Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2210.11079 · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Sequential Quantum Channel Discrimination

Yonglong Li, Christoph Hirche, Marco Tomamichel

Published Jun 26, 2022• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We consider the sequential quantum channel discrimination problem using adaptive and non-adaptive strategies. In this setting the number of uses of the underlying quantum channel is not fixed but a random variable that is either bounded in expectation or with high probability. We show that, by using adaptive strategies for the discrimination problem, both types of error probabilities decrease to zero exponentially fast and the rates are characterized by the measured relative entropy between two quantum channels. Allowing for quantum memory, we see that the optimal rates are given by the regularized channel relative entropy. We also characterize the error exponents in the discrimination problem if non-adaptive strategies are used.

DOI
10.1109/isit50566.2022.9834768

Related papers

Optimal Adaptive Strategies for Sequential Quantum Hypothesis Testing

Yonglong Li, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Marco Tomamichel

We consider sequential hypothesis testing between two quantum states using adaptive and non-adaptive strategies. In this setting, samples of an unknown state are requested sequentially and a decision to either continue or to accept one of the two hypotheses is made after each test. Under the constraint that the number of samples is bounded, either in expectation or with high probability, we exhibit adaptive strategies that minimize both types of misidentification errors. Namely, we show that these errors decrease exponentially (in the stopping time) with decay rates given by the measured relative entropies between the two states. Moreover, if we allow joint measurements on multiple samples, the rates are increased to the respective quantum relative entropies. We also fully characterize the achievable error exponents for non-adaptive strategies and provide numerical evidence showing that adaptive measurements are necessary to achieve our bounds.

IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW)•Oct 17, 2021•6 citations

Parallelization of Adaptive Quantum Channel Discrimination in the Non-Asymptotic Regime

Bjarne Bergh, Nilanjana Datta, Salzmann, Robert +1 more

We investigate the performance of parallel and adaptive quantum channel discrimination strategies for a finite number of channel uses. It has recently been shown that, in the asymmetric setting with asymptotically vanishing type I error probability, adaptive strategies are asymptotically not more powerful than parallel ones. We extend this result to the non-asymptotic regime with finitely many channel uses, by explicitly constructing a parallel strategy for any given adaptive strategy, and bounding the difference in their performances, measured in terms of the decay rate of the type II error probability per channel use. We further show that all parallel strategies can be optimized over in time polynomial in the number of channel uses, and hence our result can also be used to obtain a poly-time-computable asymptotically tight upper bound on the performance of general adaptive strategies.

arXiv:2206.08350•Jun 16, 2022•0 citations

Parallelization of Adaptive Quantum Channel Discrimination in the Non-Asymptotic Regime

Bjarne Bergh, Nilanjana Datta, Robert Salzmann +1 more

We investigate the performance of parallel and adaptive quantum channel discrimination strategies for a finite number of channel uses. It has recently been shown that, in the asymmetric setting with asymptotically vanishing type I error probability, adaptive strategies are asymptotically not more powerful than parallel ones. We extend this result to the non-asymptotic regime with finitely many channel uses, by explicitly constructing a parallel strategy for any given adaptive strategy, and bounding the difference in their performances, measured in terms of the decay rate of the type II error probability per channel use. We further show that all parallel strategies can be optimized over in time polynomial in the number of channel uses, and hence our result can also be used to obtain a poly-time-computable asymptotically tight upper bound on the performance of general adaptive strategies.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Jan 31, 2024•11 citations

