Abstract In physics, entanglement ‘reduces’ the entropy of an entity, because the (von Neumann) entropy of, e.g., a composite bipartite entity in a pure entangled state is systematically lower than the entropy of the component sub-entities. We show here that this ‘genuinely non-classical reduction of entropy as a result of composition’ also holds whenever two concepts combine in human cognition and, more generally, it is valid in human culture. On the basis of these results, we make a ‘new hypothesis’ on the nature of entanglement, namely, the production of entanglement in the preparation of a composite entity can be seen as a ‘dynamical process of collaboration between its sub-entities to reduce uncertainty’, because the composite entity is in a pure state while its sub-entities are in a non-pure state as a result of the preparation. We identify within the nature of this entanglement a mechanism of contextual updating and illustrate the mechanism in the examples we analyse. Our hypothesis naturally explains the non-classical nature of some quantum logical connectives, as due to Bell-type correlations.
Abstract In physics, entanglement ‘reduces’ the entropy of an entity, because the (von Neumann) entropy of, e.g., a composite bipartite entity in a pure entangled state is systematically lower than the entropy of the component sub-entities. We show here that this ‘genuinely non-classical reduction of entropy as a result of composition’ also holds whenever two concepts combine in human cognition and, more generally, it is valid in human culture. On the basis of these results, we make a ‘new hypothesis’ on the nature of entanglement, namely, the production of entanglement in the preparation of a composite entity can be seen as a ‘dynamical process of collaboration between its sub-entities to reduce uncertainty’, because the composite entity is in a pure state while its sub-entities are in a non-pure state as a result of the preparation. We identify within the nature of this entanglement a mechanism of contextual updating and illustrate the mechanism in the examples we analyse. Our hypothesis naturally explains the non-classical nature of some quantum logical connectives, as due to Bell-type correlations.
Abstract Quantum entanglement is regarded as one of the core concepts, which is used to describe the non-classical correlation between subsystems, and entropic uncertainty relation plays a vital role in quantum precision measurement. It is well known that entanglement of formation can be expressed by von Neumann entropy of subsystems for arbitrary pure states. An interesting question is naturally raised: is there any intrinsic correlation between the entropic uncertainty relation and quantum entanglement? Or if the relation can be applied to estimate the entanglement. In this work, we focus on exploring the complementary relation between quantum entanglement and the entropic uncertainty relation. The results show that there exists an inequality relation between both of them for an arbitrary two-qubit system, and specifically the larger uncertainty will induce the weaker entanglement of the probed system, and vice versa. Besides, we use randomly generated states as illustrations to verify our results. Therefore, we claim that our observations might offer and support the validity of using the entropy uncertainty relation to estimate quantum entanglement.
The Von Neumann entropy of reduced states is a measure of bipartite entanglement. Despite its name, the entanglement entropy cannot by itself be used as a resource for creating thermodynamic heat flows. In order to extract heat from an entangled pure state, it first needs to be converted into a stochastically mixed state by a process of quantum state reduction. Here we show that even in a system with only two degrees of freedom, for which bipartite entanglement is the sole form of entanglement available, the entanglement entropy cannot be converted into thermodynamic entropy in a one-to-one fashion. Moreover, we show that the stochastic dynamics which is necessarily present in any realistic model of quantum state reduction, allows for multiple definitions of entropy. We indicate why quantum state reduction does not allow construction of a perpetuum mobile, despite some measures of entropy evolving non-monotonically during its dynamics. Finally, we relate the different measures of entropy to the information they contain about quantum entanglement and extractable heat, and show that models of quantum state reduction based on physical, correlated stochastic driving forces give rise to observable thermodynamic signatures of quantum state reduction that can be unambiguously distinguished from environment-induced dephasing.
Classical information theory, built on Shannon entropy, and quantum information theory, built on von Neumann entropy, quantify uncertainty and compression properties of probability distributions and density operators. Both are powerful, but both treat information as a property of states of individual systems or ensembles. In this manuscript we argue that entanglement—the pattern of non-classical correlations between systems—is more fundamental than either Shannon or von Neumann information. We motivate this claim with a condensate thought experiment in which many bosons occupy the same single-particle state: Shannon and von Neumann entropies assign them identical information content, yet they can be distinguished by their distinct entanglement histories with external systems. Formally, states with identical marginal density operators but different purifications represent different global information, accessible only through their entanglement structure. Entropic quantities are then seen as coarse-grained summaries of this underlying relational information. We connect this perspective to an entanglement-geometric view of physics, including Entanglement Manifold Cosmology (EMC), in which spacetime and physical “truth” emerge from the geometry of correlations. The goal is an information-theoretic narrative that is rigorous enough for physics and information theory while readable to a non-specialist who is comfortable with basic linear algebra and quantum mechanics.
Entanglement, a defining property of quantum mechanics in which two physical subsystems cannot be seen as independent entities, challenges our everyday experience and classical intuition. However, only such strong quantum correlations enable quantum technologies, including quantum computing or communication, while revealing the limits of our classical worldview by violating local realism. Given its importance in modern quantum science, we present this tutorial addressing the questions: What is entanglement, how does it differ from classical correlations, and how can it be experimentally verified? Using celebrated examples, such as Schrödinger's cat, we highlight the distinction between classical and quantum correlations and illustrate the definition of entangled and separable states. We review entanglement criteria by discussing Heisenberg-type uncertainty relations for continuous variables and the CHSH inequality for discrete systems. Focusing on concepts of quantum correlations and operational entanglement witnesses, we provide accessible tools and illustrative examples aimed at demystifying entanglement for a broad readership.
Abstract We provide a general description of the phenomenon of entanglement in bipartite systems, as it manifests in micro and macro physical systems, as well as in human cognitive processes. We do so by observing that when genuine coincidence measurements are considered, the violation of the ‘marginal laws’, in addition to the Bell-CHSH inequality, is also to be expected. The situation can be described in the quantum formalism by considering the presence of entanglement not only at the level of the states, but also at the level of the measurements. However, at the “local” level of a specific joint measurement, a description where entanglement is only incorporated in the state remains always possible, by adopting a fine-tuned tensor product representation. But contextual tensor product representations should only be considered when there are good reasons to describe the outcome-states as (non-entangled) product states. This will not in general be true, hence, the entanglement resource will have to generally be allocated both in the states and in the measurements. In view of the numerous violations of the marginal laws observed in physics’ laboratories, it remains unclear to date if entanglement in micro-physical systems is to be understood only as an ‘entanglement of the states’, or also as an ‘entanglement of the measurements’. But even if measurements would also be entangled, the corresponding violation of the marginal laws (also called ‘no-signaling conditions’) would not for this imply that a superluminal communication would be possible.
This paper explores the fundamental relationship between the geometry of entanglement and von Neumann entropy, shedding light on the intricate nature of quantum correlations. We provide a comprehensive overview of entanglement, highlighting its crucial role in quantum mechanics. Our focus centers on the connection between entanglement, von Neumann entropy, a measure of the information content within quantum systems and the geometry of composite Hilbert spaces. We discuss various methods for quantifying and characterizing entanglement through a geometric perspective and elucidate how this connection unveils the nature of quantum entanglement, offering valuable insights into the underlying structure of quantum systems. This study underscores the significance of geometry as a key tool for understanding the rich landscape of quantum correlations and their implications across various domains of physics and information theory. An example of entanglement as an indispensable resource for the task of state teleportation is presented at the end.