Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2307.14191

Randomized higher-order tensor renormalization group

Katsumasa Nakayama

Published Jul 26, 2023• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The higher-order tensor renormalization group (HOTRG) is a fundamental method to calculate the physical quantities by using a tensor network representation. This method is based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) to take the contraction of all indices in the network with an approximation. For the SVD, randomized singular value decomposition (R-SVD) is a powerful method to reduce computational costs of SVD. However, HOTRG with the randomized method is not established. We propose a randomized HOTRG method in a dimension $d$ with the computational cost $O(D^{3d})$ depending on the truncated bond dimension $D$. We also introduce the minimally-decomposed TRG (MDTRG) as the R-HOTRG on the tensor of order $d+1$ with $O(D^{2d + 1})$ and a triad representation of the MDTRG (Triad-MDTRG) with $O(D^{d+3})$. The results from these formulations are consistent with the HOTRG result with the same truncated bond dimension $D$.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2307.14191

Related papers

Application of the projective truncation and randomized singular value decomposition to a higher dimension

Katsumasa Nakayama

We study the tensor renormalization group (TRG) in the dimension larger than two as the Higher-order TRG (HOTRG) with the randomized SVD method. The randomized SVD and the detailed discussion on the low order tensor representation, we can calculate the HOTRG with the reduced computational cost. We also represent our method by using the cost function, and the details of the cost function for the isometry determine the precision, stability, and calculation time. In our study, we show calculation order improvement using randomized SVD. We also propose that the internal line respect for any TRG method improves the calculation without changing the order of the computational cost.

arXiv:2401.06389•International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory (LATTICE)•May 5, 2024•2 citations

Cost reduction of the bottleneck contraction in the higher-order tensor renormalization group

Hideaki Oba

We reduce the computational cost of the bottleneck contraction in the higher-order tensor renormalization group (HOTRG) by using the singular value decomposition. To confirm the effectiveness of the proposed technique, we examine the HOTRG with or without the proposed technique by using the square lattice Ising model at criticality. Then, we find that the proposed method provides the consistent results with the original HOTRG while the computational cost and the elapsed time are reduced. Therefore, we conclude that the performance of the proposed method is better than that of the original one.

•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Renormalization group on a triad network

Daisuke Kadoh, Katsumasa Nakayama

We propose a new renormalization scheme of tensor networks made only of third order tensors. The isometry used for coarse-graining the network can be prepared at an $O(D^6)$ computational cost in any $d$ dimension ($d \ge 2$), where $D$ is the truncated bond dimension of tensors. Although it is reduced to $O(D^5)$ if a randomized singular value decomposition is employed, the total cost is $O(D^{d+3})$ because the contraction part for creating a renormalized tensor with isometries has $D^{d+3}$ multiplications. We test our method in three dimensional Ising model and find that the numerical results are obtained for large $D$s with reasonable errors.

arXiv:1912.02414•Jan 1, 2019•28 citations

Cost-efficient cutoff method for tensor renormalization group with randomized singular value decomposition

Haruka Yamada, Akira Imakura, Tetsuya Sakurai

Tensor renormalization group (TRG) is a coarse-graining algorithm for approximating the partition function using a tensor network in the field of elementary particle physics.Although the computational cost of TRG can be reduced using a randomized singular value decomposition, its computation time is still large.In this paper, we propose a cost-efficient cutoff method for calculating TRG by truncating small tensor elements.Numerical experiments showed that the proposed method is faster than the conventional one without degrading accuracy.

JSIAM Letters•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Anisotropic tensor renormalization group

Daiki Adachi, Tsuyoshi Okubo, Synge Todo

We propose a different tensor renormalization group algorithm, anisotropic tensor renormalization group (ATRG), for lattice models in arbitrary dimensions. The proposed method shares the same versatility with the higher-order tensor renormalization group (HOTRG) algorithm, i.e., it preserves the lattice topology after the renormalization. In comparison with HOTRG, both the computation cost and the memory footprint of our method are drastically reduced, especially in higher dimensions, by renormalizing tensors in an anisotropic way after the singular value decomposition. We demonstrate the ability of ATRG for the square lattice and the simple cubic lattice Ising models. Although the accuracy of the present method degrades when compared with HOTRG of the same bond dimension, the accuracy with fixed computation time is improved greatly due to the drastic reduction of the computation cost.

arXiv:1906.02007•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Aug 24, 2020•83 citations

Cost Reduction of Swapping Bonds Part in Anisotropic Tensor Renormalization Group

Hideaki Oba

The bottleneck part of anisotropic tensor renormalization group (ATRG) is a swapping bonds part which consists of a contraction of two tensors and a partial singular value decomposition of a matrix, and their computational costs are $O(χ^{2d+1})$, where $χ$ is the maximum bond dimension and $d$ is the dimensionality of a system. We propose an alternative method for the swapping bonds part and it scales with $O(χ^{\max(d+3,7)})$, though the total cost of ATRG with the method remains $O(χ^{2d+1})$. Moreover, the memory cost of the whole algorithm can be reduced from $O(χ^{2d})$ to $O(χ^{\max(d+1,6)})$. We examine ATRG with or without the proposed method in the four-dimensional Ising model and find that the free energy density of the proposed algorithm is consistent with that of the original ATRG while the elapsed time is significantly reduced. We also compare the proposed algorithm with higher-order tensor renromalization group (HOTRG) and find that the value of the free energy density of the proposed algorithm is lower than that of HOTRG in the fixed elapsed time.

