Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2303.12393 · Foundations of Physics

Entanglement of Observables: Quantum Conditional Probability Approach

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Irina Basieva

Published Sep 15, 2023• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract This paper is devoted to clarification of the notion of entanglement through decoupling it from the tensor product structure and treating as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observable A and B. In our framework, it is meaningless to speak about entanglement without pointing to the fixed observables A and B, so this is AB-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized as non-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilistic definition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the AB-entangled states as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor product case, AB-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vise verse. AB-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation, i.e., $$\langle AB\rangle _{\psi} \not = \langle A\rangle _{\psi} \langle B\rangle _{\psi} .$$ ⟨ A B ⟩ ψ ≠ ⟨ A ⟩ ψ ⟨ B ⟩ ψ . We describe the class of quantum states that are $$A_{u} B_{u}$$ A u B u -entangled for a family of unitary operators (u). Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.

DOI
10.1007/s10701-023-00725-7

Related papers

Probabilistic Entanglement of Quantum Observables

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

In this chapter contextual probabilistic entanglement is represented withinthe Hilbert space formalism. The notion of entanglement is clarified anddemystified through decoupling it from the tensor product structure andtreating it as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observablesA and B. In this framework, it is meaningless to speak aboutentanglement without pointing to the fixed observables A and B, so thisis AB-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized asnon-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilisticdefinition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the AB-entangledstates as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor productcase, AB-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vice versa.AB-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation. Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2024•0 citations

On spooky action at a distance and conditional probabilities

Henryk Gzyl

The aim of this exposé is to make explicit the analogy between the classical notion of non-independent probability distribution and the quantum notion of entangled state. To bring that analogy forth, we consider a classical systems with two dependent random variables and a quantum system with two components. In the classical case, afet observing one of the random variables, the underlying sample space and the probability distribution change. In the quantum case, when and event pertaining to one of the components is observed, the post-measurement state captures, both, the change in the state of the system and implicitly the new probability distribution. The predictions after a measurement in the classical case and in the quantum case, have to be computed with the conditional distribution given the value of the observed variable.

quant-pharXiv:2601.13875•Jan 21, 2026•0 citations

Conditional probability framework for entanglement and its decoupling from tensor product structure

Irina Basieva, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Abstract Our aim is to make a step toward clarification of foundations for the notion of entanglement (both physical and mathematical) by representing it in the conditional probability framework. In Schrödinger’s words, this is entanglement of knowledge which can be extracted via conditional measurements. In particular, quantum probabilities are interpreted as conditional ones (as, e.g., by Ballentine). We restrict considerations to perfect conditional correlations (PCC) induced by measurements (‘EPR entanglement’). Such entanglement is coupled to the pairs of observables with the projection type state update as the back action of measurement. In this way, we determine a special class of entangled states. One of our aims is to decouple the notion of entanglement from the compound systems. The rigid association of entanglement with the state of a few body systems stimulated its linking with quantum nonlocality (‘spooky action at a distance’). However, already by Schrödinger entanglement was presented as knotting of knowledge (about statistics) for one observable A with knowledge about another observable B.

arXiv:2205.11510•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Aug 22, 2022•14 citations

No extension of the Quantum Tensor Product admits a Superposition principle

Vincenzo Fiorentino, Kuntal Sengupta

Textbook quantum superposition refers to the feature that certain linear combinations of Hilbert space rays, each representing a valid quantum state, are themselves valid states. This notion is not operational, and it relies on the underlying Hilbert space formalism. Recent proposals for experimental tests of indefinite causal order, as well as tests probing the non-classicality of gravity, pivot on superposition, thereby calling for a theory-independent, operational formalisation of the concept. Here, we define superposition within the framework of Generalised Probabilistic Theories, based on observed statistics in prepare-and-measure experiments. Using this, we formulate three superposition principles to investigate which structural features of quantum theory carry over to other theories. We study conditions under which these principles carry over from subsystems to their compositions; to this end, we show that the quantum tensor product emerges as the largest composition rule for quantum systems respecting all three principles. Furthermore, we show how non-classical features such as entanglement and preparational uncertainty can be viewed as special forms of superposition.

