Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2304.12872 · Physical Review A

Avoided level crossings with exponentially closing gaps in quantum annealing

Arthur Braida, Simon Martiel, Ioan Todinca

Published Feb 12, 2024• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of avoided level crossings in quantum annealing, a promising framework for quantum computing that may provide a quantum advantage for certain tasks. Quantum annealing (QA) involves letting a quantum system evolve according to the Schr\"odinger equation, with the goal of obtaining the optimal solution to an optimization problem through measurements of the final state. However, the continuous nature of quantum annealing makes analytical analysis challenging, particularly with regard to the instantaneous eigenenergies. The adiabatic theorem provides a theoretical result for the annealing time required to obtain the optimal solution with high probability, which is inversely proportional to the square of the minimum spectral gap. Avoided level crossings can create exponentially closing gaps, which can lead to exponentially long running times for optimization problems. In this paper, we use a perturbative expansion to derive a condition for the occurrence of an avoided level crossing during the annealing process. We then apply this condition to the MaxCut problem on bipartite graphs. We show that no exponentially small gaps arise for regular bipartite graphs, implying that QA can efficiently solve MaxCut in that case. On the other hand, we show that irregularities in the vertex degrees can lead to the satisfaction of the avoided level crossing occurrence condition. We provide numerical evidence to support this theoretical development, and discuss the relation between the presence of exponentially closing gaps and the failure of quantum annealing.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.109.022415

Related papers

Effects of X X catalysts on quantum annealing spectra with perturbative crossings

Natasha Feinstein, Louis Fry-Bouriaux, Sougato Bose +1 more

In adiabatic quantum computation the required run-time to reach a given ground-state fidelity is dictated by the size of the minimum gap that appears between the ground and first-excited state in the annealing spectrum. In general the presence of avoided level crossings demands an exponential increase in the annealing time with the system size which has consequences both for the efficiency of the algorithm and the required qubit coherence times. One promising avenue being explored to produce more favorable gap scaling is the introduction of nonstoquastic X X couplings in the form of a catalyst—of particular interest are catalysts which utilize accessible information about the optimization problem in their construction. Here we show extreme sensitivity of the effect of an X X catalyst to subtle changes in the encoding of the optimization problem. In particular, we observe that a targeted catalyst containing a single coupling can significantly reduce the gap closing with system size at an avoided level crossing. For slightly different encodings of the same problems however, these same catalysts result in closing gaps in the annealing spectrum. To understand the origin of these closing gaps, we study how the evolution of the ground-state vector is altered by the presence of the catalyst and find that the negative components of the ground-state vector are key to understanding the response of the gap spectrum. We also consider how and when these closing gaps could be utilized in diabatic quantum annealing protocols—a promising alternative to adiabatic quantum annealing in which transitions to higher energy levels are exploited to reduce the run time of the algorithm. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2203.06779•Physical Review A•Oct 10, 2024•8 citations

Quantum annealing showing an exponentially small success probability despite a constant energy gap with polynomial energy

Hiroshi Hayasaka, Takashi Imoto, Yuichiro Matsuzaki +1 more

Quantum annealing (QA) is a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems. We can estimate the computational time for QA using what is referred to as the adiabatic condition derived from the adiabatic theorem. The adiabatic condition consists of two parts: an energy gap and a transition matrix. Most past studies have focused on the relationship between the energy gap and computational time. The success probability of QA is considered to decrease exponentially owing to the exponentially decreasing energy gap at the first-order phase-transition point. In this study, through a detailed analysis of the relationship between the energy gap, transition matrix, and computational cost during QA, we propose a general method for constructing counterintuitive models wherein QA with a constant annealing time fails despite a constant energy gap, based on polynomial energy. We assume that the energy of the total Hamiltonian is at most $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Theta}}(L)$, where $L$ is the number of qubits. In our formalism, we choose a known model that exhibits an exponentially small energy gap during QA, and modify the model by adding a specific penalty term to the Hamiltonian. In the modified model, the transition matrix in the adiabatic condition becomes exponentially large as the number of qubits increases, while the energy gap remains constant. Moreover, we achieve a quadratic speedup, for which the upper bound for improvement in the adiabatic condition is determined by the polynomial energy. For concrete examples, we consider the adiabatic Grover search and the ferromagnetic $p$-spin model. In these cases, with the addition of the penalty term, although the success probability of QA on the modified models becomes exponentially small despite a constant energy gap, we are able to achieve a success probability considerably higher than that of conventional QA. Moreover, in concrete examples, we numerically show the scaling of the computational cost is quadratically improved compared to the conventional QA. Our findings pave the way for a better understanding of QA performance.

