Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2210.03210

Universal Quantum Speedup for Branch-and-Bound, Branch-and-Cut, and Tree-Search Algorithms

Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Pierre Minssen, Romina Yalovetzky, Marco Pistoia

Published Oct 6, 2022• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Mixed Integer Programs (MIPs) model many optimization problems of interest in Computer Science, Operations Research, and Financial Engineering. Solving MIPs is NP-Hard in general, but several solvers have found success in obtaining near-optimal solutions for problems of intermediate size. Branch-and-Cut algorithms, which combine Branch-and-Bound logic with cutting-plane routines, are at the core of modern MIP solvers. Montanaro proposed a quantum algorithm with a near-quadratic speedup compared to classical Branch-and-Bound algorithms in the worst case, when every optimal solution is desired. In practice, however, a near-optimal solution is satisfactory, and by leveraging tree-search heuristics to search only a portion of the solution tree, classical algorithms can perform much better than the worst-case guarantee. In this paper, we propose a quantum algorithm, Incremental-Quantum-Branch-and-Bound, with universal near-quadratic speedup over classical Branch-and-Bound algorithms for every input, i.e., if classical Branch-and-Bound has complexity $Q$ on an instance that leads to solution depth $d$, Incremental-Quantum-Branch-and-Bound offers the same guarantees with a complexity of $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{Q}d)$. Our results are valid for a wide variety of search heuristics, including depth-based, cost-based, and $A^{\ast}$ heuristics. Universal speedups are also obtained for Branch-and-Cut as well as heuristic tree search. Our algorithms are directly comparable to commercial MIP solvers, and guarantee near quadratic speedup whenever $Q \gg d$. We use numerical simulation to verify that $Q \gg d$ for typical instances of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model, Maximum Independent Set, and Portfolio Optimization; as well as to extrapolate the dependence of $Q$ on input size parameters. This allows us to project the typical performance of our quantum algorithms for these important problems.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2210.03210

Related papers

Solving QUBOs with a quantum-amenable branch and bound method

Thomas Häner, Kyle E. C. Booth, Sima Esfandiarpour Borujeni +1 more

Due to the expected disparity in quantum vs. classical clock speeds, quantum advantage for branch and bound algorithms is more likely achievable in settings involving large search trees and low operator evaluation costs. Therefore, in this paper, we describe and experimentally validate an exact classical branch and bound solver for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems that matches these criteria. Our solver leverages cheap-to-implement bounds from the literature previously proposed for Ising models, including that of Hartwig, Daske, and Kobe from 1984. We detail a variety of techniques from high-performance computing and operations research used to boost solver performance, including a global variable reordering heuristic, a primal heuristic based on simulated annealing, and a truncated computation of the recursive bound. We also outline a number of simple and inexpensive bound extrapolation techniques. Finally, we conduct an extensive empirical analysis of our solver, comparing its performance to state-of-the-art QUBO and MaxCut solvers, and discuss the challenges of a speedup via quantum branch and bound beyond those faced by any quadratic quantum speedup.

arXiv:2407.20185•Jul 29, 2024•0 citations

Enhancing Quantum Algorithms for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization via Integer Programming

Friedrich Wagner, Jonas Nüßlein, Frauke Liers

To date, research in quantum computation promises potential for outperforming classical heuristics in combinatorial optimization. However, when aiming at provable optimality, one has to rely on classical exact methods like integer programming. State-of-the-art integer programming algorithms can compute strong relaxation bounds even for hard instances, but may have to enumerate a large number of subproblems for determining an optimum solution. If the potential of quantum computing is realized, it can be expected that in particular finding high-quality solutions for hard problems can be done fast. Still, near-future quantum hardware considerably limits the size of treatable problems. In this work, we go one step into integrating the potentials of quantum and classical techniques for combinatorial optimization. We propose a hybrid heuristic for the weighted maximum-cut problem and for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. The heuristic employs a linear programming relaxation, rendering it well-suited for integration into exact branch-and-cut algorithms. For large instances, we reduce the problem size according to a linear relaxation such that the reduced problem can be handled by quantum machines of limited size. Moreover, we improve the applicability of depth-1 QAOA, a parameterized quantum algorithm, by deriving a parameter estimate for arbitrary instances. We present numerous computational results from real quantum hardware.

arXiv:2302.05493•ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing•Jan 13, 2025•2 citations

Quantum Speedups for Group Relaxations of Integer Linear Programs

Brandon Augustino, Dylan Herman, Guneykan Ozgul +5 more

Integer Linear Programs (ILPs) are a flexible and ubiquitous model for discrete optimization problems. Solving ILPs is \textsf{NP-Hard} yet of great practical importance. Super-quadratic quantum speedups for ILPs have been difficult to obtain because classical algorithms for many-constraint ILPs are global and exhaustive, whereas quantum frameworks that offer super-quadratic speedup exploit local structure of the objective and feasible set. We address this via quantum algorithms for Gomory's group relaxation. The group relaxation of an ILP is obtained by dropping nonnegativity on variables that are positive in the optimal solution of the linear programming (LP) relaxation, while retaining integrality of the decision variables. We present a competitive feasibility-preserving classical local-search algorithm for the group relaxation, and a corresponding quantum algorithm that, under reasonable technical conditions, achieves a super-quadratic speedup. When the group relaxation satisfies a nondegeneracy condition analogous to, but stronger than, LP non-degeneracy, our approach yields the optimal solution to the original ILP. Otherwise, the group relaxation tightens bounds on the optimal objective value of the ILP, and can improve downstream branch-and-cut by reducing the integrality gap; we numerically observe this on several practically relevant ILPs. To achieve these results, we derive efficiently constructible constraint-preserving mixers for the group relaxation with favorable spectral properties, which are of independent interest.

