Quantum annealing is an emerging metaheuristic used for solving combinatorial optimisation problems. However, hardware based physical quantum annealers are primarily limited to a single vendor. As an alternative, we can discretise the quantum annealing process (discretised quantum annealing or DiQA) and use it on gate-model quantum computers. In this work, we first benchmark DiQA against simulated annealing for a similar number of steps. We then propose and evaluate a hybrid quantum classical heuristic: Quantum Accelerated Simulated Annealing (QASA), where the traditional classical annealing procedure can be sped up with the use of (relatively) low depth DiQA circuits. This is done by (i) running a partial annealing scheme with a fraction of the depth of the complete circuit (ii) sampling the results from the circuit and fitting a Gibbs distribution on it and (iii) Using the inverse temperature of the Gibbs distribution and the best sample to initialise simulated annealing (SA). Our simulation results show QASA performing comparably to SA but for a reduced amount of steps. With the promising results of our work, we hope to generate interest for potential future work in the area of fixed-parameter quantum optimisation.
Quantum annealing is an emerging metaheuristic used for solving combinatorial optimisation problems. However, hardware based physical quantum annealers are primarily limited to a single vendor. As an alternative, we can discretise the quantum annealing process (discretised quantum annealing or DiQA) and use it on gate-model quantum computers. In this work, we first benchmark DiQA against simulated annealing for a similar number of steps. We then propose and evaluate a hybrid quantum classical heuristic: Quantum Accelerated Simulated Annealing (QASA), where the traditional classical annealing procedure can be sped up with the use of (relatively) low depth DiQA circuits. This is done by (i) running a partial annealing scheme with a fraction of the depth of the complete circuit (ii) sampling the results from the circuit and fitting a Gibbs distribution on it and (iii) Using the inverse temperature of the Gibbs distribution and the best sample to initialise simulated annealing (SA). Our simulation results show QASA performing comparably to SA but for a reduced amount of steps. With the promising results of our work, we hope to generate interest for potential future work in the area of fixed-parameter quantum optimisation.
Quantum annealing is an emerging metaheuristic used for solving combinatorial optimisation problems. However, hardware based physical quantum annealers are primarily limited to a single vendor. As an alternative, we can discretise the quantum annealing process (discretised quantum annealing or DiQA) and use it on gate-model quantum computers. In this work, we first benchmark DiQA against simulated annealing for a similar number of steps. We then propose and evaluate a hybrid quantumclassical heuristic: Quantum Accelerated Simulated Annealing (QASA), where the traditional classical annealing procedure can be sped up with the use of (relatively) low depth DiQA circuits. This is done by (i) running a partial annealing scheme with a fraction of the depth of the complete circuit (ii) sampling the results from the circuit and fitting a Gibbs distribution on it and (iii) Using the inverse temperature of the Gibbs distribution and the best sample to initialise simulated annealing (SA). Our simulation results show QASA performing comparably to SA but for a reduced amount of steps.With the promising results of our work, we hope to generate interest for potential future work in the area of fixed-parameter quantum optimisation.
Quantum annealing (QA) has the potential to significantly improve solution quality and reduce time complexity in solving combinatorial optimization problems compared to classical optimization methods. However, due to the limited number of qubits and their connectivity, the QA hardware did not show such an advantage over classical methods in past benchmarking studies. Recent advancements in QA with more than 5000 qubits, enhanced qubit connectivity, and the hybrid architecture promise to realize the quantum advantage. Here, we use a quantum annealer with state-of-the-art techniques and benchmark its performance against classical solvers. To compare their performance, we solve over 50 optimization problem instances represented by large and dense Hamiltonian matrices using quantum and classical solvers. The results demonstrate that a state-of-the-art quantum solver has higher accuracy (~0.013%) and a significantly faster problem-solving time (~6561×) than the best classical solver. Our results highlight the advantages of leveraging QA over classical counterparts, particularly in hybrid configurations, for achieving high accuracy and substantially reduced problem solving time in large-scale real-world optimization problems.
