Quantum computing has proven to be capable of accelerating many algorithms by performing tasks that classical computers cannot. As quantum algorithms and implementations grow more complex, the need for rigorous circuit verification becomes critical, ensuring correct compilation and enhancing circuit fidelity through error correction and assertions. In this paper, we propose QuBEC, a Decision Diagram-based quantum equivalence checking approach, that requires less latency compared to existing techniques, while accounting for circuits with quantum error correction redundancy. QuBEC reduces verification time on benchmark circuits by up to 443×, while the number of Decision Diagram nodes required is reduced by up to 798.31×, compared to state-of-the-art strategies. The proposed QuBEC framework can contribute to the advancement of quantum computing by enabling faster and more efficient verification of quantum circuits, paving the way for the development of larger and more complex quantum algorithms.
Quantum computing has proven to be capable of accelerating many algorithms by performing tasks that classical computers cannot. As quantum algorithms and implementations grow more complex, the need for rigorous circuit verification becomes critical, ensuring correct compilation and enhancing circuit fidelity through error correction and assertions. In this paper, we propose QuBEC, a Decision Diagram-based quantum equivalence checking approach, that requires less latency compared to existing techniques, while accounting for circuits with quantum error correction redundancy. QuBEC reduces verification time on benchmark circuits by up to 443×, while the number of Decision Diagram nodes required is reduced by up to 798.31×, compared to state-of-the-art strategies. The proposed QuBEC framework can contribute to the advancement of quantum computing by enabling faster and more efficient verification of quantum circuits, paving the way for the development of larger and more complex quantum algorithms.
Quantum circuit transpilation facilitates the decomposition of complex operations into simpler hardware-compatible gates. This results in significant changes to the input circuit, and consequently, it becomes imperative to verify the correctness of the transpilation process. Quantum circuit equivalence checking is used to verify the operational equivalence of large quantum circuits to ensure the correctness of computation. Although small quantum circuits can be simulated easily on a classical computer without transpilation, this approach is unscalable for larger, more complex quantum circuits. Furthermore, a scalable quantum equivalence checking algorithm exhibiting subpar performance when applied to larger quantum circuits lacks reliability. Therefore, an equivalence-checking algorithm with scalability and acceptable performance is necessary to verify large quantum circuits. In this paper, we propose QuaSi, a simulation-based verification methodology designed to generate distinct test cases to achieve a scalable and reliable quantum circuit equivalence-checking. Our proposed approach surpasses existing state-of-the-art simulation-based methodologies by boosting the success rate of verification, in addition to reducing the verification latency. When evaluating using large benchmarks with up to 130 qubits, QuaSi furnished significantly improved performance compared to existing approaches in all types of scenarios. Furthermore, we proposed an algorithm to locate the erroneous gates to facilitate debugging the transpilation process.
Parameterised quantum circuits (PQCs) hold great promise for demonstrating quantum advantages in practical applications of quantum computation. Examples of successful applications include the variational quantum eigensolver, the quantum approximate optimisation algorithm, and quantum machine learning. However, before executing PQCs on real quantum devices, they undergo compilation and optimisation procedures. Given the inherent error-proneness of these processes, it becomes crucial to verify the equivalence between the original PQC and its compiled or optimised version. Unfortunately, most existing quantum circuit verifiers cannot directly handle parameterised quantum circuits; instead, they require parameter substitution to perform verification. In this paper, we address the critical challenge of equivalence checking for PQCs. We propose a novel compact representation for PQCs based on tensor decision diagrams. Leveraging this representation, we present an algorithm for verifying PQC equivalence without the need for instantiation. Our approach ensures both effectiveness and efficiency, as confirmed by experimental evaluations. The decision-diagram representations offer a powerful tool for analysing and verifying parameterised quantum circuits, bridging the gap between theoretical models and practical implementations.
As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. One of them is based on the ZX-calculus, a graphical rewriting system for quantum computing. However, the power and capability of this equivalence checking method has barely been explored. The aim of this work is to evaluate the ZX-calculus as a tool for equivalence checking of quantum circuits. To this end, it is demonstrated how the ZX-calculus based approach for equivalence checking can be expanded in order to verify the results of compilation flows and optimizations on quantum circuits. It is also shown that the ZX-calculus based method is not complete—especially for quantum circuits with ancillary qubits. In order to properly evaluate the proposed method, we conduct a detailed case study by comparing it to two other state-of-the-art methods for equivalence checking: one based on path-sums and another based on decision diagrams. The proposed methods have been integrated into the publicly available QCEC tool (https://github.com/cda-tum/qcec) which is part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
Despite the rapid development of quantum computing these years, state-of-the-art quantum devices still contain only a limited number of qubits. One possible way to execute more realistic algorithms in near-term quantum devices is to employ dynamic quantum circuits (DQCs). In DQCs, measurements can happen during the circuit, and their outcomes can be processed with classical computers and used to control other parts of the circuit. This technique can help significantly reduce the qubit resources required to implement a quantum algorithm. In this paper, we give a formal definition of DQCs and then characterise their functionality in terms of ensembles of linear operators, following the Kraus representation of superoperators. We further interpret DQCs as tensor networks, implement their functionality as tensor decision diagrams (TDDs), and reduce the equivalence of two DQCs to checking if they have the same TDD representation. Experiments show that embedding classical logic into conventional quantum circuits does not incur a significant time and space burden.
As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. However, there is no established baseline on which to judge current and future progress in equivalence checking of quantum circuits. In order to close this gap, we conduct a detailed case study of two of the most promising equivalence checking methodologies---one based on decision diagrams and one based on the ZX-calculus---and compare their strengths and weaknesses.
This paper concerns the problem of checking if two shallow (i.e., constant-depth) quantum circuits perform equivalent computations. Equivalence checking is a fundamental correctness question—needed, e.g., for ensuring that transformations applied to a quantum circuit do not alter its behavior. For quantum circuits, the problem is challenging because a straightforward representation on a classical computer of each circuit’s quantum state can require time and space that are exponential in the number of qubits n . The paper presents Projection-Based Equivalence Checking (PBEC), which provides decision procedures for two variants of the equivalence-checking problem. Both can be carried out on a classical computer in time and space that, for any fixed depth, is linear in n . Our key insight is that local projections can serve as constraints that fully characterize the output state of a shallow quantum circuit. The output state is the unique quantum state that satisfies all the constraints. Beyond equivalence checking, we show how to use the constraint representation to check a class of assertions, both statically and at run time. Our assertion-checking methods are sound and complete for assertions expressed as conjunctions of local projections. Our experiments showed that computing the constraint representation of a random 100-qubit 1D circuit of depth 6 takes 129.64 seconds. Equivalence checking between two random 100-qubit 1D circuits of depth 3 requires 4.46 seconds for fixed input | 0 〉 ⊗ 100 , and no more than 31.96 seconds for arbitrary inputs. Computing the constraint description for a random 100-qubit circuit of depth 3 takes 6.99 seconds for a 2D structure, compared to 10.67 seconds for a circuit with arbitrary connectivity. At depth 2, equivalence checking takes 0.20 seconds for fixed input and 0.44 seconds for arbitrary input, with similar performance for both 2D and arbitrary-connectivity circuits.