Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2306.10671

Exploring Shallow-Depth Boson Sampling: Towards Scalable Quantum Supremacy

Byeongseon Go, Changhun Oh, Liang Jiang, Hyunseok Jeong

Published Jun 19, 2023• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Boson sampling is a sampling task proven to be hard to simulate efficiently using classical computers under plausible assumptions, which makes it an appealing candidate for quantum supremacy. However, due to a large noise rate for near-term quantum devices, it is still unclear whether those noisy devices maintain the quantum advantage for much larger quantum systems. Since the noise rate typically grows with the circuit depth, an alternative is to find evidence of simulation hardness at the shallow-depth quantum circuit. To find the evidence, one way is to identify the minimum depth required for the average-case hardness of approximating output probabilities, which is considered a necessary condition for the state-of-the-art technique to prove the simulation hardness of boson sampling. In this work, we analyze the output probability distribution of shallow-depth boson sampling for Fock-states and Gaussian states, and examine the limitation of the average-case hardness argument at this shallow-depth regime for geometrically local architectures. We propose a shallow-depth linear optical circuit architecture that can overcome the problems associated with geometrically local architectures. Our numerical results suggest that this architecture demonstrates possibilities of average-case hardness properties in a shallow-depth regime, through its resemblance to the global Haar-random boson sampling circuit. This result implies that the corresponding architecture has the potential to be utilized for scalable quantum supremacy with its shallow-depth boson sampling.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2306.10671

Related papers

On computational complexity and average-case hardness of shallow-depth boson sampling

Byeongseon Go, Changhun Oh, Hyunseok Jeong

Boson Sampling, a computational task believed to be classically hard to simulate, is expected to hold promise for demonstrating quantum computational advantage using near-term quantum devices. However, noise in experimental implementations poses a significant challenge, potentially rendering Boson Sampling classically simulable and compromising its classical intractability. Numerous studies have proposed classical algorithms that can efficiently simulate Boson Sampling under various noise models, particularly as noise rates increase with circuit depth. To address this challenge, we investigate the viability of achieving quantum computational advantage through Boson Sampling implemented with shallow-depth linear optical circuits. In particular, as the average-case hardness of estimating output probabilities of Boson Sampling is a crucial ingredient in demonstrating its classical intractability, we make progress on establishing the average-case hardness of Boson Sampling confined to logarithmic-depth regimes. We also obtain the average-case hardness for logarithmic-depth Fock-state Boson Sampling subject to lossy environments and for the logarithmic-depth Gaussian Boson Sampling. By providing complexity-theoretical backgrounds for the classical simulation hardness of logarithmic-depth Boson Sampling, we expect that our findings will mark a crucial step towards a more noise-tolerant demonstration of quantum advantage with shallow-depth Boson Sampling.

arXiv:2405.01786•Quantum•Mar 13, 2026•1 citation

Exploring shallow-depth boson sampling: Toward a scalable quantum advantage

Byeongseon Go, Changhun Oh, Liang Jiang +1 more

Boson sampling is a promising candidate for showcasing quantum advantage. However, achieving this advantage involves pinpointing the optimal balance between shallow-depth circuits, which are susceptible to classical simulation, and larger-depth circuits prone to noise. Here, the authors introduce a linear-optical circuit design with nonlocal gates, aimed at enhancing the probability of demonstrating advantage even with shallow circuit depths.

Physical Review A•May 7, 2024•9 citations

Classical simulation of bosonic linear-optical random circuits beyond linear light cone

Changhun Oh, Youngrong Lim, Bill Fefferman +1 more

Sampling from probability distributions of quantum circuits is a fundamentally and practically important task which can be used to demonstrate quantum supremacy using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. In the present work, we examine classical simulability of sampling from the output photon-number distribution of linear-optical circuits composed of random beam splitters with equally distributed squeezed vacuum states and single-photon states input. We provide efficient classical algorithms to simulate linear-optical random circuits and show that the algorithms' error is exponentially small up to a depth less than quadratic in the distance between sources using a classical random walk behavior of random linear-optical circuits. Notably, the average-case depth allowing an efficient classical simulation is larger than the worst-case depth limit, which is linear in the distance. Besides, our results together with the hardness of boson sampling give a lower-bound on the depth for constituting global Haar-random unitary circuits.

arXiv:2102.10083•Feb 19, 2021•3 citations

Classical Simulation of Boson Sampling Based on Graph Structure

Changhun Oh, Youngrong Lim, Bill Fefferman +1 more

Boson sampling is a fundamentally and practically important task that can be used to demonstrate quantum supremacy using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. In this Letter, we present classical sampling algorithms for single-photon and Gaussian input states that take advantage of a graph structure of a linear-optical circuit. The algorithms' complexity grows as so-called treewidth, which is closely related to the connectivity of a given linear-optical circuit. Using the algorithms, we study approximated simulations for local Haar-random linear-optical circuits. For equally spaced initial sources, we show that, when the circuit depth is less than the quadratic in the lattice spacing, the efficient simulation is possible with an exponentially small error. Notably, right after this depth, photons start to interfere each other and the algorithms' complexity becomes subexponential in the number of sources, implying that there is a sharp transition of its complexity. Finally, when a circuit is sufficiently deep enough for photons to typically propagate to all modes, the complexity becomes exponential as generic sampling algorithms. We numerically implement a likelihood test with a recent Gaussian boson sampling experiment and show that the treewidth-based algorithm with a limited treewidth renders a larger likelihood than the experimental data.

