The Pauli measurements (the measurements that can be performed with Clifford operators followed by measurement in the computational basis) are a fundamental object in quantum information. It is well-known that there is no assignment of outcomes to all Pauli measurements that is both complete and consistent. We define two classes of hidden variable assignments based on relaxing either condition. Partial hidden variable assignments retain the consistency condition, but forfeit completeness. Contextual hidden variable assignments retain completeness but forfeit consistency. We use techniques from spectral graph theory to characterize the incompleteness and inconsistency of the respective hidden variable assignments. As an application, we interpret our incompleteness result as a statement of contextuality and our inconsistency result as a statement of nonlocality. Our results show that we can obtain large amounts of contextuality and nonlocality using Clifford gates and measurements.
The Pauli measurements (the measurements that can be performed with Clifford operators followed by measurement in the computational basis) are a fundamental object in quantum information. It is well-known that there is no assignment of outcomes to all Pauli measurements that is both complete and consistent. We define two classes of hidden variable assignments based on relaxing either condition. Partial hidden variable assignments retain the consistency condition, but forfeit completeness. Contextual hidden variable assignments retain completeness but forfeit consistency. We use techniques from spectral graph theory to characterize the incompleteness and inconsistency of the respective hidden variable assignments. As an application, we interpret our incompleteness result as a statement of contextuality and our inconsistency result as a statement of nonlocality. Our results show that we can obtain large amounts of contextuality and nonlocality using Clifford gates and measurements.
Noncontextual hidden variables theories, assigning simultaneous values to all quantum mechanical observables, are inconsistent by theorems of Gleason and others. These theorems do not exclude contextual hidden variables theories, in which a complete state assigns values to physical quantities only relative to contexts. However, any contextual theory obeying a certain factorisability conditions implies one of Bell's Inequalities, thereby precluding complete agreement with quantum mechanical predictions. The present paper distinguishes two kinds of contextual theories, ‘algebraic’ and ‘environmental’, and investigates when factorisability is reasonable. Some statements by Fine about the philosophical significance of Bell's Inequalities are then assessed.
The question of a hidden variable interpretation of quantum contextuality in the Mermin-Peres square is considered. The Kochen-Specker theorem implies that quantum mechanics may be interpreted as a contextual hidden-variable theory. It is shown that such a hidden-variable description can be viewed as either contextual in the random variables mapping hidden states to observable outcomes or in the probability measure on the hidden state space. The latter view suggests that this apparent contextuality may be interpreted as a simple consequence of measurement disturbance, wherein the initial hidden state is altered through interaction with the measuring device, thereby giving rise to a possibly different final hidden-variable state from which the measurement outcome is obtained. In light of this observation, a less restrictive and, arguably, more reasonable definition of noncontextuality is suggested. To prove that such a description is possible, an explicit and, in this sense, noncontextual hidden-variable model is constructed, which reproduces all quantum theoretic predictions for the Mermin-Peres square. A critical analysis of some recent and proposed experimental tests of contextuality is also provided. Although the discussion is restricted to a four-dimensional Hilbert space, the approach and conclusions are expected to generalize to any Hilbert space.
Abstract In chapter 12 we give an overview of the historical development of hidden-variable theories aiming to attribute ‘hidden’ definite outcomes to any potential measurement on a quantum system. We start with a discussion of von Neumann’s assumption on hidden-variable models, which was later realized not to hold by Hermann, Kochen, Specker, and Bell, going into detail on Bell’s refutation of von Neumann’s arguments. We then turn to the notion of contextuality, which severely restricts hidden-variable models: we discuss Gleason’s theorem before stating and proving the famous Kochen-Specker theorem, as well as the simpler versions of Peres’ nonet and Mermin’s pentagram. These results show that quantum mechanics is not compatible with the assignment of definite measurement outcomes to all possible measurements, and such assignments can hence only be made once a restricted set of observables, a context, is selected
By analysing the concept of contextuality (Bell–Kochen–Specker) in terms of pre- and post-selection, it is possible to assign definite values to observables in a new and surprising way. Physical reasons are presented for restrictions on these assignments. When measurements are performed which do not disturb the pre- and post-selection (i.e. weak measurements), then novel experimental aspects of contextuality can be demonstrated. We also prove that every PPS-paradox with definite predictions directly implies 'quantum contextuality' which is introduced as the analogue of contextuality at the level of quantum mechanics rather than at the level of hidden variable theories. Finally, we argue that certain results of these measurements (e.g. eccentric weak values outside the eigenvalue spectrum) cannot be explained by a 'classical-like' hidden variable theory.
It is known that "quantum non locality", leading to the violation of Bell's inequality and more generally of classical local realism, can be attributed to the conjunction of two properties, which we call here elementary locality and predictive completeness. Taking this point of view, we show again that quantum mechanics violates predictive completeness, allowing the making of contextual inferences, which can, in turn, explain why quantum non locality does not contradict relativistic causality. An important question remains: if the usual quantum state ψ is predictively incomplete, how do we complete it? We give here a set of new arguments to show that ψ should be completed indeed, not by looking for any "hidden variables", but rather by specifying the measurement context, which is required to define actual probabilities over a set of mutually exclusive physical events.
We propose a non-contextual hidden variable model, consistent with all predictions of quantum mechanics (QM). A careful scrutiny of consistency requirements of any hidden variable model with quantum mechanics and the corresponding no-go theorems, leads us to the conclusion that the notion of contextuality is not a necessary feature of QM. The alternative view that emerges, hinges on identifying a new classical property which we call multiplicativity. It turns out that by relaxing this condition of multiplicativity on hidden variable models, they can be made consistent with QM. The connection of non-multiplicativity to Bohm's model and to apparent contextuality is also discussed.