Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2212.14568

Quantum violation of trivial and non-trivial preparation non-contextuality: Nonlocality and Steering

Prabuddha Roy, A. K. Pan

Published Dec 30, 2022• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper illustrates a direct connection between quantum steering and non-trivial preparation contextuality. In two party-two measurement per party-two outcomes per measurement $(2-2-2)$ Bell scenario, any argument of Bell nonlocality is a proof of trivial preparation contextuality; however, the converse may not hold. If one of the parties (say, Alice) performs the measurements of more than two dichotomic observables, then it is possible to find a set of non-trivial functional relations between Alice's observables. We argue that the existence of a suitable set of such non-trivial relations between Alice's observables may warrant the unsteerability of quantum states at the end of another spatially separated party (say, Bob). Interestingly, such constraints can be read as non-trivial preparation non-contextuality assumptions in an ontological model. We further demonstrate two types of Bell inequalities that can be converted into linear steering inequalities using the aforementioned non-trivial conditions on Alice's observables. Such steering inequalities can also be considered as non-trivial preparation noncontextual inequalities. Since the local bound of the family of Bell expression gets reduced under the additional non-trivial conditions, it provides a test of quantum steering and nonlocality from the same family of Bell expressions depending upon its violation of the non-trivial preparation non-contextual or the local bound, thereby establishing a direct connection between quantum steering and non-trivial preparation contextuality.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2212.14568

Related papers

Sharing nonlocality and nontrivial preparation contextuality using the same family of Bell expressions

Asmita Kumari, A. K. Pan

In the work by Silva et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 250401 (2015)], the sharing of nonlocality by multiple observers was demonstrated through the quantum violation of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Halt inequality. We provide a scheme for the sharing of nonlocality and nontrivial preparation contextuality sequentially through the quantum violation of a family of Bell's inequalities, where Alice and Bob perform ${2}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}$ and $n$ numbers of measurements of dichotomic observables, respectively. For this, we consider that Alice always performs projective measurement and multiple Bobs sequentially perform unsharp measurement. We show that when Bob's choices of measurement settings are unbiased, a maximum of two Bobs can sequentially share the nonlocality through the violation of our inequalities. Further, we show that the local bound of the aforementioned family of inequalities gets reduced if nontrivial preparation noncontextuality assumptions are further imposed. Then there is a chance to share the nontrivial preparation contextuality for a greater number of Bobs than that of nonlocality. We demonstrate that the nontrivial preparation contextuality can be sequentially shared by arbitrary numbers of Bob for unbiased choices of his measurement settings.

arXiv:1912.10976•Physical Review A•Dec 24, 2019•54 citations

Connection between the contextuality breaking and incompatibility breaking qubit channels

Swati Kumari, Sumit Mukherjee, R. Prabhu

Contextuality and measurement incompatibility are two fundamental aspects of nonclassicality, and their manifestations in observed quantum correlations are often deeply interconnected. Recently, measurement incompatibility has been studied in connection with nonlocality, particularly in terms of their robustness under various quantum channels. This line of investigation helps establish a connection between the channels that break nonlocality and those that break incompatibility. In this study, we focus on an asymmetric bipartite Bell scenario involving three and four inputs on Alice and Bob sides, respectively, with each of these inputs having dichotomous outcomes. Under the assumption of locality, the observed statistics in this asymmetric scenario obeys the Elegant Bell inequality (EBI). Here, we use a different version of the EBI that relies on the assumption of the preparation noncontextuality. By taking the violation of this noncontextual version of EBI as a witness of preparation contextuality we establish a connection between the channels that break contextuality and the channels that break triple-wise measurement incompatibility. Our results suggest that any channel which breaks EBI contextuality will also break Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) nonlocality; however, the reverse does not hold. We also show that a depolarising channel that breaks N-wise incompatibility can also break a certain form of contextuality, witnessed by a generalised inequality involving N measurements on one wing of a bipartite Bell scenario.

quant-pharXiv:2604.04899•Apr 7, 2026•0 citations

Revealing universal quantum contextuality through communication games

A. K. Pan

An ontological model of an operational theory is considered to be universally noncontextual if both preparation and measurement noncontextuality assumptions are satisfied in that model. In this report, we first generalize the logical proofs of quantum preparation and measurement contextuality for qubit system for any odd number of preparations and measurements. Based on the logical proof, we derive testable universally non-contextual inequalities violated by quantum theory. We then propose a class of two-party communication games and show that the average success probability of winning such games is solely linked to suitable Bell expression whose local bound is greater than universal non-contextual bound. Thus, for a given state, even if quantum theory does not exhibit non-locality, it may still reveal non-classicality by violating the universal non-contextual bound. Further, we consider a different communication game to demonstrate that for a given choices of observables in quantum theory, even if there is no logical proof of preparation and measurement contextuality exist, the universal quantum contextuality can be revealed through that communication game. Such a game thus test a weaker form of universal non-contextuality with minimal assumption.

