© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:2308.07609 · Symmetry

Three Alternative Model-Building Strategies Using Quasi-Hermitian Time-Dependent Observables

Miloslav Znojil

Published Aug 17, 2023• 1 citation

Abstract

In the conventional (so-called Schrödinger-picture) formulation of quantum theory the operators of observables are chosen self-adjoint and time-independent. In the recent innovation of the theory, the operators can be not only non-Hermitian but also time-dependent. The formalism (called non-Hermitian interaction-picture, NIP) requires a separate description of the evolution of the time-dependent states ψ(t) (using Schrödinger-type equations) as well as of the time-dependent observables Λj(t), j=1,2,…,K (using Heisenberg-type equations). In the unitary-evolution dynamical regime of our interest, both of the respective generators of the evolution (viz., in our notation, the Schrödingerian generator G(t) and the Heisenbergian generator Σ(t)) have, in general, complex spectra. Only the spectrum of their superposition remains real. Thus, only the observable superposition H(t)=G(t)+Σ(t) (representing the instantaneous energies) should be called Hamiltonian. In applications, nevertheless, the mathematically consistent models can be based not only on the initial knowledge of the energy operator H(t) (forming a “dynamical” model-building strategy) but also, alternatively, on the knowledge of the Coriolis force Σ(t) (forming a “kinematical” model-building strategy), or on the initial knowledge of the Schrödingerian generator G(t) (forming, for some reason, one of the most popular strategies in the literature). In our present paper, every such choice (marked as “one”, “two” or “three”, respectively) is shown to lead to a construction recipe with a specific range of applicability.

DOI: 10.3390/sym15081596

Related papers

Non-Stationary Non-Hermitian “Wrong-Sign” Quantum Oscillators and Their Meaningful Physical Interpretation

Miloslav Znojil

In the framework of quantum mechanics using quasi-Hermitian operators the standard unitary evolution of a non-stationary but still closed quantum system is only properly described in the non-Hermitian interaction picture (NIP). In this formulation of the theory both the states and the observables vary with time. A few aspects of implementation of this picture are illustrated via the "wrong-sign" quartic oscillators. It is shown that in contrast to the widespread belief, both of the related Schrödinger-equation generators G(t) and the Heisenberg-equation generators Σ(t) are just auxiliary concepts. Their spectra are phenomenologically irrelevant and, in general, complex. It is argued that only the sum H(t)=G(t)+Σ(t) of the latter operators retains the standard physical meaning of the instantaneous energy of the unitary quantum system in question.

arXiv:2304.07103•Entropy•Apr 19, 2023•4 citations

Quasi-Hermitian Formulation of Quantum Mechanics Using Two Conjugate Schrödinger Equations

Miloslav Znojil

To the existing list of alternative formulations of quantum mechanics, a new version of the non-Hermitian interaction picture is added. What is new is that, in contrast to the more conventional non-Hermitian model-building recipes, the primary information about the observable phenomena is provided not only by the Hamiltonian but also by an additional operator with a real spectrum (say, R(t)) representing another observable. In the language of physics, the information carried by R(t)≠R†(t) opens the possibility of reaching the exceptional-point degeneracy of the real eigenvalues, i.e., a specific quantum phase transition. In parallel, the unitarity of the system remains guaranteed, as usual, via a time-dependent inner-product metric Θ(t). From the point of view of mathematics, the control of evolution is provided by a pair of conjugate Schrödiner equations. This opens the possibility od an innovative dyadic representation of pure states, by which the direct use of Θ(t) is made redundant. The implementation of the formalism is illustrated via a schematic cosmological toy model in which the canonical quantization leads to the necessity of working with two conjugate Wheeler-DeWitt equations. From the point of view of physics, the “kinematical input” operator R(t) may represent either the radius of a homogeneous and isotropic expanding empty Universe or, if you wish, its Hubble radius, or the scale factor a(t) emerging in the popular Lemaitre-Friedmann-Robertson-Walker classical solutions, with the exceptional-point singularity of the spectrum of R(t) mimicking the birth of the Universe (“Big Bang”) at t=0.

