Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2309.03594

On the neutron orbital angular momentum: Has it actually been demonstrated?

W. Treimer, Frank Haußer, Suda, Martin

Published Sep 7, 2023• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a Nature LETTER [1], a control of neutron angular momentum was apparently demonstrated using a neutron crystal interferometer. In the meantime, a number of highly interesting articles have been published dealing with the n-OAM and neutron interferometry, citing [1]. We show that the interpretation of [1] having detected a n-OAM is incorrect for several serious reasons and point out inconsistencies. Based only on the theory of dynamical neutron diffraction, we calculate all the interferograms and show perfect agreement with those given in [1]. There was no need to assume an additional n-OAM because no additional effect was observed that could not be explained by standard theory.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2309.03594

Related papers

Measuring the angular momentum of a neutron using Earth's rotation

Niels Geerits, Stephan Sponar, K. Steffen +6 more

A coupling between Earth's rotation and orbital angular momentum (OAM), known as the Sagnac effect, is observed in entangled neutrons produced using a spin-echo interferometer. After correction for instrument systematics the measured coupling is within 5% of theory, with an uncertainty of 7.2%. The OAM in our setup is transverse to the propagation direction and scales linearly with neutron wavelength (4–12.75 Å), so the Sagnac coupling can be varied without mechanically rotating the device, which avoids systematic errors present in previous experiments. The detected transverse OAM of our beam corresponds to 4098 ± 295 ℏ Å − 1 , 10 5 times lower than in the previous neutron experiments. This demonstrates the feasibility of using the Sagnac effect to definitively measure neutron OAM and paves the way towards a future observation of the quantum Sagnac effect.

arXiv:2407.09307•Physical Review Research•Jan 13, 2025•5 citations

Intrinsic Orbital Angular Momentum States of Neutrons

R. L. Cappelletti, Terrence Jach, John Vinson

It has been shown that single-particle wave functions, of both photons and electrons, can be created with a phase vortex, i.e., an intrinsic orbital angular momentum (OAM). A recent experiment has claimed similar success using neutrons [C. W. Clark et al., Nature, 525, 504 (2015)NATUAS0028-083610.1038/nature15265]. We show that their results are insufficient to unambiguously demonstrate OAM, and they can be fully explained as phase contrast interference patterns. Furthermore, given the small transverse coherence length of the neutrons in the original experiment, the probability that any neutron was placed in an OAM state is vanishingly small. We highlight the importance of the relative size of the coherence length, which presents a unique challenge for neutron experiments compared to electron or photon work, and we suggest improvements for the creation of neutron OAM states.

Physical Review Letters•Mar 2, 2018•35 citations

Computerized simulation of 2-dimensional phase contrast images using spiral phase plates in neutron interferometry

W. Treimer, Frank Haußer, Martin Suda

Abstract We present calculations of interferograms (interference patterns) of one or multiple spiral phase plates that would be observed with a perfect crystal neutron interferometer of Mach–Zehnder type. A spiral phase plate (SPP) in one of the two coherent beam paths produces a twist in the phase front and thus a vortex beam with intrinsic angular momentum, which in the case of neutrons should be observed as a characteristic interference pattern that appears complementary to each other in both detectors behind the interferometer. Adding additional SPPs in one beam path of the interferometer yield interference patterns similar to that of a single SPP but only due to the cumulative step height. All simulated interferograms have been calculated on the basis of dynamical neutron diffraction without any assumption of a neutron orbital angular momentum and show very convincing agreement with experimental results from the literature, see e.g. (C. W. Clark, R. Barankov, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, and D. A. Pushin, “Controlling neutron orbital angular momentum,” Nature, vol. 525, pp. 504–506, 2015). In particular, this clarifies, that the cited experiments do not give evidence of the quantization of interactions caused by a twist of the phase front of a neutron wave in the interferometer and thus no evidence for the effect of a neutron orbital angular momentum.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Aug 17, 2024•3 citations

The Orbital Angular Momentum of Neutrons and the Operation of the Neutron Interferometer

R. L. Cappelletti, Terrence Jach, John Vinson +1 more

Physical Review Letters•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Special Nature of Orbital Angular Momentum

James D. Louck

The properties of orbital angular momentum operators are examined within the framework of the formal theory of angular momentum. It is demonstrated that the occurrence of only integral quantum numbers in the orbital theory is a consequence of the particular form of the orbital operators. Single-valuedness of the eigenfunctions need not be postulated.

