Quantum annealers are specialized quantum computers for solving combinatorial optimization problems with special quantum computing characteristics, e.g., superposition and entanglement. Theoretically, quantum annealers can outperform classic computers. However, current quantum annealers are constrained by a limited number of qubits and cannot demonstrate quantum advantages. Nonetheless, research is needed to develop novel mechanisms to formulate combinatorial optimization problems for quantum annealing (QA). However, QA applications in software engineering remain unexplored. Thus, we propose BootQA , the very first effort at solving test case minimization (TCM) problems on classical software with QA. We provide a novel TCM formulation for QA and utilize bootstrap sampling to optimize the qubit usage. We also implemented our TCM formulation in three other optimization processes: simulated annealing (SA), QA without problem decomposition, and QA with an existing D-Wave problem decomposition strategy, and conducted an empirical evaluation with three real-world TCM datasets. Results show that BootQA outperforms QA without problem decomposition and QA with the existing decomposition strategy regarding effectiveness. Moreover, BootQA ’s effectiveness is similar to SA. Finally, BootQA has higher efficiency in terms of time when solving large TCM problems than the other three optimization processes.
Quantum annealers are specialized quantum computers for solving combinatorial optimization problems with special quantum computing characteristics, e.g., superposition and entanglement. Theoretically, quantum annealers can outperform classic computers. However, current quantum annealers are constrained by a limited number of qubits and cannot demonstrate quantum advantages. Nonetheless, research is needed to develop novel mechanisms to formulate combinatorial optimization problems for quantum annealing (QA). However, QA applications in software engineering remain unexplored. Thus, we propose BootQA , the very first effort at solving test case minimization (TCM) problems on classical software with QA. We provide a novel TCM formulation for QA and utilize bootstrap sampling to optimize the qubit usage. We also implemented our TCM formulation in three other optimization processes: simulated annealing (SA), QA without problem decomposition, and QA with an existing D-Wave problem decomposition strategy, and conducted an empirical evaluation with three real-world TCM datasets. Results show that BootQA outperforms QA without problem decomposition and QA with the existing decomposition strategy regarding effectiveness. Moreover, BootQA ’s effectiveness is similar to SA. Finally, BootQA has higher efficiency in terms of time when solving large TCM problems than the other three optimization processes.
Test case optimization (TCO) reduces the software testing cost while preserving its effectiveness. However, to solve TCO problems for large-scale and complex software systems, substantial computational resources are required. Quantum approximate optimization algorithms (QAOAs) are promising combinatorial optimization algorithms that rely on quantum computational resources, with the potential to offer increased efficiency compared to classical approaches. Several proof-of-concept applications of QAOAs for solving combinatorial problems, such as portfolio optimization, energy optimization in power systems, and job scheduling, have been proposed. Given the lack of investigation into QAOA's application for TCO problems, and motivated by the computational challenges of TCO problems and the potential of QAOAs, we present IGDec-QAOA to formulate a TCO problem as a QAOA problem and solve it on both ideal and noisy quantum computer simulators, as well as on a real quantum computer. To solve bigger TCO problems that require many qubits, which are unavailable these days, we integrate a problem decomposition strategy with the QAOA. We performed an empirical evaluation with five TCO problems and four publicly available industrial datasets from ABB, Google, and Orona to compare various configurations of IGDec-QAOA, assess its decomposition strategy of handling large datasets, and compare its performance with classical algorithms (i.e., Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Random Search). Based on the evaluation results achieved on an ideal simulator, we recommend the best configuration of our approach for TCO problems. Also, we demonstrate that our approach can reach the same effectiveness as GA and outperform GA in two out of five test case optimization problems we conducted. In addition, we observe that, on the noisy simulator, IGDec-QAOA achieved similar performance to that from the ideal simulator. Finally, we also demonstrate the feasibility of IGDec-QAOA on a real quantum computer in the presence of noise.
