabatic quantum evolution in a trapped-ion system. We characterize the quality of the prepared states and explore the scaling behavior with system size up to 14 qubits. Our demonstration of quantum shortcut to adiabaticity opens a path towards preparing ground states of complex systems with accessible local controls.

arXiv:2403.01854•Communications Physics•Aug 27, 2026•1 citation

Counterdiabatic quantum optimization for efficient state preparation in the Schwinger model

Ethan Laval, Bipasha Chakraborty, Stefano Cipolla

The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose design is underpinned by the adiabatic theorem, is one of the leading variational quantum algorithms for preparing the ground states of gauge theories. A recently proposed variant, DC-QAOA, incorporates counterdiabatic driving to accelerate the adiabatic process, reducing both circuit depth and runtime. In this work, we present a systematic analysis, from both theoretical and computational perspectives, of DC-QAOA and related counterdiabatic variants for preparing the ground state of the Schwinger model, the paradigmatic (1+1)-dimensional lattice gauge theory. Benchmarking these methods against standard QAOA, we show that counterdiabatic driving improves ground-state preparation while lowering circuit depth requirements. Our results establish counterdiabatic protocols as a practical route towards efficient quantum simulation of gauge theories.

hep-latCross-listedarXiv:2609.31400•Sep 28, 2026•0 citations

Geometrical scheduling of adiabatic control without information of energy spectra

Yuta Shingu, Takuya Hatomura

Adiabatic control is a fundamental technique for manipulating quantum systems, guided by the quantum adiabatic theorem, which ensures suppressed nonadiabatic transitions under slow parameter variations. Quantum annealing, a heuristic algorithm leveraging adiabatic control, seeks the ground states of Ising spin glass models and has drawn attention for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. However, exponentially small energy gaps in such models often necessitate impractically long runtime to satisfy the adiabatic condition. Despite this limitation, improving the quality of approximate solutions remains crucial for practical applications. The quantum adiabatic brachistochrone provides a method to enhance adiabaticity by minimizing an action representing nonadiabaticity via the variational principle. While effective, its implementation requires detailed energy spectra, complicating its use in quantum annealing. Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving offer alternative approaches for accelerating adiabatic processes. However, the theory of shortcuts to adiabaticity often faces challenges such as nonlocal control requirements, high computational cost, and trade-offs between speed and energy efficiency. In this work, we propose a novel quantum adiabatic brachistochrone protocol tailored for quantum annealing that eliminates the need for energy spectrum information. Our approach builds on advancements in counterdiabatic driving to design efficient parameter schedules. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through numerical simulations on the transverse-field Ising chain and axial next-nearest neighbor Ising models.

arXiv:2501.11846•Physical Review A•Jul 16, 2025•3 citations

Optimizing counterdiabaticity by variational quantum circuits

Dan Sun, Pranav Chandarana, Zi‐Hua Xin +1 more

Using counterdiabatic (CD) driving-aiming at suppression of diabatic transition-in digitized adiabatic evolution has garnered immense interest in quantum protocols and algorithms. However, improving the approximate CD terms with a nested commutator ansatz is a challenging task. In this work, we propose a technique of finding optimal coefficients of the CD terms using a variational quantum circuit. By classical optimization routines, the parameters of this circuit are optimized to provide the coefficients corresponding to the CD terms. Then their improved performance is exemplified in Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state preparation on the nearest-neighbour Ising model. Finally, we also show the advantage over the usual quantum approximation optimization algorithm, in terms of fidelity with bounded time. This article is part of the theme issue 'Shortcuts to adiabaticity: theoretical, experimental and interdisciplinary perspectives'.

arXiv:2208.02087•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Nov 6, 2022•16 citations

Polynomial scaling enhancement in the ground-state preparation of Ising spin models via counterdiabatic driving

