While the terms "redundancy" and "consensus" are often used as synonyms in the context of quantum objectivity, we show here that these should be understood as two related but distinct notions, that quantify different features of the quantum-to-classical transition. We show that the two main frameworks used to measure quantum objectivity, namely spectrum broadcast structure and quantum Darwinism, are best suited to quantify redundancy and consensus, respectively. Furthermore, by analyzing explicit examples of states with nonlocally encoded information, we highlight the potentially stark difference between the degrees of redundancy and consensus. In particular, this causes a break in the hierarchical relations between spectrum broadcast structure and quantum Darwinism. Our framework provides a new perspective to interpret known and future results in the context of quantum objectivity, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the emergence of classicality from the quantum realm.
While the terms "redundancy" and "consensus" are often used as synonyms in the context of quantum objectivity, we show here that these should be understood as two related but distinct notions, that quantify different features of the quantum-to-classical transition. We show that the two main frameworks used to measure quantum objectivity, namely spectrum broadcast structure and quantum Darwinism, are best suited to quantify redundancy and consensus, respectively. Furthermore, by analyzing explicit examples of states with nonlocally encoded information, we highlight the potentially stark difference between the degrees of redundancy and consensus. In particular, this causes a break in the hierarchical relations between spectrum broadcast structure and quantum Darwinism. Our framework provides a new perspective to interpret known and future results in the context of quantum objectivity, paving the way for a deeper understanding of the emergence of classicality from the quantum realm.
How the objective everyday world emerges from the underlying quantum behavior of its microscopic constituents is an open question at the heart of the foundations of quantum mechanics. Quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure are two different frameworks providing key insight into this question. Recent works, however, indicate these two frameworks can lead to conflicting predictions on the objectivity of the state of a system interacting with an environment. Here, we provide a resolution to this issue by defining strong quantum Darwinism and proving that it is equivalent to spectrum broadcast structure when combined with strong independence of the subenvironments. We further show that strong quantum Darwinism is sufficient and necessary to signal state objectivity without the requirement of strong independence. Our Letter unveils the deep connection between strong quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure, thereby making fundamental progress toward understanding and solving the emergence of classicality from the quantum world. Together they provide us a sharper understanding of the transition in terms of state structure, geometry, and quantum and classical information.
This paper examines the role of Quantum Darwinism in explaining the emergence of classical objectivity within The Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics. Decoherence explains why macroscopically distinct alternatives become practically inaccessible to local observers, but it does not by itself explain why multiple observers can independently agree on the same classical state. Quantum Darwinism strengthens this account by describing how information about stable pointer states becomes redundantly encoded in environmental fragments. However, this paper argues that redundancy is necessary for objectivity but not enough to explain objectivity. A simple qubit test model implemented in Qiskit is used to demonstrate redundant environmental coding. The discussion connects this claim to Strong Quantum Darwinism, Spectrum Broadcast Structure, and Quantum Discord, which sharpen the distinction between mere correlation and objective classical records. Finally, this paper proposes phase anti-redundancy as a future direction; While pointer state information becomes locally redundant, cross-branch phase information appears to remain globally encoded and increasingly difficult to recover. This suggests that branch objectivity may require not only redundant classical records, but also the fact that cross-branch phase information is encoded in global correlations rather than in locally accessible environmental fragments.
An explanation for the quantum-to-classical transition has long been sought after since the haydays of the field. Decoherence theory and open quantum system dynamics have paved the way, showing how a system can become correlated with, and so lose information into the environment. Quantum Darwinism, and its more stringent cousins Strong Quantum Darwinism and Spectrum Broadcast Structures, seek to explain how this information loss is achieved in such a way as to be objective, classical and redundant. However there remains questions as to how the structure of the environment, states and types of interactions can give rise to this redundant encoding. In this thesis, we collect the work of 3 of our papers, exploring these questions. First, we show how information from one environment can spread to another. Then we show how commutativity can play a role in the emergence of objectivity. Lastly, we move beyond a single, pure system to a more realistic bipartite one, with both classical and quantum correlations between the subsystems. We shall show how interactions between only these subsystems can mediate the redundancy of others, and how these can lower bound and upper bound other forms of interactions between said subsystems and the environment.