American Journal of Physics•May 1, 1963•12 citations

Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics

H Rauch and S Werner

The first successful operation of a perfect crystal neutron interferometer by Rauch, Treimer and Bonse (1974) in Vienna opened up new vistas; intricate quantum mechanical concepts that could only be dealt with in thought experiments during the Einstein-Bohr era, now became accessible to direct tests in the laboratory. In the following decade, Helmut Rauch and co-workers implemented interferometric verifications of 4π spinor symmetry, up-down spin superposition and stochastic versus deterministic absorption. On the other side of the Atlantic, Colella, Overhauser and Werner (COW 1975) made the first observation of a quantal phase produced by the weak force of gravity. Samuel Werner and co-workers proceeded to observe the Sagnac, AC and scalar AB effects. The field proliferated and became the subject matter of several conferences and review articles. A book on the topic, however, was not yet available. The two stalwarts, Rauch and Werner, have now spent four painstaking years writing Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, a `yearbook' comprising 365 pages of documentation followed by a 25-page reference list. The book presents this advanced subject from the experimenter's viewpoint, in keeping with the latter half of its title, at an elementary level suitable for graduate students. For teachers and researchers, the book should serve as a ready-reference reckoner for the broad range of topics covered. The book begins by bringing out the analogy between neutron optics and photon optics, illustrated with results of milestone neutron experiments. It surveys various types of neutron interferometers, providing details of perfect crystal interferometer set-ups at ILL, MURR and NIST. All known interactions of the neutron are succinctly reviewed and their observations described. Coherence properties of neutron beams are characterized in the light of partial beam detection and post-selection experiments. An in-depth portrayal of Rauch and Werner's own experiments, whether verifying counterintuitive quantal phenomena such as the up-down spin superposition, the AC and scalar AB effects or observing phases originating from the Earth's gravitation and rotation and from longitudinal and transverse motion of the medium, is made with insight. The first experimental separation of geometric and dynamical phases as well as the observation of noncyclic phases and amplitudes are briefly touched upon. The book provides a gist of interferometric tests of quantum features ranging from linearity of the Schrodinger equation to Bell nonlocality. Applications to condensed matter physics, neutron diffraction in single crystals and various interpretations of quantum mechanics are also described. Numerous references to related fields, e.g. atom interferometry, nuclear physics, general relativity and geometric phase, have been cited for the interested reader. It is a pity that such a beautiful book is not free of blemishes. The book credits the Vienna group (1997) with a direct polarimetric(!) verification of Pauli anticommutation (p 75), though polarimetry is incapable of sensing a π phase shift implied by anticommutation. Rauch and Werner persist with the Vienna group's incorrect claims on geometric phase, made in 1990 (p 206), 1994 (pp 186, 203) and 1996 (p 15, pp 206-10). The list of neutron interferometry experiments (p 15) is known within the interference community as the USA [Uncle Sam (Werner)'s Ad]. While incorrectly including the Vienna-Berlin (1996) work as a `topological phase' observation, the list leaves out several landmark achievements of neutron interferometry. The first direct verification of Pauli anticommutation (1997) and the first observation of Pancharatnam amplitudes and phases in noncyclic evolutions (1998) are just two of the glaring omissions. The 1993 erratum (Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 250) to the Missouri-Melbourne (1992) paper (p 194) on the scalar AB effect is conspicuous by its absence. The book cites a 1999 criticism (p 204) of the neutron interferometric observation of noncyclic phases, but turns a Nelson's eye to the accompanying reply (Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2090 (1999)). Incidentally, the experiment was performed with polarized neutrons - as it ought to be - and not unpolarized neutrons, as the book states. Overhauser and Colella's classic 1974 paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 1237) - a precursor to the COW (1975) experiment proper - gets disposed of in three words (p 211) and vanishes mysteriously from the list of references. The invocation of the `Feynman-Dirac prescription' (p 215) is inappropriate. The most serious `lapse' appears in Section 8.12 (pp 268-74). Wagh and Rakhecha 1997 (p 273) were the first to derive the exact spinor evolution for polarized neutrons accelerating in uniform electric and magnetic fields, and to disprove the conclusion of Casella and Werner 1992 (p 269). Rauch and Werner's book omits to acknowledge this fact and offers `its own' explanation of the phenomenon in Figs 8.6 and 8.7, based on ideas borrowed directly from Figs 4 and 2 respectively in Wagh and Rakhecha (1997). Barring such lapses, and a number of typographical errors*, Rauch and Werner have completed their Herculean task admirably to come up with this comprehensive sourcebook on neutron interferometry and its contributions to the epistemological understanding of the quantum world. The Oxford University Press has produced the book with its customary high-quality standards. The book has a smart appearance and an attractive front cover, adorned by a famous New Yorker cartoon depicting a skizzical quantal sojourn past a tree. I have no hesitation in recommending Neutron Interferometry as a must-read book to young and old physicists and philosophers hailing from a wide spectrum of disciplines. The book has already occupied pride of place on the shelf of every practitioner of neutron interferometry. So happy reading, experimenters and theoreticians - and happier interfering! Apoorva G Wagh *Use of the symbol δ to represent a partial differential (pp 2, 21), the incorrect sign for a power of 10 in Table 1.2 (p 3), a value close to unity cited for 1 - n (p 8), the word charge(s) misprinted as `change(s)' (p 193) and missing exponents ½ and 2 in Eqs (7.49) and (7.51) respectively (p 242) provide a random sample of the typographical errors in the book.

