Abstract In this chapter we offer an introduction to weak values from a three-fold perspective: first, outlining the protocols that enable their experimental determination; next, deriving their correlates in the quantum formalism and, finally, discussing their ontological significance according to different quantum theories or interpretations. We argue that weak values have predictive power and provide novel ways to characterise quantum systems. We show that this holds true regardless of ongoing ontological disputes. And, still, we contend that certain “hidden” variables theories like Bohmian mechanics constitute very valuable heuristic tools for identifying informative weak values or functions thereof. To illustrate these points, we present a case study concerning quantum thermalization. We show that certain weak values, singled out by Bohmian mechanics as physically relevant, play a crucial role in elucidating the thermalization time of certain systems, whereas standard expectation values are “blind” to the onset of thermalization.
Abstract In this chapter we offer an introduction to weak values from a three-fold perspective: first, outlining the protocols that enable their experimental determination; next, deriving their correlates in the quantum formalism and, finally, discussing their ontological significance according to different quantum theories or interpretations. We argue that weak values have predictive power and provide novel ways to characterise quantum systems. We show that this holds true regardless of ongoing ontological disputes. And, still, we contend that certain “hidden” variables theories like Bohmian mechanics constitute very valuable heuristic tools for identifying informative weak values or functions thereof. To illustrate these points, we present a case study concerning quantum thermalization. We show that certain weak values, singled out by Bohmian mechanics as physically relevant, play a crucial role in elucidating the thermalization time of certain systems, whereas standard expectation values are “blind” to the onset of thermalization.
Interest in weak values has grown steadily since their introduction in 1988, driven by developments in quantum measurement theory and increasing attention to the foundational issues at the heart of quantum mechanics. This thesis undertakes a philosophical investigation into the nature and implications of weak values, with a particular focus on their interpretation and role in creating and resolving quantum paradoxes. Overall, we argue that sequential weak values offer novel conceptual tools for assessing logical consistency in an atemporal fashion, ultimately motivating a shift toward a fundamentally relation-based ontology. Chapter 1 begins by establishing the conceptual and philosophical foundations of the thesis. We argue that performing this conceptual analysis of weak values requires a philosophical methodology informed by the structure of quantum theory and the foundational questions it poses. In Chapter 2, we provide a critical exploration of weak measurement theory and weak values, outlining their historical foundations and development, the experimental context, and interpretative challenges. Through a detailed analysis of paradoxes related to weak values such as the nested interferometer and the quantum Cheshire cat, the chapter argues that weak values reveal spatiotemporally discontinuous trajectories which conflict with classical intuition about particles and their trajectories. We contend that weak values are inherently contextual, as their significance arises in the context of the pre- and post- selections of the system. Chapter 3 develops an original account of ‘particle presence' across time, building on metaphysical notions of persistence. This chapter proposes a way of recovering continuity in paradoxes such as the three-box gendankenexperiment. Our framework offers a means of assessing the persistence of particles through spacetime via sequential weak values which we argue test the logical consistency of propositions across time. We then explore the implications for temporality, developing the key argument of this chapter: presence is defined across durations of time, rather than in discrete spacetime. This raises the possibility of presence without a well-defined causal order. In Chapter 4, the insights developed in the previous chapters are extended to a consideration of Relational Quantum Mechanics (RQM), addressing the longstanding issue of a lack of intersubjective agreement in relational interpretations. Given RQM's rejection of absolutism, this chapter critiques existing attempts at bridging perspectives and proposes a new route to empirical confirmation grounded in the persistence and reliability of observer's memory records. Our two- step model, consisting of internal confirmation via sequential weak values and then a consistency check from a second observer, offers a new approach to confirmation in RQM without rejecting the non-absolutist core of the interpretation. Sequential weak values are re-interpreted as atemporal probes available to the informational observer, distinct from its physical counterpart. This atemporal nature allows them to establish logical consistency across the observer's records and assign credence to them without presupposing a classical temporal order. These results suggest an ontology grounded in primitive relations, rather than one built on temporally ordered events. Chapter 4 thus builds on the contextuality arguments of earlier chapters: just as weak values reveal measurement outcomes to be context-dependent, their sequential and time-symmetric structure exposes temporal contextuality, challenging classical assumptions about fixed causal order and reinforcing the case for a non-classical, relation-based ontology. Finally, in Chapter 5, we conclude by summarising our key results and giving a list of open questions.
