Abstract Weak values and Kirkwood–Dirac (KD) quasiprobability distributions have been independently associated with both foundational issues in quantum theory and advantages in quantum metrology. We propose simple quantum circuits to measure weak values, KD distributions, and spectra of density matrices without the need for post-selection. This is achieved by measuring unitary-invariant, relational properties of quantum states, which are functions of Bargmann invariants, the concept that underpins our unified perspective. Our circuits also enable experimental implementation of various functions of KD distributions, such as out-of-time-ordered correlators and the quantum Fisher information in post-selected parameter estimation, among others. An upshot is a unified view of nonclassicality in all those tasks. In particular, we discuss how negativity and imaginarity of Bargmann invariants relate to set coherence.
Abstract Weak values and Kirkwood–Dirac (KD) quasiprobability distributions have been independently associated with both foundational issues in quantum theory and advantages in quantum metrology. We propose simple quantum circuits to measure weak values, KD distributions, and spectra of density matrices without the need for post-selection. This is achieved by measuring unitary-invariant, relational properties of quantum states, which are functions of Bargmann invariants, the concept that underpins our unified perspective. Our circuits also enable experimental implementation of various functions of KD distributions, such as out-of-time-ordered correlators and the quantum Fisher information in post-selected parameter estimation, among others. An upshot is a unified view of nonclassicality in all those tasks. In particular, we discuss how negativity and imaginarity of Bargmann invariants relate to set coherence.
Abstract Just a few years after the inception of quantum mechanics, there has been a research program using the nonclassical values of some quasiprobability distributions to delineate the nonclassical aspects of quantum phenomena. In particular, in Kirkwood–Dirac (KD) quasiprobability distribution, the distinctive quantum mechanical feature of noncommutativity which underlies many nonclassical phenomena, manifests in the nonreal values and/or the negative values of the real part. Here, we develop a faithful quantifier of quantum coherence based on the KD nonclassicality which captures simultaneously the nonreality and the negativity of the KD quasiprobability. The KD-nonclassicality coherence thus defined, is upper bounded by the uncertainty of the outcomes of measurement described by a rank-1 orthogonal projection-valued measure (PVM) corresponding to the incoherent orthonormal basis which is quantified by the Tsallis 1 2 -entropy. Moreover, they are identical for pure states so that the KD-nonclassicality coherence for pure state admits a simple closed expression in terms of measurement probabilities. We then use the Maassen–Uffink uncertainty relation for min-entropy and max-entropy to obtain a lower bound for the KD-nonclassicality coherence of a pure state in terms of optimal guessing probability in measurement described by a PVM noncommuting with the incoherent orthonormal basis. We also derive a trade-off relation for the KD-nonclassicality coherences of a pure state relative to a pair of noncommuting orthonormal bases with a state-independent lower bound. Finally, we sketch a variational scheme for a direct estimation of the KD-nonclassicality coherence based on weak value measurement and thereby discuss its relation with quantum contextuality.
Abstract Kirkwood-Dirac (KD) quasiprobability distributions serve as quantum analog representations of the classical phase-space probability, capable of exhibiting nonclassical behavior through negativity or nonreal values. Recent studies have demonstrated that the nonclassicality of KD quasiprobability distributions plays a crucial role in quantum information tasks and provides deep insights into foundational aspects of quantum mechanics. In this work, we introduce an interpolated KD quasiprobability distribution parametrized by a continuous variable α , which smoothly connects different KD quasiprobability representations. Based on the interpolated KD quasiprobability distribution, we propose a quantitative measure of nonclassicality and rigorously analyze its key properties, including unitary covariance, convexity, and monotonicity. Furthermore, we derive an upper bound for this measure and conduct a comparison with other nonclassicality measures. Finally, we evaluate the nonclassicality measures for several prototypical interpolated KD quasiprobability distributions, illustrating their applicability in quantum information theory.
Abstract The question of when the Kirkwood-Dirac (KD) quasiprobability serves as the most appropriate description for quantum measurements has remained unresolved, particularly across different measurement strengths. While known to generate anomalous weak values in the weak measurement regime and to reduce to classical probabilities under projective measurement, the physical mechanism governing its continuous transformation has been lacking. Here we demonstrate that the KD quasiprobability provides a general framework for all measurement regimes by identifying pointer-induced decoherence as the universal mechanism controlling this transition. We show that the decoherence factor F ( t ) simultaneously quantifies the loss of quantum coherence and interpolates the measurement strength from weak to strong. Within this framework, the KD quasiprobability naturally deforms from its full complex form—governing weak values—to the real, non-negative Wigner formula describing projective measurements, while maintaining informational completeness throughout the transition. Our work resolves the fundamental question of the KD distribution’s applicability by establishing it as the unified framework that seamlessly connects weak and strong measurement regimes through a physically transparent decoherence pathway.
