arXiv:2301.03804 · Universe

Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory: Algebraic and Geometric Approaches

Igor Frolov, Albert S. Schwarz

Published Jul 17, 2023• 2 citations

Abstract

This is a non-standard exposition of the main notions of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, including recent results. It is based on the algebraic approach in which the starting point is a star-algebra and on the geometric approach in which the starting point is a convex set of states. Standard formulas for quantum probabilities are derived from decoherence. This derivation allows us to go beyond quantum theory in the geometric approach. Particles are defined as elementary excitations of the ground state (and quasiparticles as elementary excitations of any translation invariant state). The conventional scattering matrix does not work for quasiparticles (or even for particles if the theory does not have particle interpretation). The analysis of scattering in these cases is based on the notion of an inclusive scattering matrix, which is closely related to inclusive cross-sections. It is proven that the conventional scattering matrix can be expressed in terms of Green functions (LSZ formula) and the inclusive scattering matrix can be expressed in terms of generalized Green functions that appear in the Keldysh formalism of non-equilibrium statistical physics. The derivation of the expression of the evolution operator and other physical quantities in terms of functional integrals is based on the notion of the symbol of an operator; these arguments can be applied in the geometric approach as well. In particular, this result can be used to provide a simple derivation of the diagram technique for generalized Green functions. The notion of an inclusive scattering matrix makes sense in the geometric approach, although it seems that a definition of the conventional scattering matrix cannot be provided in this situation. The geometric approach is used to show that quantum mechanics and its generalizations can be considered as classical theories where our devices are able to measure only a part of the observables.

DOI: 10.3390/universe9070337

Related papers

Scattering matrix and inclusive scattering matrix in algebraic quantum field theory

Albert S. Schwarz

We study the scattering of particles and quasiparticles in the framework of algebraic quantum field theory. The main novelty is the construction of inclusive scattering matrix related to inclusive cross-sections. The inclusive scattering matrix can be expressed in terms of generalized Green functions by a formula similar to the LSZ formula for the conventional scattering matrix. The consideration of inclusive scattering matrix is necessary in quantum field theory if a unitary scattering matrix does not exist (if the theory does not have particle interpretation). It is always necessary if we want to consider collisions of quasiparticles.

arXiv:1908.09388Aug 25, 20195 citations

Geometric and algebraic approaches to quantum theory

Albert S. Schwarz

We show how to formulate physical theory taking as a starting point the set of states (geometric approach). We discuss the relation of this formulation to the conventional approach to classical and quantum mechanics and the theory of complex systems. The equations of motion and the formulas for probabilities of physical quantities are analyzed. A heuristic proof of decoherence in our setting is used to justify the formulas for probabilities. We show that any physical theory can be obtained from classical theory if we restrict the set of observables. This remark can be used to construct models with any prescribed group of symmetries; one can hope that this construction leads to new interesting models that cannot be build in the conventional framework. The geometric approach can be used to formulate quantum theory in terms of Jordan algebras, generalizing the algebraic approach to quantum theory. The scattering theory can be formulated in geometric approach.

arXiv:2102.09176Nuclear Physics BNov 5, 20218 citations

Scattering in Algebraic Approach to Quantum Theory—Jordan Algebras

Albert S. Schwarz

Using the geometric approach, we formulate a quantum theory in terms of Jordan algebras. We analyze the notion of a (quasi)particle (=elementary excitation of translation-invariant stationary state) and the scattering of (quasi)particles in this framework.

