We study the counting version of the Boolean satisfiability problem #SAT using the ZH-calculus, a graphical language originally introduced to reason about quantum circuits. Using this, we generalize #SAT to a weighted variant we call #SAT+-, which is complete for the class GapP. We show there is an efficient linear-time reduction from #SAT to #2SAT+-, unlike previous reductions from #SAT to #2SAT which blow up the size of the formula by a polynomial factor. Our main conceptual contribution is that introducing weights to #SAT allows for more efficient translations, and we use this to remove the dependence on clause width k in this case. We observe that DPLL-style algorithms for #2SAT can be adapted to #2SAT+- directly and hence the best-known upper bounds for #2SAT apply. Applying an upper bound for #2SAT in terms of variables gives us upper bounds for #SAT in terms of clauses and variables that are better than O*(2^n) for small clause densities of m/n < 2.25, and improve on previous average-case and worst-case bounds for k >= 6 and k >= 4, respectively. Applying a similar bound in terms of clauses produces a bound of O*(1.1740^L) in terms of the length of the formula. These are, to our knowledge, the first non-trivial upper bounds for #SAT that is independent of clause size, and in terms of formula length, respectively. Based on a result of Kutzkov, we find an improved bound on #3SAT for 1.2577 < m/n <= 7/3. Finally, we use this technique to find an upper bound on the complexity of calculating amplitudes of quantum circuits in terms of the total number of gates. Our results demonstrate that graphical reasoning can lead to new algorithmic insights, even outside the domain of quantum computing that the calculus was intended for.
We study the counting version of the Boolean satisfiability problem #SAT using the ZH-calculus, a graphical language originally introduced to reason about quantum circuits. Using this, we generalize #SAT to a weighted variant we call #SAT+-, which is complete for the class GapP. We show there is an efficient linear-time reduction from #SAT to #2SAT+-, unlike previous reductions from #SAT to #2SAT which blow up the size of the formula by a polynomial factor. Our main conceptual contribution is that introducing weights to #SAT allows for more efficient translations, and we use this to remove the dependence on clause width k in this case. We observe that DPLL-style algorithms for #2SAT can be adapted to #2SAT+- directly and hence the best-known upper bounds for #2SAT apply. Applying an upper bound for #2SAT in terms of variables gives us upper bounds for #SAT in terms of clauses and variables that are better than O*(2^n) for small clause densities of m/n < 2.25, and improve on previous average-case and worst-case bounds for k >= 6 and k >= 4, respectively. Applying a similar bound in terms of clauses produces a bound of O*(1.1740^L) in terms of the length of the formula. These are, to our knowledge, the first non-trivial upper bounds for #SAT that is independent of clause size, and in terms of formula length, respectively. Based on a result of Kutzkov, we find an improved bound on #3SAT for 1.2577 < m/n <= 7/3. Finally, we use this technique to find an upper bound on the complexity of calculating amplitudes of quantum circuits in terms of the total number of gates. Our results demonstrate that graphical reasoning can lead to new algorithmic insights, even outside the domain of quantum computing that the calculus was intended for.
Counting the solutions to Boolean formulae defines the problem #SAT, which is complete for the complexity class #P. We use the ZH-calculus, a universal and complete graphical language for linear maps which naturally encodes counting problems in terms of diagrams, to give graphical reductions from #SAT to several related counting problems. Some of these graphical reductions, like to #2SAT, are substantially simpler than known reductions via the matrix permanent. Additionally, our approach allows us to consider the case of counting solutions modulo an integer on equal footing. Finally, since the ZH-calculus was originally introduced to reason about quantum computing, we show that the problem of evaluating ZH-diagrams in the fragment corresponding to the Clifford+T gateset, is in FP^#P. Our results show that graphical calculi represent an intuitive and useful framework for reasoning about counting problems.
We provide a graphical treatment of SAT and #SAT on equal footing. Instances of #SAT can be represented as tensor networks in a standard way. These tensor networks are interpreted by diagrams of the ZH-calculus: a system to reason about tensors over C in terms of diagrams built from simple generators, in which computation may be carried out by transformations of diagrams alone. In general, nodes of ZH diagrams take parameters over C which determine the tensor coefficients; for the standard representation of #SAT instances, the coefficients take the value 0 or 1. Then, by choosing the coefficients of a diagram to range over B, we represent the corresponding instance of SAT. Thus, by interpreting a diagram either over the boolean semiring or the complex numbers, we instantiate either the decision or counting version of the problem. We find that for classes known to be in P, such as 2SAT and #XORSAT, the existence of appropriate rewrite rules allows for efficient simplification of the diagram, producing the solution in polynomial time. In contrast, for classes known to be NP-complete, such as 3SAT, or #P-complete, such as #2SAT, the corresponding rewrite rules introduce hyperedges to the diagrams, in numbers which are not easily bounded above by a polynomial. This diagrammatic approach unifies the diagnosis of the complexity of CSPs and #CSPs and shows promise in aiding tensor network contraction-based algorithms.