Quantum annealing is a computational paradigm in which optimisation problems are mapped onto the energy landscape of an interacting quantum system and explored through its dynamical evolution. By continuously transforming a simple initial Hamiltonian into one whose ground state encodes the solution, the system traverses a complex landscape via a combination of quantum fluctuations, tunnelling processes, and dissipative dynamics. Unlike gate-based quantum computing, quantum annealing is a specialised and near-term approach aimed primarily at discrete optimisation and sampling tasks. While it is not expected to provide polynomial-time solutions to NP-hard problems in the worst case, it offers a physically motivated heuristic for navigating rugged energy landscapes that arise across science and engineering. Modern quantum annealers realise programmable spin systems with thousands of qubits, placing them among the largest controllable quantum devices currently available. As a result, their significance extends beyond optimisation: they also function as experimental platforms for studying non-equilibrium many-body quantum dynamics in regimes that are difficult to access using classical simulation. In this review we present an accessible introduction to the principles of quantum annealing, describe the main hardware platforms and algorithmic techniques, and analyse how tunnelling, spectral gaps, and open-system effects shape computational performance. We survey applications ranging from optimisation and machine learning to quantum simulation and many-body physics, and discuss the central challenges in benchmarking, scaling, and control. These perspectives position quantum annealing as a distinctive framework at the interface of optimisation, stochastic sampling, and programmable quantum dynamics, with a role that is complementary to both classical algorithms and gate-based quantum computing.
Critical decision-making issues in science, engineering, and industry are based on combinatorial optimization; however, its application is inherently limited by the NP-hard nature of the problem. A specialized paradigm of analogue quantum computing, quantum annealing (QA), has been proposed to solve these problems by encoding optimization problems into physical energy landscapes and solving them by quantum tunnelling systematically through exploration of solution space. This is a critical review that summarizes the current applications of quantum annealing to combinatorial optimization and includes a theoretical background, hardware designs, algorithm implementation strategies, encoding and embedding schemes, protocols to benchmark quantum annealing, areas of implementation, and links with the quantum algorithms implementation with gate-based hardware and classical solvers. We develop a unified framework, relating adiabatic quantum dynamics, Ising and QUBO models, stoquastic and non-stoquastic Hamiltonians, and diabatic transitions to modern flux-qubit annealers (Chimera, Pegasus, Zephyr topologies), and emergent architectures (Lechner-Hauke-Zoller systems, Rydberg atom platforms), and hybrids of quantum and classical computation. Through our analysis, we find that overhead in embedding and encoding is the largest determinant of the scalability and performance (this is not just the number of qubits). Minor embeddings also usually have a physical qubit count per logical variable of between 5 and 12 qubits, which limits effective problem capacity by 80-92% and, due to chain-breaking errors, compromises the quality of solutions.
Quantum annealing (QA) was originally intended for accelerating the solution of combinatorial optimization tasks that have natural encodings as Ising models. However, recent experiments on QA-hardware platforms have demonstrated that, in the operating regime corresponding to weak interactions, the QA hardware behaves like a noisy Gibbs sampler at a hardware-specific effective temperature. This work builds on those insights and identifies a class of small hardware-native Ising models that are robust to noise effects and proposes a procedure for executing these models on QA hardware to maximize Gibbs-sampling performance. The experimental results indicate that the proposed protocol results in high-quality Gibbs samples from a hardware-specific effective temperature. Furthermore, we show that this effective temperature can be adjusted by modulating the annealing time and energy scale. The procedure proposed in this work provides an approach to using QA hardware for Ising-model sampling presenting potential opportunities for applications in machine learning and physics simulation.
Quantum computers are early-stage technology, but are progressing rapidly. Here, we compare metaheuristics with a quantum annealer (QA), a quantum computer tailored to solve combinatorial optimisation problems formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimisation (QUBO) problem. Formulating non-trivial optimisation problems as QUBOs is a challenge, so it is to ensure that the direct comparison of classical and quantum search algorithms is conducted fairly. This paper illustrates the use of a streamlined methodology to derive a QUBO for a classical optimisation problem – the Steiner tree problem – and provides comprehensive experiments comparing D-WAVE pure QA and hybrid QA with classical methods including Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithms. We find that the pure QA suffers from considerable qubit noise but the hybrid QA is on a par with traditional methods.