A central challenge of applying near-term quantum optimization algorithms to industrially relevant problems is the need to incorporate complex constraints. In general, such constraints cannot be easily encoded in the circuit, and the quantum circuit measurement outcomes are not guaranteed to respect the constraints. Therefore, the optimization must trade off the in-constraint probability and the quality of the inconstraint solution by adding a penalty for constraint violation into the objective. We propose a new approach for solving constrained optimization problems with unconstrained, easy-to-implement quantum ansatze. Our method leverages the inconstraint energy as the objective and adds a lower-bound constraint on the in-constraint probability to the optimizer. We demonstrate significant gains in solution quality over directly optimizing the penalized energy. We implement our method in QVoice, a Python package that interfaces with Qiskit for quick prototyping in simulators and on quantum hardware.
A central challenge of applying near-term quantum optimization algorithms to industrially relevant problems is the need to incorporate complex constraints. In general, such constraints cannot be easily encoded in the circuit, and the quantum circuit measurement outcomes are not guaranteed to respect the constraints. Therefore, the optimization must trade off the in-constraint probability and the quality of the inconstraint solution by adding a penalty for constraint violation into the objective. We propose a new approach for solving constrained optimization problems with unconstrained, easy-to-implement quantum ansatze. Our method leverages the inconstraint energy as the objective and adds a lower-bound constraint on the in-constraint probability to the optimizer. We demonstrate significant gains in solution quality over directly optimizing the penalized energy. We implement our method in QVoice, a Python package that interfaces with Qiskit for quick prototyping in simulators and on quantum hardware.
While variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have demonstrated considerable success in unconstrained optimization, their application to constrained combinatorial problems face a trade-off. Penalty-based methods, despite their circuit simplicity, suffer from a fundamental limitation: inefficient sampling in vast infeasible regions. This often results in suboptimal solutions that violate constraints and impede convergence to high-quality results. In contrast, ansatz-based approaches enforce solution feasibility by design but require complex, problem-specific circuits that are challenging to implement on current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. To overcome these limitations, we introduce an alternative VQA whose core innovation lies in a strategically designed loss function. This function offers a dual advantage. First, it is provably guaranteed that its global minimum corresponds uniquely to the optimal feasible solution, as this is achieved by ensuring universally higher loss values for all infeasible solutions. Second, it furnishes distinct computational pathways for feasible versus infeasible regions, thus creating clear and non competing guidance for the optimizer. As a result of these combined features, the algorithm's overall performance is significantly enhanced. Regarding hardware overhead, our design requires adding only an efficient validation oracle module to the penalty-based circuit, resulting in a circuit complexity significantly lower than that of ansatz-based approaches with their custom mixers. To validate the practical efficiency of our method, we empirically demonstrate its effectiveness by solving minimum vertex cover and maximum independent set problems on random graphs of varying small-scale sizes.
Realizing the potential of near-term quantum computers to solve industry-relevant constrained-optimization problems is a promising path to quantum advantage. In this work, we consider the extractive summarization constrained-optimization problem and demonstrate the largest-to-date execution of a quantum optimization algorithm that natively preserves constraints on quantum hardware. We report results with the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz algorithm with a Hamming-weight-preserving XY mixer (XY-QAOA) on trapped-ion quantum computer. We successfully execute XY-QAOA circuits that restrict the quantum evolution to the in-constraint subspace, using up to 20 qubits and a two-qubit gate depth of up to 159. We demonstrate the necessity of directly encoding the constraints into the quantum circuit by showing the trade-off between the in-constraint probability and the quality of the solution that is implicit if unconstrained quantum optimization methods are used. We show that this trade-off makes choosing good parameters difficult in general. We compare XY-QAOA to the Layer Variational Quantum Eigensolver algorithm, which has a highly expressive constant-depth circuit, and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. We discuss the respective trade-offs of the algorithms and implications for their execution on near-term quantum hardware.
