Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2305.14511

Adiabatic driving and geometric phases in classical systems

A. D. Bermúdez Manjarres

Published May 23, 2023• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We study the concepts of adiabatic driving and geometric phases of classical integrable systems under the Koopman-von Neumann formalism. In close relation to what happens to a quantum state, a classical Koopman-von Neumann eigenstate will acquire a geometric phase factor $exp\left\{ iΦ\right\} $ after a closed variation of the parameters $λ$ in its associated Hamiltonian. The explicit form of $Φ$ is then derived for integrable systems, and its relation with the Hannay angles is shown. Additionally, we use quantum formulas to write a classical adiabatic gauge potential that generates adiabatic unitary flow between classical eigenstates, and we explicitly show the relationship between the potential and the classical geometric phase.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2305.14511

Related papers

The geometric tensor for classical states

A. D. Bermúdez Manjarres

We use the Liouville eigenfunctions to define a classical version of the geometric tensor and study its relationship with the classical adiabatic gauge potential (AGP). We focus on integrable systems and show that the imaginary part of the geometric tensor is related to the Hannay curvature. The singularities of the geometric tensor and the AGP allows us to link the transition from Arnold-Liouville integrability to chaos with some of the mathematical formalism of quantum phase transitions.

arXiv:2307.01208•Jun 28, 2023•0 citations

Geometric Phases in Classical and Quantum Systems

Simon Godskesen

We are accustomed to think the phase of single particle states does not matter. After all, the phase cancels out when calculating physical observables. However, the geometric phase can cause interference even in single particle states and can be measured. Berry’s phase is a geometric phase the system accumulates as its time-dependent Hamiltonian is subjected to closed adiabatic excursion in parameter space. In this report, we explore how Berry’s phase manifests itself in various fields of physics, both classical and quantum mechanical. The Hannay angle is a classical analogue to Berry’s phase and they are related by a derivative. The Aharonov-Bohm effect is a manifestation of Berry’s phase. Net rotation of deformable bodies in the language of gauge theory can be translated as a Berry phase. The well-known BornOppenheimer approximation is a molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect and is another manifestation of Berry’s Phase.

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

The geometric phase for chaotic systems

Jonathan M. Robbins, Michael Berry

Abstract The geometric phase acquired by the eigenstates of cycled quantum systems is given by the flux of a two-form through a surface in the system’s parameter space. We obtain the classical limit of this two-form in a form applicable to systems whose classical dynamics is chaotic. For integrable systems the expression is equivalent to the Hannay two-form. We discuss various properties of the classical two-form, derive semiclassical corrections to it (associated with classical periodic orbits), and consider implications for the semiclassical density of degeneracies.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Mar 9, 1992•40 citations

Geometric quantum phase and angles

J. Anandan, Yakir Aharonov

The geometric phase in quantum mechanics is formulated for charged particles in a gauge-invariant, geometric manner. It is then extended to an evolution resulting from a sequence of measurements as in the work of Pancharatnam and Aharonov and Vardi. Its close connection to the Feynman formulation of quantum mechanics is pointed out. The geometric angles, which are generalizations of the classical, adiabatic angles introduced by Hannay and the quantum, adiabatic angles introduced by Anandan and Stodolsky in their group-theoretic treatment of Berry's phase, are studied in quantum and classical physics. The geometric phase for a quantum spin in a magnetic field due to a second particle is obtained using the quantum reference frame defined by the latter. The question of whether the geometric phase and angles are local or nonlocal and their relationship to the electromagnetic and gravitational phases are also discussed.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Sep 15, 1988•156 citations

Adiabatic Approximation for Path Integrals and Geometrical Potentials

Takashi Ohnishi, Naoto Nagaosa

Geometrical concepts have played an important role in quantum mechanics. In the Schrodinger representation, the Berry–Simon connection and the quantum geometric tensor appear as gauge potentials in the effective Hamiltonian for a heavy system under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. On the other hand, the Berry phase should arise as the amplitude of each path in the pathintegral formalism. In their pioneering work, Kuratsuji and Iida have developed the treatment of the Born– Oppenheimer approximation in the path integral quantization, where the Berry phase of the light system naturally appears in the effective action for the heavy system. However, they did not derive the gauge potentials themselves in the effective Hamiltonian. In this short note, we show that the gauge potentials which relate to the geometry of the Hilbert space of the light system are also derived in the adiabatic scheme of path integrals. Our result presents the path-integral formalism to consider the effective dynamics of the heavy system under the adiabatic approximation. Let us consider the following Hamiltonian:

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Dec 25, 2006•2 citations

Simulation of quantum shortcuts to adiabaticity by classical oscillators

Yang Liu, Y. N. Zhang, H. D. Liu +1 more

It is known that the dynamics and geometric phase of a quantum system can be simulated by classical coupled oscillators using the quantum−classical mapping method without loss of physics. In this work, we show that this method can also be used to simulate the schemes of quantum shortcuts to adiabaticity, which can quickly achieve the adiabatic effect through a non-adiabatic process. By mapping quantum systems by classical oscillators, two schemes, Berry’s “transitionless quantum driving” and the Lewis−Riesenfeld invariant method, are simulated by a corresponding transitionless classical driving method, which keeps adiabatic phase trajectories and acquires Hannay’s angle and the classical Lewis−Riesenfeld invariant method by manipulating the configurations of classical coupled oscillators. The classical shortcuts to adiabaticity for the two coupled classical oscillators, which is the classical version of a spin-1/2 in a magnetic field, is employed to illustrate our results and compared with quantum shortcuts-to-adiabaticity methods.

