Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2303.03319 · Leibniz international proceedings in informatics

Quantum Algorithm for Path-Edge Sampling

Stacey Jeffery, Shelby Kimmel, Álvaro Piedrafita

Published Jan 1, 2023• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a quantum algorithm for sampling an edge on a path between two nodes s and t in an undirected graph given as an adjacency matrix, and show that this can be done in query complexity that is asymptotically the same, up to log factors, as the query complexity of detecting a path between s and t. We use this path sampling algorithm as a subroutine for st-path finding and st-cut-set finding algorithms in some specific cases. Our main technical contribution is an algorithm for generating a quantum state that is proportional to the positive witness vector of a span program.

DOI
10.4230/lipics.tqc.2023.5

Related papers

Quantum Complexity of Minimum Cut

Simon Apers, Troy Lee

The minimum cut problem in an undirected and weighted graph G is to find the minimum total weight of a set of edges whose removal disconnects G. We completely characterize the quantum query and time complexity of the minimum cut problem in the adjacency matrix model. If G has n vertices and edge weights at least 1 and at most τ, we give a quantum algorithm to solve the minimum cut problem using Õ(n^{3/2}√{τ}) queries and time. Moreover, for every integer 1 ≤ τ ≤ n we give an example of a graph G with edge weights 1 and τ such that solving the minimum cut problem on G requires Ω(n^{3/2}√{τ}) queries to the adjacency matrix of G. These results contrast with the classical randomized case where Ω(n²) queries to the adjacency matrix are needed in the worst case even to decide if an unweighted graph is connected or not. In the adjacency array model, when G has m edges the classical randomized complexity of the minimum cut problem is ̃ Θ(m). We show that the quantum query and time complexity are Õ(√{mnτ}) and Õ(√{mnτ} + n^{3/2}), respectively, where again the edge weights are between 1 and τ. For dense graphs we give lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of Ω(n^{3/2}) for τ > 1 and Ω(τ n) for any 1 ≤ τ ≤ n. Our query algorithm uses a quantum algorithm for graph sparsification by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS 2020) and results on the structure of near-minimum cuts by Kawarabayashi and Thorup (STOC 2015) and Rubinstein, Schramm and Weinberg (ITCS 2018). Our time efficient implementation builds on Karger’s tree packing technique (STOC 1996).

Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2021•2 citations

Quantum algorithms for graph problems with cut queries

Troy Lee, Miklós Sántha, Shengyu Zhang

Let G be an n-vertex graph with m edges. When asked a subset S of vertices, a cut query on G returns the number of edges of G that have exactly one endpoint in S. We show that there is a bounded-error quantum algorithm that determines all connected components of G after making O(log(n)6) many cut queries. In contrast, it follows from results in communication complexity that any randomized algorithm even just to decide whether the graph is connected or not must make at least Ω(n/log(n)) many cut queries. We further show that with O(log(n)8) many cut queries a quantum algorithm can with high probability output a spanning forest for G. En route to proving these results, we design quantum algorithms for learning a graph using cut queries. We show that a quantum algorithm can learn a graph with maximum degree d after O(d log(n)2) many cut queries, and can learn a general graph with many cut queries. These two upper bounds are tight up to the poly-logarithmic factors, and compare to Ω(dn) and Ω(m/log(n)) lower bounds on the number of cut queries needed by a randomized algorithm for the same problems, respectively. The key ingredients in our results are the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm, approximate counting with “OR queries”, and learning sparse vectors from inner products as in compressed sensing.

arXiv:2007.08285•Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks•Jan 1, 2021•13 citations