arXiv:1912.10972•Scientific Reports•Nov 26, 2019•21 citations

Sharing preparation contextuality in a Bell experiment by an arbitrary pair of sequential observers

Asmita Kumari, A. K. Pan

Based on the quantum violation of the bipartite Bell inequality, it has been established that the sharing of nonlocality can be demonstrated for at most two sequential observers at one end and at most one pair of observers at both ends. In this work we study the sharing of nonlocality and preparation contextuality based on a bipartite Bell inequality, involving arbitrary $n$ measurements by one party and ${2}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}$ measurements by another party. Such a Bell inequality has two bounds, the local bound and the preparation noncontextual bound, which is smaller than the local bound. We show that while nonlocality can be shared only by the first pair of the sequential observers, the preparation contextuality can be shared by an arbitrary pair of independent sequential observers at both ends.

arXiv:2311.04568•Physical Review A•Jan 30, 2023•12 citations

Quantum nonlocality via local contextuality with qubit-qubit entanglement

Debashis Saha, Adán Cabello, Sujit K. Choudhary +1 more

Quantum nonlocality can be revealed ``via local contextuality'' in qudit-qudit entangled systems with $d>2$, that is, through the violation of inequalities containing Alice-Bob correlations that admit a local description, and Alice-Alice correlations (between the results of sequences of measurements on Alice's subsystem) that admit a local (but contextual) description. A fundamental question to understand the respective roles of entanglement and local contextuality is whether nonlocality via local contextuality exists when the parties have only qubit-qubit entanglement. Here we respond affirmatively to this question. This result further clarifies the connection between contextuality and nonlocality and opens the door for observing nonlocality via local contextuality in actual experiments.

arXiv:1507.08480•Physical Review A•Apr 28, 2016•5 citations

Trade-off relations between Bell nonlocality and local Kochen–Specker contextuality in generalized Bell scenarios

Lucas Emanuel Antunes Porto, Gabriel Ruffolo, Rafael Rabelo +2 more

Abstract The relations between Bell nonlocality and Kochen–Specker contextuality have been subject of research from many different perspectives in the last decades. Recently, some interesting results on these relations have been explored in the so-called generalized Bell scenarios, that is, scenarios where Bell spatial separation (or agency independence) coexist with (at least one of the) parties’ ability to perform compatible measurements at each round of the experiment. When this party has an n-cycle compatiblity setup, it was first claimed that Bell nonlocality could not be concomitantly observed with contextuality at this party’s local experiment. However, by a more natural reading of the definition of locality, it turns out that both Bell nonlocality and local contextuality can, in fact, be jointly present. In spite of it, in this work we prove that in the simplest of those scenarios there cannot be arbitrary amounts of both of these two resources together. That is, in these cases we show that the violation of any Bell inequality limits the possible violations of any local noncontextuality inequality. We also explore this trade-off relation using quantifiers of nonlocality and contextuality, discussing how such a relation can be understood in terms of a ‘global’ notion of contextuality, and we study possible extensions of this result to other scenarios.

