Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2304.08508

Solutions of some Schrodinger equations

B. L. Burrows

Published Apr 17, 2023• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Two types of non-Hermitian systems are considered. One of them is both non-Hermitian and non-Linear and an iterative process is used to obtain excited state solutions; the ground state may be solved exactly. The model has been used in many physical systems and the method of calculation uses a simple Hilbert space with a generalised inner product. The second type has a complex term in the Hamiltonian and is a well studied problem in the infinite interval. Here a finite interval is considered and a complete set of eigenfunctions for this interval is used.The relationship between the finite interval states and the infinite interval states is discussed.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2304.08508

Related papers

Quantum mechanics of complex Hamiltonian systems in one dimension

R. S. Kaushal, Aishwarya Parthasarathi

With a view to obtaining further insight into the nature of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a stationary state one-dimensional Schrödinger equation corresponding to a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H ( x , p ) we investigate the ground-state solutions for a variety of potentials within the framework of an extended complex phase space characterized by x = x 1 + i p 2 , p = p 1 + i x 2 , where ( x 1 , p 1 ) and ( x 2 , p 2 ) are real and considered as canonical pairs. The analyticity property of the eigenfunction alone is found sufficient to throw light on the nature of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for different systems. It is noted that the imaginary part of the eigenvalue, E i , turns out to be zero for all potentials V ( x ) with real couplings whereas it turns out to be nonzero for the case when the couplings are complex. The prescription is also extended to study the excited states. The problems related to the normalization of the eigenfunction and the boundary conditions to be used within this framework are also discussed.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 2, 2002•37 citations

The solution of the Schrödinger equation for complex Hamiltonian systems in two dimensions

Fakir Chand, Ram Mehar Singh, Narender Kumar +1 more

We investigate the ground state solutions of the Schrodinger equation for complex (non-Hermitian) Hamiltonian systems in two dimensions within the framework of an extended complex phase-space approach. The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of some two-dimensional complex potentials are found.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 1, 2007•16 citations

Resonances from non-Hermitian quantum mechanical calculations

Nimrod Moiseyev

The Hermitian properties of the Hamiltonian are related not only to the operator itself but also to the functions on which it acts. Hermitian Hamiltonians operate on functions in the L 2 Hilbert space which correspond to boundary conditions which vanish at infinity. In this chapter, in order to move into the non-Hermitian domain, we will impose on the solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) different boundary conditions which lead to solutions which can be associated with different types of the complex poles of the scattering matrix. These solutions will contain information which was not available within the scope of functions in L 2 . By imposing outgoing boundary conditions on the eigenfunctions of the timeindependent Hamiltonian complex eigenvalues, E res = ε − (i/2)Г, are obtained. These complex energies are associated with decaying resonance states which were discussed in the previous two chapters. The bound states (if they exist) appear as real eigenvalues since they result from exactly such outgoing boundary conditions which appear under the threshold energy. When incoming boundary conditions are imposed two kind of solution are obtained. One type of solution is the complex conjugates of the decay resonance solutions mentioned above. In scattering theory text books (see Taylor for example) the physical resonance solutions are associated with the poles of the scattering matrix which are embedded in the lower half of the complex energy plane. However, in nuclear physics the complex poles embedded in the upper half of the complex energy plane, so-called virtual states , are denoted as capture resonances .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 17, 2011•0 citations

Solutions of time-dependent Schrodinger equations for model non-Hermitian quantum mechanical systems

B. L. Burrows

The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is solved for two model problems for a non-Hermitian quantum system.A simple matrix model system is used to examine two critical problems for these systems: complex and non-observable energies and situations where the matrix is defective. In addition the stationary states for infinite dimensional model system, which is confined in space , is examined and it is shown that the pattern of eigenvalue energies differs from when the system is unconfined.

arXiv:2412.07457•Dec 10, 2024•0 citations

ALTERNATIVE HAMILTONIAN DESCRIPTIONS FOR QUANTUM SYSTEMS AND NON-HERMITIAN OPERATORS WITH REAL SPECTRUM

F. Ventriglia

Many problems in theoretical physics are very frequently dealt with non-Hermitian operators. Recently there has been a lot of interest in non-Hermitian operators with real spectra. In this paper, by using the inverse problem for quantum systems, we show that, on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, all diagonalizable operators with a real spectrum can be made Hermitian with respect to a properly chosen inner product. In particular this allows the use of standard methods of quantum mechanics to analyze non-Hermitian operators with real spectra.