Advances in quantum algorithms for the shortest path problem

Adam Wesołowski, Stephen Piddock

Given an undirected, weighted graph, with $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, and two special vertices $s$ and $t$, the problem is to find the shortest path between them. We give two bounded-error quantum algorithms with improved runtime in the adjacency list model that solve the problem on special classes of graphs defined via pathfinding probabilities of classical random walks and the electrical network framework. Firstly, we give a simple quantum algorithm based on sampling edges from a graph via the quantum flow state and running a classical algorithm on the sampled edges. It runs in $\tilde{O}(l^2\sqrt{m})$ expected time and uses $O(\log{n})$ space on graphs where the shortest $s$-$t$ path is also a minimum resistance $s$-$t$ subgraph. Our main algorithm can be thought of as a divide and conquer version of this approach and works on a special class of graphs where classical loop-erased random walk has a probability $q>0.537$ of finding the shortest $s$-$t$ path. In such cases the quantum algorithm outputs the shortest $s$-$t$ path with high probability in $\widetilde{O}(\ell\sqrt{m})$ expected time and $O(\log{n})$ space, where $l$ is the length (or total weight, in case of weighted graphs) of the shortest $s$-$t$ path. This algorithm can be parallelised to $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{lm})$ circuit depth when using $O(l\log{n})$ space. With the latter we partially resolve with an affirmative answer the open problem of whether a path between two vertices can be found in the number of steps required to detect it.

arXiv:2408.10427•Aug 19, 2024•1 citation

A sublinear query quantum algorithm for s-t minimum cut on dense simple graphs

Simon Apers, Arinta Auza, Troy Lee

An $s{\operatorname{-}}t$ minimum cut in a graph corresponds to a minimum weight subset of edges whose removal disconnects vertices $s$ and $t$. Finding such a cut is a classic problem that is dual to that of finding a maximum flow from $s$ to $t$. In this work we describe a quantum algorithm for the minimum $s{\operatorname{-}}t$ cut problem on undirected graphs. For an undirected graph with $n$ vertices, $m$ edges, and integral edge weights bounded by $W$, the algorithm computes with high probability the weight of a minimum $s{\operatorname{-}}t$ cut after $\widetilde O(\sqrt{m} n^{5/6} W^{1/3})$ queries to the adjacency list of $G$. For simple graphs this bound is always $\widetilde O(n^{11/6})$, even in the dense case when $m = Ω(n^2)$. In contrast, a randomized algorithm must make $Ω(m)$ queries to the adjacency list of a simple graph $G$ even to decide whether $s$ and $t$ are connected.

arXiv:2110.15587•Oct 29, 2021•0 citations

Quantum algorithms for path and cycle containment problems

Arjan Cornelissen, Amin Shiraz Gilani, Subhasree Patro

The quantum query complexity of subgraph-containment problems, which ask whether a given subgraph $H$ is present in an input graph $G$, has been the subject of considerable study. However, even for relatively simple subgraphs, such as paths and cycles, a complete understanding of their query complexities remains elusive. In this work, we consider several variants of path- and cycle-containment problems in the adjacency matrix model, where we search for paths or cycles of constant length $k$. We compare the settings where the graphs are directed or undirected, where the goal is to detect or find the existence of a path/cycle, and where the path/cycle we are looking for has length exactly $k$, or at most $k$. We also consider several promise versions of these problems, where we suppose that the input graph has a certain structure. We characterize the relative difficulty of these variants of the path/cycle-containment problems, by relating them to one another using randomized reductions, and grouping them into equivalence classes. When we restrict our attention to path-containment problems, we get a dichotomy result. Some of the path-containment problems can be solved using a linear number of queries, and all the others are equivalent to one another (and additionally to several cycle-containment problems) under randomized reductions, up to constant overhead. For the latter equivalence class, we prove a novel quantum-walk-based algorithm that achieves query complexity $\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2-α_k})$, where $α_k \in Θ(c^{-k})$ and $c = \sqrt{3+\sqrt{17}}/2 \approx 1.33$, beating the previous best upper bound $O(n^{3/2})$ on its query complexity. We also provide a conditional lower bound based on the graph-collision problem, which implies that this equivalence class does not admit linear-query quantum algorithms unless graph collision admits an $O(\sqrt{n})$ query algorithm.

quant-pharXiv:2605.09017•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•May 12, 2026•0 citations

A quantum query algorithm for the graph collision problem

Dmitry Gavinsky, Tsuyoshi Ito

We construct a new quantum algorithm for the graph collision problem; that is, the problem of deciding whether the set of marked vertices contains a pair of adjacent vertices in a known graph G. The query complexity of our algorithm is O(sqrt(n)+sqrt(alpha*(G))), where n is the number of vertices and alpha*(G) is the maximum total degree of the vertices in an independent set of G. Notably, if G is a random graph where every edge is present with a fixed probability independently of other edges, then our algorithm requires O(sqrt(n log n)) queries on most graphs, which is optimal up to the sqrt(log n) factor on most graphs.