This paper establishes a theoretical framework for constraint-preserving quantum optimization that maintains problem structure throughout quantum algorithm execution, addressing a fundamental challenge in translating real-world optimization problems to quantum hardware. We develop mathematical formulations that embed hard constraints directly into quantum circuit design rather than relying solely on penalty methods, proving that certain constraint classes can be exactly enforced through quantum state space restriction. Our theory characterizes the complexity of constraint preservation across different problem classes including facility location, network optimization, and resource allocation, deriving conditions under which quantum algorithms can explore only feasible solution spaces. We introduce automated repair mechanisms with theoretical guarantees on convergence to valid solutions and establish bounds on the additional quantum resources required for constraint maintenance. The framework provides rigorous analysis of trade-offs between constraint flexibility, quantum circuit depth, and solution quality, identifying problem structures amenable to efficient constraint-preserving quantum formulations. We extend the theory to socioeconomic weighting and multi-objective scenarios, proving that preference structures can be incorporated without compromising feasibility guarantees. This theoretical foundation advances practical quantum optimization by ensuring quantum algorithms produce implementable solutions while maintaining provable performance characteristics across diverse constrained optimization domains including logistics, energy systems, and infrastructure planning.
Abstract Constrained optimization problems are ubiquitous in science and industry. Quantum algorithms have shown promise in solving optimization problems, yet none of the current algorithms can effectively handle arbitrary constraints. We introduce a technique that uses quantum Zeno dynamics to solve optimization problems with multiple arbitrary constraints, including inequalities. We show that the dynamics of quantum optimization can be efficiently restricted to the in-constraint subspace on a fault-tolerant quantum computer via repeated projective measurements, requiring only a small number of auxiliary qubits and no post-selection. Our technique has broad applicability, which we demonstrate by incorporating it into the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) and variational quantum circuits for optimization. We evaluate our method numerically on portfolio optimization problems with multiple realistic constraints and observe better solution quality and higher in-constraint probability than state-of-the-art techniques. We implement a proof-of-concept demonstration of our method on the Quantinuum H1-2 quantum processor.
Constrained combinatorial optimization with strict linear constraints underpins applications in drug discovery, power grids, logistics, and finance, yet remains computationally demanding for classical algorithms, especially at large scales. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) offers a promising quantum framework, but conventional penalty-based formulations distort optimization landscapes and demand deep circuits, undermining scalability on near-term hardware. In this work, we introduce Hamming Weight Operators, a new class of constraint-aware operators that confine quantum evolution strictly within the feasible subspace. Building on this idea, we develop Adaptive Hamming Weight Operator QAOA, which dynamically selects the most effective operators to construct shallow, problem-tailored circuits. We validate our approach on benchmark tasks from both finance and high-energy physics, specifically portfolio optimization and two-jet clustering with energy balance. Across these problems, our method inherently satisfies all constraints by construction, converges faster, and achieves higher Approximation Ratios than penalty-based QAOA, while requiring roughly half as many gates. By embedding constraint-aware operators into an adaptive variational framework, our approach establishes a scalable and hardware-efficient pathway for solving practical constrained optimization problems on near-term quantum devices.
Combinatorial optimization problems that arise in science and industry typically have constraints. Yet the presence of constraints makes them challenging to tackle using both classical and quantum optimization algorithms. We propose a new quantum algorithm for constrained optimization, which we call quantum constrained Hamiltonian optimization (Q-CHOP). Our algorithm leverages the observation that for many problems, while the best solution is difficult to find, the worst feasible (constraint-satisfying) solution is known. The basic idea of Q-CHOP is to enforce a Hamiltonian constraint at all times, thereby restricting evolution to the subspace of feasible states, and slowly “rotate” an objective Hamiltonian to trace an adiabatic path from the worst feasible state to the best feasible state. Q-CHOP thereby assigns qualitatively distinct roles to the constraint and objective functions of a constrained optimization problem. We additionally propose a version of Q-CHOP that can start in any feasible state. Finally, we benchmark Q-CHOP against the commonly-used adiabatic algorithm of quantum annealing with an objective function that penalizes constraint violation, and find that Q-CHOP consistently performs significantly better on a wide range of problems, including textbook graph problems, knapsack problems, combinatorial auctions, and a real-world financial use case of bond exchange-traded fund basket optimization.