Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2303.06158 · Quantum

Earthquake Quantization

Benjamin Koch, Enrique Muñoz

Published Jan 2, 2024• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this homage to Einstein's 144th birthday we propose a novel quantization prescription, where the paths of a path-integral are not random, but rather solutions of a geodesic equation in a random background. We show that this change of perspective can be made mathematically equivalent to the usual formulations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. To conclude, we comment on conceptual issues, such as quantum gravity coupled to matter and the quantum equivalence principle.

DOI
10.22331/q-2024-01-02-1216

Related papers

On the Equivalence Principle and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

Maciej Trzetrzelewski

Abstract Einstein’s Equivalence Principle implies that the Lorentz force equation can be derived from a geodesic equation by imposing a certain (necessary) condition on the electromagnetic potential (Trzetrzelewski, EPL 120:4, 2018). We analyze the quantization of that constraint and find the corresponding differential equations for the phase of the wave function. We investigate these equations in the case of Coulomb potential and show that physically acceptable solutions do not exist. This result signals an inconsistency between Einstein’s Equivalence Principle and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics at an atomic level.

Foundations of Physics•Oct 6, 2020•1 citation

Unfinished history and paradoxes of quantum potential. I. Non-relativistic origin, history and paradoxes

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

This is the first of two related papers analyzing and explaining the origin, manifestations and parodoxical features of the quantum potential (QP) from the non-relativistic and relativistic points of view. The QP arises in the quantum Hamiltonian under various procedures of quantization of natural systems, i.e., those whose Hamilton functions are positive-definite quadratic forms in momenta with coefficients depending on the coordinates in (n-dimensional) configurational space V n thus endowed with a Riemannian structure. The result of quantization may be considered as quantum mechanics (QM) of a particle in V n in the normal Gaussian coordinate system in the globally static space-time V 1,n . Contradiction of the QP to the General Covariance and Equivalence principles is discussed. It is found that actually the historically first Hilbert space-based quantization by E. Schrödinger (1926), after revision in the modern framework of QM, also leads to a QP in the form that B. DeWitt found 26 years later. Efforts to avoid the QP or to reduce its drawbacks are discussed. The general conclusion is that some form of QP and a violation of the principles of general relativity which it induces are inevitable in the non-relativistic quantum Hamiltonian. It is also shown that Feynman (path-integral) quantization of natural systems singles out two versions of the QP, which both determine two bi-scalar (independent of a choice of coordinates) propagators fixing two different algorithms of path integral calculation. The accompanying paper under the same general title and the subtitle “The Relativistic Point of View” (published in the same issue of the journal and referred to as Paper II) considers a relation of the nonrelativistic QP to the quantum theory of a scalar field non-minimally coupled to the curved space-time metric.

arXiv:1201.2664•Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2013•2 citations

Quantum Mechanics in Riemannian Space: Different Approaches to Quantization of the Geodesic Motion Compared

Эрнест Ахмеджанович Тагиров

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2003•1 citation

Emergent Time in the Path Integral of Barbour and Bertotti's Timeless Mechanics

Sean Gryb

Abstract: The problem of time is studied in a toy model for quantum gravity: Barbour and Bertotti’s timeless formulation of non-relativistic mechanics. We quantize this timeless theory using path integrals and compare it to the path integral quantization of parameterized Newtonian mechanics, which contains absolute time. In general, we find that the solutions to the timeless theory are energy eigenstates, as predicted by the usual canonical quantization. Nevertheless, the path integral formalism brings new insight as it allows us to precisely determine the difference between the theory with and without time. This difference is found to lie in the form of the constraints imposed on the gauge fixing functions by the boundary conditions. In the stationary phase approximation, the constraints of both theories are equivalent. This suggests that a notion of

•Apr 18, 2008•13 citations

On quantizing gravity and geometrizing quantum mechanics

Ali Mostafazadeh

We elaborate on some recent results on a solution of the Hilbert-space problem in minisuperspace quantum cosmology and discuss the consequences of making the (geometry of the) Hilbert space of ordinary nonrelativistic quantum systems time-dependent. The latter reveals a remarkable similarity between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

•Sep 1, 2005•0 citations

On quantizing gravity and geometrizing quantum mechanics

Mostafa Zadeh Ali

We elaborate on some recent results on a solution of the Hilbert-space problem in minisuperspace quantum cosmology and discuss the consequences of making the (geometry of the) Hilbert space of ordinary nonrelativistic quantum systems time-dependent. The latter reveals a remarkable similarity between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

Iranian Journal of Physics Research•Sep 15, 2005•0 citations
In this homage to Einstein's 144th birthday we propose a novel quantization prescription, where the paths of a path-integral are not random, but rather solutions of a geodesic equation in a random background. We show that this change of perspective can be made mathematically equivalent to the usual formulations of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. To conclude, we comment on conceptual issues, such as quantum gravity coupled to matter and the quantum equivalence principle.
Abstract Einstein’s Equivalence Principle implies that the Lorentz force equation can be derived from a geodesic equation by imposing a certain (necessary) condition on the electromagnetic potential (Trzetrzelewski, EPL 120:4, 2018). We analyze the quantization of that constraint and find the corresponding differential equations for the phase of the wave function. We investigate these equations in the case of Coulomb potential and show that physically acceptable solutions do not exist. This result signals an inconsistency between Einstein’s Equivalence Principle and Relativistic Quantum Mechanics at an atomic level.
This is the first of two related papers analyzing and explaining the origin, manifestations and parodoxical features of the quantum potential (QP) from the non-relativistic and relativistic points of view. The QP arises in the quantum Hamiltonian under various procedures of quantization of natural systems, i.e., those whose Hamilton functions are positive-definite quadratic forms in momenta with coefficients depending on the coordinates in (n-dimensional) configurational space V n thus endowed with a Riemannian structure. The result of quantization may be considered as quantum mechanics (QM) of a particle in V n in the normal Gaussian coordinate system in the globally static space-time V 1,n . Contradiction of the QP to the General Covariance and Equivalence principles is discussed. It is found that actually the historically first Hilbert space-based quantization by E. Schrödinger (1926), after revision in the modern framework of QM, also leads to a QP in the form that B. DeWitt found 26 years later. Efforts to avoid the QP or to reduce its drawbacks are discussed. The general conclusion is that some form of QP and a violation of the principles of general relativity which it induces are inevitable in the non-relativistic quantum Hamiltonian. It is also shown that Feynman (path-integral) quantization of natural systems singles out two versions of the QP, which both determine two bi-scalar (independent of a choice of coordinates) propagators fixing two different algorithms of path integral calculation. The accompanying paper under the same general title and the subtitle “The Relativistic Point of View” (published in the same issue of the journal and referred to as Paper II) considers a relation of the nonrelativistic QP to the quantum theory of a scalar field non-minimally coupled to the curved space-time metric.
Abstract: The problem of time is studied in a toy model for quantum gravity: Barbour and Bertotti’s timeless formulation of non-relativistic mechanics. We quantize this timeless theory using path integrals and compare it to the path integral quantization of parameterized Newtonian mechanics, which contains absolute time. In general, we find that the solutions to the timeless theory are energy eigenstates, as predicted by the usual canonical quantization. Nevertheless, the path integral formalism brings new insight as it allows us to precisely determine the difference between the theory with and without time. This difference is found to lie in the form of the constraints imposed on the gauge fixing functions by the boundary conditions. In the stationary phase approximation, the constraints of both theories are equivalent. This suggests that a notion of