Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2306.09885

An ontological description for relativistic, massive bosons

Gerard ’t Hooft

Published Jun 16, 2023• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Relativistic, scalar particles are considered, contained in a box with periodic boundary conditions. Although interactions are not expected to be a fundamental problem, we concentrate on free particles. By considering them to be harmonic oscillators, it is found that their dynamical variables can be replaced by a completely ontological set, which means that, here, quantum mechanics does not deviate from a purely geometric, ontological particle system. The effects of the mass terms are included. Locality holds for the quantum theory, and seems to be fully obeyed also by the classical treatment, although further discussion will be needed. Quantised interactions are briefly speculated on, but mostly postponed to later. We do discuss extensively the distinction between the quantum treatment and the classical one, even though they produce exactly the same equations mathematically. We briefly explain how this result can be squared with the usual quantum no-go theorems. It is suggested to apply this theory for real time quantum model simulations.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2306.09885

Related papers

The hidden ontological variable in quantum harmonic oscillators

Gerard ’t Hooft

The standard quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator has an exact, dual relationship with a completely classical system: a classical particle running along a circle. Duality here means that there is a one-to-one relation between all observables in one model, and the observables of the other model. Thus the duality we find, appears to be in conflict with the usual assertion that classical theories can never reproduce quantum effects as observed in many quantum models. We suggest that there must be more of such relationships, but we study only this one as a prototype. It reveals how classical hidden variables may work. The classical states can form the basis of Hilbert space that can be adopted in describing the quantum model. Wave functions in the quantum system generate probability distributions in the classical one. One finds that, where the classical system always obeys the rule probability in = probability out, the same probabilities are quantum probabilities in the quantum system. It is shown how the quantum x and p operators in a quantum oscillator can be given a classical meaning. It is explained how an apparent clash with quantum logic can be rationalized.

arXiv:2407.18153•Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology•Dec 19, 2024•6 citations

Particles in Quantum Field Theory

Doreen Fraser

An important way in which quantum field theory (QFT) differs from non-relativistic quantum mechanics is that in QFT systems generically possess an infinite number of degrees of freedom. This chapter examines the proposals for non-fundamental roles that the particle concept plays in particle physics. The fields which feature in the QFT formalism are mathematical expressions; work needs to be done to determine the ontological properties of the entities that are represented by the mathematical field formalism. One difficulty for the quanta interpretation of QFT is that the analysis in terms of quanta offered in the preceding paragraphs is restricted to free systems. The no-go results for interacting systems inspire a different approach to regarding particles as non-fundamental entities. The fields which feature in the QFT formalism are mathematical expressions; work needs to be done to determine the ontological properties of the entities that are represented by the mathematical field formalism.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 11, 2021•26 citations

Geometrizing the Quantum—A Toy Model

Benjamin Koch, Jerzy Kowalski-Glikman, R. Durka +1 more

It is shown that the equations of relativistic Bohmian mechanics for multiple bosonic particles have a dual description in terms of a classical theory of conformally “curved” space‐time. This shows that it is possible to formulate quantum mechanics as a purely classical geometrical theory. The results are further generalized to interactions with an external electromagnetic field.

arXiv:1004.3240•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2009•5 citations

Interpretation of Quantum Theory and Cosmology

Giovanni M. Prosepri, M. Baldicchi

We reconsider the problem of the interpretation of the Quantum Theory (QT) in the perspective of the entire universe and of Bphr idea that the classical language is the language of our experience and QT acquires a meaning only with a reference to it. We distinguish a classical or macroscopic level, and a quantum or microscopic one that is perceived only through the modifications that it induces in the first. The macroscopic state of the universe is assumed to be specified by a set of variables, a classical energy momentum tensor and some conserved currents, which are supposed to have a well defined value across the entire space-time. To the energy-momentum tensor a classical metric is related by the Einstein equation. The quantum state and dynamics are expressed by the usual QT formalism in terms of a density operator and the ordinary quantum operators in Heisenberg picture. For the macroscopic variables a basic distribution of probability is postulated in terms of a density and the corresponding quantum operators, so in some way their evolution is driven by the underlying QT. Such postulate essentially replaces the usual elfadjoint operators correspondence. For the Universe we adopt a variance of the ΛCDM model with Omega=1, one single inflaton with an Higgs type potential, the initial time at t=minus infinite. The expectation values of all fundamental fields are supposed to vanish for time going to minus infinite. In the framework the scalar fluctuation in the Cosmic Microwave Background are correctly explained giving appropriate calue to the parameters in the potential. As in more conventional models the absence of the tensor fluctuations remains not understood, if even a quantum metric is introduced. This seems to suggest that Gravity is a pure classical phenomenon, what could be consistently accommodated in our formalism by an appropriate even if somewhat ad hoc assumption

