Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2308.02252

Measurement incompatibility cannot be stochastically distilled

Huan-Yu Ku, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Costantino Budroni

Published Aug 4, 2023• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We show that the incompatibility of a set of measurements cannot be increased by subjecting them to a filter, namely, by combining them with a device that post-selects the incoming states on a fixed outcome of a stochastic transformation. This result holds for several measures of incompatibility, such as those based on robustness and convex weight. Expanding these ideas to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering experiments, we are able to solve the problem of the maximum steerability obtained with respect to the most general local filters in a way that allows for an explicit calculation of the filter operation. Moreover, our results generalize to nonphysical maps, i.e., positive but not completely positive linear maps.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2308.02252

Related papers

No-go theorems on probabilistically enhancing measurement incompatibility’s advantages

Huan-Yu Ku, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Costantino Budroni

Abstract We show that the quantum advantages arising from incompatibility of a set of measurements cannot be enhanced by subjecting them to a filter, namely, by combining them with a device that post-selects the incoming states on a fixed outcome of a stochastic transformation. This result holds for several measures of incompatibility, such as those based on robustness and convex weight. As an application, we show that, for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, our no-go results determine the maximum steerability attainable under the most general local filters, together with an explicit expression for the optimal filter. Moreover, our results generalize to nonphysical maps, i.e., positive but not completely positive linear maps.

npj Quantum Information•May 20, 2026•1 citation

Characterisation and fundamental limitations of irreversible stochastic steering distillation

Chung-Yun Hsieh, Huan-Yu Ku, Costantino Budroni

Steering resources, central for quantum advantages in one-sided device-independent quantum information tasks, can be enhanced via local filters. Recently, reversible steering conversion under local filters has been fully characterised. Here, we solve the problem in the irreversible scenario, which leads to a complete understanding of stochastic steering distillation. This result also provides an operational interpretation of the max-relative entropy as the optimal filter success probability. We further show that all steering measures can be used to quantify measurement incompatibility in certain stochastic steering distillation scenarios. Finally, for a broad class of steering robustness measures, we show that their maximally achievable values in stochastic steering distillation are always upper bounded by different types of incompatibility robustness measures. Hence, measurement incompatibility sets the fundamental limitations for stochastic steering distillation.

arXiv:2309.06191•Sep 12, 2023•4 citations

Complete classification of steerability under local filters and its relation with measurement incompatibility

Huan-Yu Ku, Chung-Yun Hsieh, Shin-Liang Chen +2 more

Quantum steering is a central resource for one-sided device-independent quantum information. It is manipulated via one-way local operations and classical communication, such as local filtering on the trusted party. Here, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for a steering assemblage to be transformable into another via local filtering. We characterize the equivalence classes with respect to filters in terms of the steering equivalent observables (SEO), first proposed to connect the problem of steerability and measurement incompatibility. We provide an efficient method to compute the extractable steerability that is maximal via local filters and show that it coincides with the incompatibility of the SEO. Moreover, we show that there always exists a bipartite state that provides an assemblage with steerability equal to the incompatibility of the measurements on the untrusted party. Finally, we investigate the optimal success probability and rates for transformation protocols (distillation and dilution) in the single-shot scenario together with examples.

arXiv:2201.07691•Nature Communications•Aug 25, 2022•41 citations

Most incompatible measurements for robust steering tests

Jessica Bavaresco, Marco Túlio Quintino, Leonardo Guerini +3 more

We address the problem of characterizing the steerability of quantum states under restrictive measurement scenarios, i.e., the problem of determining whether a quantum state can demonstrate steering when subjected to $N$ measurements of $k$ outcomes. We consider the cases of either general positive operator-valued measures (POVMs) or specific kinds of measurements (e.g., projective or symmetric). We propose general methods to calculate lower and upper bounds for the white-noise robustness of a $d$-dimensional quantum state under different measurement scenarios that are also applicable to the study of the noise robustness of the incompatibility of sets of unknown qudit measurements. We show that some mutually unbiased bases, symmetric informationally complete measurements, and other symmetric choices of measurements are not optimal for steering the isotropic states and provide candidates for the most incompatible sets of measurements in each case. Finally, we provide numerical evidence that nonprojective POVMs do not improve over projective ones for this task.

