Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2306.01045 · Entropy

Simultaneous Momentum and Position Measurement and the Instrumental Weyl-Heisenberg Group

Christopher S. Jackson, Carlton M. Caves

Published Aug 16, 2023• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The canonical commutation relation, [Q,P]=iℏ, stands at the foundation of quantum theory and the original Hilbert space. The interpretation of P and Q as observables has always relied on the analogies that exist between the unitary transformations of Hilbert space and the canonical (also known as contact) transformations of classical phase space. Now that the theory of quantum measurement is essentially complete (this took a while), it is possible to revisit the canonical commutation relation in a way that sets the foundation of quantum theory not on unitary transformations but on positive transformations. This paper shows how the concept of simultaneous measurement leads to a fundamental differential geometric problem whose solution shows us the following. The simultaneous P and Q measurement (SPQM) defines a universal measuring instrument, which takes the shape of a seven-dimensional manifold, a universal covering group we call the instrumental Weyl-Heisenberg (IWH) group. The group IWH connects the identity to classical phase space in unexpected ways that are significant enough that the positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) offers a complete alternative to energy quantization. Five of the dimensions define processes that can be easily recognized and understood. The other two dimensions, the normalization and phase in the center of the IWH group, are less familiar. The normalization, in particular, requires special handling in order to describe and understand the SPQM instrument.

DOI
10.3390/e25081221

Related papers

Simultaneous Measurements of Noncommuting Observables: Positive Transformations and Instrumental Lie Groups

Christopher S. Jackson, Carlton M. Caves

We formulate a general program for describing and analyzing continuous, differential weak, simultaneous measurements of noncommuting observables, which focuses on describing the measuring instrument autonomously, without states. The Kraus operators of such measuring processes are time-ordered products of fundamental differential positive transformations, which generate nonunitary transformation groups that we call instrumental Lie groups. The temporal evolution of the instrument is equivalent to the diffusion of a Kraus-operator distribution function, defined relative to the invariant measure of the instrumental Lie group. This diffusion can be analyzed using Wiener path integration, stochastic differential equations, or a Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equation. This way of considering instrument evolution we call the Instrument Manifold Program. We relate the Instrument Manifold Program to state-based stochastic master equations. We then explain how the Instrument Manifold Program can be used to describe instrument evolution in terms of a universal cover that we call the universal instrumental Lie group, which is independent not just of states, but also of Hilbert space. The universal instrument is generically infinite dimensional, in which case the instrument’s evolution is chaotic. Special simultaneous measurements have a finite-dimensional universal instrument, in which case the instrument is considered principal, and it can be analyzed within the differential geometry of the universal instrumental Lie group. Principal instruments belong at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We consider the three most fundamental examples: measurement of a single observable, position and momentum, and the three components of angular momentum. As these measurements are performed continuously, they converge to strong simultaneous measurements. For a single observable, this results in the standard decay of coherence between inequivalent irreducible representations. For the latter two cases, it leads to a collapse within each irreducible representation onto the classical or spherical phase space, with the phase space located at the boundary of these instrumental Lie groups.

arXiv:2306.06167•Entropy•Aug 23, 2023•5 citations

Towards the Geometry of Quantum Optical Measurements: Kraus Trajectories in the Instrumental Weyl-Heisenberg Group Manifold

Tzula B. Propp, Chris S. Jackson

Since ancient Greek times, geometry has been a method by which humans can make inferences, by the use of similar triangles, about the world far beyond their immediate senses. Similarity plays an equally important role in quantum measurement, except that instead of triangles, the similarity is between the infinitesimal generators of rotation, canonical transformation, or some other virtual symmetry. For many quantum optical measurements of a single mode, these generators produce Kraus operators that are contained within a twelve-dimensional Lie group: the Instrumental Weyl-Heisenberg group manifold ($\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}$). In particular, $\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}$ is general enough to include all diffusively generated 'dyne measurements. In this paper, $\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}$ will be used to develop two more general classes of 'dyne measurement: one that interpolates between diffusive homodyne and diffusive heterodyne (``slomodyne'') and one that adds to 'dyne measurements adaptive squeezing and displacement. Our analysis uses an approach known as the Instrument Manifold Program (IMP). In particular, a Harish-Chandra-like decomposition of $\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}$ is used to calculate the vielbein transformation from a right-invariant basis to the corresponding coordinate basis, allowing us to universally and autonomously navigate $\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}$ and locate the Kraus-operator of whatever selective process is being considered as it evolves in time according to the measurement record.