A fact of the classical world is public property: many agents can learn it without erasing or revising it. Quantum mechanics offers no such notion, since unknown states cannot be copied and measurement disturbs. This review develops quantum Darwinism’s resolution, which locates classicality in the environment as a broadcast medium carrying independent records of an observable. The framework is assembled in information-theoretic terms: quantum mutual information between system and environment fragments, redundancy at an information deficit, the Holevo quantity separating accessible from total correlation, spectrum broadcast structure as the record-bearing state, and the quantum Chernoff information fixing the rate of accumulation. A proposition proving that spectrum broadcast structure forces the classical plateau fragment by fragment is given. Three media — spin registers, oscillator baths, and scattered photons — are examined, followed by account of a record’s life cycle: formation, degradation under intra-environmental scrambling and information backflow, and counterexamples where decoherence proceeds while no record is deposited. The relation between redundancy and consensus, consistent histories, laboratory evidence, and unresolved problems are treated in closing.
Quantum Darwinism is a leading framework for explaining how classical reality emerges from a quantum universe—the environment redundantly encodes the pointer state information of quantum systems, enabling multiple independent observers to reach consensus about reality. However, a fundamental question has remained unanswered: Why does the environment possess this capacity for redundant recording? This paper proposes, within the information-potential conversion framework, that the redundant recording mechanism of quantum Darwinism is the physical realization of the information-potential conversion consensus protocol—the environment, acting as the physical medium for information-potential conversion, redundantly encodes system information, providing consistent conversion records for independent information processing units, from which classical reality emerges. Based on this interpretation, three testable quantitative predictions are proposed: (1) In superconducting quantum circuits, when system complexity exceeds a critical threshold, the efficiency of redundant recording should exhibit an abrupt transition—a signal of the information-potential conversion phase transition of the consensus protocol from “quantum critical” to “classically locked”; (2) There should exist a precise linear relationship between functional information and information-potential conversion energy consumption: each additional bit of functional information doubles the minimum heat dissipation required for record stabilization; (3) Consensus strength—the stability of classical reality—should be positively correlated with the number of information processing units participating in the consensus protocol, and a critical number exists at which the consensus phase transition occurs. quantum Darwinism, information-potential conversion, consensus protocol, classical emergence, redundant recording, functional information
Quantum mechanics describes the smallest systems, whilst classical physics describes macroscopic scales. However, the quantum-to-classical transition is a major unsolved problem. In this thesis, we develop further understanding of the transition through the concept of objectivity. The objects we perceive in our everyday world are objective: they exist regardless of observation, and their properties are independent of observers. This is because information about everyday objects came be found, for example, in the surrounding photon environment. Quantum Darwinism is a conceptual and theoretical framework that describes the emergence of objectivity. The “Darwinistic” part refers to how certain types of information tends to spread at the expense of others. The thesis addresses the quantitative description of objectivity, the dynamics of emergent objectivity, and the analysis of non-objectivity in experimental and biology-inspired systems. Firstly, we propose two new mathematical frameworks to describe objectivity, Strong Quantum Darwinism and invariant spectrum broadcast structure. Then we unite them with the pre-existing frameworks, Zurek's Quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure, by identifying their deep connections and differences. These conditions highlight how Each framework considers varying amounts of objectivity in the system and environments and together, they create a hierarchy of objectivity. We then analyse objectivity in a scenario where system-environment interactions are strong and non-Markovian, highlighting some practical differences between the Quantum Darwinism frameworks. Next, we describe the quantum channels that create objective states, leading us to discuss the contribution of non-Markovianity to the emergence of objectivity. Then, we introduce a witnessing scheme that simplifies the detection of non-objectivity to promote further experimental testing of Quantum Darwinism with larger environments. Finally, we examine the contribution of quantum coherence and non-objectivity to the performance of a biological-inspired quantum magnetic sensor that operates close to the quantum-classical boundary. We find that the sensor operates in a non-objective regime, and that quantum coherence is necessary for the sensor's performance. The quantum-to-classical transition is a longstanding open question: these findings deepen our knowledge of how objectivity emerges, and contributes to and the types of interactions that keep systems quantum, which is relevant for understanding quantum biological systems and exploiting environment effects in novel quantum technologies. While the quantum-to-classical transition remains unsolved, Quantum Darwinism and its frameworks contribute to the understanding of emergent objectivity and have much potential to further explore aspects of the transition within the structure of quantum mechanics.