arXiv:1704.02994•Physical Review A•Aug 7, 2017•50 citations

Measurement incompatibility and Schrödinger-Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering in a class of probabilistic theories

Manik Banik

Steering is one of the most counter intuitive non-classical features of bipartite quantum system, first noticed by Schrödinger at the early days of quantum theory. On the other hand, measurement incompatibility is another non-classical feature of quantum theory, initially pointed out by Bohr. Recently, Quintino et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160402 (2014)] and Uola et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160403 (2014)] have investigated the relation between these two distinct non-classical features. They have shown that a set of measurements is not jointly measurable (i.e., incompatible) if and only if they can be used for demonstrating Schrödinger-Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. The concept of steering has been generalized for more general abstract tensor product theories rather than just Hilbert space quantum mechanics. In this article, we discuss that the notion of measurement incompatibility can be extended for general probability theories. Further, we show that the connection between steering and measurement incompatibility holds in a border class of tensor product theories rather than just quantum theory.

arXiv:1502.05779•Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2015•35 citations

Noise robustness of the incompatibility of quantum measurements

Teiko Heinosaari, Jukka Kiukas, Daniel Reitzner

The existence of incompatible measurements is a fundamental phenomenon having no explanation in classical physics. Intuitively, one considers given measurements to be incompatible within a framework of a physical theory, if their simultaneous implementation on a single physical device is prohibited by the theory itself. In the mathematical language of quantum theory, measurements are described by POVMs (positive operator valued measures), and given POVMs are by definition incompatible if they cannot be obtained via coarse-graining from a single common POVM; this notion generalizes noncommutativity of projective measurements. In quantum theory, incompatibility can be regarded as a resource necessary for manifesting phenomena such as Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality violations or Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering which do not have classical explanation. We define operational ways of quantifying this resource via the amount of added classical noise needed to render the measurements compatible, i.e., useless as a resource. In analogy to entanglement measures, we generalize this idea by introducing the concept of incompatibility measure, which is monotone in local operations. In this paper, we restrict our consideration to binary measurements, which are already sufficient to explicitly demonstrate nontrivial features of the theory. In particular, we construct a family of incompatibility monotones operationally quantifying violations of certain scaled versions of the CHSH Bell inequality, prove that they can be computed via a semidefinite program, and show how the noise-based quantities arise as special cases. We also determine maximal violations of the new inequalities, demonstrating how Tsirelson's bound appears as a special case. The resource aspect is further motivated by simple quantum protocols where our incompatibility monotones appear as relevant figures of merit.