Measurement Science and Technology•Feb 16, 2001•83 citations
In a Nature LETTER [1], a control of neutron angular momentum was apparently demonstrated using a neutron crystal interferometer. In the meantime, a number of highly interesting articles have been published dealing with the n-OAM and neutron interferometry, citing [1]. We show that the interpretation of [1] having detected a n-OAM is incorrect for several serious reasons and point out inconsistencies. Based only on the theory of dynamical neutron diffraction, we calculate all the interferograms and show perfect agreement with those given in [1]. There was no need to assume an additional n-OAM because no additional effect was observed that could not be explained by standard theory.
A coupling between Earth's rotation and orbital angular momentum (OAM), known as the Sagnac effect, is observed in entangled neutrons produced using a spin-echo interferometer. After correction for instrument systematics the measured coupling is within 5% of theory, with an uncertainty of 7.2%. The OAM in our setup is transverse to the propagation direction and scales linearly with neutron wavelength (4–12.75 Å), so the Sagnac coupling can be varied without mechanically rotating the device, which avoids systematic errors present in previous experiments. The detected transverse OAM of our beam corresponds to 4098 ± 295 ℏ Å − 1 , 10 5 times lower than in the previous neutron experiments. This demonstrates the feasibility of using the Sagnac effect to definitively measure neutron OAM and paves the way towards a future observation of the quantum Sagnac effect.
It has been shown that single-particle wave functions, of both photons and electrons, can be created with a phase vortex, i.e., an intrinsic orbital angular momentum (OAM). A recent experiment has claimed similar success using neutrons [C. W. Clark et al., Nature, 525, 504 (2015)NATUAS0028-083610.1038/nature15265]. We show that their results are insufficient to unambiguously demonstrate OAM, and they can be fully explained as phase contrast interference patterns. Furthermore, given the small transverse coherence length of the neutrons in the original experiment, the probability that any neutron was placed in an OAM state is vanishingly small. We highlight the importance of the relative size of the coherence length, which presents a unique challenge for neutron experiments compared to electron or photon work, and we suggest improvements for the creation of neutron OAM states.
Abstract We present calculations of interferograms (interference patterns) of one or multiple spiral phase plates that would be observed with a perfect crystal neutron interferometer of Mach–Zehnder type. A spiral phase plate (SPP) in one of the two coherent beam paths produces a twist in the phase front and thus a vortex beam with intrinsic angular momentum, which in the case of neutrons should be observed as a characteristic interference pattern that appears complementary to each other in both detectors behind the interferometer. Adding additional SPPs in one beam path of the interferometer yield interference patterns similar to that of a single SPP but only due to the cumulative step height. All simulated interferograms have been calculated on the basis of dynamical neutron diffraction without any assumption of a neutron orbital angular momentum and show very convincing agreement with experimental results from the literature, see e.g. (C. W. Clark, R. Barankov, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, and D. A. Pushin, “Controlling neutron orbital angular momentum,” Nature, vol. 525, pp. 504–506, 2015). In particular, this clarifies, that the cited experiments do not give evidence of the quantization of interactions caused by a twist of the phase front of a neutron wave in the interferometer and thus no evidence for the effect of a neutron orbital angular momentum.
The first successful operation of a perfect crystal neutron interferometer by Rauch, Treimer and Bonse (1974) in Vienna opened up new vistas; intricate quantum mechanical concepts that could only be dealt with in thought experiments during the Einstein-Bohr era, now became accessible to direct tests in the laboratory. In the following decade, Helmut Rauch and co-workers implemented interferometric verifications of 4π spinor symmetry, up-down spin superposition and stochastic versus deterministic absorption. On the other side of the Atlantic, Colella, Overhauser and Werner (COW 1975) made the first observation of a quantal phase produced by the weak force of gravity. Samuel Werner and co-workers proceeded to observe the Sagnac, AC and scalar AB effects. The field proliferated and became the subject matter of several conferences and review articles. A book on the topic, however, was not yet available. The two stalwarts, Rauch and Werner, have now spent four painstaking years writing Neutron Interferometry: Lessons in Experimental Quantum Mechanics, a `yearbook' comprising 365 pages of documentation followed by a 25-page reference list. The book presents this advanced subject from the experimenter's viewpoint, in keeping with the latter half of its title, at