When are Adaptive Strategies in Asymptotic Quantum Channel Discrimination Useful

Farzin Salek, Masahito Hayashi, Andreas Winter

We present a broad investigation of asymptotic binary hypothesis testing, when each hypothesis represents asymptotically many independent instances of a quantum channel, and the tests are based on using the unknown channel and observing its output. Unlike the familiar setting of quantum states as hypotheses, there is a fundamental distinction between adaptive and non-adaptive strategies with respect to the channel uses, and we introduce a number of further variants of the discrimination tasks by imposing different restrictions on the test strategies. The following results are obtained: (1) The first separation between adaptive and non-adaptive symmetric hypothesis testing exponents for quantum channels, which we derive from a general lower bound on the error probability for non-adaptive strategies; the concrete example we analyze is a pair of entanglement-breaking channels. (2) We prove that for classical-quantum channels, adaptive and non-adaptive strategies lead to the same error exponents both in the symmetric (Chernoff) and asymmetric (Hoeffding, Stein) settings. (3) We prove, in some sense generalizing the previous statement, that for general channels adaptive strategies restricted to classical feed-forward and product state channel inputs are not superior in the asymptotic limit to non-adaptive product state strategies. (4) As an application of our findings, we address the discrimination power of quantum channels and show that adaptive strategies with classical feedback and no quantum memory at the input do not increase the discrimination power of entanglement-breaking channel beyond non-adaptive tensor product input strategies.

•Nov 12, 2020•8 citations

Asymptotic Separation Between Adaptive and Non-adaptive Strategies in Quantum Channel Discrimination

Farzin Salek, Masahito Hayashi, Andreas Winter

We present a broad investigation of asymptotic binary hypothesis testing, when each hypothesis represents asymptotically many independent instances of a quantum channel, and the tests are based on using the unknown channel multiple times and observing its output at the end. Unlike the familiar setting of quantum states as hypotheses, there is a fundamental distinction between adaptive and non-adaptive strategies with respect to the channel uses, and we introduce a number of further variants of the discrimination tasks by imposing different restrictions on the test strategies. Our main result is the first separation between adaptive and non-adaptive symmetric hypothesis testing exponents for quantum channels, which we derive from a general lower bound on the error probability for non-adaptive strategies; the concrete example we analyze is a pair of entanglement-breaking channels. Full details in [1].

