We present two results on the subject of quantum contextuality and cohomology, and non-locality and quantum advantage with shallow circuits. Abramsky et al. showed that a range of examples of quantum contextuality is detected by a cohomological invariant based on Čech cohomology. However, the approach does not give a complete cohomological characterisation of contextuality. A different cohomological approach to contextuality was introduced by Okay et al. Their approach exploits the algebraic structure of the Pauli operators and their qudit generalisations known as Weyl operators. We give an abstract account of this structure, then generalise their approach to any example of contextuality with this structure. We prove at this general level that the approach does not give a more complete characterisation of contextuality than the Čech cohomology approach. Bravyi, Gosset, and König (BGK) gave the first unconditional proof that a restricted class of quantum circuits is more powerful than its classical analogue. The result, for the class of circuits of bounded depth and fan-in (shallow circuits), exploits a particular family of examples of contextuality. BGK's quantum circuit and computational problem are derived from a family of non-local games related to the well-known GHZ non-local game. We present a generalised version of their construction. A systematic way of taking examples of contextuality and producing unconditional quantum advantage results with shallow circuits.
We present two results on the subject of quantum contextuality and cohomology, and non-locality and quantum advantage with shallow circuits. Abramsky et al. showed that a range of examples of quantum contextuality is detected by a cohomological invariant based on Čech cohomology. However, the approach does not give a complete cohomological characterisation of contextuality. A different cohomological approach to contextuality was introduced by Okay et al. Their approach exploits the algebraic structure of the Pauli operators and their qudit generalisations known as Weyl operators. We give an abstract account of this structure, then generalise their approach to any example of contextuality with this structure. We prove at this general level that the approach does not give a more complete characterisation of contextuality than the Čech cohomology approach. Bravyi, Gosset, and König (BGK) gave the first unconditional proof that a restricted class of quantum circuits is more powerful than its classical analogue. The result, for the class of circuits of bounded depth and fan-in (shallow circuits), exploits a particular family of examples of contextuality. BGK's quantum circuit and computational problem are derived from a family of non-local games related to the well-known GHZ non-local game. We present a generalised version of their construction. A systematic way of taking examples of contextuality and producing unconditional quantum advantage results with shallow circuits.
We present two results on the subject of quantum contextuality and cohomology, and non-locality and quantum advantage with shallow circuits. Abramsky et al. showed that a range of examples of quantum contextuality is detected by a cohomological invariant based on Čech cohomology. However, the approach does not give a complete cohomological characterisation of contextuality. A different cohomological approach to contextuality was introduced by Okay et al. Their approach exploits the algebraic structure of the Pauli operators and their qudit generalisations known as Weyl operators. We give an abstract account of this structure, then generalise their approach to any example of contextuality with this structure. We prove at this general level that the approach does not give a more complete characterisation of contextuality than the Čech cohomology approach. Bravyi, Gosset, and König (BGK) gave the first unconditional proof that a restricted class of quantum circuits is more powerful than its classical analogue. The result, for the class of circuits of bounded depth and fan-in (shallow circuits), exploits a particular family of examples of contextuality. BGK's quantum circuit and computational problem are derived from a family of non-local games related to the well-known GHZ non-local game. We present a generalised version of their construction. A systematic way of taking examples of contextuality and producing unconditional quantum advantage results with shallow circuits.
Okay, Roberts, Bartlett and Raussendorf recently introduced a new cohomological approach to contextuality in measurement based quantum computation. We give an abstract description of their obstruction and the algebraic structure it exploits, using the sheaf theoretic framework of Abramsky and Brandenburger. At this level of generality we contrast their approach to the Cech cohomology obstruction of Abramsky, Mansfield and Barbosa and give a direct proof that Cech cohomology is at least as powerful.