arXiv:2212.09995•Physical Review A•Aug 26, 2024•4 citations

Bounding first-order quantum phase transitions in adiabatic quantum computing

Matthias Werner, Artur García-Sáez, Marta P. Estarellas

In the context of adiabatic quantum computation (AQC), it has been argued that first-order quantum phase transitions (QPTs) due to localization phenomena cause AQC to fail by exponentially decreasing the minimal spectral gap of the Hamiltonian along the annealing path as a function of the qubit number. The vanishing of the spectral gap is often linked to the localization of the ground state in a local minimum, requiring the system to tunnel into the global minimum at a later stage of the annealing. Recent methods have been proposed to avoid this phenomenon by carefully designing the involved Hamiltonians. However, it remains a challenge to formulate a comprehensive theory of the effect of the various parameters and the conditions under which QPTs make the AQC algorithm fail. Equipped with concepts from graph theory, in this work we link graph quantities associated with the Hamiltonians along the annealing path with the occurrence of QPTs. These links allow us to derive bounds on the location of the minimal spectral gap along the annealing path, augmenting the toolbox for the analysis of strategies to improve the runtime of AQC algorithms.

arXiv:2301.13861•Physical Review Research•Dec 13, 2023•7 citations

Diabatic quantum annealing for the frustrated ring model

Jeremy Côté, Frédéric Sauvage, Martín Larocca +3 more

Abstract Quantum annealing (QA) is a continuous-time heuristic quantum algorithm for solving or approximately solving classical optimization problems. The algorithm uses a schedule to interpolate between a driver Hamiltonian with an easy-to-prepare ground state and a problem Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes solutions to an optimization problem. The standard implementation relies on the evolution being adiabatic: keeping the system in the instantaneous ground state with high probability and requiring a time scale inversely related to the minimum energy gap between the instantaneous ground and excited states. However, adiabatic evolution can lead to evolution times that scale exponentially with the system size, even for computationally simple problems. Here, we study whether non-adiabatic evolutions with optimized annealing schedules can bypass this exponential slowdown for one such class of problems called the frustrated ring model. For sufficiently optimized annealing schedules and system sizes of up to 39 qubits, we provide numerical evidence that we can avoid the exponential slowdown. Our work highlights the potential of highly-controllable QA to circumvent bottlenecks associated with the standard implementation of QA.

arXiv:2212.02624•Quantum Science and Technology•Sep 20, 2023•14 citations

Improving the efficiency of quantum annealing with controlled diagonal catalysts

T Hattori, Shu Tanaka

Quantum annealing is a promising algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. It searches for the ground state of the Ising model, which corresponds to the optimal solution of a given combinatorial optimization problem. The guiding principle of quantum annealing is the adiabatic theorem in quantum mechanics, which guarantees that a system remains in the ground state of its Hamiltonian if the time evolution is sufficiently slow. According to the adiabatic theorem, the annealing time required for quantum annealing to satisfy the adiabaticity scales inversely proportional to the square of the minimum energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state during time evolution. As a result, finding the ground state becomes significantly more difficult when the energy gap is small, creating a major bottleneck in quantum annealing. Expanding the energy gap is one strategy for improving the performance of quantum annealing; however, its implementation in actual hardware remains difficult. This study proposes a method for efficiently solving instances with small energy gaps by introducing additional local terms to the Hamiltonian and exploiting the diabatic transition remaining in the small energy gap. The proposed method achieves an approximate quadratic speedup of the exponential scaling exponent in time to solution compared to the conventional quantum annealing. In addition, we investigate the transferability of the parameters obtained with the proposed method.

arXiv:2503.15244•Physical Review A•Feb 3, 2026•3 citations

On the relevance of avoided crossings away from quantum critical point to the complexity of quantum adiabatic algorithm