Quantum computing offers the potential to address complex computational challenges, particularly in areas such as simulation and optimisation. Despite this promise, current gate-based quantum devices remain limited in scale and reliability, constraining their practical use. In this context, quantum annealing (QA) emerges as a viable and currently accessible alternative for solving optimisation problems, as it employs adiabatic quantum evolution to efficiently explore large and complex search spaces. This makes it a natural candidate for search-based software testing in the Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) domain, which demands effective test cases due to their complexity and combination of continuous and discrete domains. This work explores the use of quantum annealing to enhance test case generation for CPS through a mutation-based approach. We employ quantum annealing to identify areas on test cases that can be improved and apply mutations to those areas. We encode test case mutation as a binary optimisation problem, and use quantum annealing to identify and target critical regions of the test cases for improvement. Our approach mechanises this process into an algorithm that uses D-Wave’s quantum annealer to find the solution. As a main contribution, we offer insights into how quantum annealing can advance testing methodologies by empirically evaluating the correlation between problem size, hardware limitations, and the effectiveness of the results. Moreover, we compare the proposed method against state-of-the-art classical optimisation algorithms, targeting efficiency (time to generate test cases) and effectiveness (fault detection rates). Our results indicate that quantum annealing may enable faster test case generation (when problem decomposition, sampling and scheduling strategies are applied) while achieving comparable fault detection performance to state-of-the-art alternatives.
A combinatorial optimization problem (COP) is the problem of finding the optimal solution in a finite set. When the size of the feasible solution set is large, the complexity of the problem increases, and it is not easy to solve in a reasonable time with the current classical computer technology. Quantum annealing (QA) is a method that replaces classical simulated annealing (SA) methods that do not solve these cases. Therefore, several attempts have been made to solve this problem using a special-purpose quantum annealer to which the QA method is applied. In this survey, we analyze recent studies that solve real-scale COPs using quantum annealers. Through this, we discuss how to reduce the size of the COP to be input to overcome the hardware limitations of the existing quantum annealer. Additionally, we demonstrated the applicability of quantum annealer to COP on a practical scale by comparing and analyzing the results of the classical simulated annealing (SA) and QA method from each study.
Critical decision-making issues in science, engineering, and industry are based on combinatorial optimization; however, its application is inherently limited by the NP-hard nature of the problem. A specialized paradigm of analogue quantum computing, quantum annealing (QA), has been proposed to solve these problems by encoding optimization problems into physical energy landscapes and solving them by quantum tunnelling systematically through exploration of solution space. This is a critical review that summarizes the current applications of quantum annealing to combinatorial optimization and includes a theoretical background, hardware designs, algorithm implementation strategies, encoding and embedding schemes, protocols to benchmark quantum annealing, areas of implementation, and links with the quantum algorithms implementation with gate-based hardware and classical solvers. We develop a unified framework, relating adiabatic quantum dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to modern flux-qubit annealers (Chimera, Pegasus, Zephyr topologies), and emergent architectures (Lechner-Hauke-Zoller systems, Rydberg atom platforms), and hybrids of quantum and classical computation. Through our analysis, we find that overhead in embedding and encoding is the largest determinant of the scalability and performance (this is not just the number of qubits). Minor embeddings also usually have a physical qubit count per logical variable of between 5 and 12 qubits, which limits effective problem capacity by 80-92% and, due to chain-breaking errors, compromises the quality of solutions.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.
Combinatorial optimization is a foundation of numerous scientific, industrial, and social decision-making questions, but its usefulness is mostly restricted by the exponential complexity of the problem of classical computability. The quantum annealing (QA) has become one of the leading analogue quantum systems to address such problems, whereby optimization problems are converted into physical energy structures and quantum fluctuations are utilized to perform systematic exploration. It provides a critical, synthesized, and comprehensive review of quantum annealing as applied to combinatorial optimization, including the theoretical basis, hardware designs, algorithm methods, issues of embedding and encoding, benchmarking procedures, applications, and integration with quantum algorithms based on gates and solvers on a classical computer. We build a comprehensive taxonomy between adiabatic dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to state-of-the-art flux-qubit annealers, new architectures, and hybrid quantum classical pipelines. We show that the overhead of embedding and encoding and the benchmarking approach taken are the most significant factors in determining scalability and performance, but not the raw number of qubits. Transportation, energy systems, robotics, finance, pharmacological discovery, and machine learning are just some examples of the domain-specific case studies that use QA with minimal empirical utility as a hybrid refinement engine and not an independent solver. Moreover, we introduce a stringent evaluation of the existing benchmarking culture, clarify the causal links between QA and QAOA as well as between VQE and structural predicaments, and reveal the institutional roots of the existing restrictions. We conclude by identifying a research roadmap in the future, focusing on the annealing hardness characterization, Stoquastic control manipulation, embedding rules automation, architecture design, and development of principled quantum advantage. It creates a benchmark reference to those in the field and research and deployment of scalable, reliable, and application-relevant quantum optimization