Frontiers in Physics•Jan 13, 2023•3 citations
We study the concepts of adiabatic driving and geometric phases of classical integrable systems under the Koopman-von Neumann formalism. In close relation to what happens to a quantum state, a classical Koopman-von Neumann eigenstate will acquire a geometric phase factor exp{iΦ}exp\left\{ iΦ\right\} exp{iΦ} after a closed variation of the parameters λλλ in its associated Hamiltonian. The explicit form of ΦΦΦ is then derived for integrable systems, and its relation with the Hannay angles is shown. Additionally, we use quantum formulas to write a classical adiabatic gauge potential that generates adiabatic unitary flow between classical eigenstates, and we explicitly show the relationship between the potential and the classical geometric phase.
We are accustomed to think the phase of single particle states does not matter. After all, the phase cancels out when calculating physical observables. However, the geometric phase can cause interference even in single particle states and can be measured. Berry’s phase is a geometric phase the system accumulates as its time-dependent Hamiltonian is subjected to closed adiabatic excursion in parameter space. In this report, we explore how Berry’s phase manifests itself in various fields of physics, both classical and quantum mechanical. The Hannay angle is a classical analogue to Berry’s phase and they are related by a derivative. The Aharonov-Bohm effect is a manifestation of Berry’s phase. Net rotation of deformable bodies in the language of gauge theory can be translated as a Berry phase. The well-known BornOppenheimer approximation is a molecular Aharonov-Bohm effect and is another manifestation of Berry’s Phase.
Abstract The geometric phase acquired by the eigenstates of cycled quantum systems is given by the flux of a two-form through a surface in the system’s parameter space. We obtain the classical limit of this two-form in a form applicable to systems whose classical dynamics is chaotic. For integrable systems the expression is equivalent to the Hannay two-form. We discuss various properties of the classical two-form, derive semiclassical corrections to it (associated with classical periodic orbits), and consider implications for the semiclassical density of degeneracies.
The geometric phase in quantum mechanics is formulated for charged particles in a gauge-invariant, geometric manner. It is then extended to an evolution resulting from a sequence of measurements as in the work of Pancharatnam and Aharonov and Vardi. Its close connection to the Feynman formulation of quantum mechanics is pointed out. The geometric angles, which are generalizations of the classical, adiabatic angles introduced by Hannay and the quantum, adiabatic angles introduced by Anandan and Stodolsky in their group-theoretic treatment of Berry's phase, are studied in quantum and classical physics. The geometric phase for a quantum spin in a magnetic field due to a second particle is obtained using the quantum reference frame defined by the latter. The question of whether the geometric phase and angles are local or nonlocal and their relationship to the electromagnetic and gravitational phases are also discussed.
Geometrical concepts have played an important role in quantum mechanics. In the Schrodinger representation, the Berry–Simon connection and the quantum geometric tensor appear as gauge potentials in the effective Hamiltonian for a heavy system under the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. On the other hand, the Berry phase should arise as the amplitude of each path in the pathintegral formalism. In their pioneering work, Kuratsuji and Iida have developed the treatment of the Born– Oppenheimer approximation in the path integral quantization, where the Berry phase of the light system naturally appears in the effective action for the heavy system. However, they did not derive the gauge potentials themselves in the effective Hamiltonian. In this short note, we show that the gauge potentials which relate to the geometry of the Hilbert space of the light system are also derived in the adiabatic scheme of path integrals. Our result presents the path-integral formalism to consider the effective dynamics of the heavy system under the adiabatic approximation. Let us consider the following Hamiltonian:
It is known that the dynamics and geometric phase of a quantum system can be simulated by classical coupled oscillators using the quantum−classical mapping method without loss of physics. In this work, we show that this method can also be used to simulate the schemes of quantum shortcuts to adiabaticity, which can quickly achieve the adiabatic effect through a non-adiabatic process. By mapping quantum systems by classical oscillators, two schemes, Berry’s “transitionless quantum driving” and the Lewis−Riesenfeld invariant method, are simulated by a corresponding transitionless classical driving method, which keeps adiabatic phase trajectories and acquires Hannay’s angle and the classical Lewis−Riesenfeld invariant method by manipulating the configurations of classical coupled oscillators. The classical shortcuts to adiabaticity for the two coupled classical oscillators, which is the classical version of a spin-1/2 in a magnetic field, is employed to illustrate our results and compared with quantum shortcuts-to-adiabaticity methods.