arXiv:1501.04554•Physical Review A•Aug 17, 2015•86 citations
We show that the incompatibility of a set of measurements cannot be increased by subjecting them to a filter, namely, by combining them with a device that post-selects the incoming states on a fixed outcome of a stochastic transformation. This result holds for several measures of incompatibility, such as those based on robustness and convex weight. Expanding these ideas to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering experiments, we are able to solve the problem of the maximum steerability obtained with respect to the most general local filters in a way that allows for an explicit calculation of the filter operation. Moreover, our results generalize to nonphysical maps, i.e., positive but not completely positive linear maps.
Abstract We show that the quantum advantages arising from incompatibility of a set of measurements cannot be enhanced by subjecting them to a filter, namely, by combining them with a device that post-selects the incoming states on a fixed outcome of a stochastic transformation. This result holds for several measures of incompatibility, such as those based on robustness and convex weight. As an application, we show that, for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, our no-go results determine the maximum steerability attainable under the most general local filters, together with an explicit expression for the optimal filter. Moreover, our results generalize to nonphysical maps, i.e., positive but not completely positive linear maps.
Steering resources, central for quantum advantages in one-sided device-independent quantum information tasks, can be enhanced via local filters. Recently, reversible steering conversion under local filters has been fully characterised. Here, we solve the problem in the irreversible scenario, which leads to a complete understanding of stochastic steering distillation. This result also provides an operational interpretation of the max-relative entropy as the optimal filter success probability. We further show that all steering measures can be used to quantify measurement incompatibility in certain stochastic steering distillation scenarios. Finally, for a broad class of steering robustness measures, we show that their maximally achievable values in stochastic steering distillation are always upper bounded by different types of incompatibility robustness measures. Hence, measurement incompatibility sets the fundamental limitations for stochastic steering distillation.
Quantum steering is a central resource for one-sided device-independent quantum information. It is manipulated via one-way local operations and classical communication, such as local filtering on the trusted party. Here, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for a steering assemblage to be transformable into another via local filtering. We characterize the equivalence classes with respect to filters in terms of the steering equivalent observables (SEO), first proposed to connect the problem of steerability and measurement incompatibility. We provide an efficient method to compute the extractable steerability that is maximal via local filters and show that it coincides with the incompatibility of the SEO. Moreover, we show that there always exists a bipartite state that provides an assemblage with steerability equal to the incompatibility of the measurements on the untrusted party. Finally, we investigate the optimal success probability and rates for transformation protocols (distillation and dilution) in the single-shot scenario together with examples.
We address the problem of characterizing the steerability of quantum states under restrictive measurement scenarios, i.e., the problem of determining whether a quantum state can demonstrate steering when subjected to NNN measurements of kkk outcomes. We consider the cases of either general positive operator-valued measures (POVMs) or specific kinds of measurements (e.g., projective or symmetric). We propose general methods to calculate lower and upper bounds for the white-noise robustness of a ddd-dimensional quantum state under different measurement scenarios that are also applicable to the study of the noise robustness of the incompatibility of sets of unknown qudit measurements. We show that some mutually unbiased bases, symmetric informationally complete measurements, and other symmetric choices of measurements are not optimal for steering the isotropic states and provide candidates for the most incompatible sets of measurements in each case. Finally, we provide numerical evidence that nonprojective POVMs do not improve over projective ones for this task.
Steering is one of the most counter intuitive non-classical features of bipartite quantum system, first noticed by Schrödinger at the early days of quantum theory. On the other hand, measurement incompatibility is another non-classical feature of quantum theory, initially pointed out by Bohr. Recently, Quintino et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160402 (2014)] and Uola et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 160403 (2014)] have investigated the relation between these two distinct non-classical features. They have shown that a set of measurements is not jointly measurable (i.e., incompatible) if and only if they can be used for demonstrating Schrödinger-Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering. The concept of steering has been generalized for more general abstract tensor product theories rather than just Hilbert space quantum mechanics. In this article, we discuss that the notion of measurement incompatibility can be extended for general probability theories. Further, we show that the connection between steering and measurement incompatibility holds in a border class of tensor product theories rather than just quantum theory.
The existence of incompatible measurements is a fundamental phenomenon having no explanation in classical physics. Intuitively, one considers given measurements to be incompatible within a framework of a physical theory, if their simultaneous implementation on a single physical device is prohibited by the theory itself. In the mathematical language of quantum theory, measurements are described by POVMs (positive operator valued measures), and given POVMs are by definition incompatible if they cannot be obtained via coarse-graining from a single common POVM; this notion generalizes noncommutativity of projective measurements. In quantum theory, incompatibility can be regarded as a resource necessary for manifesting phenomena such as Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) Bell inequality violations or Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) steering which do not have classical explanation. We define operational ways of quantifying this resource via the amount of added classical noise needed to render the measurements compatible, i.e., useless as a resource. In analogy to entanglement measures, we generalize this idea by introducing the concept of incompatibility measure, which is monotone in local operations. In this paper, we restrict our consideration to binary measurements, which are already sufficient to explicitly demonstrate nontrivial features of the theory. In particular, we construct a family of incompatibility monotones operationally quantifying violations of certain scaled versions of the CHSH Bell inequality, prove that they can be computed via a semidefinite program, and show how the noise-based quantities arise as special cases. We also determine maximal violations of the new inequalities, demonstrating how Tsirelson's bound appears as a special case. The resource aspect is further motivated by simple quantum protocols where our incompatibility monotones appear as relevant figures of merit.