To solve 3sat instances on quantum annealers they need to be transformed to an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). When there are multiple transformations available, the question arises whether different transformations lead to differences in the obtained solution quality. Thus, in this paper we conduct an empirical benchmark study, in which we compare four structurally different QUBO transformations for the 3sat problem with regards to the solution quality on D-Wave's Advantage_system4.1. We show that the choice of QUBO transformation can significantly impact the number of correct solutions the quantum annealer returns. Furthermore, we show that the size of a QUBO instance (i.e., the dimension of the QUBO matrix) is not a sufficient predictor for solution quality, as larger QUBO instances may produce better results than smaller QUBO instances for the same problem. We also empirically show that the number of different quadratic values of a QUBO instance, combined with their range, can significantly impact the solution quality.
To solve 3sat instances on quantum annealers they need to be transformed to an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). When there are multiple transformations available, the question arises whether different transformations lead to differences in the obtained solution quality. Thus, in this paper we conduct an empirical benchmark study, in which we compare four structurally different QUBO transformations for the 3sat problem with regards to the solution quality on D-Wave's Advantage_system4.1. We show that the choice of QUBO transformation can significantly impact the number of correct solutions the quantum annealer returns. Furthermore, we show that the size of a QUBO instance (i.e., the dimension of the QUBO matrix) is not a sufficient predictor for solution quality, as larger QUBO instances may produce better results than smaller QUBO instances for the same problem. We also empirically show that the number of different quadratic values of a QUBO instance, combined with their range, can significantly impact the solution quality.
The increasing complexity of computational problems in various fields entails the development of efficient methods to solve them. Thus, the emerging technology of quantum computers comes with algorithms, such as quantum annealing, that could solve optimization problems exponentially faster. In particular, to solve the 3SAT problem on quantum annealers, it must be transformed into an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Given that the choice of 3SAT-to-QUBO transformation affects the solution quality on quantum annealing, an algorithmic method for creating numerous 3SAT-to-QUBO transformations has recently been proposed, aiming to investigate more deeply such effect. This represents a challenge when deciding which is the best performing 3SAT-to-QUBO transformation that should be used when solving a 3SAT instance on quantum annealing. To overcome this issue, this work investigates the impact of different 3SAT-to-QUBO transformations on the solution quality of simulated annealing, as a classical analogue to quantum annealing. We demonstrate that different QUBO encodings of the same 3SAT instance can lead to different outcomes in terms of energy and clause satisfaction. We also reveal some correlations between 3SAT features, QUBO structural properties, and solution quality. These findings underscore the importance of the choice of 3SAT-to-QUBO transformation in simulated annealing, and provide a foundation for the future development of machine learning models for guiding encoding choices in both classical and quantum environments.
One way of solving 3sat instances on a quantum computer is to transform the 3sat instances into instances of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimizations (QUBOs), which can be used as an input for the QAOA algorithm on quantum gate systems or as an input for quantum annealers. This mapping is performed by a 3sat-to-QUBO transformation. Recently, it has been shown that the choice of the 3sat-to-QUBO transformation can significantly impact the solution quality of quantum annealing. It has been shown that the solution quality can vary up to an order of magnitude difference in the number of correct solutions received, depending solely on the 3sat-to-QUBO transformation. An open question is: what causes these differences in the solution quality when solving 3sat-instances with different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations? To be able to conduct meaningful studies that assess the reasons for the differences in the performance, a larger number of different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations would be needed. However, currently, there are only a few known 3sat-to-QUBO transformations, and all of them were created manually by experts, who used time and clever reasoning to create these transformations. In this paper, we will solve this problem by proposing an algorithmic method that is able to create thousands of new and different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations, and thus enables researchers to systematically study the reasons for the significant difference in the performance of different 3sat-to-QUBO transformations. Our algorithmic method is an exhaustive search procedure that exploits properties of 4×4 dimensional pattern QUBOs, a concept which has been used implicitly in the creation of 3sat-to-QUBO transformations before, but was never described explicitly. We will thus also formally and explicitly introduce the concept of pattern QUBOs in this paper.
As contemporary quantum computers do not possess error correction, any calculation performed by these devices can be considered an involuntary approximation. To solve a problem on a quantum annealer, it has to be expressed as an instance of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). In this work, we thus study whether systematically approximating QUBO representations of the MAX-3SAT problem can improve the solution quality when solved on contemporary quantum hardware, compared to using exact, non-approximated QUBO representations. For a MAX-3SAT instance consisting of a 3SAT formula withnvariables andmclauses, we propose a method of systematically creating approximate QUBO representations of dimension(n×n), which is significantly smaller than the QUBO matrices of any exact, non-approximated MAX-3SAT QUBO transformation. In an empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that using our QUBO approximations for solving MAX-3SAT problems on D-Wave's quantum annealer Advantage_System6.4 can yield better results than using state-of-the-art exact QUBO transformations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using naive QUBO approximation methods, based on removing values from exact(n+m)×(n+m)−dimensionalQUBO representations of MAX-3SAT instances, is ineffective.
Recent advancements in quantum computing have demonstrated significant potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems, like the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. However, current quantum and quantum-inspired algorithms often require transforming these constrained problems into an unconstrained form, known as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Such transformations can significantly impact the algorithms’ speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess all nine methods using Simulated Annealing and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time and the quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Additionally, we tested these transformations on quantum annealers, which were unable to solve even small problem instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. However, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the total number of variables in the QUBO representation. This is a critical factor for enhanced performance on emerging quantum hardware, since it also reduces the required number of qubits and the embedding chain lengths.
Recent advancements in quantum computing have demonstrated significant potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems, like the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. However, current quantum and quantum-inspired algorithms often require transforming these constrained problems into an unconstrained form, known as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO). Such transformations can significantly impact the algorithms’ speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess all nine methods using Simulated Annealing and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time and the quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Additionally, we tested these transformations on quantum annealers, which were unable to solve even small problem instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. However, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the total number of variables in the QUBO representation. This is a critical factor for enhanced performance on emerging quantum hardware, since it also reduces the required number of qubits and the embedding chain lengths.
Recent advances in quantum computing have shown great potential for solving combinatorial optimization problems. A notable example is the quadratic knapsack problem, a constrained binary optimization problem. However, current quantum-inspired algorithms require Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) formulations. Transforming constrained optimization into QUBO impacts the algorithms' speed and efficiency. In this study, we evaluate five existing transformation methods and propose four novel approaches. We assess them by using Simulated Annealing (SA), and find that three of our approaches outperform existing methods in terms of execution time as well as quality and quantity of feasible solutions found. Also, we tested these transformations on a quantum annealer, which was unable to solve even small instances, due to limitations in connectivity and error rates. In general, our results highlight the advantages of the new approaches, which reduce the number of variables in the QUBO representation.