arXiv:1204.1527•Apr 6, 2012•9 citations
We present a quantum algorithm for sampling an edge on a path between two nodes s and t in an undirected graph given as an adjacency matrix, and show that this can be done in query complexity that is asymptotically the same, up to log factors, as the query complexity of detecting a path between s and t. We use this path sampling algorithm as a subroutine for st-path finding and st-cut-set finding algorithms in some specific cases. Our main technical contribution is an algorithm for generating a quantum state that is proportional to the positive witness vector of a span program.
The minimum cut problem in an undirected and weighted graph G is to find the minimum total weight of a set of edges whose removal disconnects G. We completely characterize the quantum query and time complexity of the minimum cut problem in the adjacency matrix model. If G has n vertices and edge weights at least 1 and at most τ, we give a quantum algorithm to solve the minimum cut problem using Õ(n^{3/2}√{τ}) queries and time. Moreover, for every integer 1 ≤ τ ≤ n we give an example of a graph G with edge weights 1 and τ such that solving the minimum cut problem on G requires Ω(n^{3/2}√{τ}) queries to the adjacency matrix of G. These results contrast with the classical randomized case where Ω(n²) queries to the adjacency matrix are needed in the worst case even to decide if an unweighted graph is connected or not. In the adjacency array model, when G has m edges the classical randomized complexity of the minimum cut problem is ̃ Θ(m). We show that the quantum query and time complexity are Õ(√{mnτ}) and Õ(√{mnτ} + n^{3/2}), respectively, where again the edge weights are between 1 and τ. For dense graphs we give lower bounds on the quantum query complexity of Ω(n^{3/2}) for τ > 1 and Ω(τ n) for any 1 ≤ τ ≤ n. Our query algorithm uses a quantum algorithm for graph sparsification by Apers and de Wolf (FOCS 2020) and results on the structure of near-minimum cuts by Kawarabayashi and Thorup (STOC 2015) and Rubinstein, Schramm and Weinberg (ITCS 2018). Our time efficient implementation builds on Karger’s tree packing technique (STOC 1996).
Let G be an n-vertex graph with m edges. When asked a subset S of vertices, a cut query on G returns the number of edges of G that have exactly one endpoint in S. We show that there is a bounded-error quantum algorithm that determines all connected components of G after making O(log(n)6) many cut queries. In contrast, it follows from results in communication complexity that any randomized algorithm even just to decide whether the graph is connected or not must make at least Ω(n/log(n)) many cut queries. We further show that with O(log(n)8) many cut queries a quantum algorithm can with high probability output a spanning forest for G. En route to proving these results, we design quantum algorithms for learning a graph using cut queries. We show that a quantum algorithm can learn a graph with maximum degree d after O(d log(n)2) many cut queries, and can learn a general graph with many cut queries. These two upper bounds are tight up to the poly-logarithmic factors, and compare to Ω(dn) and Ω(m/log(n)) lower bounds on the number of cut queries needed by a randomized algorithm for the same problems, respectively. The key ingredients in our results are the Bernstein-Vazirani algorithm, approximate counting with “OR queries”, and learning sparse vectors from inner products as in compressed sensing.
Given an undirected, weighted graph, with nnn vertices and mmm edges, and two special vertices sss and ttt, the problem is to find the shortest path between them. We give two bounded-error quantum algorithms with improved runtime in the adjacency list model that solve the problem on special classes of graphs defined via pathfinding probabilities of classical random walks and the electrical network framework. Firstly, we give a simple quantum algorithm based on sampling edges from a graph via the quantum flow state and running a classical algorithm on the sampled edges. It runs in O~(l2m)\tilde{O}(l^2\sqrt{m})O~(l2m​) expected time and uses O(log⁡n)O(\log{n})O(logn) space on graphs where the shortest sss-ttt path is also a minimum resistance sss-ttt subgraph. Our main algorithm can be thought of as a divide and conquer version of this approach and works on a