arXiv:2306.12179•Axioms•Jun 28, 2023•7 citations

Composite Quantum Coriolis Forces

Miloslav Znojil

In a consistent quantum theory known as “non-Hermitian interaction picture” (NIP), the standard quantum Coriolis operator Σ(t) emerges whenever the observables of a unitary system are given in their quasi-Hermitian and non-stationary rather than “usual” representations. With Σ(t) needed, in NIP, in both the Schrödinger-like and Heisenberg-like dynamical evolution equations we show that another, amended and potentially simplified theory can be based on an auxiliary N−term factorization of the Dyson’s Hermitization map Ω(t). The knowledge of this factorization is shown to lead to a multiplet of alternative eligible Coriolis forces Σn(t) with n=0,1,…,N. The related formulae for the measurable predictions constitute a new formalism refered to as “factorization-based non-Hermitian interaction picture” (FNIP). The conventional NIP formalism (where N=1) becomes complemented by an (N−1)-plet of its innovative “hybrid” alternatives. Some of the respective ad hoc adaptations of observables may result in an optimal representation of quantum dynamics.

arXiv:2303.04263•Mathematics•Mar 12, 2023•10 citations

Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics I: Instantaneous Self-Energy

Lingfeng Liu, Wei-Wei Yang, Jiangping Hu +1 more

Starting from the unitary evolution of a closed quantum system, we rigorously demonstrate that the projection of the global wavefunction onto an arbitrary local subsystem is governed by an exact, time-dependent non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation. Crucially, the derivation does not rely on conventional approximations such as the Born approximation, the Markov approximation, or the wide-band limit. The central quantity is the \textit{instantaneous self-energy}, a time-dependent and generally non-Hermitian operator that encodes environmental backaction and, together with the subsystem Hamiltonian, forms the exact time-local generator of the projected dynamics. By benchmarking the conventional non-Hermitian approximation against this exact framework, we systematically expose its limitations. These results provide a rigorous microscopic foundation for the emergence of effective non-Hermitian dynamics in quantum systems.

arXiv:2609.23426•Sep 20, 2026•0 citations

On the pseudo-Hermitian invariant method for the time-dependent Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Boubakeur Khantoul, Abdelhafid Bounames, Mustapha Maamache

We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators $H(t)$ that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators $I_{PH}(t)$ that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore, $H(t)$ is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but $I_{PH}(t)$ obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.

•Oct 28, 2016•3 citations

Alternative Formulations

Bernard d’Espagnat

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

In the conventional (so-called Schrödinger-picture) formulation of quantum theory the operators of observables are chosen self-adjoint and time-independent. In the recent innovation of the theory, the operators can be not only non-Hermitian but also time-dependent. The formalism (called non-Hermitian interaction-picture, NIP) requires a separate description of the evolution of the time-dependent states ψ(t) (using Schrödinger-type equations) as well as of the time-dependent observables Λj(t), j=1,2,…,K (using Heisenberg-type equations). In the unitary-evolution dynamical regime of our interest, both of the respective generators of the evolution (viz., in our notation, the Schrödingerian generator G(t) and the Heisenbergian generator Σ(t)) have, in general, complex spectra. Only the spectrum of their superposition remains real. Thus, only the observable superposition H(t)=G(t)+Σ(t) (representing the instantaneous energies) should be called Hamiltonian. In applications, nevertheless, the mathematically consistent models can be based not only on the initial knowledge of the energy operator H(t) (forming a “dynamical” model-building strategy) but also, alternatively, on the knowledge of the Coriolis force Σ(t) (forming a “kinematical” model-building strategy), or on the initial knowledge of the Schrödingerian generator G(t) (forming, for some reason, one of the most popular strategies in the literature). In our present paper, every such choice (marked as “one”, “two” or “three”, respectively) is shown to lead to a construction recipe with a specific range of applicability.

In the framework of quantum mechanics using quasi-Hermitian operators the standard unitary evolution of a non-stationary but still closed quantum system is only properly described in the non-Hermitian interaction picture (NIP). In this formulation of the theory both the states and the observables vary with time. A few aspects of implementation of this picture are illustrated via the "wrong-sign" quartic oscillators. It is shown that in contrast to the widespread belief, both of the related Schrödinger-equation generators G(t) and the Heisenberg-equation generators Σ(t) are just auxiliary concepts. Their spectra are phenomenologically irrelevant and, in general, complex. It is argued that only the sum H(t)=G(t)+Σ(t) of the latter operators retains the standard physical meaning of the instantaneous energy of the unitary quantum system in question.

