Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2211.03266 · The European Physical Journal Plus

A $$(k+1)$$-partite entanglement measure of N-partite quantum states

Yan Hong, Xianfei Qi, Ting Gao, Fengli Yan

Published Dec 6, 2023• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04700-z

Related papers

Mirror Entanglement Measure of Multipartite Quantum States with Respect to k-partitions

Yinzhu Wang, Yaxue Liu, Fangyu Zhou +2 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Nov 24, 2021•1 citation

Complete k-partite entanglement measure

Jinxing Zhao, Yu Guo, Fei He

arXiv:2503.16178•Quantum Information Processing•Nov 21, 2025•0 citations

N-partite Entanglement Measures of GHZ States in a Non-inertial Frame

Juvenal Rueda-Paz, J. L. Manríquez-Zepeda, María de Lourdes López-García +1 more

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jul 14, 2023•2 citations

Uniqueness of Entanglement Measure and Thermodynamics

Vlatko Vedral, Elham Kashefi

We apply the axiomatic approach to thermodynamics presented by Giles to derive a unique measure of entanglement for bi-partite pure states. This implies that local manipulations of entanglement in quantum information theory and adiabatic transformations of states in thermodynamics have the same underlying mathematical structure. We discuss possible extensions of our results to mixed and multi-partite states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0112137•Dec 21, 2001•3 citations

Entanglement certification and quantification in spatial-bin photonic qutrits

Debadrita Ghosh, Thomas D. Jennewein, Urbasi Sinha

Higher dimensional quantum systems are an important avenue for new explorations in quantum computing as well as quantum communications. One of the ubiquitous resources in quantum technologies is entanglement. However, so far, entanglement has been certified in higher dimensional systems through suitable bounds on known entanglement measures. In this work, we have, for the first time, quantified the amount of entanglement in bi-partite pure qutrit states by analytically relating statistical correlation measures and known measures of entanglement, and have determined the amount of entanglement in our experimentally generated spatially correlated bi-partite qutrit system. We obtain the value of Negativity in our bi-partite qutrit to be 0.85 +/- 0.03 and the Entanglement of Formation(EOF) to be 1.23 +/- 0.01. In terms of quantifying the deviation from the maximally entangled state, the Negativity value demonstrates ~15 % deviation while the EOF value demonstrates ~24 % deviation. This serves as the first experimental evidence of such non-equivalence of entanglement measures for higher dimensional systems.

arXiv:1909.01367•Sep 3, 2019•1 citation

A New Multipartite Entanglement Measure for Arbitrary n-qudit Pure States

Chao Zhao, Guowu Yang, Xiaoyu Li

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Sep 14, 2015•3 citations
A (k+1)(k+1)(k+1)-partite entanglement measure of N-partite quantum states
Higher dimensional quantum systems are an important avenue for new explorations in quantum computing as well as quantum communications. One of the ubiquitous resources in quantum technologies is entanglement. However, so far, entanglement has been certified in higher dimensional systems through suitable bounds on known entanglement measures. In this work, we have, for the first time, quantified the amount of entanglement in bi-partite pure qutrit states by analytically relating statistical correlation measures and known measures of entanglement, and have determined the amount of entanglement in our experimentally generated spatially correlated bi-partite qutrit system. We obtain the value of Negativity in our bi-partite qutrit to be 0.85 +/- 0.03 and the Entanglement of Formation(EOF) to be 1.23 +/- 0.01. In terms of quantifying the deviation from the maximally entangled state, the Negativity value demonstrates ~15 % deviation while the EOF value demonstrates ~24 % deviation. This serves as the first experimental evidence of such non-equivalence of entanglement measures for higher dimensional systems.