special class of graphs where classical loop-erased random walk has a probability q>0.537q>0.537q>0.537 of finding the shortest sss-ttt path. In such cases the quantum algorithm outputs the shortest sss-ttt path with high probability in O~(ℓm)\widetilde{O}(\ell\sqrt{m})O(ℓm​) expected time and O(log⁡n)O(\log{n})O(logn) space, where lll is the length (or total weight, in case of weighted graphs) of the shortest sss-ttt path. This algorithm can be parallelised to O~(lm)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{lm})O~(lm​) circuit depth when using O(llog⁡n)O(l\log{n})O(llogn) space. With the latter we partially resolve with an affirmative answer the open problem of whether a path between two vertices can be found in the number of steps required to detect it.
An s-⁡ts{\operatorname{-}}ts-t minimum cut in a graph corresponds to a minimum weight subset of edges whose removal disconnects vertices sss and ttt. Finding such a cut is a classic problem that is dual to that of finding a maximum flow from sss to ttt. In this work we describe a quantum algorithm for the minimum s-⁡ts{\operatorname{-}}ts-t cut problem on undirected graphs. For an undirected graph with nnn vertices, mmm edges, and integral edge weights bounded by WWW, the algorithm computes with high probability the weight of a minimum s-⁡ts{\operatorname{-}}ts-t cut after O~(mn5/6W1/3)\widetilde O(\sqrt{m} n^{5/6} W^{1/3})O(m​n5/6W1/3) queries to the adjacency list of GGG. For simple graphs this bound is always O~(n11/6)\widetilde O(n^{11/6})O(n11/6), even in the dense case when m=Ω(n2)m = Ω(n^2)m=Ω(n2). In contrast, a randomized algorithm must make Ω(m)Ω(m)Ω(m) queries to the adjacency list of a simple graph GGG even to decide whether sss and ttt are connected.
The quantum query complexity of subgraph-containment problems, which ask whether a given subgraph HHH is present in an input graph GGG, has been the subject of considerable study. However, even for relatively simple subgraphs, such as paths and cycles, a complete understanding of their query complexities remains elusive. In this work, we consider several variants of path- and cycle-containment problems in the adjacency matrix model, where we search for paths or cycles of constant length kkk. We compare the settings where the graphs are directed or undirected, where the goal is to detect or find the existence of a path/cycle, and where the path/cycle we are looking for has length exactly kkk, or at most kkk. We also consider several promise versions of these problems, where we suppose that the input graph has a certain structure. We characterize the relative difficulty of these variants of the path/cycle-containment problems, by relating them to one another using randomized reductions, and grouping them into equivalence classes. When we restrict our attention to path-containment problems, we get a dichotomy result. Some of the path-containment problems can be solved using a linear number of queries, and all the others are equivalent to one another (and additionally to several cycle-containment problems) under randomized reductions, up to constant overhead. For the latter equivalence class, we prove a novel quantum-walk-based algorithm that achieves query complexity O~(n3/2−αk)\widetilde{O}(n^{3/2-α_k})O(n3/2−αk​), where αk∈Θ(c−k)α_k \in Θ(c^{-k})αk​∈Θ(c−k) and c=3+17/2≈1.33c = \sqrt{3+\sqrt{17}}/2 \approx 1.33c=3+17​​/2≈1.33, beating the previous best upper bound O(n3/2)O(n^{3/2})O(n3/2) on its query complexity. We also provide a conditional lower bound based on the graph-collision problem, which implies that this equivalence class does not admit linear-query quantum algorithms unless graph collision admits an O(n)O(\sqrt{n})O(n​) query algorithm.
We construct a new quantum algorithm for the graph collision problem; that is, the problem of deciding whether the set of marked vertices contains a pair of adjacent vertices in a known graph G. The query complexity of our algorithm is O(sqrt(n)+sqrt(alpha*(G))), where n is the number of vertices and alpha*(G) is the maximum total degree of the vertices in an independent set of G. Notably, if G is a random graph where every edge is present with a fixed probability independently of other edges, then our algorithm requires O(sqrt(n log n)) queries on most graphs, which is optimal up to the sqrt(log n) factor on most graphs.