Andreas Hartmann, Glen Bigan Mbeng, Wolfgang Lechner

The preparation of ground states of spin systems is a fundamental operation in quantum computing and serves as the basis of adiabatic quantum computing. This form of quantum computation is subject to the adiabatic theorem which in turn poses a fundamental speed limit. We show that by employing diabatic transitions via counterdiabatic driving, a less strict requirement on adiabaticity applies. We demonstrate a scaling advantage from local and multispin counterdiabatic driving in the ground-state fidelity compared to their adiabatic counterpart, for different Ising spin models.

arXiv:2109.04962•Physical Review A•Feb 18, 2022•12 citations

Exact counterdiabatic driving for finite topological lattice models

Callum W. Duncan

Adiabatic protocols are often employed in state preparation schemes but require the system to be driven by a slowly varying Hamiltonian so that transitions between instantaneous eigenstates are exponentially suppressed. Counterdiabatic driving is a technique to speed up adiabatic protocols by including additional terms calculated from the instantaneous eigenstates that counter diabatic excitations. However, this approach requires knowledge of the full eigenspectrum meaning that the exact analytical form of counterdiabatic driving is only known for a subset of problems, e.g., the harmonic oscillator and transverse field Ising model. We extend this subset of problems to include the general family of one-dimensional non-interacting lattice models with open boundary conditions and arbitrary on-site potential, tunnelling terms, and lattice size. We formulate this approach for all states of lattice models, including bound and in-gap states which appear, e.g., in topological insulators. We also derive targeted counterdiabatic driving terms which are tailored to enforce the dynamical state to remain in a specific state. As an example, we consider state transfer using the topological edge states of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. The derived analytical counterdiabatic driving Hamiltonian can be utilised to inform control protocols in many-body lattice models or to probe the non-equilibrium properties of lattice models.