quant-pharXiv:2610.16512•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations

Weyl quantization

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

The commutator of position and momentum operators is first considered in the coordinate and momentum representations, and then in an abstract Hilbert space. The reader is then introduced to canonical operators with the associated canonical quantization of commutation rules, which consists of maps defined on a symplectic space and taking values in the set of unitary operators on a Hilbert space. If the symplectic space is finite-dimensional, all of its irreducible representations are unitarily equivalent. The Weyl exponentiated form of the commutation relations is described and investigated. One then arrives at the definition of Weyl systems, and it is shown how to recover from them the formulation in terms of self-adjoint operators which satisfy a generalized form of commutation relations. Further topics are the Heisenberg representation for temporal evolution and the generalized uncertainty relations. Unitary operators associated with symplectic linear transformations are then considered, and, within this framework, translations, rotations and the harmonic oscillator are considered. The Weyl programme is then reassessed. Lastly, the basic postulates of modern quantum theory are eventually studied: the probabilistic nature of the predictions of results of measurements; the correspondence between observables and self-adjoint operators on Hilbert spaces; the expected result of measuring an observable quantity; and the evolution of the state vector in systems which are not affected by any external influence. The chapter ends with an outline of rigged Hilbert space formalism and its applications. The commutator in wave mechanics In the first part of this book we studied wave mechanics within the framework of the Schrödinger equation.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 11, 2004•0 citations

Modified Heisenberg Commutations Relations and Its Standard Hamiltonian Interpretation

Mauricio Contreras G., Roberto Ortiz, José Mauricio González

This paper analyzes the modified canonical Heisenberg commutation relations or GUP, from a standard Hamiltonian point of view. For a one-dimensional system, a such modified canonical Heisenberg commutation relation is defined by the commutator between a position x^ and a momentum operator p^ (called the deformed momentum), which becomes a function F of the same operators: x^,p^=F(x^,p^), that is, the Heisenberg algebra closes itself in general in a nonlinear way. The function F also depends on a parameter that controls the deformation of the Heisenberg algebra in such a way that for a null parameter value, one recovers the usual Heisenberg algebra x^,p^0=iℏI. Thus, it naturally raises the following questions: What does a relation of this type mean in Hamiltonian theory from a standard point of view? Is the deformed momentum the canonical variable conjugate to the position in such a relation? Moreover, what are the canonical variables in this model? The answer to these questions comes from the existence of two different phase spaces: The first one, called the non-deformed phase (which is obtained for control parameter value equal to zero), is defined by the Cartesian x^ coordinate and its non-deformed conjugate momentum p^0, which satisfies the standard quantum mechanical Heisenberg commutation relation. The second phase space, the deformed one, is given by the deformed momentum p^ and a new position coordinate y^, which is its canonical conjugate variable, so y^ and p^ also satisfy standard commutation relations. We construct a classical canonical transformation that maps the non-deformed phase space into the deformed one for a specific class of deformation functions F. Additionally, a quantum mechanical operator transformation is found between the two non-commutative phase spaces, which allows the Schrödinger equation to be written in both spaces. Thus, there are two equivalent quantum mechanical descriptions of the same physical process associated with a deformed commutation relation.

Mathematics•Dec 3, 2025•0 citations

Commutator Geometry of Wavefunctions: Unifying Quantum Uncertainty

Revista, Zen, PHYSICS, 10

Quantum uncertainty, famously encapsulated by Heisenberg's principle, is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, traditionally understood through the algebraic non-commutativity of observable operators. This paper proposes a novel framework: the commutator geometry of wavefunctions, aiming to unify diverse manifestations of quantum uncertainty within a single, intrinsic geometric description of the quantum state space. By establishing a direct link between the algebraic structure of commutators and the differential geometry of projective Hilbert space, we demonstrate how the inherent non-commutativity of observables fundamentally sculpts the geometry of quantum states. This approach allows for the derivation of geometric measures of uncertainty that intrinsically capture the limitations on simultaneous measurability. We show how this geometric formulation not only recovers existing uncertainty relations, such as the Robertson-Schroedinger inequality, but also provides a more profound, unified interpretation of quantum uncertainty as a manifestation of curvature and metric properties within the space of wavefunctions. The methodology involves constructing a commutator-induced metric and curvature tensor on the quantum state manifold, revealing how the degree of non-commutativity directly dictates the "fuzziness" or "spread" in observable values. Illustrative examples, including position-momentum and angular momentum, are used to demonstrate the efficacy and intuitive appeal of this geometric perspective. The implications of this unified geometric understanding extend to foundational issues in quantum mechanics, potentially offering new insights into quantum gravity, quantum information theory, and the very nature of quantum reality, where uncertainty is not merely a statistical limitation but an intrinsic geometric feature of the universe.