arXiv:2301.10446UniverseMar 31, 20232 citations

Star products and geometric algebra

Peter Henselder

Considering physics as it is done today one notices that physics separates into two formally and conceptually different parts. There is on the one hand classical physics that deals with macroscopic phenomena and there is on the other hand quantum physics that deals with microscopic phenomena. Penrose [96] described this situation as a disturbing analogy to ancient Greece, where two different sets of laws for earth and heaven were applied. So immediately the question arises if one really has to use different formalisms on different scales or if it is possible to describe physics in a unified way. In order to investigate this question one first has to consider how classical and quantum physics are related. Quantum mechanics results from classical physics by a procedure called quantization and classical physics is reobtained by taking the classical limit. Both procedures are heavily plagued by problems [61, 100]. In the first chapter the mathematical problems of quantization will be addressed and it will be described how the star product formalism circumvents these problems. The star product formalism has the advantage that there is no formal break if one goes from classical physics to quantum physics. This formal advantage and the resulting beauty is then used as a guiding principle for the further development. The first question that arises is if the spin can be described in the star product formalism. That this is indeed possible is shown in the second chapter. As a starting point the spin description with pseudoclassical mechanics as it was developed by Berezin is used. One can then construct a fermionic star product and apply it for deformation quantization of pseudoclassical mechanics. In analogy to the bosonic star product formalism one obtains spin Wigner functions that act as spin projectors. Besides the nonrelativistic case it is also possible to formulate Dirac theory with star products. The Clifford algebra of the gamma matrices is hereby described as a deformed version of a four dimensional Grassmann algebra. The fermionic star product in combination with the bosonic Moyal product leads to a supersymmetric star product formalism that can be used to describe supersymmetric quantum mechanics and in the relativistic case to describe the supersymmetric structure of Dirac theory. The other direction of generalization of the star product formalism is the application of star products in quantum field theory that is described in chapter three. After constructing a suitable normal product it is shown that the algebraic structures of perturbative quantum field theory appear also in the star product formalism, which is an expression of the algebra morphism of the operator and the star product formalism. But moreover the quantum group structure that was recently found in perturbative quantum field theory is shown to be a natural algebraic structure of the star product. The essential advantage of deformation quantization is that the classical limit has a well defined meaning. In the context of the spin description with star products this leads to the question of the classical limit of spin, or equivalently to the question of the physical status of pseudoclassical mechanics. In chapter four it is shown that this question is solved if one realizes that the fermionic sector together with the fermionic star product describe the underlying geometric structure. The deformation of a Grassmann algebra leads to a Clifford calculus that is equivalent to geometric algebra. The formulation of geometric algebra in the star product formalism is given in chapter four. One sees there that geometric algebra as the most fundamental geometric formalism that unifies all geometric structures that appear in physics can be described in a supersymmetric manner that parallels the bosonic star product structures. Having obtained a formulation of geometry with fermionic star products this formalism is then applied in the fifth chapter to physical problems. As examples for the application of geometric algebra in classical physics the rigid body and the Kepler problem are considered. In both cases the formalism of geometric algebra gives the most elegant formulation of the problem. In the quantum case one can then combine the fermionic star product formalism that describes the underlying geometric structure with the bosonic star product that describes the noncommuative structure of quantum mechanics. The result is a noncommutative version of geometric algebra that leads to a natural appearance of spin terms. The same idea applied on the phase space leads to the split in supersymmetric partner systems. Geometric algebra gives in this way a natural geometric foundation of supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Similarly one can interpret the hidden BRST-structure of classical mechanics that was found by E. Gozzi and M. Reuter in the path integral formalism from a star product point of view.

Dec 13, 20078 citations

Inclusive scattering matrix and scattering of quasiparticles

Albert S. Schwarz

The quantum theory can be formulated in the language of positive functionals on Weyl or Clifford algebra (L-functionals). It is shown that this language gives simple understanding of diagrams of Keldysh formalism (that coincide in our case with the diagrams of thermo-field dynamics). The matrix elements of the scattering matrix in the formalism of L-functionals are related to inclusive cross-sections, therefore we suggest the name “inclusive scattering matrix” for this notion. The inclusive scattering matrix can be expressed in terms of on-shell values of generalized Green functions. This notion is necessary if we want to analyze collisions of quasiparticles.

arXiv:1904.04050Nuclear Physics BNov 25, 20197 citations

12. Particles

Arnold Neumaier

As we have seen in Section 8.4, the basis of our perception of an objective reality is statistical mechanics and field theory. These are routinely used in equilibrium and nonequilibrium statistical thermodynamics (see, for example, Calzetta & Hu [59]), which govern the macroscopic laws of everyday life. Thus the quantum theory of fields must be the fundamental description of Nature. Therefore, the simpler quantum mechanics of particles is necessarily a derived description. This chapter discusses the extent to which a particle picture of matter and radiation is appropriate. In relativistic quantum field theory, particles appear only as asymptotic excitations of the fields. The quantum particle concept therefore makes mathematical (and intuitive) sense only under very special circumstances, namely in those where a system actually behaves like particles do: - As quasiparticles, they are useful in the domain, where the geometric optics perspective applies. - Before and after a scattering event in a dilute gas or a particle collider ring, particles can be considered as being essentially free. During the very short interaction time itself, the scattering process cannot be described by a particle picture, but needs a hydromechanical description or a kinetic description via Kadanoff-Baym equations. Already at the very beginning of modern quantum mechanics, when Born found his probability interpretation, the scattering process of single particles in an external classical field was understood (see Section 14.1 of the Appendix) to be a wave process relating initially and finally stationary particles, freely moving in their center of mass frame. It is a historical accident that one continues to use the name particle in the many microscopic situations, where it is grossly inappropriate to think of it with the classical meaning of a tiny bullet moving through space. When we restrict the use of the particle concept to where it is appropriate, or when we do not think of particles as “objects”, in both cases all mystery is gone, and the foundations become fully rational. The inappropriate focus on the particle aspect of quantum mechanics created the appearance of mystery; common sense is restored by focussing instead on the field aspect. To substantiate the above summary view, we give in Section 12.1 an analysis of the photoelectric effect and in Section 12.2 a review of the origin of particle tracks. This leads in Section 12.3 to a discussion about the reality of particles. In the remainder of the chapter, we discuss the relation between fields and particles in more detail. Section 12.4 poses the problem how the nonrelativistic multiparticle description arises from relativistic quantum field theory. Section 12.5 considers the case of free quantum fields, and Section 12.6 the case of interacting quantum fields. Section 12.7, the final section, discusses the semiclassical view of quasiparticles in the approximation familiar from geometric optics.

De Gruyter eBooksOct 24, 20190 citations