quant-pharXiv:2608.17572•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

Structural Entanglement from Interaction-Induced Fixed Points

Yukio‐Pegio Gunji, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

We introduce a lattice-theoretic framework for composite information systems in which tensor-like composition and entanglement are defined without presupposing Hilbert spaces or quantum states. Starting from approximation operators induced by indiscernibility relations, we construct composite systems via interaction-dependent closure operators and characterize their fixed-point lattices. Entanglement is defined structurally as the impossibility of generating a fixed point of the composite system from local fixed points alone. This notion does not rely on non-distributive logic a priori and remains meaningful even when local lattices are Boolean. Non-distributive and orthomodular structures arise only under additional conditions and are treated as emergent properties rather than assumptions. The proposed framework generalizes the concept of entanglement as a property of composition and interaction, providing a unified information-theoretic perspective on non-separability beyond standard quantum-mechanical formalisms. By mapping quantum states to correlation patterns via row-set tensor products, we demonstrate that standard quantum entanglement can be understood as a stabilized structural constraint. In this context, maximally entangled states, such as Bell states, correspond to diagonal constraint sets that are non-generable from local components, confirming that the structural core of entanglement exists independently of linear or probabilistic interpretations. Beyond quantum mechanics, the framework admits a natural interpretation in terms of relational databases, where entanglement corresponds to irreducible global relations stabilized by interaction-induced fixed points.

Entropy•Jul 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement-Based Probability Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum entanglement, a peculiar phenomenon where two or more particles become linked in such a way that they share the same fate, is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. This paper explores the potential of leveraging this entanglement to revolutionize probability theory, proposing a formalization of probability based on quantum entanglement as a fundamental building block. We aim to develop a set of operators representing entanglement, enabling precise calculation of probabilities and correlations within quantum systems. The core claim is that this framework offers a deeper and more rigorous understanding of randomness and uncertainty inherent in quantum mechanics.