Sergey Knysh, Vadim Smelyanskiy

Two recent preprints [B. Altshuler, H. Krovi, and J. Roland, "Quantum adiabatic optimization fails for random instances of NP-complete problems", arXiv:0908.2782 and "Anderson localization casts clouds over adiabatic quantum optimization", arXiv:0912.0746] argue that random 4th order perturbative corrections to the energies of local minima of random instances of NP-complete problem lead to avoided crossings that cause the failure of quantum adiabatic algorithm (due to exponentially small gap) close to the end, for very small transverse field that scales as an inverse power of instance size N. The theoretical portion of this work does not to take into account the exponential degeneracy of the ground and excited states at zero field. A corrected analysis shows that unlike those in the middle of the spectrum, avoided crossings at the edge would require high [O(1)] transverse fields, at which point the perturbation theory may become divergent due to quantum phase transition. This effect manifests itself only in large instances [exp(0.02 N) >> 1], which might be the reason it had not been observed in the authors' numerical work. While we dispute the proposed mechanism of failure of quantum adiabatic algorithm, we cannot draw any conclusions on its ultimate complexity.

arXiv:1005.3011•May 17, 2010•21 citations
This paper explores the phenomenon of avoided level crossings in quantum annealing, a promising framework for quantum computing that may provide a quantum advantage for certain tasks. Quantum annealing (QA) involves letting a quantum system evolve according to the Schr"odinger equation, with the goal of obtaining the optimal solution to an optimization problem through measurements of the final state. However, the continuous nature of quantum annealing makes analytical analysis challenging, particularly with regard to the instantaneous eigenenergies. The adiabatic theorem provides a theoretical result for the annealing time required to obtain the optimal solution with high probability, which is inversely proportional to the square of the minimum spectral gap. Avoided level crossings can create exponentially closing gaps, which can lead to exponentially long running times for optimization problems. In this paper, we use a perturbative expansion to derive a condition for the occurrence of an avoided level crossing during the annealing process. We then apply this condition to the MaxCut problem on bipartite graphs. We show that no exponentially small gaps arise for regular bipartite graphs, implying that QA can efficiently solve MaxCut in that case. On the other hand, we show that irregularities in the vertex degrees can lead to the satisfaction of the avoided level crossing occurrence condition. We provide numerical evidence to support this theoretical development, and discuss the relation between the presence of exponentially closing gaps and the failure of quantum annealing.
In adiabatic quantum computation the required run-time to reach a given ground-state fidelity is dictated by the size of the minimum gap that appears between the ground and first-excited state in the annealing spectrum. In general the presence of avoided level crossings demands an exponential increase in the annealing time with the system size which has consequences both for the efficiency of the algorithm and the required qubit coherence times. One promising avenue being explored to produce more favorable gap scaling is the introduction of nonstoquastic X X couplings in the form of a catalyst—of particular interest are catalysts which utilize accessible information about the optimization problem in their construction. Here we show extreme sensitivity of the effect of an X X catalyst to subtle changes in the encoding of the optimization problem. In particular, we observe that a targeted catalyst containing a single coupling can significantly reduce the gap closing with system size at an avoided level crossing. For slightly different encodings of the same problems however, these same catalysts result in closing gaps in the annealing spectrum. To understand the origin of these closing gaps, we study how the evolution of the ground-state vector is altered by the presence of the catalyst and find that the negative components of the ground-state vector are key to understanding the response of the gap spectrum. We also consider how and when these closing gaps could be utilized in diabatic quantum annealing protocols—a promising alternative to adiabatic quantum annealing in which transitions to higher energy levels are exploited to reduce the run time of the algorithm. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Quantum annealing (QA) is a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems. We can estimate the computational time for QA using what is referred to as the adiabatic condition derived from the adiabatic theorem. The adiabatic condition consists of two parts: an energy gap and a transition matrix. Most past studies have focused on the relationship between the energy gap and computational time. The success probability of QA is considered to decrease exponentially owing to the exponentially decreasing energy gap at the first-order phase-transition point. In this study, through a detailed analysis of the relationship between the energy gap, transition matrix, and computational cost during QA, we propose a general method for constructing counterintuitive models wherein QA with a constant annealing time fails despite a constant energy gap, based on polynomial energy. We assume that the energy of the total Hamiltonian is at most $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Theta}}(L)$, where LLL is the number of qubits. In our formalism, we choose a known model that exhibits an exponentially small energy gap during QA, and modify the model by adding a specific penalty term to the Hamiltonian. In the modified model, the transition matrix in the adiabatic condition becomes exponentially large as the number of qubits increases, while the energy gap remains constant. Moreover, we achieve a quadratic speedup, for which the upper bound for improvement in the adiabatic condition is determined by the polynomial energy. For concrete examples, we consider the adiabatic Grover search and the ferromagnetic ppp-spin model. In these cases, with the addition of the penalty term, although the success probability of QA on the modified models becomes exponentially small despite a constant energy gap, we are able to achieve a success probability considerably higher than that of conventional QA. Moreover, in concrete examples, we numerically show the scaling of the computational cost is quadratically improved compared to the conventional QA. Our findings pave the way for a better understanding of QA performance.
