We address two questions regarding square-well potentials from a didactic perspective.The first question concerns whether or not the justification of the standard a priori omission of the potential's vertical segments in the analysis of the eigenvalue problem is licit.The detour we follow to find out the answer considers a trapezoidal potential, includes the solution, analytical and numerical, of the corresponding eigenvalue problem and then analyzes the behavior of that solution in the limit when the slope of the trapezoidal potential's ramps becomes vertical.The second question, obviously linked to the first one, pertains whether or not eigenfunction's and its first derivative's continuity at the potential's jump points is justified as a priori assumption to kick-off the solution process, as it is standardly accepted in textbook approaches to the potential's eigenvalue problem.We show that, by following the indicated detour, the irrelevance of the potential's vertical segments and the continuity of eigenfunctions and their first derivatives at the potential's jump points turn out to be proven results instead of initial assumptions.
We address two questions regarding square-well potentials from a didactic perspective.The first question concerns whether or not the justification of the standard a priori omission of the potential's vertical segments in the analysis of the eigenvalue problem is licit.The detour we follow to find out the answer considers a trapezoidal potential, includes the solution, analytical and numerical, of the corresponding eigenvalue problem and then analyzes the behavior of that solution in the limit when the slope of the trapezoidal potential's ramps becomes vertical.The second question, obviously linked to the first one, pertains whether or not eigenfunction's and its first derivative's continuity at the potential's jump points is justified as a priori assumption to kick-off the solution process, as it is standardly accepted in textbook approaches to the potential's eigenvalue problem.We show that, by following the indicated detour, the irrelevance of the potential's vertical segments and the continuity of eigenfunctions and their first derivatives at the potential's jump points turn out to be proven results instead of initial assumptions.
The finite square potential well is a staple problem in introductory quantum mechanics. There is an extensive literature on the determination of the allowed energies, which requires the solution of a transcendental equation by numerical, graphical or approximate analytic methods. Here we investigate the less explored problem of a particle in a semi-infinite potential well. The energy eigenvalues, which are also determined by a transcendental equation, are found by a standard graphical method, and a simple rule that yields the number of stationary states is provided. Next a simplification of the aforementioned transcendental equation is attempted. During the process pitfalls are encountered and a purportedly simpler graphical treatment of the problem given in the solutions manual to a fine textbook is shown to be flawed. A more careful analysis brings forth the correct simplification, which is shown to be particularly suitable for finding highly accurate approximations to the energy levels. Finally, a class of exact solutions is produced, the associated normalized eigenfunctions are constructed and the probability of finding the particle inside the well is computed.
The goal of Quantum Mechanics I, A Problem Text, is to enable students to solve problems appropriate to their first course in quantum mechanics. Significantly detailed solutions to traditionally posed problems dominate. Theory and rationale are addressed in prescript and postscript narratives and/or within the solved problems to guide students; and clarify vocabulary, symbology, and terminology. Applications of the postulates are presented initially using arguments from linear algebra appropriate to discrete systems with low-dimensional vectors and matrix operators, introducing orthogonality, orthonormality, Hermiticity, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, probability, expectation value, and degeneracy. These arguments blend into infinite-dimensional vectors and operators, and calculus-based arguments for continuous systems where delta functions, theta functions, and Fourier transforms are initially discussed. Dirac notation is fully developed within these first five chapters. Chapter six discusses Ehrenfest’s theorem, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations, and Gaussian wave functions and wave packets. Increasingly sophisticated potential energy functions are then treated to include the free particle, the infinite square well, the one-dimensional scattering state, the simple harmonic oscillator, the finite square well, orbital angular momentum, and the hydrogen atom. Ladder operators are featured in the developments of the simple harmonic oscillator and orbital angular momentum. The diversity of narratives and detailed solutions intend
The goal of Quantum Mechanics I, A Problem Text, is to enable students to solve problems appropriate to their first course in quantum mechanics. Significantly detailed solutions to traditionally posed problems dominate. Theory and rationale are addressed in prescript and postscript narratives and/or within the solved problems to guide students; and clarify vocabulary, symbology, and terminology. Applications of the postulates are presented initially using arguments from linear algebra appropriate to discrete systems with low-dimensional vectors and matrix operators, introducing orthogonality, orthonormality, Hermiticity, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, probability, expectation value, and degeneracy. These arguments blend into infinite-dimensional vectors and operators, and calculus-based arguments for continuous systems where delta functions, theta functions, and Fourier transforms are initially discussed. Dirac notation is fully developed within these first five chapters. Chapter six discusses Ehrenfest’s theorem, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations, and Gaussian wave functions and wave packets. Increasingly sophisticated potential energy functions are then treated to include the free particle, the infinite square well, the one-dimensional scattering state, the simple harmonic oscillator, the finite square well, orbital angular momentum, and the hydrogen atom. Ladder operators are featured in the developments of the simple harmonic oscillator and orbital angular momentum. The diversity of narratives and detailed solutions intend
Abstract We address an interesting problem in elementary quantum mechanics, namely how can one obtain the momentum state eigenfunctions for the infinite square well potential as a direct solution of the time-independent Schrödinger equation in momentum space. The conventional method for obtaining the momentum state eigenfunctions for the infinite square well potential is to take the Fourier transform of the coordinate space eigenfunctions. Unfortunately, the Schrödinger equation in momentum space for the infinite well potential is not well-defined. As such we must use a potential whose Fourier transform is well-defined and then take a limit in which the potential approaches that of the infinite well potential. We present three approaches to the problem: one based on dimensional analysis, one in which the infinite well potential is viewed as the limit of a finite well whose depth approaches infinity, and one in which the infinite well potential is viewed as the limit of a power law potential in the limit that the power approaches infinity.
The computation of allowed energy levels for a particle bounded to a finite square well potential is ubiquitous in modern physics and introductory quantum mechanics textbooks. For stationary bound states, the matching conditions for the wave functions lead to a pair of transcendental equations whose roots correspond to the energy eigenvalues. However, the graphical solutions available do not make clear the dependence of the energies on the well potential parameters. In this note, I present a simpler graphical solution involving only one dimensionless parameter that determines a straight-line crossing identical sinusoidal curves. I then reduce this solution to a single cosine curve, and from a three-point interpolation, I derive an approximate formula for all energy levels valid for any square quantum well and that demands only a pocket calculator.
The goal of Quantum Mechanics I, A Problem Text, is to enable students to solve problems appropriate to their first course in quantum mechanics. Significantly detailed solutions to traditionally posed problems dominate. Theory and rationale are addressed in prescript and postscript narratives and/or within the solved problems to guide students; and clarify vocabulary, symbology, and terminology. Applications of the postulates are presented initially using arguments from linear algebra appropriate to discrete systems with low-dimensional vectors and matrix operators, introducing orthogonality, orthonormality, Hermiticity, eigenvectors, eigenvalues, probability, expectation value, and degeneracy. These arguments blend into infinite-dimensional vectors and operators, and calculus-based arguments for continuous systems where delta functions, theta functions, and Fourier transforms are initially discussed. Dirac notation is fully developed within these first five chapters. Chapter six discusses Ehrenfest’s theorem, the Heisenberg uncertainty relations, and Gaussian wave functions and wave packets. Increasingly sophisticated potential energy functions are then treated to include the free particle, the infinite square well, the one-dimensional scattering state, the simple harmonic oscillator, the finite square well, orbital angular momentum, and the hydrogen atom. Ladder operators are featured in the developments of the simple harmonic oscillator and orbital angular momentum. The diversity of narratives and detailed solutions intend