We propose a new design heuristic to tackle combinatorial optimisation problems, inspired by Hamiltonians for optimal state-transfer. The result is a rapid approximate optimisation algorithm. We provide numerical evidence of the success of this new design heuristic. We find this approach results in a better approximation ratio than the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm at lowest depth for the majority of problem instances considered, while utilising comparable resources. This opens the door to investigating new approaches for tackling combinatorial optimisation problems, distinct from adiabatic-influenced approaches.
We propose a new design heuristic to tackle combinatorial optimisation problems, inspired by Hamiltonians for optimal state-transfer. The result is a rapid approximate optimisation algorithm. We provide numerical evidence of the success of this new design heuristic. We find this approach results in a better approximation ratio than the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm at lowest depth for the majority of problem instances considered, while utilising comparable resources. This opens the door to investigating new approaches for tackling combinatorial optimisation problems, distinct from adiabatic-influenced approaches.
Quantum computing promises solutions to classically difficult and new-found problems through controlling the subtleties of quantum computing. The Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) is a recently proposed quantum algorithm designed to tackle difficult combinatorial optimisation problems utilising both quantum and classical computation. The hybrid nature, generality and typically low gate-depth make it a strong candidate for near-term implementation in quantum computing. Finding the practical limits of the algorithm is currently an open problem. Until now, no tools to facilitate the design and validation of probabilistic quantum optimisation algorithms such as the QAOA on a non-trivial scale exist. Graph similarity is a long standing classically difficult problem withstanding decades of research from academia and industry. Determining the maximal edge overlap between all possible node label permutations is an NP-Complete task and provides an apt measure of graph similarity. We introduce a novel quantum optimisation simulation package facilitating investigation of all constituent components of the QAOA from desktop to cluster scale using graph similarity as an example. Our simulation provides flexibility and performance. We investigate eight classical optimisation methods each at six levels of decomposition. Moreover an encoding for permutation based problems such as graph similarity through edge overlap to the QAOA allows for significant quantum memory savings at the cost of additional operations. This compromise extends into the classical portion of the algorithm as the inclusion of infeasible solutions creates a challenging cost-function landscape. We present performance analysis of our simulation and of the QAOA setting a precedent for investigating and validating numerous other difficult problems to the QAOA as we move towards realising practical quantum computation.
The Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) is a widely studied quantum-classical iterative heuristic for combinatorial optimisation. While QAOA targets problems in complexity class NP, the classical optimisation procedure required in every iteration is itself known to be NP-hard. Still, advantage over classical approaches is suspected for certain scenarios, but nature and origin of its computational power are not yet satisfactorily understood. By introducing means of efficiently and accurately approximating the QAOA optimisation landscape from solution space structures, we derive a new algorithmic variant of unit-depth QAOA for two-level Hamiltonians (including all problems in NP): Instead of performing an iterative quantum-classical computation for each input instance, our non-iterative method is based on a quantum circuit that is instance-independent, but problem-specific. It matches or outperforms unit-depth QAOA for key combinatorial problems, despite reduced computational effort. Our approach is based on proving a long-standing conjecture regarding instance-independent structures in QAOA. By ensuring generality, we link existing empirical observations on QAOA parameter clustering to established approaches in theoretical computer science, and provide a sound foundation for understanding the link between structural properties of solution spaces and quantum optimisation.
Combinatorial optimisation constitutes a central class of computational problems with broad relevance across science and industry, combining foundational theoretical interest with significant real-world impact. Many problems of practical importance admit concise mathematical formulations, yet resist efficient classical solution methods due to their NP-hard structure. Quantum computing offers several algorithmic paradigms that promise structural speedups for such problems. Most quantum and hybrid frameworks fall into one of the following three categories: algorithms based on continuous adiabatic evolution, such as quantum annealing; circuit-based variational quantum algorithms; circuit-based approaches based on Grover's algorithm. These three algorithmic families are conceptualised for different kinds and generations of quantum architectures, often studied in isolation from each other and from preexisting sophisticated classical methods. This thesis develops a unified, predominantly circuit-based treatment of quantum algorithms for combinatorial optimisation, with a particular focus on principled design transfers between near-term parametric algorithms and far-term fault-tolerant approaches. Starting from the Boolean circuit model, reversible and quantum circuit formulations are derived that allow for precise size and depth analysis of classical control logic, reversible embeddings, and quantum realisations of Boolean and pseudo-Boolean functions. These constructions form a common backbone for optimisation algorithms based on adiabatic evolution, variational principles, and amplitude amplification. Adiabatic quantum computation is analysed within this circuit framework, leading to explicit convergence conditions and resource bounds for discretised adiabatic evolutions driven by pseudo-Boolean cost functions of bounded degree. Variational quantum algorithms are then revisited with an emphasis on feasibility-preserving operations and mixing families. In this context, a novel class of exhaustive variational quantum algorithms is introduced, characterised by finite parameterisations that provably reach optimal solutions. These constructions naturally induce state-preparation routines that guarantee to generate superpositions of all feasible solutions. Finally, Grover’s algorithm and its generalisations are studied as optimisation methods, highlighting their structural dependence on feasible-state preparation and their conceptual proximity to variational and adiabatic approaches. By establishing explicit design transfer principles between these paradigms, this thesis provides a unified perspective on quantum optimisation algorithms, accompanied by concrete circuit constructions and quantitative resource analyses.
