The Portfolio Optimization task has long been studied in the Financial Services literature as a procedure to identify the basket of assets that satisfy desired conditions on the expected return and the associated risk. A well-known approach to tackle this task is the maximization of the Sharpe Ratio, achievable with a problem reformulation as Quadratic Programming. While the sole Sharpe Ratio could be efficiently optimized via classical solvers, in business scenarios it is common that multiple additional needs arise, which have to be integrated in the optimization model as either new constraints or objective function terms. Then, in general, the problem may become non-convex and hence could potentially be not efficiently solvable via classical techniques anymore. One example of such additional objective function term consists of maximizing a diversification measure penalizing portfolios holding significant portions of investments on assets belonging to the same sector, while favouring solutions that diversify over multiple sectors. The problem of optimizing both the Sharpe Ratio and a diversification term can be mapped to a QUBO and be solved via quantum annealing devices or Hybrid Computing approaches, which are expected to find high quality solutions. We propose a new QUBO formulation for the task described and provide the mathematical details and required assumptions, showing the ease of modeling the optimization as QUBO against the effort that would be required by classical strategies. We derive results via the available QUBO solvers, as well as discussing the behaviour of Hybrid approaches to tackle large scale problems in the near term. We finally elaborate on the results showing the trade-off between the observed values of the portfolio's Sharpe Ratio and diversification, as a natural consequence of solving a multi-objective optimization problem.
The Portfolio Optimization task has long been studied in the Financial Services literature as a procedure to identify the basket of assets that satisfy desired conditions on the expected return and the associated risk. A well-known approach to tackle this task is the maximization of the Sharpe Ratio, achievable with a problem reformulation as Quadratic Programming. While the sole Sharpe Ratio could be efficiently optimized via classical solvers, in business scenarios it is common that multiple additional needs arise, which have to be integrated in the optimization model as either new constraints or objective function terms. Then, in general, the problem may become non-convex and hence could potentially be not efficiently solvable via classical techniques anymore. One example of such additional objective function term consists of maximizing a diversification measure penalizing portfolios holding significant portions of investments on assets belonging to the same sector, while favouring solutions that diversify over multiple sectors. The problem of optimizing both the Sharpe Ratio and a diversification term can be mapped to a QUBO and be solved via quantum annealing devices or Hybrid Computing approaches, which are expected to find high quality solutions. We propose a new QUBO formulation for the task described and provide the mathematical details and required assumptions, showing the ease of modeling the optimization as QUBO against the effort that would be required by classical strategies. We derive results via the available QUBO solvers, as well as discussing the behaviour of Hybrid approaches to tackle large scale problems in the near term. We finally elaborate on the results showing the trade-off between the observed values of the portfolio's Sharpe Ratio and diversification, as a natural consequence of solving a multi-objective optimization problem.
The optimization of investment portfolios represents a pivotal task within the field of financial economics. Its objective is to identify asset combinations that meet specified criteria for return and risk. Traditionally, the maximization of the Sharpe Ratio, often achieved through quadratic programming, has constituted a popular approach for this purpose. However, real-world scenarios frequently necessitate more complex considerations, particularly in relation to portfolio diversification with a view to mitigating sector-specific risks and enhancing stability. The incorporation of diversification alongside the Sharpe Ratio into the optimization model creates a joint optimization task, which can be formulated as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) and addressed using quantum annealing or hybrid computing techniques. These techniques offer promising solutions. We present a novel QUBO formulation for this optimization, detailing its mathematical formulation and demonstrating its advantages over classical methods, particularly in handling diversification objectives. By leveraging available QUBO solvers and hybrid approaches, we explore the feasibility of handling large-scale problems while highlighting the importance of diversification in achieving robust portfolio performance. We finally elaborate on the results showing the trade-off between the observed values of the portfolio’s Sharpe Ratio and diversification, as a natural consequence of solving a multi-objective optimization problem.