arXiv:2403.12150•Mar 18, 2024•0 citations
Abstract State preparation plays a pivotal role in numerous quantum algorithms, including quantum phase estimation. This paper extends and benchmarks counterdiabatic driving protocols across three one-dimensional spin systems characterized by phase transitions: the axial next-nearest neighbor Ising, XXZ, and Haldane–Shastry models. We perform a shallow quantum optimal control over the counterdiabatic protocols by optimizing an energy cost function. Moreover, we provide a code package for computing symbolically various adiabatic gauge potentials. This protocol consistently surpasses standard annealing schedules, often achieving performance improvements of several orders of magnitude. The axial next-nearest neighbor Ising model stands out as a notable example, where fidelities exceeding 0.5 are attainable in most cases. Furthermore, the optimized paths exhibit promising generalization capabilities to higher-dimensional systems, allowing for the extension of parameters from smaller models. Nevertheless, our investigations reveal limitations in the case of the XXZ and Haldane–Shastry models, particularly when transitioning away from the ferromagnetic phase. This suggests that finding optimal diabatic gauge potentials for specific systems remains an important research direction.
Abstract Counterdiabatic driving can suppress diabatic losses during adiabatic ground state preparation. As its implementation necessitates the generation of an adiabatic gauge potential, which requires knowledge of the spectral gap of instantaneous Hamiltonians and involves highly non-local controls in many-body systems, local counterdiabatic driving with approximate adiabatic gauge potential has been widely adopted. In this work, using transverse-field Ising model as an example, we present an in-depth study of the performance of local counterdiabatic protocols and provide a closed-form analysis of ground-state-fidelity optimization. We then propose a two-stage protocol based on local counterdiabatic and simple local single-body control to further improve the performance. The practical implementation of these protocols does not require diagonalization of instantaneous Hamiltonians or spectral gaps, and only additional local single-body driving is involved. To benchmark their performance, we experimentally implement digitized adiabatic quantum evolution in a trapped-ion system. We characterize the quality of the prepared states and explore the scaling behavior with system size up to 14 qubits. Our demonstration of quantum shortcut to adiabaticity opens a path towards preparing ground states of complex systems with accessible local controls.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), whose design is underpinned by the adiabatic theorem, is one of the leading variational quantum algorithms for preparing the ground states of gauge theories. A recently proposed variant, DC-QAOA, incorporates counterdiabatic driving to accelerate the adiabatic process, reducing both circuit depth and runtime. In this work, we present a systematic analysis, from both theoretical and computational perspectives, of DC-QAOA and related counterdiabatic variants for preparing the ground state of the Schwinger model, the paradigmatic (1+1)-dimensional lattice gauge theory. Benchmarking these methods against standard QAOA, we show that counterdiabatic driving improves ground-state preparation while lowering circuit depth requirements. Our results establish counterdiabatic protocols as a practical route towards efficient quantum simulation of gauge theories.
Adiabatic control is a fundamental technique for manipulating quantum systems, guided by the quantum adiabatic theorem, which ensures suppressed nonadiabatic transitions under slow parameter variations. Quantum annealing, a heuristic algorithm leveraging adiabatic control, seeks the ground states of Ising spin glass models and has drawn attention for addressing combinatorial optimization problems. However, exponentially small energy gaps in such models often necessitate impractically long runtime to satisfy the adiabatic condition. Despite this limitation, improving the quality of approximate solutions remains crucial for practical applications. The quantum adiabatic brachistochrone provides a method to enhance adiabaticity by minimizing an action representing nonadiabaticity via the variational principle. While effective, its implementation requires detailed energy spectra, complicating its use in quantum annealing. Shortcuts to adiabaticity by counterdiabatic driving offer alternative approaches for accelerating adiabatic processes. However, the theory of shortcuts to adiabaticity often faces challenges such as nonlocal control requirements, high computational cost, and trade-offs between speed and energy efficiency. In this work, we propose a novel quantum adiabatic brachistochrone protocol tailored for quantum annealing that eliminates the need for energy spectrum information. Our approach builds on advancements in counterdiabatic driving to design efficient parameter schedules. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method through numerical simulations on the transverse-field Ising chain and axial next-nearest neighbor Ising models.
Using counterdiabatic (CD) driving-aiming at suppression of diabatic transition-in digitized adiabatic evolution has garnered immense interest in quantum protocols and algorithms. However, improving the approximate CD terms with a nested commutator ansatz is a challenging task. In this work, we propose a technique of finding optimal coefficients of the CD terms using a variational quantum circuit. By classical optimization routines, the parameters of this circuit are optimized to provide the coefficients corresponding to the CD terms. Then their improved performance is exemplified in Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state preparation on the nearest-neighbour Ising model. Finally, we also show the advantage over the usual quantum approximation optimization algorithm, in terms of fidelity with bounded time. This article is part of the theme issue 'Shortcuts to adiabaticity: theoretical, experimental and interdisciplinary perspectives'.
The preparation of ground states of spin systems is a fundamental operation in quantum computing and serves as the basis of adiabatic quantum computing. This form of quantum computation is subject to the adiabatic theorem which in turn poses a fundamental speed limit. We show that by employing diabatic transitions via counterdiabatic driving, a less strict requirement on adiabaticity applies. We demonstrate a scaling advantage from local and multispin counterdiabatic driving in the ground-state fidelity compared to their adiabatic counterpart, for different Ising spin models.
Adiabatic protocols are often employed in state preparation schemes but require the system to be driven by a slowly varying Hamiltonian so that transitions between instantaneous eigenstates are exponentially suppressed. Counterdiabatic driving is a technique to speed up adiabatic protocols by including additional terms calculated from the instantaneous eigenstates that counter diabatic excitations. However, this approach requires knowledge of the full eigenspectrum meaning that the exact analytical form of counterdiabatic driving is only known for a subset of problems, e.g., the harmonic oscillator and transverse field Ising model. We extend this subset of problems to include the general family of one-dimensional non-interacting lattice models with open boundary conditions and arbitrary on-site potential, tunnelling terms, and lattice size. We formulate this approach for all states of lattice models, including bound and in-gap states which appear, e.g., in topological insulators. We also derive targeted counterdiabatic driving terms which are tailored to enforce the dynamical state to remain in a specific state. As an example, we consider state transfer using the topological edge states of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model. The derived analytical counterdiabatic driving Hamiltonian can be utilised to inform control protocols in many-body lattice models or to probe the non-equilibrium properties of lattice models.