•Nov 28, 2025•0 citations

The Geometry of Quantum Mechanics: Hilbert Structure, Unitary Dynamics, Spin, Measurement, and the One-Particle Quantum Theory in Six-Throat Directed Spacetime

Ibrahim Mohammed Mussa

Paper XXII of the Six-Throat Directed Geometry program derives the mathematical structure of one-particle quantum mechanics from the directed spinor dynamics established on the regular closed six-throat spacetime. Starting from the conserved curved-spacetime Dirac current, the construction produces a positive and slice-independent inner product and its Hilbert-space completion. The corresponding geometric propagator is unitary and satisfies composition, inverse, and adjoint closure. Real physical observables are represented by self-adjoint operators with real spectra and orthogonal spectral resolutions. The compact global geometry yields an exact periodic commutator algebra, while the standard canonical position-momentum relation is recovered on regular local charts. The Robertson and Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relations then follow from the same Hilbert-space structure. The tetrad Clifford algebra generates the intrinsic spin-one-half representation, including the expected spin magnitude, the spinor sign reversal under a full two-pi rotation, and the rotational multiplets obtained by coupling orbital and intrinsic angular momentum. Detector-surface current is promoted from the direct Born-flux construction of Paper XXI to a general positive measurement structure described by a non-projective POVM and the trace probability rule. Density operators, purity, von Neumann entropy, conditional access states, and Kraus dephasing channels arise within the same measurement framework. The positive-energy Dirac branch reduces at low energy to Pauli dynamics and, when the spin-covariant terms commute appropriately, to the Schrödinger Hamiltonian. The same unitary framework yields the Liouville-von Neumann equation, the Heisenberg operator equation, and the Ehrenfest relations in the local directed potential. A forty-three-condition numerical closure audit satisfies all 43 declared conditions across the derived one-particle structure. Representative numerical results include Hilbert-product and unitary residuals at approximately machine precision, exact spin-one-half algebra to numerical precision, POVM completeness at machine precision, low-energy wave-packet infidelity of 3.16 × 10⁻¹⁰ for the stated audit configuration, and Schrödinger-Heisenberg expectation agreement at 5.66 × 10⁻¹⁷. The result is a single geometric chain from conserved spacetime flux to one-particle state space, unitary dynamics, observables, commutators, uncertainty, spin, measurement operators, statistical states, and the low-energy quantum equations. Composite systems, entanglement, exchange symmetry, quantum statistics, and variable-particle-number field theory remain subsequent structural layers and are not claimed as part of the present one-particle closure.

