Sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion are three typical kinds of spontaneous affective responses of humans to external events and they are tightly intertwined with each other. Such events may be expressed in multiple modalities (e.g., linguistic, visual and acoustic), e.g., multi-modal conversations. Joint analysis of humans’ multi-modal sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion is an important yet challenging topic, as it is a complex cognitive process involving both cross-modality interaction and cross-affection correlation. From the probability theory perspective, cross-affection correlation also means that the judgments on sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion are incompatible. However, this exposed phenomenon cannot be sufficiently modelled by classical probability theory due to its assumption of compatibility. Neither do the existing approaches take it into consideration. In view of the recent success of quantum probability (QP) in modeling human cognition, particularly contextual incompatible decision making, we take the first step towards introducing QP into joint multi-modal sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion analysis. Specifically, we propose aQUantum probabIlity driven multi-modal sarcasm, sEntiment and emoTion analysis framework, termed QUIET. Extensive experiments on two datasets and the results show that the effectiveness and advantages of QUIET in comparison with a wide range of the state-of-the-art baselines. We also show the great potential of QP in multi-affect analysis.
Sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion are three typical kinds of spontaneous affective responses of humans to external events and they are tightly intertwined with each other. Such events may be expressed in multiple modalities (e.g., linguistic, visual and acoustic), e.g., multi-modal conversations. Joint analysis of humans’ multi-modal sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion is an important yet challenging topic, as it is a complex cognitive process involving both cross-modality interaction and cross-affection correlation. From the probability theory perspective, cross-affection correlation also means that the judgments on sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion are incompatible. However, this exposed phenomenon cannot be sufficiently modelled by classical probability theory due to its assumption of compatibility. Neither do the existing approaches take it into consideration. In view of the recent success of quantum probability (QP) in modeling human cognition, particularly contextual incompatible decision making, we take the first step towards introducing QP into joint multi-modal sarcasm, sentiment, and emotion analysis. Specifically, we propose aQUantum probabIlity driven multi-modal sarcasm, sEntiment and emoTion analysis framework, termed QUIET. Extensive experiments on two datasets and the results show that the effectiveness and advantages of QUIET in comparison with a wide range of the state-of-the-art baselines. We also show the great potential of QP in multi-affect analysis.
Sarcasm and sentiment embody intrinsic uncertainty of human cognition, making joint detection of multi-modal sarcasm and sentiment a challenging task.In view of the advantages of quantum probability (QP) in modeling such uncertainty, this paper explores the potential of QP as a mathematical framework and proposes a QP driven multi-task (QPM) learning framework.The QPM framework involves a complex-valued multi-modal representation encoder, a quantum-like fusion network and a quantum measurement mechanism.Each multimodal (e.g., textual, visual) utterance is first encoded as a quantum superposition of a set of basis terms using a complex-valued representation.Then, the quantum-like fusion network leverages quantum state composition and quantum interference to model the contextual interaction between adjacent utterances and the correlations across modalities respectively.Finally, quantum incompatible measurements are performed on the multi-modal representation of each utterance to yield the probabilistic outcomes of sarcasm and sentiment recognition.Experimental results show the state-of-the-art performance of our model.
Sarcasm detection in unimodal or multimodal setting is a very complex task. Sarcasm, emotion, and sentiment are related to each other, and hence any multitask model could be an effective way to leverage the interdependence among these tasks. In order to better represent these clandestine associations, we avoid solely relying on traditional machine learning methods to encode the relationships between the modalities. In this article, we propose a hybrid quantum model that banks upon the low computational complexity and robust representational power of a variational quantum circuit (VQC) and the tried and tested dense neural network to tackle sentiment, emotion, and sarcasm classification simultaneously. We empirically establish that the quantum properties like superposition, entanglement, and interference will better capture and replicate not only the cross-modal interactions between text, acoustics, and visuals but also the correlations between the three responses. We consider the extended MUStARD dataset to evaluate our proposed hybrid model. The results show that our proposed hybrid quantum framework yields more promising results for the primary task of sarcasm detection with the help of the two secondary classification tasks,viz.sentiment and emotion.
