Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2211.10633 · Physics Letters A

Hybrid form of quantum theory with non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

Miloslav Znojil

Published Nov 22, 2022• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2022.128556

Related papers

-symmetric versus Hermitian formulations of quantum mechanics

Carl M. Bender, Junhua Chen, Kimball A. Milton

A non-Hermitian Hamiltonian that has an unbroken symmetry can be converted by means of a similarity transformation to a physically equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian. This raises the following question: in which form of the quantum theory, the non-Hermitian or the Hermitian one, is it easier to perform calculations? This paper compares both forms of a non-Hermitian i x 3 quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian and demonstrates that it is much harder to perform calculations in the Hermitian theory because the perturbation series for the Hermitian Hamiltonian is constructed from divergent Feynman graphs. For the Hermitian version of the theory, dimensional continuation is used to regulate the divergent graphs that contribute to the ground-state energy and the one-point Green's function. The results that are obtained are identical to those found much more simply and without divergences in the non-Hermitian -symmetric Hamiltonian. The contribution to the ground-state energy of the Hermitian version of the theory involves graphs with overlapping divergences, and these graphs are extremely difficult to regulate. In contrast, the graphs for the non-Hermitian version of the theory are finite to all orders and they are very easy to evaluate.

arXiv:hep-th/0511229•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 1, 2006•76 citations

Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics

Fabio Bagarello, Roberto Passante, Camillo Trapani

Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 2016•111 citations

Exact PT -symmetry is equivalent to Hermiticity

Ali Mostafazadeh

We show that a quantum system possessing an exact antilinear symmetry, in particular PT -symmetry, is equivalent to a quantum system having a Hermitian Hamiltonian. We construct the unitary operator relating an arbitrary non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with exact PT -symmetry to a Hermitian Hamiltonian. We apply our general results to PT -symmetry in finite dimensions and give the explicit form of the above-mentioned unitary operator and Hermitian Hamiltonian in two dimensions. Our findings lead to the conjecture that non-Hermitian CPT -symmetric field theories are equivalent to certain nonlocal Hermitian field theories.

arXiv:quant-ph/0304080•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jun 11, 2003•448 citations

Quantum mechanics with a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian

Alexander N. Grigorenko

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1993•9 citations

Gauging non-Hermitian Hamiltonians

H F Jones

We address the problem of coupling non-Hermitian systems, treated as fundamental rather than effective theories, to the electromagnetic field. In such theories the observables are not the x and p appearing in the Hamiltonian, but quantities X and P constructed by means of the metric operator. Following the analogous procedure of gauging a global symmetry in Hermitian quantum mechanics we find that the corresponding gauge transformation in X implies minimal substitution in the form P → P − e A ( X ). We discuss how the relevant matrix elements governing electromagnetic transitions may be calculated in the special case of the Swanson Hamiltonian, where the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian h is local, and in the more generic example of the imaginary cubic interaction, where H is local but h is not.

arXiv:0811.0305•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Mar 6, 2009•12 citations

Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Systems with a Pseudo-Hermitian Hamiltonian

Natália Bebiano, João da Providência, João P. da Providência

Brazilian Journal of Physics•Jan 5, 2016•10 citations
A non-Hermitian Hamiltonian that has an unbroken symmetry can be converted by means of a similarity transformation to a physically equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian. This raises the following question: in which form of the quantum theory, the non-Hermitian or the Hermitian one, is it easier to perform calculations? This paper compares both forms of a non-Hermitian i x 3 quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian and demonstrates that it is much harder to perform calculations in the Hermitian theory because the perturbation series for the Hermitian Hamiltonian is constructed from divergent Feynman graphs. For the Hermitian version of the theory, dimensional continuation is used to regulate the divergent graphs that contribute to the ground-state energy and the one-point Green's function. The results that are obtained are identical to those found much more simply and without divergences in the non-Hermitian -symmetric Hamiltonian. The contribution to the ground-state energy of the Hermitian version of the theory involves graphs with overlapping divergences, and these graphs are extremely difficult to regulate. In contrast, the graphs for the non-Hermitian version of the theory are finite to all orders and they are very easy to evaluate.
We show that a quantum system possessing an exact antilinear symmetry, in particular PT -symmetry, is equivalent to a quantum system having a Hermitian Hamiltonian. We construct the unitary operator relating an arbitrary non-Hermitian Hamiltonian with exact PT -symmetry to a Hermitian Hamiltonian. We apply our general results to PT -symmetry in finite dimensions and give the explicit form of the above-mentioned unitary operator and Hermitian Hamiltonian in two dimensions. Our findings lead to the conjecture that non-Hermitian CPT -symmetric field theories are equivalent to certain nonlocal Hermitian field theories.
We address the problem of coupling non-Hermitian systems, treated as fundamental rather than effective theories, to the electromagnetic field. In such theories the observables are not the x and p appearing in the Hamiltonian, but quantities X and P constructed by means of the metric operator. Following the analogous procedure of gauging a global symmetry in Hermitian quantum mechanics we find that the corresponding gauge transformation in X implies minimal substitution in the form P → P − e A ( X ). We discuss how the relevant matrix elements governing electromagnetic transitions may be calculated in the special case of the Swanson Hamiltonian, where the equivalent Hermitian Hamiltonian h is local, and in the more generic example of the imaginary cubic interaction, where H is local but h is not.