Challenging computational problems arising in the practical world are frequently tackled by heuristic algorithms. Small universal quantum computers will emerge in the next year or two, enabling a substantial broadening of the types of quantum heuristics that can be investigated beyond quantum annealing. The immediate question is: what experiments should we prioritize that will give us insight into quantum heuristics? One leading candidate is the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) metaheuristic. In this work, we provide a framework for designing QAOA circuits for a variety of combinatorial optimization problems with both hard constraints that must be met and soft constraints whose violation we wish to minimize. We work through a number of examples, and discuss design principles.
Combinatorial Optimization problems play an important role in various domains such as logis- tics, life science or the financial sector. As their complexity in general grows exponentially with their problem size, finding the optimal solution classically becomes infeasible very fast. This raises the central question of whether quantum computers are in principle suitable for solving combinatorial optimization problems better and faster than classical computers. In order to find answers to that question, one needs to study quantum algorithms designed for those problems under ideal conditions (i.e., simulations, which are however limited due to exponential scaling) to investigate their potential, but one also needs real quantum hardware to test its viability and evaluate whether practical advantages are reasonable. In this regard, we consider variational quantum algorithms, especially the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) consisting of a problem and a mixer Hamiltonian with freely selectable parameters, originally proposed as variational hybrid ansatz with classical optimization. This algorithm structure of- fers flexible and relatively shallow circuits, which makes it suitable for current NISQ hardware. However, optimizing the variational circuit parameters can be an NP-hard problem at worst. In this thesis, we study different versions of QAOA, especially with a focus on limitations, perfor- mance and potential advantages opposite classical methods. The first part of the thesis concerns the investigation of various aspects regarding the imple- mentation of the variational QAOA protocol such as: the incorporation of a problem constraint either by adding a suitable penalty term of by choosing a suitable mixer (that restricts the search space), the scaling of the problem Hamiltonian in comparison to the mixer Hamiltonian, the choice of the initial values for the classical optimization of the circuit parameters, and finally the choice of the function to be minimized (i.e., CVaR vs. expectation value). We apply this proto- col to both the portfolio optimization and the feature selection and evaluate the performance. In order to improve QAOA, we consider the warm-start QAOA for different problem instances and analyze its improved performance with regard to involved quantum effects. For this purpose, we propose a classical pre-processing method and demonstrate that the warm-start results can be reproduced or even exceeded by this method. The second part addresses the issue that the standard variational form requires a high number of circuit parameters that have to be optimized at a sufficiently large depth, which is a major limitationforachievingpotentialscalingadvantagescomparedtoclassicalmethods. Toovercome this limitation, we investigate and further develop fixed schedules for QAOA, which only rely on two free parameters. We start with introducing the continuous adiabatic theorem as it motivates the form of QAOA and show its limitations, which we address by applying a discrete version of the theorem. With our findings, a new version of QAOA based on linear-ramps (LR-QAOA) is introduced and further developed. In order to derive suitable parameter values for this schedule, we propose a method based on extrapolation from smaller towards larger problem sizes. With our results obtained on a noiseless emulator, we evaluate the quantum runtime scaling and discuss whether a scaling advantage can be achieved compared to classical methods.
This paper presents a new algorithm for solving the travelling salesman problem (TSP). The TSP is one of the most known combinatorial optimisation problems. It is about finding the shortest Hamiltonian cycle relating N cities. The algorithm is inspired from both genetic algorithms and quantum computing fields. It extends the standard genetic algorithms by combining them to some concepts and principles provided from quantum computing field such as quantum bit, states superposition and interference. The obtained results from the application of the proposed algorithm on some instances of TSP are significantly better than those provided by standard genetic algorithms.