Abstract Bell inequalities represent one of the cornerstones of quantum foundations, and a fundamental tool for quantum technologies. Although a lot of effort was put in exploring and generalizing them, because of the wave function collapse it was deemed impossible to estimate the entire Bell parameter from one entangled pair, since this would involve measuring incompatible observables on the same quantum state. Conversely, here it is reported the first implementation of a new generation of Bell inequality tests, able to extract a Bell parameter value from each entangled pair and, at the same time, preserve the pair entanglement instead of destroying it. This is obtained by exploiting sequences of weak measurements, allowing incompatible observable measurements on a quantum state without collapsing its wave function. On the fundamental side, by removing the need to choose between different measurement bases our approach stretches the concept of counterfactual definiteness, since it allows measuring the entangled pair in all the bases needed for the Bell inequality test, intrinsically eliminating the issues connected with the otherwise not-chosen bases. On the practical side, after our Bell parameter measurement the entanglement within the pair remains (basically) unaltered, hence exploitable for other quantum-technology-related or foundational purposes.
Abstract Bell inequalities represent one of the cornerstones of quantum foundations, and a fundamental tool for quantum technologies. Although a lot of effort was put in exploring and generalizing them, because of the wave function collapse it was deemed impossible to estimate the entire Bell parameter from one entangled pair, since this would involve measuring incompatible observables on the same quantum state. Conversely, here it is reported the first implementation of a new generation of Bell inequality tests, able to extract a Bell parameter value from each entangled pair and, at the same time, preserve the pair entanglement instead of destroying it. This is obtained by exploiting sequences of weak measurements, allowing incompatible observable measurements on a quantum state without collapsing its wave function. On the fundamental side, by removing the need to choose between different measurement bases our approach stretches the concept of counterfactual definiteness, since it allows measuring the entangled pair in all the bases needed for the Bell inequality test, intrinsically eliminating the issues connected with the otherwise not-chosen bases. On the practical side, after our Bell parameter measurement the entanglement within the pair remains (basically) unaltered, hence exploitable for other quantum-technology-related or foundational purposes.
Since their formulation, Bell inequalities have been one of the pillars of quantum foundations and quantum information, also representing a tool of the utmost relevance for quantum technologies, e.g. for quantum communication A long path, awarded by the 2022 Nobel prize, has gone along since their introduction, finally reaching conclusive Bell inequality violations in 2015. However, none of the experiments run so far was able to extract information on the entire Bell inequality from every entangled pair measured, because of the wavefunction collapse. Here we illustrate an actual paradigm shift in this perspective, since we experimentally demonstrate the possibility of extracting information on the full Bell parameter (specifically the CHSH one) from each entangled pair measured and, at the same time, still conserving most of the pair entanglement after the measurement.
Measuring incompatible observables on entangled states through weak measurements: from single pair measurement of CHSH to testing relativistic independence. F.Piacentini, A.Avella, E.Rebufello, S. Virzì, I.P.Degiovanni, M.Gramegna, M.Genovese We present the first single-pair Bell inequality test [1] able to obtain a Bell parameter value for every entangled pair detected. This is made possible by exploiting sequential weak measurements, allowing to perform non-commuting measurements in sequence on the same state, on each entangled particle. Such a feature removes the need to choose between different measurement bases [2]. We also demonstrate how, after the Bell parameter measurement, the pair under test still presents a noteworthy amount of entanglement, providing evidence of the absence of the wave function collapse and allowing us to exploit this quantum resource for further protocols. Finally, as a further use of sequential weak measurement, we present a test [3] of the relativistic independence. [1] S.Virzì, et al. Quant.Sci. Tech. 9 045027 (2024) [2] M.Genovese & F.Piacentini, arXiv:2409.02510 [3] F.Atzori rt al., PRX quantum 5, 040351 (2024)
Bell inequalities represent a milestone for contemporary physics, both for quantum foundation investigations and technological applications (e.g., quantum communication and entanglement certification). Although loophole-free tests have been recently performed, a strong debate is still ongoing on the actual meaning of Bell inequality tests, for example, on the possible additional hypotheses and eventual loopholes to be included in Bell's theorem, as well as on the implications for certain interpretations of quantum mechanics. A recent work [S. Virzì , ] challenges some of the statements appeared in this debate, achieving an experimental estimation of the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter from a single entangled pair owing to a weak-interaction-based measurement approach. Here, we analyze the implications of this result for quantum mechanics foundations investigation, illustrating how it can tackle some of the aforementioned interpretations of Bell inequality tests and, more in general, of quantum mechanics itself.
This paper aims to clarify the true physical relation of photon pairs and to falsify the "entanglement collapse" hypothesis that standard quantum mechanics imposes upon them. Bell experiments violating Bell's inequality only rule out "local independent hidden variables," and are not a sufficient condition for proving "superposition plus wave-function collapse." The physical definition of entanglement in standard quantum mechanics is: subsystems are strongly correlated, the system is inseparable, and the individual subsystem has no definite independent physical state; its mathematical expressions are the non-factorizability of pure-state wave functions and the non-convex-combination of mixed-state density matrices. The physical definition and mathematical expressions are fully aligned: the individual subsystem cannot be written as a separate expression and has no definite independent physical state. Operationally, it is also absolutely impossible to realize an individual measurement of the subsystem. However, in Bell experiments, photon pairs are separately and individually measured on spatially separated detectors, which directly falsifies the premise that "the photon pair is in an entangled state." Stripping away mysticism, the true relation of two photons is a linear equation with two unknowns (independent particles under an initial-state constraint); the three-photon logic (a linear equation with three unknowns) proves that after measuring one photon, the other two still have not collapsed into definite values and must still be measured individually to obtain their states—"wave-function collapse into a definite value" is purely fictitious in algebraic logic.
Summary form only given. Measurements are the very basis of Physics, especially in Quantum Mechanics, where they assume even a more fundamental role because of wave function collapse after a “strong” (projective) measurement. Furthermore, measuring a quantum-mechanical observable completely erases the information on its conjugate one (e.g. measurement of position erases information on momentum, and vice-versa). Nevertheless, in Quantum Mechanics other kinds of measurement are possible. For example, wave function collapse can be overcome through Weak Measurements, i.e. measurements performed with an interaction sufficiently weak not to collapse the original state, featuring several interesting properties. An example of these are weak values [1-3], realised for the first time in [4-6], that have been used for addressing fundamental questions [7-12] as Contextuality and are also a tool for Quantum Metrology [13-19]. One of the most intriguing properties of Weak Measurements is that, since they are not affected by wave function collapse, they can allow gathering simultaneous information on non-commuting observables [20], impossible with the standard (projective) measurement protocols. A second example is offered by Protective Measurements [21], a new technique able to extract information on the expectation value of an observable even measuring a single particle. In this talk, after a general introduction to WMs, we present the first realisation of sequential weak value measurements [22], i.e. a joint measurement of the weak value of (incompatible) polarizations on a single photon. Then, we present an experiment addressed to explore the connection between anomalous weak values and Contextuality [23], showing a clear violation of the inequality proposed in [12] while satisfying all the additional theoretical requests, unequivocally demonstrating the contextual nature of weak values. Finally, we present and discuss the first implementation of Protective Measurements, showing unprecedented measurement capability and demonstrating how the expectation value of an observable can be obtained with a single measurement on a single particle.