arXiv:2304.07095•Apr 14, 2023•1 citation

Interpretation of quantum theory in a cosmological perspective

Giovanni Maria Prosperi, M. Baldicchi

Abstract We reconsider the problem of the interpretation of the quantum theory (QT) in the perspective of the entire universe and of the Bohr's idea that the classical language is the language of our experience and QT acquires a meaning only with a reference to it. We distinguish a classical or macroscopic state, and a quantum or microscopic one that is perceived only through the modifications that it induces in the first. The macroscopic state is specified by a set of variables, a classical energy–momentum tensor and conserved currents, which are supposed to have always a well-defined value. The microscopic state and dynamics are expressed by the usual QT formalism. For the macroscopic variables, a basic distribution of probability is postulated in terms of quantum operators and a statistical operator, what replace the usual probability rule of QT. For the universe, a variance of the ΛCDM model with $$\Omega = 1$$ Ω = 1 is assumed, one inflaton, a Goldstone type potential, initial time at $$t = - \infty$$ t = - ∞ , expectation values of all fundamental fields vanishing for $$t \to - \infty$$ t → - ∞ . The scalar fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background is correctly explained, but the absence of the tensor fluctuations remains not understood. This seems to suggest that gravity is a pure classical phenomenon what perhaps could be accommodated in our framework.

The European Physical Journal Plus•Jul 19, 2024•0 citations

On the Compatibility of Quantum Matter and Classical Gravity

Sebastiano Sonego

The formulation of a consistent scheme for treating semiclassical systems is considered, giving particular emphasis to the case of gravity. A critical review of the semiclassical problem is first given, stressing the conceptual aspects of the topic; the theory usually adopted is found to be unsatisfactory, and the need to have an unambiguous interpretation of quantum mechanics before trying to give an alternative description is realized. Our way to arrive at such an interpretation is rather unusual, but it presents the advantage of being almost compelling in the choice to make: First, we reformulate the Schrodinger equation as a set of hydrodynamical equations involving quantities which formally play the role of mass density, velocity and pressure for a fluid; the problem of interpreting the wave function is thus reduced to that of interpreting these quantities. We then show how they can be derived from the Wigner distribution function exactly as in the usual formalism of kinetic theory, and discuss how this fact provides strong support in favour of the statistical interpretation of quantum theory, according to which the state vector describes only ensembles, and not individual systems. We also consider some implications of these results on the possible existence of a more fundamental theory underlying quantum mechanics. It is shown that reconsidering the semiclassical problem in the light of the statistical interpretation, one is led to distinguish between a strongly and a weakly semiclassical regime, which are essentially characterized by the size of the statistical dispersion induced in the observables of the classical subsystem by the coupling to the quantum one. It turns out that in the weakly semiclassical regime, in which this dispersion is not negligible, the concept of coupling equations cannot be successfully applied, and one has rather to define a probability distribution even for the values of the classical observables; an hypothesis which allows to specify such a distribution is enunciated. Several examples of the application of these general principles are considered, and it is shown how the treatment of semiclassical relativistic fields requires a much more sophisticated treatment of the quantum source. This is provided reformulating quantum theory in terms of a quasiprobability functional P[1] in the space of the histories of the system. It is shown how such a functional allows to reconstruct the usual phase space distributions when integrated over suitable sets of paths, in a way which clarify the relations between operator ordering, path integration and phase space treatment of quantum theory. The relativistic extension of p[f] is also constructed, and an explicitly covariant version of relativistic quantum theory is discussed in some details. It is shown how the latter allows, formally, to consider superpositions of different mass eigenstates, although such superpositions are not directly observable. Finally, the application of these new techniques to the treatment of semiclassical electromagnetism and gravity, as well as of a scalar field, are considered. It is shown how the usual semiclassical field equations, suitably reinterpreted in terms of averages of the field, are recovered either in linear cases or in the strongly semiclassical regime, but that they do not hold in general. Finally, some possible extensions and implications of the formalism are discussed.