Abstract The present work introduces the Local Density of States (LDOS) primitive forBoolean satisfiability (SAT). For a Boolean formula on n variables and m clausesof width k, a window of ℓ free variables, and a random assignment of the remain-ing n − ℓ variables, the residual satisfying fraction p is the proportion of the2ℓ window assignments that satisfy the formula. The present work estimatesp on a gate-based quantum computer by amplitude estimation on a clause-by-clause phase-flip oracle, and averages p over random windows to form the LDOSsignature, consisting of its mean, its variance, and its positivity fraction, theprobability that a window remains satisfiable. It is proven that p is estimableto relative precision ε with O(mk/(ε√p)) gates, optimal up to logarithmicfactors. This estimation advantage inherits the known Grover-versus-classical k-SAT decision crossover and appears only at clause width four and above; atclause width three the best known classical algorithm is faster, and no advan-tage is claimed. The principal conceptual result recasts the positivity fractionas a structural lens on the geometry of the solution set. An exact reformulationshows that its leading behaviour is a counting effect, fixed by the window frac-tion and the clause width and carrying no dependence on the freezing transitionof random SAT; a dedicated sweep of the window fraction is required to isolateany freezing-specific signal, and a preliminary classical experiment confirms thecounting-driven behaviour. The present work asserts no quantum-versus-classicalhardness separation.
Quantum propositional logic, introduced by Birkhoff and von Neumann, formalizes reasoning about experimental propositions in quantum mechanics through closed subspaces of Hilbert spaces. We provide a comprehensive complexity analysis of the satisfiability problem for quantum logic formulas over the connectives conjunction, disjunction, and negation. Distinguishing between weak satisfiability (evaluation to a nonzero subspace) and strong satisfiability (evaluation to the full space), we establish that both notions coincide with Boolean satisfiability for dimension one, are classically NP complete for dimension two, and become complete for the Blum Shub Smale class NP_R when dimension d >= 3 is fixed. Our principal contribution is twofold. First, we present two alternative constructive reductions from quantum logic satisfiability to the Existential Theory of the Reals (ETR): a realification based encoding that explicitly handles the complex to real translation through commutant characterizations, and a rank one column encoding with orthogonal splitting gadgets. Both reductions yield polynomial size systems of quadratic equations for fixed dimension, proving membership in the complexity class existsR and hence in PSPACE via Cannys algorithm. Second, we provide detailed size bounds distinguishing weak and strong satisfiability: weak satisfiability encodes with O(n D^2 + N_v D) scalar variables where n is the number of atoms, D the real dimension, and N_v the number of disjunctions, while strong satisfiability requires O(n D^2 + N_v D^2) variables due to basis vector witnesses. When dimension is part of the input, strong satisfiability becomes polynomial time equivalent to feasibility of noncommutative integer polynomial equations. These results position quantum logic satisfiability precisely between classical NP and existsR, highlighting dimension as a fundamental complexity parameter.
The constraint satisfaction problems k-SAT and Quantum k-SAT (k-QSAT) are canonical NP-complete and QMA_1-complete problems (for k >= 3), respectively, where QMA_1 is a quantum generalization of NP with one-sided error. Whereas k-SAT has been well-studied for special tractable cases, as well as from a parameterized complexity perspective, much less is known in similar settings for k-QSAT. Here, we study the open problem of computing satisfying assignments to k-QSAT instances which have a "matching" or "dimer covering"; this is an NP problem whose decision variant is trivial, but whose search complexity remains open. Our results fall into three directions, all of which relate to the "matching" setting: (1) We give a polynomial-time classical algorithm for k-QSAT when all qubits occur in at most two clauses. (2) We give a parameterized algorithm for k-QSAT instances from a certain non-trivial class, which allows us to obtain exponential speedups over brute force methods in some cases by reducing the problem to solving for a single root of a single univariate polynomial. (3) We conduct a structural graph theoretic study of 3-QSAT interaction graphs which have a "matching". We remark that the results of (2), in particular, introduce a number of new tools to the study of Quantum SAT, including graph theoretic concepts such as transfer filtrations and blow-ups from algebraic geometry; we hope these prove useful elsewhere.
We present an exact quantum algorithm for solving the Exact Satisfiability problem, which belongs to the important NP-complete complexity class. The algorithm is based on an intuitive approach that can be divided into two parts: the first step consists in the identification and efficient characterization of a restricted subspace that contains all the valid assignments of the Exact Satisfiability; while the second part performs a quantum search in such restricted subspace. The quantum algorithm can be used either to find a valid assignment (or to certify that no solution exists) or to count the total number of valid assignments. The query complexities for the worst-case are respectively bounded by and , where n is the number of variables and the number of linearly independent clauses. Remarkably, the proposed quantum algorithm results to be faster than any known exact classical algorithm to solve dense formulas of Exact Satisfiability. As a concrete application, we provide the worst-case complexity for the Hamiltonian cycle problem obtained after mapping it to a suitable Occupation problem. Specifically, we show that the time complexity for the proposed quantum algorithm is bounded by for 3-regular undirected graphs, where n is the number of nodes. The same worst-case complexity holds for -regular bipartite graphs. As a reference, the current best classical algorithm has a (worst-case) running time bounded by . Finally, when compared to heuristic techniques for Exact Satisfiability problems, the proposed quantum algorithm is faster than the classical WalkSAT and Adiabatic Quantum Optimization for random instances with a density of constraints close to the satisfiability threshold, the regime in which instances are typically the hardest to solve. The proposed quantum algorithm can be straightforwardly extended to the generalized version of the Exact Satisfiability known as Occupation problem. The general version of the algorithm is presented and analyzed.