an elementary level suitable for graduate students. For teachers and researchers, the book should serve as a ready-reference reckoner for the broad range of topics covered. The book begins by bringing out the analogy between neutron optics and photon optics, illustrated with results of milestone neutron experiments. It surveys various types of neutron interferometers, providing details of perfect crystal interferometer set-ups at ILL, MURR and NIST. All known interactions of the neutron are succinctly reviewed and their observations described. Coherence properties of neutron beams are characterized in the light of partial beam detection and post-selection experiments. An in-depth portrayal of Rauch and Werner's own experiments, whether verifying counterintuitive quantal phenomena such as the up-down spin superposition, the AC and scalar AB effects or observing phases originating from the Earth's gravitation and rotation and from longitudinal and transverse motion of the medium, is made with insight. The first experimental separation of geometric and dynamical phases as well as the observation of noncyclic phases and amplitudes are briefly touched upon. The book provides a gist of interferometric tests of quantum features ranging from linearity of the Schrodinger equation to Bell nonlocality. Applications to condensed matter physics, neutron diffraction in single crystals and various interpretations of quantum mechanics are also described. Numerous references to related fields, e.g. atom interferometry, nuclear physics, general relativity and geometric phase, have been cited for the interested reader. It is a pity that such a beautiful book is not free of blemishes. The book credits the Vienna group (1997) with a direct polarimetric(!) verification of Pauli anticommutation (p 75), though polarimetry is incapable of sensing a π phase shift implied by anticommutation. Rauch and Werner persist with the Vienna group's incorrect claims on geometric phase, made in 1990 (p 206), 1994 (pp 186, 203) and 1996 (p 15, pp 206-10). The list of neutron interferometry experiments (p 15) is known within the interference community as the USA [Uncle Sam (Werner)'s Ad]. While incorrectly including the Vienna-Berlin (1996) work as a `topological phase' observation, the list leaves out several landmark achievements of neutron interferometry. The first direct verification of Pauli anticommutation (1997) and the first observation of Pancharatnam amplitudes and phases in noncyclic evolutions (1998) are just two of the glaring omissions. The 1993 erratum (Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 250) to the Missouri-Melbourne (1992) paper (p 194) on the scalar AB effect is conspicuous by its absence. The book cites a 1999 criticism (p 204) of the neutron interferometric observation of noncyclic phases, but turns a Nelson's eye to the accompanying reply (Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 2090 (1999)). Incidentally, the experiment was performed with polarized neutrons - as it ought to be - and not unpolarized neutrons, as the book states. Overhauser and Colella's classic 1974 paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 1237) - a precursor to the COW (1975) experiment proper - gets disposed of in three words (p 211) and vanishes mysteriously from the list of references. The invocation of the `Feynman-Dirac prescription' (p 215) is inappropriate. The most serious `lapse' appears in Section 8.12 (pp 268-74). Wagh and Rakhecha 1997 (p 273) were the first to derive the exact spinor evolution for polarized neutrons accelerating in uniform electric and magnetic fields, and to disprove the conclusion of Casella and Werner 1992 (p 269). Rauch and Werner's book omits to acknowledge this fact and offers `its own' explanation of the phenomenon in Figs 8.6 and 8.7, based on ideas borrowed directly from Figs 4 and 2 respectively in Wagh and Rakhecha (1997). Barring such lapses, and a number of typographical errors*, Rauch and Werner have completed their Herculean task admirably to come up with this comprehensive sourcebook on neutron interferometry and its contributions to the epistemological understanding of the quantum world. The Oxford University Press has produced the book with its customary high-quality standards. The book has a smart appearance and an attractive front cover, adorned by a famous New Yorker cartoon depicting a skizzical quantal sojourn past a tree. I have no hesitation in recommending Neutron Interferometry as a must-read book to young and old physicists and philosophers hailing from a wide spectrum of disciplines. The book has already occupied pride of place on the shelf of every practitioner of neutron interferometry. So happy reading, experimenters and theoreticians - and happier interfering! Apoorva G Wagh *Use of the symbol δ to represent a partial differential (pp 2, 21), the incorrect sign for a power of 10 in Table 1.2 (p 3), a value close to unity cited for 1 - n (p 8), the word charge(s) misprinted as `change(s)' (p 193) and missing exponents ½ and 2 in Eqs (7.49) and (7.51) respectively (p 242) provide a random sample of the typographical errors in the book.