arXiv:2110.01564•Physical Review Letters•May 13, 2022•40 citations

"Quantum Supremacy" and the Complexity of Random Circuit Sampling

Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, Chinmay Nirkhe +1 more

A critical milestone on the path to useful quantum computers is quantum supremacy - a demonstration of a quantum computation that is prohibitively hard for classical computers. A leading near-term candidate, put forth by the Google/UCSB team, is sampling from the probability distributions of randomly chosen quantum circuits, which we call Random Circuit Sampling (RCS). In this paper we study both the hardness and verification of RCS. While RCS was defined with experimental realization in mind, we show complexity theoretic evidence of hardness that is on par with the strongest theoretical proposals for supremacy. Specifically, we show that RCS satisfies an average-case hardness condition - computing output probabilities of typical quantum circuits is as hard as computing them in the worst-case, and therefore #P-hard. Our reduction exploits the polynomial structure in the output amplitudes of random quantum circuits, enabled by the Feynman path integral. In addition, it follows from known results that RCS satisfies an anti-concentration property, making it the first supremacy proposal with both average-case hardness and anti-concentration.

arXiv:1803.04402•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Mar 12, 2018•63 citations

Noise and the Frontier of Quantum Supremacy

Adam Bouland, Bill Fefferman, Zeph A. Landau +1 more

Noise is the defining feature of the NISQ era, but it remains unclear if noisy quantum devices are capable of quantum speedups. Quantum supremacy experiments have been a major step forward, but gaps remain between the theory behind these experiments and their actual implementations. In this work we initiate the study of the complexity of quantum random circuit sampling experiments with realistic amounts of noise. Actual quantum supremacy experiments have high levels of uncorrected noise and exponentially decaying fidelities. It is natural to ask if there is any signal of exponential complexity in these highly noisy devices. Surprisingly, we show that it remains hard to compute the output probabilities of noisy random quantum circuits without error correction. More formally, so long as the noise rate of the device is below the error detection threshold, we show it is #P-hard to compute the output probabilities of random circuits with a constant rate of noise per gate. This hardness persists even though these probabilities are exponentially close to uniform. Therefore the small deviations away from uniformity are hard to compute, formalizing an important intuition behind Google's supremacy claim. Interestingly these hardness results also have implications for the complexity of experiments in a low-noise setting. The issue here is that prior hardness results for computing output proba-bilities of random circuits are not robust enough to imprecision to connect with the Stockmeyer argument for hardness of sampling from circuits with constant fidelity. We exponentially improve the robustness of prior results to imprecision, both in the cases of Random Circuit Sampling and BosonSampling. In the latter case we bring the proven hardness within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling for the first time. We then show that our results are in tension with one another - the high-noise result implies the low-noise result is essentially optimal, even with generalizations of our techniques.