Video sentiment analysis as a decision-making process is inherently complex, involving the fusion of decisions from multiple modalities and the so-caused cognitive biases. Inspired by recent advances in quantum cognition, we show that the sentiment judgment from one modality could be incompatible with the judgment from another, i.e., the order matters and they cannot be jointly measured to produce a final decision. Thus the cognitive process exhibits ``quantum-like'' biases that cannot be captured by classical probability theories. Accordingly, we propose a fundamentally new, quantum cognitively motivated fusion strategy for predicting sentiment judgments. In particular, we formulate utterances as quantum superposition states of positive and negative sentiment judgments, and uni-modal classifiers as mutually incompatible observables, on a complex-valued Hilbert space with positive-operator valued measures. Experiments on two benchmarking datasets illustrate that our model significantly outperforms various existing decision level and a range of state-of-the-art content-level fusion approaches. The results also show that the concept of incompatibility allows effective handling of all combination patterns, including those extreme cases that are wrongly predicted by all uni-modal classifiers.
A long-standing goal in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is to develop systems that can perceive and understand human multimodal language. This requires both the consideration of context in the form of surrounding utterances in a conversation, i.e., context modelling, as well as the impact of different modalities (e.g., linguistic, visual acoustic), i.e., multimodal fusion. In the last few years, significant strides have been made towards the interpretation of human language due to simultaneous advancement in deep learning, data gathering and computing infrastructure. AI models have been investigated to either model interactions across distinct modalities, i.e., linguistic, visual and acoustic, or model interactions across parties in a conversation, achieving unprecedented levels of performance. However, AI models are often designed with only performance as their design target, leaving aside other essential factors such as transparency, interpretability, and how humans understand and reason about cognitive states. In line with this observation, in this dissertation, we develop quantum probabilistic neural models and techniques that allow us to capture rational and irrational cognitive biases, without requiring a priori understanding and identification of them. First, we present a comprehensive empirical comparison of state-of-the-art (SOTA) modality fusion strategies for video sentiment analysis. The findings provide us helpful insights into the development of more effective modality fusion models incorporating quantum-inspired components. Second, we introduce an end-to-end complex-valued neural model for video sentiment analysis, simulating quantum procedural steps, outside of physics, into the neural network modelling paradigm. Third, we investigate non-classical correlations across different modalities. In particular, we describe a methodology to model interactions between image and text for an information retrieval scenario. The results provide us with theoretical and empirical insights to develop a transparent end-to-end probabilistic neural model for video emotion detection in conversations, capturing non-classical correlations across distinct modalities. Fourth, we introduce a theoretical framework to model user's cognitive states underlying their multimodal decision perspectives, and propose a methodology to capture interference of modalities in decision making. Overall, we show that our models advance the SOTA on various affective analysis tasks, achieve high transparency due to the mapping to quantum physics meanings, and improve post-hoc interpretability, unearthing useful and explainable knowledge about cross-modal interactions.
Quantum theory, originally proposed as a physical theory to describe the motions of microscopic particles, has been applied to various non-physics domains involving human cognition and decision-making that are inherently uncertain and exhibit certain non-classical, quantum-like characteristics. Sentiment analysis is a typical example of such domains. In the last few years, by leveraging the modeling power of quantum probability (a non-classical probability stemming from quantum mechanics methodology) and deep neural networks, a range of novel quantum-cognitively inspired models for sentiment analysis have emerged and performed well. This survey presents a timely overview of the latest developments in this fascinating cross-disciplinary area. We first provide a background of quantum probability and quantum cognition at a theoretical level, analyzing their advantages over classical theories in modeling the cognitive aspects of sentiment analysis. Then, recent quantum-cognitively inspired models are introduced and discussed in detail, focusing on how they approach the key challenges of the sentiment analysis task. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the current research and highlight future research directions.
Sentiment, emotion, and sarcasm analysis in multimodal dialogues is crucial for understanding the underlying intentions and attitudes expressed by individuals. Traditional methods often struggle to capture the full intensity of these polarities, leading to less accurate results. To address this limitation, we propose a quantum-inspired approach leveraging Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) for enhanced classification and intensity analysis. A key component of our method is the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm that optimizes the parameters of the QNN by minimizing the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian system. This optimization enables the network to learn complex relationships in multimodal data more effectively. Our approach surpasses state-of-the-art methods, achieving up to 7.5 % higher accuracy and 6.8 % greater precision. Experiments on benchmark datasets such as MUStARD, Memotion, CMU-MOSEI, and MELD demonstrate its effectiveness, with an F1-score of 87.3 % on CMU-MOSEI. This method is particularly beneficial in domains like social media, customer support, and entertainment, where both verbal and non-verbal cues play a critical role in accurate sentiment analysis .