arXiv:2405.02964•New Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 2024•1 citation
This paper illustrates a direct connection between quantum steering and non-trivial preparation contextuality. In two party-two measurement per party-two outcomes per measurement (2−2−2)(2-2-2)(2−2−2) Bell scenario, any argument of Bell nonlocality is a proof of trivial preparation contextuality; however, the converse may not hold. If one of the parties (say, Alice) performs the measurements of more than two dichotomic observables, then it is possible to find a set of non-trivial functional relations between Alice's observables. We argue that the existence of a suitable set of such non-trivial relations between Alice's observables may warrant the unsteerability of quantum states at the end of another spatially separated party (say, Bob). Interestingly, such constraints can be read as non-trivial preparation non-contextuality assumptions in an ontological model. We further demonstrate two types of Bell inequalities that can be converted into linear steering inequalities using the aforementioned non-trivial conditions on Alice's observables. Such steering inequalities can also be considered as non-trivial preparation noncontextual inequalities. Since the local bound of the family of Bell expression gets reduced under the additional non-trivial conditions, it provides a test of quantum steering and nonlocality from the same family of Bell expressions depending upon its violation of the non-trivial preparation non-contextual or the local bound, thereby establishing a direct connection between quantum steering and non-trivial preparation contextuality.
In the work by Silva et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 250401 (2015)], the sharing of nonlocality by multiple observers was demonstrated through the quantum violation of Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Halt inequality. We provide a scheme for the sharing of nonlocality and nontrivial preparation contextuality sequentially through the quantum violation of a family of Bell's inequalities, where Alice and Bob perform ${2}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}$ and nnn numbers of measurements of dichotomic observables, respectively. For this, we consider that Alice always performs projective measurement and multiple Bobs sequentially perform unsharp measurement. We show that when Bob's choices of measurement settings are unbiased, a maximum of two Bobs can sequentially share the nonlocality through the violation of our inequalities. Further, we show that the local bound of the aforementioned family of inequalities gets reduced if nontrivial preparation noncontextuality assumptions are further imposed. Then there is a chance to share the nontrivial preparation contextuality for a greater number of Bobs than that of nonlocality. We demonstrate that the nontrivial preparation contextuality can be sequentially shared by arbitrary numbers of Bob for unbiased choices of his measurement settings.
Contextuality and measurement incompatibility are two fundamental aspects of nonclassicality, and their manifestations in observed quantum correlations are often deeply interconnected. Recently, measurement incompatibility has been studied in connection with nonlocality, particularly in terms of their robustness under various quantum channels. This line of investigation helps establish a connection between the channels that break nonlocality and those that break incompatibility. In this study, we focus on an asymmetric bipartite Bell scenario involving three and four inputs on Alice and Bob sides, respectively, with each of these inputs having dichotomous outcomes. Under the assumption of locality, the observed statistics in this asymmetric scenario obeys the Elegant Bell inequality (EBI). Here, we use a different version of the EBI that relies on the assumption of the preparation noncontextuality. By taking the violation of this noncontextual version of EBI as a witness of preparation contextuality we establish a connection between the channels that break contextuality and the channels that break triple-wise measurement incompatibility. Our results suggest that any channel which breaks EBI contextuality will also break Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) nonlocality; however, the reverse does not hold. We also show that a depolarising channel that breaks N-wise incompatibility can also break a certain form of contextuality, witnessed by a generalised inequality involving N measurements on one wing of a bipartite Bell scenario.
An ontological model of an operational theory is considered to be universally noncontextual if both preparation and measurement noncontextuality assumptions are satisfied in that model. In this report, we first generalize the logical proofs of quantum preparation and measurement contextuality for qubit system for any odd number of preparations and measurements. Based on the logical proof, we derive testable universally non-contextual inequalities violated by quantum theory. We then propose a class of two-party communication games and show that the average success probability of winning such games is solely linked to suitable Bell expression whose local bound is greater than universal non-contextual bound. Thus, for a given state, even if quantum theory does not exhibit non-locality, it may still reveal non-classicality by violating the universal non-contextual bound. Further, we consider a different communication game to demonstrate that for a given choices of observables in quantum theory, even if there is no logical proof of preparation and measurement contextuality exist, the universal quantum contextuality can be revealed through that communication game. Such a game thus test a weaker form of universal non-contextuality with minimal assumption.
Based on the quantum violation of the bipartite Bell inequality, it has been established that the sharing of nonlocality can be demonstrated for at most two sequential observers at one end and at most one pair of observers at both ends. In this work we study the sharing of nonlocality and preparation contextuality based on a bipartite Bell inequality, involving arbitrary nnn measurements by one party and ${2}^{n\ensuremath{-}1}$ measurements by another party. Such a Bell inequality has two bounds, the local bound and the preparation noncontextual bound, which is smaller than the local bound. We show that while nonlocality can be shared only by the first pair of the sequential observers, the preparation contextuality can be shared by an arbitrary pair of independent sequential observers at both ends.
Quantum nonlocality can be revealed ``via local contextuality'' in qudit-qudit entangled systems with d>2d>2d>2, that is, through the violation of inequalities containing Alice-Bob correlations that admit a local description, and Alice-Alice correlations (between the results of sequences of measurements on Alice's subsystem) that admit a local (but contextual) description. A fundamental question to understand the respective roles of entanglement and local contextuality is whether nonlocality via local contextuality exists when the parties have only qubit-qubit entanglement. Here we respond affirmatively to this question. This result further clarifies the connection between contextuality and nonlocality and opens the door for observing nonlocality via local contextuality in actual experiments.
Abstract The relations between Bell nonlocality and Kochen–Specker contextuality have been subject of research from many different perspectives in the last decades. Recently, some interesting results on these relations have been explored in the so-called generalized Bell scenarios, that is, scenarios where Bell spatial separation (or agency independence) coexist with (at least one of the) parties’ ability to perform compatible measurements at each round of the experiment. When this party has an n-cycle compatiblity setup, it was first claimed that Bell nonlocality could not be concomitantly observed with contextuality at this party’s local experiment. However, by a more natural reading of the definition of locality, it turns out that both Bell nonlocality and local contextuality can, in fact, be jointly present. In spite of it, in this work we prove that in the simplest of those scenarios there cannot be arbitrary amounts of both of these two resources together. That is, in these cases we show that the violation of any Bell inequality limits the possible violations of any local noncontextuality inequality. We also explore this trade-off relation using quantifiers of nonlocality and contextuality, discussing how such a relation can be understood in terms of a ‘global’ notion of contextuality, and we study possible extensions of this result to other scenarios.