Superconducting qubits already demonstrated potential in emulating coherent back scattering or weak localization (WL) and tunnelling phenomena however, in a real multipath system they have not been verified yet.Here we show how a double-path system can be emulated by a quantum device through construction of multiple scattering centers in closed paths (detune boxes) and tunnel barriers with a large return probability (Pr) of electrons. Incorporation of such arrangements of tunnel barriers can add an extra geometric phase and demonstrate Aharonov-Bohm type oscillations (phi)0 and (phi/2)0 in a ring and a tube, respectively. A combination of inter and intra layer tunnelling in a double-path circuit creates a phase reversal and subsequently weak anti-localization (WAL) effect with a long coherence time. Finally, angle dependence of Pr firmly establishes stability of the two-path circuit which is also associated with a phase reversal due to the inter-path resonance.
Abstract The effects of discontinuously time‐varying perturbations on the dynamics of a particle moving in harmonic, symmetric double well and symmetric triple well potentials, are investigated both classically and quantum mechanically. The quantum dynamics is followed using the time‐dependent Fourier grid Hamiltonian (TDFGH) method while the classical dynamics is analyzed within the framework of classical Hamiltonian mechanics. Depending on the spatial symmetry of the perturbation and the characteristic features of the reversal time , different types of ‘phase space’ structures are observed in each of the potentials. For symmetric double and triple well potentials, quantum dynamics reveals that complete destruction of tunnelling (CDT) can be achieved in the presence of a time‐dependent spatially asymmetric perturbing field that is continuous in time. Any discontinuity in time‐variation of the perturbation may induce over the barrier transition. The relevance of these results in the context of (i) tunnelling control and (ii) quantum computing with 3‐state or 2‐state quantum registers is briefly discussed.
A clear consensus on how long it takes a particle to tunnel through a potential barrier has never been so urgently required, since the electron dynamics in strong-field ionization can be resolved on attosecond time-scale in experiment and the exact nature of the tunneling process is the key to trigger subsequent attosecond techniques. Here a general picture of tunneling time is suggested by introducing a quantum travel time, which is defined as the ratio of the travel distance to the expected value of the velocity operator under the barrier. Specially, if applied to rectangular barrier tunneling, it can retrieve the Büttiker-Landauer time
τBL in the case of an opaque barrier, and has a clear physical meaning in the case of a very thin barrier wherein
τBL can not be well defined. In the case of strong-field tunneling process, with the help of the newly defined time, the tunneling delay time measured by attoclock experiment can be interpreted as a travel time spent by the electron to tunnel from a point under the barrier to the tunnel exit. In addition, a peculiar oscillation structure in the wavelength dependence of tunneling delay time in deep tunneling regime is observed, which is beyond the scope of adiabatic tunneling picture. This oscillation structure can be attributed to the interference between the ground state tunneling channel and the excited states tunneling channels.