In the context of adiabatic quantum computation (AQC), it has been argued that first-order quantum phase transitions (QPTs) due to localization phenomena cause AQC to fail by exponentially decreasing the minimal spectral gap of the Hamiltonian along the annealing path as a function of the qubit number. The vanishing of the spectral gap is often linked to the localization of the ground state in a local minimum, requiring the system to tunnel into the global minimum at a later stage of the annealing. Recent methods have been proposed to avoid this phenomenon by carefully designing the involved Hamiltonians. However, it remains a challenge to formulate a comprehensive theory of the effect of the various parameters and the conditions under which QPTs make the AQC algorithm fail. Equipped with concepts from graph theory, in this work we link graph quantities associated with the Hamiltonians along the annealing path with the occurrence of QPTs. These links allow us to derive bounds on the location of the minimal spectral gap along the annealing path, augmenting the toolbox for the analysis of strategies to improve the runtime of AQC algorithms.
Abstract Quantum annealing (QA) is a continuous-time heuristic quantum algorithm for solving or approximately solving classical optimization problems. The algorithm uses a schedule to interpolate between a driver Hamiltonian with an easy-to-prepare ground state and a problem Hamiltonian whose ground state encodes solutions to an optimization problem. The standard implementation relies on the evolution being adiabatic: keeping the system in the instantaneous ground state with high probability and requiring a time scale inversely related to the minimum energy gap between the instantaneous ground and excited states. However, adiabatic evolution can lead to evolution times that scale exponentially with the system size, even for computationally simple problems. Here, we study whether non-adiabatic evolutions with optimized annealing schedules can bypass this exponential slowdown for one such class of problems called the frustrated ring model. For sufficiently optimized annealing schedules and system sizes of up to 39 qubits, we provide numerical evidence that we can avoid the exponential slowdown. Our work highlights the potential of highly-controllable QA to circumvent bottlenecks associated with the standard implementation of QA.
Quantum annealing is a promising algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems. It searches for the ground state of the Ising model, which corresponds to the optimal solution of a given combinatorial optimization problem. The guiding principle of quantum annealing is the adiabatic theorem in quantum mechanics, which guarantees that a system remains in the ground state of its Hamiltonian if the time evolution is sufficiently slow. According to the adiabatic theorem, the annealing time required for quantum annealing to satisfy the adiabaticity scales inversely proportional to the square of the minimum energy gap between the ground state and the first excited state during time evolution. As a result, finding the ground state becomes significantly more difficult when the energy gap is small, creating a major bottleneck in quantum annealing. Expanding the energy gap is one strategy for improving the performance of quantum annealing; however, its implementation in actual hardware remains difficult. This study proposes a method for efficiently solving instances with small energy gaps by introducing additional local terms to the Hamiltonian and exploiting the diabatic transition remaining in the small energy gap. The proposed method achieves an approximate quadratic speedup of the exponential scaling exponent in time to solution compared to the conventional quantum annealing. In addition, we investigate the transferability of the parameters obtained with the proposed method.
Two recent preprints [B. Altshuler, H. Krovi, and J. Roland, "Quantum adiabatic optimization fails for random instances of NP-complete problems", arXiv:0908.2782 and "Anderson localization casts clouds over adiabatic quantum optimization", arXiv:0912.0746] argue that random 4th order perturbative corrections to the energies of local minima of random instances of NP-complete problem lead to avoided crossings that cause the failure of quantum adiabatic algorithm (due to exponentially small gap) close to the end, for very small transverse field that scales as an inverse power of instance size N. The theoretical portion of this work does not to take into account the exponential degeneracy of the ground and excited states at zero field. A corrected analysis shows that unlike those in the middle of the spectrum, avoided crossings at the edge would require high [O(1)] transverse fields, at which point the perturbation theory may become divergent due to quantum phase transition. This effect manifests itself only in large instances [exp(0.02 N) >> 1], which might be the reason it had not been observed in the authors' numerical work. While we dispute the proposed mechanism of failure of quantum adiabatic algorithm, we cannot draw any conclusions on its ultimate complexity.