The Kirkwood-Dirac (KD) quasiprobability is a quantum analog expression of the phase-space probability in classical statistical mechanics, yet it can behave nonclassically by taking negative or nonreal values. The nonclassicality of the KD quasiprobability distribution has lately been shown to provide advantages in some quantum information tasks and shed light on a number of aspects of quantum physics. Characterization and quantification of KD nonclassicality are crucial both theoretically and experimentally. Most of the existing measures of KD nonclassicality concentrate merely on the negative or/and imaginary part(s) of the KD distribution. Yet it is not clear whether these measures can account for all nonclassicality in the distribution. In this paper, we suggest a KD nonclassicality measure based on the two quantum modification terms in the quasiprobability distribution. The present paper is mainly motivated by the following two considerations: First, the two quantum modification terms are actually the sources of the negative and imaginary parts of the KD quasiprobability respectively. Secondly, these quantum modification terms deviate the KD quasiprobability from the classical joint probability distribution function of two successive projective measurements (termed as the Wigner formula), which can be obtained from the multiplication principle in classical probability theory. Our measure refines the quantification of KD nonclassicality in the sense that even for real and nonnegative KD distribution, its quantum modification terms can still exist, resulting in a nonvanishing KD nonclassicality. As an illustration, we analyze the KD nonclassicality of the positive KD distribution in the postselected metrology scheme [S. Das, S. Modak, and M. N. Bera, Phys. Rev. A 107, 042413 (2023)], which provides interpretation on the source of quantum advantages. We also give an upper bound on the KD nonclassicality measure and offer an easily verifiable sufficient condition for nonvanishing KD nonclassicality.
Two topics, evolving rapidly in separate fields, were combined recently: the out-of-time-ordered correlator (OTOC) signals quantum-information scrambling in many-body systems. The Kirkwood-Dirac (KD) quasiprobability represents operators in quantum optics. The OTOC was shown to equal a moment of a summed quasiprobability [Yunger Halpern, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012120 (2017)]. That quasiprobability, we argue, is an extension of the KD distribution. We explore the quasiprobability's structure from experimental, numerical, and theoretical perspectives. First, we simplify and analyze Yunger Halpern's weak-measurement and interference protocols for measuring the OTOC and its quasiprobability. We decrease, exponentially in system size, the number of trials required to infer the OTOC from weak measurements. We also construct a circuit for implementing the weak-measurement scheme. Next, we calculate the quasiprobability (after coarse graining) numerically and analytically: we simulate a transverse-field Ising model first. Then, we calculate the quasiprobability averaged over random circuits, which model chaotic dynamics. The quasiprobability, we find, distinguishes chaotic from integrable regimes. We observe nonclassical behaviors: the quasiprobability typically has negative components. It becomes nonreal in some regimes. The onset of scrambling breaks a symmetry that bifurcates the quasiprobability, as in classical-chaos pitchforks. Finally, we present mathematical properties. We define an extended KD quasiprobability that generalizes the KD distribution. The quasiprobability obeys a Bayes-type theorem, for example, that exponentially decreases the memory required to calculate weak values, in certain cases. A time-ordered correlator analogous to the OTOC, insensitive to quantum-information scrambling, depends on a quasiprobability closer to a classical probability. This work not only illuminates the OTOC's underpinnings, but also generalizes quasiprobability theory and motivates immediate-future weak-measurement challenges.
Abstract There are several mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger picture expresses quantum states in terms of wavefunctions over, e.g. position or momentum. Alternatively, phase-space formulations represent states with quasi-probability distributions over, e.g. position and momentum. A quasi-probability distribution resembles a probability distribution but may have negative and non-real entries. The most famous quasi-probability distribution, the Wigner function, has played a pivotal role in the development of a continuous-variable quantum theory that has clear analogues of position and momentum. However, the Wigner function is ill-suited for much modern quantum-information research, which is focused on finite-dimensional systems and general observables. Instead, recent years have seen the Kirkwood–Dirac (KD) distribution come to the forefront as a powerful quasi-probability distribution for analysing quantum mechanics. The KD distribution allows tools from statistics and probability theory to be applied to problems in quantum-information processing. A notable difference to the Wigner function is that the KD distribution can represent a quantum state in terms of arbitrary observables. This paper reviews the KD distribution, in three parts. First, we present definitions and basic properties of the KD distribution and its generalisations. Second, we summarise the KD distribution’s extensive usage in the study or development of measurement disturbance; quantum metrology; weak values; direct measurements of quantum states; quantum thermodynamics; quantum scrambling and out-of-time-ordered correlators; and the foundations of quantum mechanics, including Leggett–Garg inequalities, the consistent-histories interpretation and contextuality. We emphasise connections between operational quantum advantages and negative or non-real KD quasi-probabilities. Third, we delve into the KD distribution’s mathematical structure. We summarise the current knowledge regarding the geometry of KD-positive states (the states for which the KD distribution is a classical probability distribution), describe how to witness and quantify KD non-positivity, and outline relationships between KD non-positivity, coherence and observables’ incompatibility.