In this study, the portfolio optimization problem is explored, using a combination of classical and quantum computing techniques. The portfolio optimization problem with specific objectives or constraints is often a quadratic optimization problem, due to the quadratic nature of, for example, risk measures. Quantum computing is a promising solution for quadratic optimization problems, as it can leverage quantum annealing and quantum approximate optimization algorithms, which are expected to tackle these problems more efficiently. Quantum computing takes advantage of quantum phenomena like superposition and entanglement. In this paper, a specific problem is introduced, where a portfolio of loans need to be optimized for 2030, considering ‘Return on Capital’ and ‘Concentration Risk’ objectives, as well as a carbon footprint constraint. This paper introduces the formulation of the problem and how it can be optimized using quantum computing, using a reformulation of the problem as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem. Two QUBO formulations are presented, each addressing different aspects of the problem. The QUBO formulation succeeded in finding solutions that met the emission constraint, although classical simulated annealing still outperformed quantum annealing in solving this QUBO, in terms of solutions close to the Pareto frontier. Overall, this paper provides insights into how quantum computing can address complex optimization problems in the financial sector. It also highlights the potential of quantum computing for providing more efficient and robust solutions for portfolio management.
A quantum approach for portfolio optimization involves using quantum computing to solve complex optimization problems related to portfolio selection. The approach involves constructing a mathematical model of the portfolio optimization problem using various algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) or the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE). This approach has the potential to provide more accurate and efficient solutions than classical approaches, particularly for large and complex portfolio optimization problems. Moreover, this paper also dives into discussing and comparing the results obtained from both these approaches. Our work is under the assumptions required for the proposed formulation deriving meaningful considerations about the solution quality found, measured as the value of Sharpe Ratio.
Large-scale portfolio optimization is hard because investors must balance risk, return, diversification, and liquidity across many assets with complex constraints. Classical methods, such as quadratic programming or metaheuristics, often become slow or less effective as the number of assets and factors grows. In this project, I explore the use of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) as a hybrid quantum–classical approach to portfolio selection. The framework encodes portfolio decisions as qubits and represents financial objectives—such as mean–variance trade-offs or risk-adjusted return—inside a parameterized quantum circuit. Classical optimization is then used to tune the circuit parameters so that the quantum system converges toward low-risk, high-return portfolios. Multi-factor constraints, including sector limits, liquidity rules, ESG scores, and macroeconomic risk factors, are integrated into the Hamiltonian as penalty terms. A qualitative comparison with classical solvers (e.g., mixed-integer programming and simulated annealing) suggests that QAOA can scale more gracefully in high-dimensional settings and handle complex constraint structures. Overall, the project shows how quantum hybrid optimization could support future portfolio management, linking theoretical quantum algorithms with practical, sustainability-aware investment strategies.
This study explores the integration of quantum computing techniques, specifically the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), with classical portfolio optimization frameworks through the Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) approach. Using monthly turnover data from the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE), this paper demonstrates the construction of a QUBO matrix by encoding expected returns and covariance-based risk profiles. Binary asset inclusion constraints are introduced into portfolios and then optimised using both brute force enumeration and quantum inspired solvers. The analysis reveals those combinations including Index Futures and Index Options exhibit superior risk-adjusted performance (Sharpe Ratio≈0.286). The hybrid approach suggests the promise of quantum inspired models as means to improve financial decision making under uncertainty. The results also give a robust template for scalable asset selection models that operate within the constraints of quantum computing infrastructure.
This paper investigates and compares quantum and classical investment strategies for portfolio construction under realistic trading and allocation constraints. The study considers a multi-period portfolio re-balancing setting in which asset weights are subject to lower and upper bounds, class-level exposure restrictions, and turnover limitations. On the quantum side, the portfolio selection problem is reformulated as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model through a finite binary encoding of asset weights, and subsequently embedded into a constrained quadratic model (CQM) solved by a hybrid quantum-classical optimization workflow. On the classical side, benchmark allocation strategies are introduced to provide an economically meaningful reference for performance assessment. The proposed framework jointly evaluates portfolio efficiency from two complementary perspectives: business performance, measured through return, volatility, and a measure of the trade-off between them, the Sharpe ratio; and computational performance, assessed through solver structure, constraint handling, and hardware execution characteristics. The resulting comparison provides a rigorous basis for understanding the practical role of quantum annealing in constrained portfolio optimization, while clarifying both its modeling advantages and its current implementation limitations relative to established classical approaches.