•Dec 4, 1990•0 citations
Relativistic, scalar particles are considered, contained in a box with periodic boundary conditions. Although interactions are not expected to be a fundamental problem, we concentrate on free particles. By considering them to be harmonic oscillators, it is found that their dynamical variables can be replaced by a completely ontological set, which means that, here, quantum mechanics does not deviate from a purely geometric, ontological particle system. The effects of the mass terms are included. Locality holds for the quantum theory, and seems to be fully obeyed also by the classical treatment, although further discussion will be needed. Quantised interactions are briefly speculated on, but mostly postponed to later. We do discuss extensively the distinction between the quantum treatment and the classical one, even though they produce exactly the same equations mathematically. We briefly explain how this result can be squared with the usual quantum no-go theorems. It is suggested to apply this theory for real time quantum model simulations.
The standard quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator has an exact, dual relationship with a completely classical system: a classical particle running along a circle. Duality here means that there is a one-to-one relation between all observables in one model, and the observables of the other model. Thus the duality we find, appears to be in conflict with the usual assertion that classical theories can never reproduce quantum effects as observed in many quantum models. We suggest that there must be more of such relationships, but we study only this one as a prototype. It reveals how classical hidden variables may work. The classical states can form the basis of Hilbert space that can be adopted in describing the quantum model. Wave functions in the quantum system generate probability distributions in the classical one. One finds that, where the classical system always obeys the rule probability in = probability out, the same probabilities are quantum probabilities in the quantum system. It is shown how the quantum x and p operators in a quantum oscillator can be given a classical meaning. It is explained how an apparent clash with quantum logic can be rationalized.
An important way in which quantum field theory (QFT) differs from non-relativistic quantum mechanics is that in QFT systems generically possess an infinite number of degrees of freedom. This chapter examines the proposals for non-fundamental roles that the particle concept plays in particle physics. The fields which feature in the QFT formalism are mathematical expressions; work needs to be done to determine the ontological properties of the entities that are represented by the mathematical field formalism. One difficulty for the quanta interpretation of QFT is that the analysis in terms of quanta offered in the preceding paragraphs is restricted to free systems. The no-go results for interacting systems inspire a different approach to regarding particles as non-fundamental entities. The fields which feature in the QFT formalism are mathematical expressions; work needs to be done to determine the ontological properties of the entities that are represented by the mathematical field formalism.
We reconsider the problem of the interpretation of the Quantum Theory (QT) in the perspective of the entire universe and of Bphr idea that the classical language is the language of our experience and QT acquires a meaning only with a reference to it. We distinguish a classical or macroscopic level, and a quantum or microscopic one that is perceived only through the modifications that it induces in the first. The macroscopic state of the universe is assumed to be specified by a set of variables, a classical energy momentum tensor and some conserved currents, which are supposed to have a well defined value across the entire space-time. To the energy-momentum tensor a classical metric is related by the Einstein equation. The quantum state and dynamics are expressed by the usual QT formalism in terms of a density operator and the ordinary quantum operators in Heisenberg picture. For the macroscopic variables a basic distribution of probability is postulated in terms of a density and the corresponding quantum operators, so in some way their evolution is driven by the underlying QT. Such postulate essentially replaces the usual elfadjoint operators correspondence. For the Universe we adopt a variance of the ΛCDM model with Omega=1, one single inflaton with an Higgs type potential, the initial time at t=minus infinite. The expectation values of all fundamental fields are supposed to vanish for time going to minus infinite. In the framework the scalar fluctuation in the Cosmic Microwave Background are correctly explained giving appropriate calue to the parameters in the potential. As in more conventional models the absence of the tensor fluctuations remains not understood, if even a quantum metric is introduced. This seems to suggest that Gravity is a pure classical phenomenon, what could be consistently accommodated in our formalism by an appropriate even if somewhat ad hoc assumption