To the existing list of alternative formulations of quantum mechanics, a new version of the non-Hermitian interaction picture is added. What is new is that, in contrast to the more conventional non-Hermitian model-building recipes, the primary information about the observable phenomena is provided not only by the Hamiltonian but also by an additional operator with a real spectrum (say, R(t)) representing another observable. In the language of physics, the information carried by R(t)≠R†(t) opens the possibility of reaching the exceptional-point degeneracy of the real eigenvalues, i.e., a specific quantum phase transition. In parallel, the unitarity of the system remains guaranteed, as usual, via a time-dependent inner-product metric Θ(t). From the point of view of mathematics, the control of evolution is provided by a pair of conjugate Schrödiner equations. This opens the possibility od an innovative dyadic representation of pure states, by which the direct use of Θ(t) is made redundant. The implementation of the formalism is illustrated via a schematic cosmological toy model in which the canonical quantization leads to the necessity of working with two conjugate Wheeler-DeWitt equations. From the point of view of physics, the “kinematical input” operator R(t) may represent either the radius of a homogeneous and isotropic expanding empty Universe or, if you wish, its Hubble radius, or the scale factor a(t) emerging in the popular Lemaitre-Friedmann-Robertson-Walker classical solutions, with the exceptional-point singularity of the spectrum of R(t) mimicking the birth of the Universe (“Big Bang”) at t=0.

In a consistent quantum theory known as “non-Hermitian interaction picture” (NIP), the standard quantum Coriolis operator Σ(t) emerges whenever the observables of a unitary system are given in their quasi-Hermitian and non-stationary rather than “usual” representations. With Σ(t) needed, in NIP, in both the Schrödinger-like and Heisenberg-like dynamical evolution equations we show that another, amended and potentially simplified theory can be based on an auxiliary N−term factorization of the Dyson’s Hermitization map Ω(t). The knowledge of this factorization is shown to lead to a multiplet of alternative eligible Coriolis forces Σn(t) with n=0,1,…,N. The related formulae for the measurable predictions constitute a new formalism refered to as “factorization-based non-Hermitian interaction picture” (FNIP). The conventional NIP formalism (where N=1) becomes complemented by an (N−1)-plet of its innovative “hybrid” alternatives. Some of the respective ad hoc adaptations of observables may result in an optimal representation of quantum dynamics.

Starting from the unitary evolution of a closed quantum system, we rigorously demonstrate that the projection of the global wavefunction onto an arbitrary local subsystem is governed by an exact, time-dependent non-Hermitian Schrödinger equation. Crucially, the derivation does not rely on conventional approximations such as the Born approximation, the Markov approximation, or the wide-band limit. The central quantity is the \textit{instantaneous self-energy}, a time-dependent and generally non-Hermitian operator that encodes environmental backaction and, together with the subsystem Hamiltonian, forms the exact time-local generator of the projected dynamics. By benchmarking the conventional non-Hermitian approximation against this exact framework, we systematically expose its limitations. These results provide a rigorous microscopic foundation for the emergence of effective non-Hermitian dynamics in quantum systems.

We propose a scheme to deal with certain time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian operators

H(t)

that generate a real phase in their time-evolution. This involves the use of invariant operators

I_{PH}(t)

that are pseudo-Hermitian with respect to the time-dependent metric operator and which implies that the dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. Furthermore,

H(t)

is not generally quasi-Hermitian and does not define an observable of the system but

I_{PH}(t)

obeys a quasi-hermiticity transformation as in the completely time-independent Hamiltonian systems case. The harmonic oscillator with a time-dependent frequency under the action of a complex time-dependent linear potential is considered as an illustrative example.

The description of the time evolution of systems is technically known as the "Schrodinger picture." An important alternative description is the "Heisenberg picture," which indeed was the one Heisenberg used when he first formulated quantum mechanics. The Schrodinger and Heisenberg pictures represent two different but equivalent sets of rules. In other words, when applied to a given physical situation they lead to the same observable predictions. In some respects, the Heisenberg picture presents definite technical advantages. It is particularly convenient, for instance, in quantum field theory. The chapter discusses work consistently with the equivalent Schrodinger set of rules. For this reason, it describes briefly the Heisenberg formulation. The chapter shows that the expressions used in the Schrodinger picture can be carried over to the Heisenberg picture. It implies, however, that the kets associated with the possible values that can be found upon measurement of an observable are themselves time-dependent kets.