•Sep 6, 2026•0 citations
Abstract This paper is devoted to clarification of the notion of entanglement through decoupling it from the tensor product structure and treating as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observable A and B. In our framework, it is meaningless to speak about entanglement without pointing to the fixed observables A and B, so this is AB-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized as non-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilistic definition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the AB-entangled states as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor product case, AB-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vise verse. AB-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation, i.e., ⟨AB⟩ψ≠⟨A⟩ψ⟨B⟩ψ.\langle AB\rangle _{\psi} \not = \langle A\rangle _{\psi} \langle B\rangle _{\psi} .⟨AB⟩ψ​=⟨A⟩ψ​⟨B⟩ψ​. ⟨ A B ⟩ ψ ≠ ⟨ A ⟩ ψ ⟨ B ⟩ ψ . We describe the class of quantum states that are AuBuA_{u} B_{u}Au​Bu​ A u B u -entangled for a family of unitary operators (u). Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.
In this chapter contextual probabilistic entanglement is represented withinthe Hilbert space formalism. The notion of entanglement is clarified anddemystified through decoupling it from the tensor product structure andtreating it as a constraint posed by probabilistic dependence of quantum observablesA and B. In this framework, it is meaningless to speak aboutentanglement without pointing to the fixed observables A and B, so thisis AB-entanglement. Dependence of quantum observables is formalized asnon-coincidence of conditional probabilities. Starting with this probabilisticdefinition, we achieve the Hilbert space characterization of the AB-entangledstates as amplitude non-factorisable states. In the tensor productcase, AB-entanglement implies standard entanglement, but not vice versa.AB-entanglement for dichotomous observables is equivalent to their correlation. Finally, observables entanglement is compared with dependence of random variables in classical probability theory.
The aim of this exposé is to make explicit the analogy between the classical notion of non-independent probability distribution and the quantum notion of entangled state. To bring that analogy forth, we consider a classical systems with two dependent random variables and a quantum system with two components. In the classical case, afet observing one of the random variables, the underlying sample space and the probability distribution change. In the quantum case, when and event pertaining to one of the components is observed, the post-measurement state captures, both, the change in the state of the system and implicitly the new probability distribution. The predictions after a measurement in the classical case and in the quantum case, have to be computed with the conditional distribution given the value of the observed variable.
Abstract Our aim is to make a step toward clarification of foundations for the notion of entanglement (both physical and mathematical) by representing it in the conditional probability framework. In Schrödinger’s words, this is entanglement of knowledge which can be extracted via conditional measurements. In particular, quantum probabilities are interpreted as conditional ones (as, e.g., by Ballentine). We restrict considerations to perfect conditional correlations (PCC) induced by measurements (‘EPR entanglement’). Such entanglement is coupled to the pairs of observables with the projection type state update as the back action of measurement. In this way, we determine a special class of entangled states. One of our aims is to decouple the notion of entanglement from the compound systems. The rigid association of entanglement with the state of a few body systems stimulated its linking with quantum nonlocality (‘spooky action at a distance’). However, already by Schrödinger entanglement was presented as knotting of knowledge (about statistics) for one observable A with knowledge about another observable B.
Textbook quantum superposition refers to the feature that certain linear combinations of Hilbert space rays, each representing a valid quantum state, are themselves valid states. This notion is not operational, and it relies on the underlying Hilbert space formalism. Recent proposals for experimental tests of indefinite causal order, as well as tests probing the non-classicality of gravity, pivot on superposition, thereby calling for a theory-independent, operational formalisation of the concept. Here, we define superposition within the framework of Generalised Probabilistic Theories, based on observed statistics in prepare-and-measure experiments. Using this, we formulate three superposition principles to investigate which structural features of quantum theory carry over to other theories. We study conditions under which these principles carry over from subsystems to their compositions; to this end, we show that the quantum tensor product emerges as the largest composition rule for quantum systems respecting all three principles. Furthermore, we show how non-classical features such as entanglement and preparational uncertainty can be viewed as special forms of superposition.
We introduce a lattice-theoretic framework for composite information systems in which tensor-like composition and entanglement are defined without presupposing Hilbert spaces or quantum states. Starting from approximation operators induced by indiscernibility relations, we construct composite systems via interaction-dependent closure operators and characterize their fixed-point lattices. Entanglement is defined structurally as the impossibility of generating a fixed point of the composite system from local fixed points alone. This notion does not rely on non-distributive logic a priori and remains meaningful even when local lattices are Boolean. Non-distributive and orthomodular structures arise only under additional conditions and are treated as emergent properties rather than assumptions. The proposed framework generalizes the concept of entanglement as a property of composition and interaction, providing a unified information-theoretic perspective on non-separability beyond standard quantum-mechanical formalisms. By mapping quantum states to correlation patterns via row-set tensor products, we demonstrate that standard quantum entanglement can be understood as a stabilized structural constraint. In this context, maximally entangled states, such as Bell states, correspond to diagonal constraint sets that are non-generable from local components, confirming that the structural core of entanglement exists independently of linear or probabilistic interpretations. Beyond quantum mechanics, the framework admits a natural interpretation in terms of relational databases, where entanglement corresponds to irreducible global relations stabilized by interaction-induced fixed points.
Quantum entanglement, a peculiar phenomenon where two or more particles become linked in such a way that they share the same fate, is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics. This paper explores the potential of leveraging this entanglement to revolutionize probability theory, proposing a formalization of probability based on quantum entanglement as a fundamental building block. We aim to develop a set of operators representing entanglement, enabling precise calculation of probabilities and correlations within quantum systems. The core claim is that this framework offers a deeper and more rigorous understanding of randomness and uncertainty inherent in quantum mechanics.