Abstract We reconsider the problem of the interpretation of the quantum theory (QT) in the perspective of the entire universe and of the Bohr's idea that the classical language is the language of our experience and QT acquires a meaning only with a reference to it. We distinguish a classical or macroscopic state, and a quantum or microscopic one that is perceived only through the modifications that it induces in the first. The macroscopic state is specified by a set of variables, a classical energy–momentum tensor and conserved currents, which are supposed to have always a well-defined value. The microscopic state and dynamics are expressed by the usual QT formalism. For the macroscopic variables, a basic distribution of probability is postulated in terms of quantum operators and a statistical operator, what replace the usual probability rule of QT. For the universe, a variance of the ΛCDM model with Ω=1\Omega = 1Ω=1 Ω = 1 is assumed, one inflaton, a Goldstone type potential, initial time at t=−∞t = - \inftyt=−∞ t = - ∞ , expectation values of all fundamental fields vanishing for t→−∞t \to - \inftyt→−∞ t → - ∞ . The scalar fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background is correctly explained, but the absence of the tensor fluctuations remains not understood. This seems to suggest that gravity is a pure classical phenomenon what perhaps could be accommodated in our framework.
The formulation of a consistent scheme for treating semiclassical systems is considered, giving particular emphasis to the case of gravity. A critical review of the semiclassical problem is first given, stressing the conceptual aspects of the topic; the theory usually adopted is found to be unsatisfactory, and the need to have an unambiguous interpretation of quantum mechanics before trying to give an alternative description is realized. Our way to arrive at such an interpretation is rather unusual, but it presents the advantage of being almost compelling in the choice to make: First, we reformulate the Schrodinger equation as a set of hydrodynamical equations involving quantities which formally play the role of mass density, velocity and pressure for a fluid; the problem of interpreting the wave function is thus reduced to that of interpreting these quantities. We then show how they can be derived from the Wigner distribution function exactly as in the usual formalism of kinetic theory, and discuss how this fact provides strong support in favour of the statistical interpretation of quantum theory, according to which the state vector describes only ensembles, and not individual systems. We also consider some implications of these results on the possible existence of a more fundamental theory underlying quantum mechanics. It is shown that reconsidering the semiclassical problem in the light of the statistical interpretation, one is led to distinguish between a strongly and a weakly semiclassical regime, which are essentially characterized by the size of the statistical dispersion induced in the observables of the classical subsystem by the coupling to the quantum one. It turns out that in the weakly semiclassical regime, in which this dispersion is not negligible, the concept of coupling equations cannot be successfully applied, and one has rather to define a probability distribution even for the values of the classical observables; an hypothesis which allows to specify such a distribution is enunciated. Several examples of the application of these general principles are considered, and it is shown how the treatment of semiclassical relativistic fields requires a much more sophisticated treatment of the quantum source. This is provided reformulating quantum theory in terms of a quasiprobability functional P[1] in the space of the histories of the system. It is shown how such a functional allows to reconstruct the usual phase space distributions when integrated over suitable sets of paths, in a way which clarify the relations between operator ordering, path integration and phase space treatment of quantum theory. The relativistic extension of p[f] is also constructed, and an explicitly covariant version of relativistic quantum theory is discussed in some details. It is shown how the latter allows, formally, to consider superpositions of different mass eigenstates, although such superpositions are not directly observable. Finally, the application of these new techniques to the treatment of semiclassical electromagnetism and gravity, as well as of a scalar field, are considered. It is shown how the usual semiclassical field equations, suitably reinterpreted in terms of averages of the field, are recovered either in linear cases or in the strongly semiclassical regime, but that they do not hold in general. Finally, some possible extensions and implications of the formalism are discussed.