quant-pharXiv:2602.13494•Feb 17, 2026•0 citations

Hybrid Quantum Branch-and-Bound Method for Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization

Zedong Peng, Daniel de Roux, David E. Bernal

Quantum algorithms have shown promise in solving Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems, benefiting from their connection to the transverse field Ising model.Various Ising solvers, both classical and quantum, have emerged to tackle such problems efficiently but lack global optimality guarantees and oftentimes sufer from hardware limitations such as limited qubit availability.In this work, we propose a hybrid branch-andbound (B&B) framework that integrates Ising solvers as heuristics within a classical B&B algorithm.Unlike prior theoretical studies, our work presents a practical implementation, available as open-source at GitHub.We explore when and where to apply Ising solvers in the search tree, and introduce a custom branching rule optimized QUBO embedding.Our method is evaluated on hundreds of QUBO instances from QUBOLib.jl using Gurobi and the D-Wave quantum annealer.Our Results show up to 11% less solution time and 17% fewer nodes compared to default Gurobi, an off-the-shelf commercial optimization solver.These findings demonstrate the value of hybrid quantum-classical strategies for enhancing exact optimization.

arXiv:2509.11040•Computer Science Research Notes•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

A Novel Solver for QUBO Problems: Performance Analysis and Comparative Study with State-of-the-Art Algorithms

Jiecheng Yang, Ding Wang, Xiang Zhao +3 more

Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) provides a versatile framework for representing NP-hard combinatorial problems, yet existing solvers often face trade-offs among speed, accuracy, and scalability. In this work, we introduce a quantum-inspired solver (QIS) that unites branch-and-bound pruning, continuous gradient-descent refinement, and quantum-inspired heuristics within a fully adaptive control architecture. We benchmark QIS3 against eight state-of-the-art solvers, including genetic algorithms, coherent Ising machines, simulated bifurcation, parallel tempering, simulated annealing, our prior QIS2 version, D-Wave's simulated-annealing (Neal), and Gurobi on three canonical QUBO problem classes: Max-Cut, NAE-3SAT, and Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass problems. Under a uniform runtime budget, QIS3 attains the best solution on nearly all instances, achieving optimality in 94% of max-cut instances. These results establish QIS3 as a robust, high-performance solver that bridges classical exact strategies and quantum-inspired heuristics for scalable QUBO optimization.

arXiv:2506.04596•Jun 5, 2025•0 citations

A Heuristic Method to solve large-scale Integer Linear Programs by combining Branch-and-Price with a Quantum Algorithm

Marika Svensson, Martin Andersson, Mattias Grönkvist +4 more

We present a method that integrates any quantum algorithm capable of finding solutions to integer linear programs into the Branch-and-Price algorithm, which is regularly used to solve large-scale integer linear programs with a specific structure. The role of the quantum algorithm is to find integer solutions to subproblems appearing in Branch-and-Price. Obtaining optimal or near-optimal integer solutions to these subproblems can increase the quality of solutions and reduce the depth and branching factor of the Branch-and-Price algorithm and hence reduce the overall running time. We investigate the viability of the approach by considering the Tail Assignment problem and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). Here, the master problem is the optimization problem Set Partitioning or its decision version Exact Cover and can be expressed as finding the ground state of an Ising spin glass Hamiltonian. For Exact Cover, our numerical results indicate that the required algorithm depth decreases with the number of feasible solutions for a given success probability of finding a feasible solution. For Set Partitioning, on the other hand, we find that for a given success probability of finding the optimal solution, the required algorithm depth can increase with the number of feasible solutions if the Hamiltonian is balanced poorly, which in the worst case is exponential in the problem size. We therefore address the importance of properly balancing the objective and constraint parts of the Hamiltonian. We empirically find that the approach is viable with QAOA if polynomial algorithm depth can be realized on quantum devices.

