Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2212.14341 · Physics Letters A

Device-independent randomness certification using multiple copies of entangled states

Shyam Sundar Mahato, A. K. Pan

Published Nov 4, 2022• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128534

Related papers

Measurement-device-independent randomness certification by \emph{local} entangled states

Manik Banik

Nonlocal correlations obtained from entangled quantum states are useful for device independent (DI) randomness certification [Nature (London) 464, 1021 (2010)]. The advantage of this DI protocol over the conventional quantum protocol is that even with untrusted experimental apparatus randomness can be certified. Although quantum entanglement is the necessary physical source for nonlocal correlation, these two are different concepts. There exist entangled states which produce no nonlocal correlation and hence are not useful for the DI randomness certification task. In this work we introduce measurement-device-independent randomness certification task and show that entangled states, having local description, can be useful resource in such task which otherwise are useless in corresponding DI scenario.

•Jan 7, 2014•3 citations

Device-independent randomness expansion with entangled photons

Lynden K. Shalm, Yanbao Zhang, Joshua C. Bienfang +12 more

arXiv:1912.11158•Nature Physics•Jan 28, 2021•111 citations

Experimental quantum state certification by actively sampling photonic entangled states

Michael Antesberger, Mariana M. E. Schmid, Huan Cao +3 more

Entangled quantum states are essential ingredients for many quantum technologies, but they must be validated before they are used. As a full characterization is prohibitively resource intensive, recent work has focused on developing methods to efficiently extract a few parameters of interest, in a so-called verification framework. Most existing approaches are based on preparing an ensemble of nominally identical and independently distributed (IID) quantum states and then measuring each copy of the ensemble. However, this leaves no states left for the intended quantum tasks and the IID assumptions do not always hold experimentally. To overcome these challenges, we experimentally implement quantum state certification (QSC), which measures only a subset of the ensemble, certifying the fidelity of multiple copies of the remaining states. We use active optical switches to randomly sample from sources of two-photon Bell states and three-photon GHZ (Greenberger-Horn-Zeilinger) states, reporting statistically sound fidelities in real time without destroying the entire ensemble. In addition, our QSC protocol removes the assumption that the states are identically distributed (but still assumes independent copies); can achieve close N −1 scaling, in the number of states measured N ; and can be implemented in a device-independent manner. Together, these benefits make our QSC protocol suitable for benchmarking large-scale quantum computing devices and deployed quantum communication setups relying on entanglement in both standard and adversarial situations.

arXiv:2407.13913•Science Advances•Feb 11, 2026•0 citations

Certified Quantum Randomness: Device-Independent and Semi-Device-Independent Approaches, Experimental Realizations, and Applications

Shyam Sundar Mahato

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Feb 23, 2026•0 citations

Measurement-device–independent randomness from local entangled states

Anubhav Chaturvedi, Manik Banik

Nonlocal correlations are useful for device-independent (DI) randomness certification (P ironio S. et al. , Nature (London) , 464 (2010) 1021). The advantage of this DI protocol over the conventional quantum protocol is that randomness can be certified even when experimental apparatuses are not trusted. Quantum entanglement is the necessary physical source for the nonlocal correlation required for such DI task. However, nonlocality and entanglement are distinct concepts. There exist entangled states which produce no nonlocal correlation and hence are not useful for the DI randomness certification task. Here we introduce the measurement-device–independent randomness certification task where one has trusted quantum state preparation devices but the mesurement devices are completely unspecified. Interestingly we show that there exist entangled states, with local description, that are a useful resource in such task but are useless in the corresponding DI scenario.

arXiv:1401.1338•Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Nov 1, 2015•44 citations

Source-device-independent randomness expansion using quantum random access codes

Yu-Qian Zhou, Qian-Kun Yao, Ya-Qi Dong +2 more

Quantum Information Processing•May 13, 2023•0 citations
Nonlocal correlations obtained from entangled quantum states are useful for device independent (DI) randomness certification [Nature (London) 464, 1021 (2010)]. The advantage of this DI protocol over the conventional quantum protocol is that even with untrusted experimental apparatus randomness can be certified. Although quantum entanglement is the necessary physical source for nonlocal correlation, these two are different concepts. There exist entangled states which produce no nonlocal correlation and hence are not useful for the DI randomness certification task. In this work we introduce measurement-device-independent randomness certification task and show that entangled states, having local description, can be useful resource in such task which otherwise are useless in corresponding DI scenario.
Entangled quantum states are essential ingredients for many quantum technologies, but they must be validated before they are used. As a full characterization is prohibitively resource intensive, recent work has focused on developing methods to efficiently extract a few parameters of interest, in a so-called verification framework. Most existing approaches are based on preparing an ensemble of nominally identical and independently distributed (IID) quantum states and then measuring each copy of the ensemble. However, this leaves no states left for the intended quantum tasks and the IID assumptions do not always hold experimentally. To overcome these challenges, we experimentally implement quantum state certification (QSC), which measures only a subset of the ensemble, certifying the fidelity of multiple copies of the remaining states. We use active optical switches to randomly sample from sources of two-photon Bell states and three-photon GHZ (Greenberger-Horn-Zeilinger) states, reporting statistically sound fidelities in real time without destroying the entire ensemble. In addition, our QSC protocol removes the assumption that the states are identically distributed (but still assumes independent copies); can achieve close N −1 scaling, in the number of states measured N ; and can be implemented in a device-independent manner. Together, these benefits make our QSC protocol suitable for benchmarking large-scale quantum computing devices and deployed quantum communication setups relying on entanglement in both standard and adversarial situations.
Nonlocal correlations are useful for device-independent (DI) randomness certification (P ironio S. et al. , Nature (London) , 464 (2010) 1021). The advantage of this DI protocol over the conventional quantum protocol is that randomness can be certified even when experimental apparatuses are not trusted. Quantum entanglement is the necessary physical source for the nonlocal correlation required for such DI task. However, nonlocality and entanglement are distinct concepts. There exist entangled states which produce no nonlocal correlation and hence are not useful for the DI randomness certification task. Here we introduce the measurement-device–independent randomness certification task where one has trusted quantum state preparation devices but the mesurement devices are completely unspecified. Interestingly we show that there exist entangled states, with local description, that are a useful resource in such task but are useless in the corresponding DI scenario.