The main subjects of this thesis are non-locality and contextuality, two fundamental features of quantum mechanics that constitute valuable resources for quantum computation. Our analysis is based on Abramsky & Brandenburger's sheaf theoretic framework, which captures both these phenomena in a unified treatment and in a very general setting. This high-level description transcends quantum physics and allows to precisely characterise the notion of contextuality as the apparent paradox realised by data being locally consistent but globally inconsistent. More specifically, we aim to develop a deeper understanding of so-called logical forms of contextuality, i.e. situations where the phenomenon can be witnessed using purely logical arguments, disregarding probabilities. The sheaf theoretic description of logical contextuality has recently inspired the development of a topological treatment of the phenomenon based on sheaf cohomology. In this thesis, we embark on a detailed analysis of the cohomology of contextuality, exposing key shortcomings in the current methods, and introducing an (almost) complete cohomological characterisation of logical forms of contextuality. More specifically, we show that, in its current formulation, sheaf cohomology does not constitute a complete invariant for contextuality, not even in its strongest forms, and that higher cohomology groups cannot be used to study the phenomenon. Then, we solve these issues by introducing a novel construction, which derives refined versions of the presheaves describing empirical models to expose their deeper extendability properties, resulting in a sheaf cohomological invariant which is applicable to the vast majority of empirical models, and conjectured to work universally. We propose a general theory of contextual semantics using the language of valuation algebras. In particular, we give a general definition of contextual behaviour as a fundamental gap between local agreement and global disagreement of information sources. Not only does this formalism aptly capture and generalise the known instances of contextuality beyond quantum theory, but it also provides inspiration for further applications of the phenomenon, and paves the way for the transfer of results and techniques between different fields. We give a prime example of this potential by developing faster algorithms to detect contextuality based on mainstream methods of generic inference. Finally, we turn our attention back to instances of contextuality in quantum physics, and study strong contextuality in multi-qubit states. We give a complete combinatorial characterisation of All-vs-Nothing proofs of strong contextuality in stabiliser quantum mechanics. This allows to produce the complete list of all stabiliser states exhibiting this kind of contextuality, which consitututes an important resource in certain models of quantum computation. Then, we extend our search for strongly contextual behaviour beyond stabiliser states, and identify the minimum quantum resources needed to realise strong non-locality. Additional results include a partial classification of strongly non-local models comprised of three-qubit states and local projective measurements, and the introduction of a new infinite family of strongly non-local three-qubit states.
Circuit depth is a central resource in complexity theory. While bounded-depth classical circuits admit well-understood hierarchy theorems, the internal structure of constant-depth quantum computation remains comparatively unexplored.
We prove an explicit depth hierarchy theorem for QNC0. For each d≥12, we construct a family of two-round interactive problems on which no depth-(d−1) quantum circuit can achieve near-perfect success, regardless of gate set, circuit size, or ancillary qubits. In contrast, we prove that our construction admits realizations by simple bounded fan-in quantum circuits of depth larger than d by a small constant factor. Moreover, all bounded fan-in classical circuits of sublogarithmic depth (in the input size) fail to achieve perfect success on these tasks for every d, yielding a hierarchy of problems that show unconditional quantum advantage of QNC0 over NC0.
A key obstacle is the scarcity of lower bound techniques for quantum circuits. To address this, we develop methods to analyze how depth affects a circuit's ability to realize nonlocal correlations amongst its output qubits in a fine-grained manner. Our approach exploits the correspondence between constraint systems and nonlocal games, translating group-theoretic constructions into rigid operator-valued constraint systems and then into non-local games. In particular, we construct constraint systems whose unique faithful operator-valued solutions require every perfect strategy, and every near-perfect strategy to a fixed precision, to implement multi-controlled phase operations. This reduces to a nonlocal unitary-synthesis problem, yielding depth lower bounds for both shallow quantum and classical circuits.
These results show that increasing depth strictly increases computational power within QNC0, establishing a genuinely quantum hierarchy.
Recent work by Abramsky and Brandenburger used sheaf theory to give a mathematical formulation of non-locality and contextuality. By adopting this viewpoint, it has been possible to define cohomological obstructions to the existence of global sections. In the present work, we illustrate new insights into different aspects of this theory. We shed light on the power of detection of the cohomological obstruction by showing that it is not a complete invariant for strong contextuality even under symmetry and connectedness restrictions on the measurement cover, disproving a previous conjecture. We generalise obstructions to higher cohomology groups and show that they give rise to a refinement of the notion of cohomological contextuality: different "levels" of contextuality are organised in a hierarchy of logical implications. Finally, we present an alternative description of the first cohomology group in terms of torsors, resulting in a new interpretation of the cohomological obstructions.
In a previous paper with Adam Brandenburger, we used sheaf theory to analyze the structure of non-locality and contextuality. Moreover, on the basis of this formulation, we showed that the phenomena of non-locality and contextuality can be characterized precisely in terms of obstructions to the existence of global sections. Our aim in the present work is to build on these results, and to use the powerful tools of sheaf cohomology to study the structure of non-locality and contextuality. We use the Cech cohomology on an abelian presheaf derived from the support of a probabilistic model, viewed as a compatible family of distributions, in order to define a cohomological obstruction for the family as a certain cohomology class. This class vanishes if the family has a global section. Thus the non-vanishing of the obstruction provides a sufficient (but not necessary) condition for the model to be contextual. We show that for a number of salient examples, including PR boxes, GHZ states, the Peres-Mermin magic square, and the 18-vector configuration due to Cabello et al. giving a proof of the Kochen-Specker theorem in four dimensions, the obstruction does not vanish, thus yielding cohomological witnesses for contextuality.