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jul 12, 2021•1 citation

Sampling complexity of quantum channel discrimination

Lei S. Li, Zhe Ji, Qing-Wen Wang +2 more

Abstract In this paper, we study the problem of sampling complexity for channel discrimination with respect to two different strategies: product strategy and adaptive strategy. We first formally introduce the definitions of the sampling complexity of the channels under the framework of hypothesis testing , wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. We then establish the lower and upper bounds on the sampling complexity of the symmetric, asymmetric, and error exponent hypothesis testing settings. We show that, by imposing product strategy on testing, the bounds are always characterized by the generalized channel divergence, while with adaptive strategy, the bounds are characterized by the amortized channel divergence. Finally, we analyze two concrete examples, and obtain that the adaptive strategy can not lead to an advantage to the problem of determining the sampling complexity for classical-quantum channels, which can bring advantages for generalized amplitude damping channels.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Apr 11, 2025•1 citation
We consider the sequential quantum channel discrimination problem using adaptive and non-adaptive strategies. In this setting the number of uses of the underlying quantum channel is not fixed but a random variable that is either bounded in expectation or with high probability. We show that, by using adaptive strategies for the discrimination problem, both types of error probabilities decrease to zero exponentially fast and the rates are characterized by the measured relative entropy between two quantum channels. Allowing for quantum memory, we see that the optimal rates are given by the regularized channel relative entropy. We also characterize the error exponents in the discrimination problem if non-adaptive strategies are used.
We consider sequential hypothesis testing between two quantum states using adaptive and non-adaptive strategies. In this setting, samples of an unknown state are requested sequentially and a decision to either continue or to accept one of the two hypotheses is made after each test. Under the constraint that the number of samples is bounded, either in expectation or with high probability, we exhibit adaptive strategies that minimize both types of misidentification errors. Namely, we show that these errors decrease exponentially (in the stopping time) with decay rates given by the measured relative entropies between the two states. Moreover, if we allow joint measurements on multiple samples, the rates are increased to the respective quantum relative entropies. We also fully characterize the achievable error exponents for non-adaptive strategies and provide numerical evidence showing that adaptive measurements are necessary to achieve our bounds.
We investigate the performance of parallel and adaptive quantum channel discrimination strategies for a finite number of channel uses. It has recently been shown that, in the asymmetric setting with asymptotically vanishing type I error probability, adaptive strategies are asymptotically not more powerful than parallel ones. We extend this result to the non-asymptotic regime with finitely many channel uses, by explicitly constructing a parallel strategy for any given adaptive strategy, and bounding the difference in their performances, measured in terms of the decay rate of the type II error probability per channel use. We further show that all parallel strategies can be optimized over in time polynomial in the number of channel uses, and hence our result can also be used to obtain a poly-time-computable asymptotically tight upper bound on the performance of general adaptive strategies.
We investigate the performance of parallel and adaptive quantum channel discrimination strategies for a finite number of channel uses. It has recently been shown that, in the asymmetric setting with asymptotically vanishing type I error probability, adaptive strategies are asymptotically not more powerful than parallel ones. We extend this result to the non-asymptotic regime with finitely many channel uses, by explicitly constructing a parallel strategy for any given adaptive strategy, and bounding the difference in their performances, measured in terms of the decay rate of the type II error probability per channel use. We further show that all parallel strategies can be optimized over in time polynomial in the number of channel uses, and hence our result can also be used to obtain a poly-time-computable asymptotically tight upper bound on the performance of general adaptive strategies.
We present a broad investigation of asymptotic binary hypothesis testing, when each hypothesis represents asymptotically many independent instances of a quantum channel, and the tests are based on using the unknown channel and observing its output. Unlike the familiar setting of quantum states as hypotheses, there is a fundamental distinction between adaptive and non-adaptive strategies with respect to the channel uses, and we introduce a number of further variants of the discrimination tasks by imposing different restrictions on the test strategies. The following results are obtained: (1) The first separation between adaptive and non-adaptive symmetric hypothesis testing exponents for quantum channels, which we derive from a general lower bound on the error probability for non-adaptive strategies; the concrete example we analyze is a pair of entanglement-breaking channels. (2) We prove that for classical-quantum channels, adaptive and non-adaptive strategies lead to the same error exponents both in the symmetric (Chernoff) and asymmetric (Hoeffding, Stein) settings. (3) We prove, in some sense generalizing the previous statement, that for general channels adaptive strategies restricted to classical feed-forward and product state channel inputs are not superior in the asymptotic limit to non-adaptive product state strategies. (4) As an application of our findings, we address the discrimination power of quantum channels and show that adaptive strategies with classical feedback and no quantum memory at the input do not increase the discrimination power of entanglement-breaking channel beyond non-adaptive tensor product input strategies.
We present a broad investigation of asymptotic binary hypothesis testing, when each hypothesis represents asymptotically many independent instances of a quantum channel, and the tests are based on using the unknown channel multiple times and observing its output at the end. Unlike the familiar setting of quantum states as hypotheses, there is a fundamental distinction between adaptive and non-adaptive strategies with respect to the channel uses, and we introduce a number of further variants of the discrimination tasks by imposing different restrictions on the test strategies. Our main result is the first separation between adaptive and non-adaptive symmetric hypothesis testing exponents for quantum channels, which we derive from a general lower bound on the error probability for non-adaptive strategies; the concrete example we analyze is a pair of entanglement-breaking channels. Full details in [1].
Abstract In this paper, we study the problem of sampling complexity for channel discrimination with respect to two different strategies: product strategy and adaptive strategy. We first formally introduce the definitions of the sampling complexity of the channels under the framework of hypothesis testing , wherein the goal is to determine the minimum number of samples needed to reach a desired error probability. We then establish the lower and upper bounds on the sampling complexity of the symmetric, asymmetric, and error exponent hypothesis testing settings. We show that, by imposing product strategy on testing, the bounds are always characterized by the generalized channel divergence, while with adaptive strategy, the bounds are characterized by the amortized channel divergence. Finally, we analyze two concrete examples, and obtain that the adaptive strategy can not lead to an advantage to the problem of determining the sampling complexity for classical-quantum channels, which can bring advantages for generalized amplitude damping channels.