Modern Physics Letters A•Aug 10, 2002•12 citations

Square integrable resonance wavefunctions

Nimrod Moiseyev

As discussed in the previous chapter, the poles of the S-matrix are identified with discrete eigenvalues of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, where the asymptotes of the corresponding eigenfunctions are either purely outgoing waves or purely incoming waves. More specifically, the bound and decay resonance poles are obtained by imposing the outgoing boundary conditions on the solutions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, while the anti-bound and virtual states (sometimes referred to as capture resonances) are associated with the solutions obtained under the requirement of the incoming boundary conditions. Except for the bound states, all other poles of the S-matrix are associated with exponentially divergent wavefunctions which by definition do not belong to the Hilbert space of conventional Hermitian quantum mechanics. This fact represents a major difficulty for the development of a non-Hermitian quantum mechanical formalism. Consequently, one may wonder, for example, how to properly define an inner product in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics (NHQM) if the wavefunctions diverge asymptotically. We recall in this context that the concept of an inner product constitutes a fundamental building block of standard (Hermitian) quantum mechanics (QM), by means of which one defines the quantum mechanical expectation values of physically observable quantities over the quantum states under consideration. An inner product for NHQM is necessary in order to accommodate the tools of conventional QM. Furthermore, one might anticipate that an appropriate NHQM inner product would also facilitate practical numerical calculation of the S-matrix poles for those cases where the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian do not possess an analytical closed form expression (unlike the cases studied in the previous chapter).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 17, 2011•0 citations
Two types of non-Hermitian systems are considered. One of them is both non-Hermitian and non-Linear and an iterative process is used to obtain excited state solutions; the ground state may be solved exactly. The model has been used in many physical systems and the method of calculation uses a simple Hilbert space with a generalised inner product. The second type has a complex term in the Hamiltonian and is a well studied problem in the infinite interval. Here a finite interval is considered and a complete set of eigenfunctions for this interval is used.The relationship between the finite interval states and the infinite interval states is discussed.
With a view to obtaining further insight into the nature of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a stationary state one-dimensional Schrödinger equation corresponding to a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian H ( x , p ) we investigate the ground-state solutions for a variety of potentials within the framework of an extended complex phase space characterized by x = x 1 + i p 2 , p = p 1 + i x 2 , where ( x 1 , p 1 ) and ( x 2 , p 2 ) are real and considered as canonical pairs. The analyticity property of the eigenfunction alone is found sufficient to throw light on the nature of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions for different systems. It is noted that the imaginary part of the eigenvalue, E i , turns out to be zero for all potentials V ( x ) with real couplings whereas it turns out to be nonzero for the case when the couplings are complex. The prescription is also extended to study the excited states. The problems related to the normalization of the eigenfunction and the boundary conditions to be used within this framework are also discussed.
The Hermitian properties of the Hamiltonian are related not only to the operator itself but also to the functions on which it acts. Hermitian Hamiltonians operate on functions in the L 2 Hilbert space which correspond to boundary conditions which vanish at infinity. In this chapter, in order to move into the non-Hermitian domain, we will impose on the solutions to the time-independent Schrödinger equation (TISE) different boundary conditions which lead to solutions which can be associated with different types of the complex poles of the scattering matrix. These solutions will contain information which was not available within the scope of functions in L 2 . By imposing outgoing boundary conditions on the eigenfunctions of the timeindependent Hamiltonian complex eigenvalues, E res = ε − (i/2)Г, are obtained. These complex energies are associated with decaying resonance states which were discussed in the previous two chapters. The bound states (if they exist) appear as real eigenvalues since they result from exactly such outgoing boundary conditions which appear under the threshold energy. When incoming boundary conditions are imposed two kind of solution are obtained. One type of solution is the complex conjugates of the decay resonance solutions mentioned above. In scattering theory text books (see Taylor for example) the physical resonance solutions are associated with the poles of the scattering matrix which are embedded in the lower half of the complex energy plane. However, in nuclear physics the complex poles embedded in the upper half of the complex energy plane, so-called virtual states , are denoted as capture resonances .
Many problems in theoretical physics are very frequently dealt with non-Hermitian operators. Recently there has been a lot of interest in non-Hermitian operators with real spectra. In this paper, by using the inverse problem for quantum systems, we show that, on finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, all diagonalizable operators with a real spectrum can be made Hermitian with respect to a properly chosen inner product. In particular this allows the use of standard methods of quantum mechanics to analyze non-Hermitian operators with real spectra.
As discussed in the previous chapter, the poles of the S-matrix are identified with discrete eigenvalues of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, where the asymptotes of the corresponding eigenfunctions are either purely outgoing waves or purely incoming waves. More specifically, the bound and decay resonance poles are obtained by imposing the outgoing boundary conditions on the solutions of the time-independent Schrödinger equation, while the anti-bound and virtual states (sometimes referred to as capture resonances) are associated with the solutions obtained under the requirement of the incoming boundary conditions. Except for the bound states, all other poles of the S-matrix are associated with exponentially divergent wavefunctions which by definition do not belong to the Hilbert space of conventional Hermitian quantum mechanics. This fact represents a major difficulty for the development of a non-Hermitian quantum mechanical formalism. Consequently, one may wonder, for example, how to properly define an inner product in non-Hermitian quantum mechanics (NHQM) if the wavefunctions diverge asymptotically. We recall in this context that the concept of an inner product constitutes a fundamental building block of standard (Hermitian) quantum mechanics (QM), by means of which one defines the quantum mechanical expectation values of physically observable quantities over the quantum states under consideration. An inner product for NHQM is necessary in order to accommodate the tools of conventional QM. Furthermore, one might anticipate that an appropriate NHQM inner product would also facilitate practical numerical calculation of the S-matrix poles for those cases where the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian do not possess an analytical closed form expression (unlike the cases studied in the previous chapter).