•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations
The canonical commutation relation, [Q,P]=iℏ, stands at the foundation of quantum theory and the original Hilbert space. The interpretation of P and Q as observables has always relied on the analogies that exist between the unitary transformations of Hilbert space and the canonical (also known as contact) transformations of classical phase space. Now that the theory of quantum measurement is essentially complete (this took a while), it is possible to revisit the canonical commutation relation in a way that sets the foundation of quantum theory not on unitary transformations but on positive transformations. This paper shows how the concept of simultaneous measurement leads to a fundamental differential geometric problem whose solution shows us the following. The simultaneous P and Q measurement (SPQM) defines a universal measuring instrument, which takes the shape of a seven-dimensional manifold, a universal covering group we call the instrumental Weyl-Heisenberg (IWH) group. The group IWH connects the identity to classical phase space in unexpected ways that are significant enough that the positive-operator-valued measure (POVM) offers a complete alternative to energy quantization. Five of the dimensions define processes that can be easily recognized and understood. The other two dimensions, the normalization and phase in the center of the IWH group, are less familiar. The normalization, in particular, requires special handling in order to describe and understand the SPQM instrument.
We formulate a general program for describing and analyzing continuous, differential weak, simultaneous measurements of noncommuting observables, which focuses on describing the measuring instrument autonomously, without states. The Kraus operators of such measuring processes are time-ordered products of fundamental differential positive transformations, which generate nonunitary transformation groups that we call instrumental Lie groups. The temporal evolution of the instrument is equivalent to the diffusion of a Kraus-operator distribution function, defined relative to the invariant measure of the instrumental Lie group. This diffusion can be analyzed using Wiener path integration, stochastic differential equations, or a Fokker-Planck-Kolmogorov equation. This way of considering instrument evolution we call the Instrument Manifold Program. We relate the Instrument Manifold Program to state-based stochastic master equations. We then explain how the Instrument Manifold Program can be used to describe instrument evolution in terms of a universal cover that we call the universal instrumental Lie group, which is independent not just of states, but also of Hilbert space. The universal instrument is generically infinite dimensional, in which case the instrument’s evolution is chaotic. Special simultaneous measurements have a finite-dimensional universal instrument, in which case the instrument is considered principal, and it can be analyzed within the differential geometry of the universal instrumental Lie group. Principal instruments belong at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We consider the three most fundamental examples: measurement of a single observable, position and momentum, and the three components of angular momentum. As these measurements are performed continuously, they converge to strong simultaneous measurements. For a single observable, this results in the standard decay of coherence between inequivalent irreducible representations. For the latter two cases, it leads to a collapse within each irreducible representation onto the classical or spherical phase space, with the phase space located at the boundary of these instrumental Lie groups.
Since ancient Greek times, geometry has been a method by which humans can make inferences, by the use of similar triangles, about the world far beyond their immediate senses. Similarity plays an equally important role in quantum measurement, except that instead of triangles, the similarity is between the infinitesimal generators of rotation, canonical transformation, or some other virtual symmetry. For many quantum optical measurements of a single mode, these generators produce Kraus operators that are contained within a twelve-dimensional Lie group: the Instrumental Weyl-Heisenberg group manifold (IWH12\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}IWH12). In particular, IWH12\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}IWH12 is general enough to include all diffusively generated 'dyne measurements. In this paper, IWH12\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}IWH12 will be used to develop two more general classes of 'dyne measurement: one that interpolates between diffusive homodyne and diffusive heterodyne (``slomodyne'') and one that adds to 'dyne measurements adaptive squeezing and displacement. Our analysis uses an approach known as the Instrument Manifold Program (IMP). In particular, a Harish-Chandra-like decomposition of IWH12\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}IWH12 is used to calculate the vielbein transformation from a right-invariant basis to the corresponding coordinate basis, allowing us to universally and autonomously navigate IWH12\mathrm{IWH}^{\textbf{12}}IWH12 and locate the Kraus-operator of whatever selective process is being considered as it evolves in time according to the measurement record.
The commutator of position and momentum operators is first considered in the coordinate and momentum representations, and then in an abstract Hilbert space. The reader is then introduced to canonical operators with the associated canonical quantization of commutation rules, which consists of maps defined on a symplectic space and taking values in the set of unitary operators on a Hilbert space. If the symplectic space is finite-dimensional, all of its irreducible representations are unitarily equivalent. The Weyl exponentiated form of the commutation relations is described and investigated. One then arrives at the definition of Weyl systems, and it is shown how to recover from them the formulation in terms of self-adjoint operators which satisfy a generalized form of commutation relations. Further topics are the Heisenberg representation for temporal evolution and the generalized uncertainty relations. Unitary operators associated with symplectic linear transformations are then considered, and, within this framework, translations, rotations and the harmonic oscillator are considered. The Weyl programme is then reassessed. Lastly, the basic postulates of modern quantum theory are eventually studied: the probabilistic nature of the predictions of results of measurements; the correspondence between observables and self-adjoint operators on Hilbert spaces; the expected result of measuring an observable quantity; and the evolution of the state vector in systems which are not affected by any external influence. The chapter ends with an outline of rigged Hilbert space formalism and its applications. The commutator in wave mechanics In the first part of this book we studied wave mechanics within the framework of the Schrödinger equation.