arXiv:1908.07295•Aug 20, 2019•1 citation
The higher-order tensor renormalization group (HOTRG) is a fundamental method to calculate the physical quantities by using a tensor network representation. This method is based on the singular value decomposition (SVD) to take the contraction of all indices in the network with an approximation. For the SVD, randomized singular value decomposition (R-SVD) is a powerful method to reduce computational costs of SVD. However, HOTRG with the randomized method is not established. We propose a randomized HOTRG method in a dimension ddd with the computational cost O(D3d)O(D^{3d})O(D3d) depending on the truncated bond dimension DDD. We also introduce the minimally-decomposed TRG (MDTRG) as the R-HOTRG on the tensor of order d+1d+1d+1 with O(D2d+1)O(D^{2d + 1})O(D2d+1) and a triad representation of the MDTRG (Triad-MDTRG) with O(Dd+3)O(D^{d+3})O(Dd+3). The results from these formulations are consistent with the HOTRG result with the same truncated bond dimension DDD.
We study the tensor renormalization group (TRG) in the dimension larger than two as the Higher-order TRG (HOTRG) with the randomized SVD method. The randomized SVD and the detailed discussion on the low order tensor representation, we can calculate the HOTRG with the reduced computational cost. We also represent our method by using the cost function, and the details of the cost function for the isometry determine the precision, stability, and calculation time. In our study, we show calculation order improvement using randomized SVD. We also propose that the internal line respect for any TRG method improves the calculation without changing the order of the computational cost.
We reduce the computational cost of the bottleneck contraction in the higher-order tensor renormalization group (HOTRG) by using the singular value decomposition. To confirm the effectiveness of the proposed technique, we examine the HOTRG with or without the proposed technique by using the square lattice Ising model at criticality. Then, we find that the proposed method provides the consistent results with the original HOTRG while the computational cost and the elapsed time are reduced. Therefore, we conclude that the performance of the proposed method is better than that of the original one.
We propose a new renormalization scheme of tensor networks made only of third order tensors. The isometry used for coarse-graining the network can be prepared at an O(D6)O(D^6)O(D6) computational cost in any ddd dimension (d≥2d \ge 2d≥2), where DDD is the truncated bond dimension of tensors. Although it is reduced to O(D5)O(D^5)O(D5) if a randomized singular value decomposition is employed, the total cost is O(Dd+3)O(D^{d+3})O(Dd+3) because the contraction part for creating a renormalized tensor with isometries has Dd+3D^{d+3}Dd+3 multiplications. We test our method in three dimensional Ising model and find that the numerical results are obtained for large DDDs with reasonable errors.
Tensor renormalization group (TRG) is a coarse-graining algorithm for approximating the partition function using a tensor network in the field of elementary particle physics.Although the computational cost of TRG can be reduced using a randomized singular value decomposition, its computation time is still large.In this paper, we propose a cost-efficient cutoff method for calculating TRG by truncating small tensor elements.Numerical experiments showed that the proposed method is faster than the conventional one without degrading accuracy.
We propose a different tensor renormalization group algorithm, anisotropic tensor renormalization group (ATRG), for lattice models in arbitrary dimensions. The proposed method shares the same versatility with the higher-order tensor renormalization group (HOTRG) algorithm, i.e., it preserves the lattice topology after the renormalization. In comparison with HOTRG, both the computation cost and the memory footprint of our method are drastically reduced, especially in higher dimensions, by renormalizing tensors in an anisotropic way after the singular value decomposition. We demonstrate the ability of ATRG for the square lattice and the simple cubic lattice Ising models. Although the accuracy of the present method degrades when compared with HOTRG of the same bond dimension, the accuracy with fixed computation time is improved greatly due to the drastic reduction of the computation cost.
The bottleneck part of anisotropic tensor renormalization group (ATRG) is a swapping bonds part which consists of a contraction of two tensors and a partial singular value decomposition of a matrix, and their computational costs are O(χ2d+1)O(χ^{2d+1})O(χ2d+1), where χχχ is the maximum bond dimension and ddd is the dimensionality of a system. We propose an alternative method for the swapping bonds part and it scales with O(χmax⁡(d+3,7))O(χ^{\max(d+3,7)})O(χmax(d+3,7)), though the total cost of ATRG with the method remains O(χ2d+1)O(χ^{2d+1})O(χ2d+1). Moreover, the memory cost of the whole algorithm can be reduced from O(χ2d)O(χ^{2d})O(χ2d) to O(χmax⁡(d+1,6))O(χ^{\max(d+1,6)})O(χmax(d+1,6)). We examine ATRG with or without the proposed method in the four-dimensional Ising model and find that the free energy density of the proposed algorithm is consistent with that of the original ATRG while the elapsed time is significantly reduced. We also compare the proposed algorithm with higher-order tensor renromalization group (HOTRG) and find that the value of the free energy density of the proposed algorithm is lower than that of HOTRG in the fixed elapsed time.