arXiv:2102.01738•Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science•Feb 1, 2022•38 citations
Boson sampling is a sampling task proven to be hard to simulate efficiently using classical computers under plausible assumptions, which makes it an appealing candidate for quantum supremacy. However, due to a large noise rate for near-term quantum devices, it is still unclear whether those noisy devices maintain the quantum advantage for much larger quantum systems. Since the noise rate typically grows with the circuit depth, an alternative is to find evidence of simulation hardness at the shallow-depth quantum circuit. To find the evidence, one way is to identify the minimum depth required for the average-case hardness of approximating output probabilities, which is considered a necessary condition for the state-of-the-art technique to prove the simulation hardness of boson sampling. In this work, we analyze the output probability distribution of shallow-depth boson sampling for Fock-states and Gaussian states, and examine the limitation of the average-case hardness argument at this shallow-depth regime for geometrically local architectures. We propose a shallow-depth linear optical circuit architecture that can overcome the problems associated with geometrically local architectures. Our numerical results suggest that this architecture demonstrates possibilities of average-case hardness properties in a shallow-depth regime, through its resemblance to the global Haar-random boson sampling circuit. This result implies that the corresponding architecture has the potential to be utilized for scalable quantum supremacy with its shallow-depth boson sampling.
Boson Sampling, a computational task believed to be classically hard to simulate, is expected to hold promise for demonstrating quantum computational advantage using near-term quantum devices. However, noise in experimental implementations poses a significant challenge, potentially rendering Boson Sampling classically simulable and compromising its classical intractability. Numerous studies have proposed classical algorithms that can efficiently simulate Boson Sampling under various noise models, particularly as noise rates increase with circuit depth. To address this challenge, we investigate the viability of achieving quantum computational advantage through Boson Sampling implemented with shallow-depth linear optical circuits. In particular, as the average-case hardness of estimating output probabilities of Boson Sampling is a crucial ingredient in demonstrating its classical intractability, we make progress on establishing the average-case hardness of Boson Sampling confined to logarithmic-depth regimes. We also obtain the average-case hardness for logarithmic-depth Fock-state Boson Sampling subject to lossy environments and for the logarithmic-depth Gaussian Boson Sampling. By providing complexity-theoretical backgrounds for the classical simulation hardness of logarithmic-depth Boson Sampling, we expect that our findings will mark a crucial step towards a more noise-tolerant demonstration of quantum advantage with shallow-depth Boson Sampling.
Sampling from probability distributions of quantum circuits is a fundamentally and practically important task which can be used to demonstrate quantum supremacy using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. In the present work, we examine classical simulability of sampling from the output photon-number distribution of linear-optical circuits composed of random beam splitters with equally distributed squeezed vacuum states and single-photon states input. We provide efficient classical algorithms to simulate linear-optical random circuits and show that the algorithms' error is exponentially small up to a depth less than quadratic in the distance between sources using a classical random walk behavior of random linear-optical circuits. Notably, the average-case depth allowing an efficient classical simulation is larger than the worst-case depth limit, which is linear in the distance. Besides, our results together with the hardness of boson sampling give a lower-bound on the depth for constituting global Haar-random unitary circuits.
Boson sampling is a fundamentally and practically important task that can be used to demonstrate quantum supremacy using noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. In this Letter, we present classical sampling algorithms for single-photon and Gaussian input states that take advantage of a graph structure of a linear-optical circuit. The algorithms' complexity grows as so-called treewidth, which is closely related to the connectivity of a given linear-optical circuit. Using the algorithms, we study approximated simulations for local Haar-random linear-optical circuits. For equally spaced initial sources, we show that, when the circuit depth is less than the quadratic in the lattice spacing, the efficient simulation is possible with an exponentially small error. Notably, right after this depth, photons start to interfere each other and the algorithms' complexity becomes subexponential in the number of sources, implying that there is a sharp transition of its complexity. Finally, when a circuit is sufficiently deep enough for photons to typically propagate to all modes, the complexity becomes exponential as generic sampling algorithms. We numerically implement a likelihood test with a recent Gaussian boson sampling experiment and show that the treewidth-based algorithm with a limited treewidth renders a larger likelihood than the experimental data.
A critical milestone on the path to useful quantum computers is quantum supremacy - a demonstration of a quantum computation that is prohibitively hard for classical computers. A leading near-term candidate, put forth by the Google/UCSB team, is sampling from the probability distributions of randomly chosen quantum circuits, which we call Random Circuit Sampling (RCS). In this paper we study both the hardness and verification of RCS. While RCS was defined with experimental realization in mind, we show complexity theoretic evidence of hardness that is on par with the strongest theoretical proposals for supremacy. Specifically, we show that RCS satisfies an average-case hardness condition - computing output probabilities of typical quantum circuits is as hard as computing them in the worst-case, and therefore #P-hard. Our reduction exploits the polynomial structure in the output amplitudes of random quantum circuits, enabled by the Feynman path integral. In addition, it follows from known results that RCS satisfies an anti-concentration property, making it the first supremacy proposal with both average-case hardness and anti-concentration.
Noise is the defining feature of the NISQ era, but it remains unclear if noisy quantum devices are capable of quantum speedups. Quantum supremacy experiments have been a major step forward, but gaps remain between the theory behind these experiments and their actual implementations. In this work we initiate the study of the complexity of quantum random circuit sampling experiments with realistic amounts of noise. Actual quantum supremacy experiments have high levels of uncorrected noise and exponentially decaying fidelities. It is natural to ask if there is any signal of exponential complexity in these highly noisy devices. Surprisingly, we show that it remains hard to compute the output probabilities of noisy random quantum circuits without error correction. More formally, so long as the noise rate of the device is below the error detection threshold, we show it is #P-hard to compute the output probabilities of random circuits with a constant rate of noise per gate. This hardness persists even though these probabilities are exponentially close to uniform. Therefore the small deviations away from uniformity are hard to compute, formalizing an important intuition behind Google's supremacy claim. Interestingly these hardness results also have implications for the complexity of experiments in a low-noise setting. The issue here is that prior hardness results for computing output proba-bilities of random circuits are not robust enough to imprecision to connect with the Stockmeyer argument for hardness of sampling from circuits with constant fidelity. We exponentially improve the robustness of prior results to imprecision, both in the cases of Random Circuit Sampling and BosonSampling. In the latter case we bring the proven hardness within a constant factor in the exponent of the robustness required for hardness of sampling for the first time. We then show that our results are in tension with one another - the high-noise result implies the low-noise result is essentially optimal, even with generalizations of our techniques.