This paper analyzes the modified canonical Heisenberg commutation relations or GUP, from a standard Hamiltonian point of view. For a one-dimensional system, a such modified canonical Heisenberg commutation relation is defined by the commutator between a position x^ and a momentum operator p^ (called the deformed momentum), which becomes a function F of the same operators: x^,p^=F(x^,p^), that is, the Heisenberg algebra closes itself in general in a nonlinear way. The function F also depends on a parameter that controls the deformation of the Heisenberg algebra in such a way that for a null parameter value, one recovers the usual Heisenberg algebra x^,p^0=iℏI. Thus, it naturally raises the following questions: What does a relation of this type mean in Hamiltonian theory from a standard point of view? Is the deformed momentum the canonical variable conjugate to the position in such a relation? Moreover, what are the canonical variables in this model? The answer to these questions comes from the existence of two different phase spaces: The first one, called the non-deformed phase (which is obtained for control parameter value equal to zero), is defined by the Cartesian x^ coordinate and its non-deformed conjugate momentum p^0, which satisfies the standard quantum mechanical Heisenberg commutation relation. The second phase space, the deformed one, is given by the deformed momentum p^ and a new position coordinate y^, which is its canonical conjugate variable, so y^ and p^ also satisfy standard commutation relations. We construct a classical canonical transformation that maps the non-deformed phase space into the deformed one for a specific class of deformation functions F. Additionally, a quantum mechanical operator transformation is found between the two non-commutative phase spaces, which allows the Schrödinger equation to be written in both spaces. Thus, there are two equivalent quantum mechanical descriptions of the same physical process associated with a deformed commutation relation.
Quantum uncertainty, famously encapsulated by Heisenberg's principle, is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, traditionally understood through the algebraic non-commutativity of observable operators. This paper proposes a novel framework: the commutator geometry of wavefunctions, aiming to unify diverse manifestations of quantum uncertainty within a single, intrinsic geometric description of the quantum state space. By establishing a direct link between the algebraic structure of commutators and the differential geometry of projective Hilbert space, we demonstrate how the inherent non-commutativity of observables fundamentally sculpts the geometry of quantum states. This approach allows for the derivation of geometric measures of uncertainty that intrinsically capture the limitations on simultaneous measurability. We show how this geometric formulation not only recovers existing uncertainty relations, such as the Robertson-Schroedinger inequality, but also provides a more profound, unified interpretation of quantum uncertainty as a manifestation of curvature and metric properties within the space of wavefunctions. The methodology involves constructing a commutator-induced metric and curvature tensor on the quantum state manifold, revealing how the degree of non-commutativity directly dictates the "fuzziness" or "spread" in observable values. Illustrative examples, including position-momentum and angular momentum, are used to demonstrate the efficacy and intuitive appeal of this geometric perspective. The implications of this unified geometric understanding extend to foundational issues in quantum mechanics, potentially offering new insights into quantum gravity, quantum information theory, and the very nature of quantum reality, where uncertainty is not merely a statistical limitation but an intrinsic geometric feature of the universe.
Paper XXII of the Six-Throat Directed Geometry program derives the mathematical structure of one-particle quantum mechanics from the directed spinor dynamics established on the regular closed six-throat spacetime. Starting from the conserved curved-spacetime Dirac current, the construction produces a positive and slice-independent inner product and its Hilbert-space completion. The corresponding geometric propagator is unitary and satisfies composition, inverse, and adjoint closure. Real physical observables are represented by self-adjoint operators with real spectra and orthogonal spectral resolutions. The compact global geometry yields an exact periodic commutator algebra, while the standard canonical position-momentum relation is recovered on regular local charts. The Robertson and Schrödinger-Robertson uncertainty relations then follow from the same Hilbert-space structure. The tetrad Clifford algebra generates the intrinsic spin-one-half representation, including the expected spin magnitude, the spinor sign reversal under a full two-pi rotation, and the rotational multiplets obtained by coupling orbital and intrinsic angular momentum. Detector-surface current is promoted from the direct Born-flux construction of Paper XXI to a general positive measurement structure described by a non-projective POVM and the trace probability rule. Density operators, purity, von Neumann entropy, conditional access states, and Kraus dephasing channels arise within the same measurement framework. The positive-energy Dirac branch reduces at low energy to Pauli dynamics and, when the spin-covariant terms commute appropriately, to the Schrödinger Hamiltonian. The same unitary framework yields the Liouville-von Neumann equation, the Heisenberg operator equation, and the Ehrenfest relations in the local directed potential. A forty-three-condition numerical closure audit satisfies all 43 declared conditions across the derived one-particle structure. Representative numerical results include Hilbert-product and unitary residuals at approximately machine precision, exact spin-one-half algebra to numerical precision, POVM completeness at machine precision, low-energy wave-packet infidelity of 3.16 × 10⁻¹⁰ for the stated audit configuration, and Schrödinger-Heisenberg expectation agreement at 5.66 × 10⁻¹⁷. The result is a single geometric chain from conserved spacetime flux to one-particle state space, unitary dynamics, observables, commutators, uncertainty, spin, measurement operators, statistical states, and the low-energy quantum equations. Composite systems, entanglement, exchange symmetry, quantum statistics, and variable-particle-number field theory remain subsequent structural layers and are not claimed as part of the present one-particle closure.