Bohmian mechanics (BM) is a popular interpretation of quantum mechanics (QM) in which particles have real positions. The velocity of a point x in configuration space is defined as the standard probability current j ( x ) divided by the probability density P ( x ). However, this 'standard' j is in fact only one of infinitely many that transform correctly and satisfy . In this paper, I show that a particular j is singled out if one requires that j be determined experimentally as a weak value , using a technique that would make sense to a physicist with no knowledge of QM. This 'naively observable' j seems the most natural way to define j operationally. Moreover, I show that this operationally defined j equals the standard j , so, assuming , one obtains the dynamics of BM. It follows that the possible Bohmian paths are naively observable from a large enough ensemble. Furthermore, this justification for the Bohmian law of motion singles out x as the hidden variable, because (for example) the analogously defined momentum current is in general incompatible with the evolution of the momentum distribution. Finally I discuss how, in this setting, the usual quantum probabilities can be motivated from a Bayesian standpoint, via the principle of indifference.
Weak values have been shown to be helpful especially when considering them as the outcomes of weak measurements. In this paper we show that, in principle, the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of any operator may be elucidated from expectation values of suitably defined density, flux, and Hermitian commutator operators. Expectation values are the outcomes of strong (projective) measurements, implying that weak values are general properties of operators in association with pre- and postselection and they need not be preferentially associated with weak measurements. They should be considered as an important measurable property which provides added information compared with the ``standard'' diagonal expectation value of an operator. As the first specific example we consider the determination of the real and imaginary parts of the weak value of the momentum operator employing projective time-of-flight experiments. Then the results are analyzed from the point of view of Bohmian mechanics. Finally, we consider recent neutron interferometry experiments used to determine the weak values of the neutron spin.
Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.
The highly speculative nature of the pilot-wave theory is obvious and acknowledged even by its keenest supporters. But many physicists, including those who do not believe it is a true description of what exists, may well find it useful when trying to interpret quantum theory. Hidden-variables theories are not the only theories susceptible of being interpreted as faithful descriptions of "what exists" (so-called ontological theories). In particular, several physicists investigated the possibility of building up ontological theories in which the state vector would constitute the complete specification of the physical state of the system. Within such an approach the main difficulty is of course the one linked with the reduction of the wave packet. In any ontologically interpretable theory elements must be added to standard quantum mechanics in order that objective states of individual physical systems can be defined. The models reviewed in this chapter are a sample of what has been proposed in the domain of ontologically interpretable theories.
The so-called eigenvalue-eigenstate link states that no property can be associated to a quantum system unless it is in an eigenstate of the corresponding operator. This precludes the assignation of properties to unmeasured quantum systems in general. This arbitrary limitation of orthodox quantum mechanics generates many puzzling situations such as for example the impossibility to uniquely define a work distribution, an essential building block of quantum thermodynamics. Alternatively, modal theories (e.g., Bohmian mechanics) provide an ontology that always allows one to define intrinsic properties, i.e., properties of quantum systems that are detached from any possible measuring context. We prove here that Aharonov, Albert, and Vaidman's notion of a weak value can always be identified with an intrinsic dynamical property of a quantum system defined in a certain modal theory. Furthermore, the fact that weak values are experimentally accessible (as an ensemble average of weak measurements which are postselected by a strong measurement) strengthens the idea that understanding the intrinsic (unperturbed) dynamics of quantum systems is possible and useful in a given modal theory. As examples of the physical soundness of these intrinsic properties, we discuss three intrinsic Bohmian properties, viz., the dwell time, the work distribution, and the quantum noise at high frequencies.