•Mar 29, 2021•3 citations
Mixed Integer Programs (MIPs) model many optimization problems of interest in Computer Science, Operations Research, and Financial Engineering. Solving MIPs is NP-Hard in general, but several solvers have found success in obtaining near-optimal solutions for problems of intermediate size. Branch-and-Cut algorithms, which combine Branch-and-Bound logic with cutting-plane routines, are at the core of modern MIP solvers. Montanaro proposed a quantum algorithm with a near-quadratic speedup compared to classical Branch-and-Bound algorithms in the worst case, when every optimal solution is desired. In practice, however, a near-optimal solution is satisfactory, and by leveraging tree-search heuristics to search only a portion of the solution tree, classical algorithms can perform much better than the worst-case guarantee. In this paper, we propose a quantum algorithm, Incremental-Quantum-Branch-and-Bound, with universal near-quadratic speedup over classical Branch-and-Bound algorithms for every input, i.e., if classical Branch-and-Bound has complexity QQQ on an instance that leads to solution depth ddd, Incremental-Quantum-Branch-and-Bound offers the same guarantees with a complexity of O~(Qd)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{Q}d)O~(Q​d). Our results are valid for a wide variety of search heuristics, including depth-based, cost-based, and A∗A^{\ast}A∗ heuristics. Universal speedups are also obtained for Branch-and-Cut as well as heuristic tree search. Our algorithms are directly comparable to commercial MIP solvers, and guarantee near quadratic speedup whenever Q≫dQ \gg dQ≫d. We use numerical simulation to verify that Q≫dQ \gg dQ≫d for typical instances of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model, Maximum Independent Set, and Portfolio Optimization; as well as to extrapolate the dependence of QQQ on input size parameters. This allows us to project the typical performance of our quantum algorithms for these important problems.
Due to the expected disparity in quantum vs. classical clock speeds, quantum advantage for branch and bound algorithms is more likely achievable in settings involving large search trees and low operator evaluation costs. Therefore, in this paper, we describe and experimentally validate an exact classical branch and bound solver for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problems that matches these criteria. Our solver leverages cheap-to-implement bounds from the literature previously proposed for Ising models, including that of Hartwig, Daske, and Kobe from 1984. We detail a variety of techniques from high-performance computing and operations research used to boost solver performance, including a global variable reordering heuristic, a primal heuristic based on simulated annealing, and a truncated computation of the recursive bound. We also outline a number of simple and inexpensive bound extrapolation techniques. Finally, we conduct an extensive empirical analysis of our solver, comparing its performance to state-of-the-art QUBO and MaxCut solvers, and discuss the challenges of a speedup via quantum branch and bound beyond those faced by any quadratic quantum speedup.
To date, research in quantum computation promises potential for outperforming classical heuristics in combinatorial optimization. However, when aiming at provable optimality, one has to rely on classical exact methods like integer programming. State-of-the-art integer programming algorithms can compute strong relaxation bounds even for hard instances, but may have to enumerate a large number of subproblems for determining an optimum solution. If the potential of quantum computing is realized, it can be expected that in particular finding high-quality solutions for hard problems can be done fast. Still, near-future quantum hardware considerably limits the size of treatable problems. In this work, we go one step into integrating the potentials of quantum and classical techniques for combinatorial optimization. We propose a hybrid heuristic for the weighted maximum-cut problem and for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization. The heuristic employs a linear programming relaxation, rendering it well-suited for integration into exact branch-and-cut algorithms. For large instances, we reduce the problem size according to a linear relaxation such that the reduced problem can be handled by quantum machines of limited size. Moreover, we improve the applicability of depth-1 QAOA, a parameterized quantum algorithm, by deriving a parameter estimate for arbitrary instances. We present numerous computational results from real quantum hardware.
Integer Linear Programs (ILPs) are a flexible and ubiquitous model for discrete optimization problems. Solving ILPs is \textsf{NP-Hard} yet of great practical importance. Super-quadratic quantum speedups for ILPs have been difficult to obtain because classical algorithms for many-constraint ILPs are global and exhaustive, whereas quantum frameworks that offer super-quadratic speedup exploit local structure of the objective and feasible set. We address this via quantum algorithms for Gomory's group relaxation. The group relaxation of an ILP is obtained by dropping nonnegativity on variables that are positive in the optimal solution of the linear programming (LP) relaxation, while retaining integrality of the decision variables. We present a competitive feasibility-preserving classical local-search algorithm for the group relaxation, and a corresponding quantum algorithm that, under reasonable technical conditions, achieves a super-quadratic speedup. When the group relaxation satisfies a nondegeneracy condition analogous to, but stronger than, LP non-degeneracy, our approach yields the optimal solution to the original ILP. Otherwise, the group relaxation tightens bounds on the optimal objective value of the ILP, and can improve downstream branch-and-cut by reducing the integrality gap; we numerically observe this on several practically relevant ILPs. To achieve these results, we derive efficiently constructible constraint-preserving mixers for the group relaxation with favorable spectral properties, which are of independent interest.
Quantum algorithms have shown promise in solving Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems, benefiting from their connection to the transverse field Ising model.Various Ising solvers, both classical and quantum, have emerged to tackle such problems efficiently but lack global optimality guarantees and oftentimes sufer from hardware limitations such as limited qubit availability.In this work, we propose a hybrid branch-andbound (B&B) framework that integrates Ising solvers as heuristics within a classical B&B algorithm.Unlike prior theoretical studies, our work presents a practical implementation, available as open-source at GitHub.We explore when and where to apply Ising solvers in the search tree, and introduce a custom branching rule optimized QUBO embedding.Our method is evaluated on hundreds of QUBO instances from QUBOLib.jl using Gurobi and the D-Wave quantum annealer.Our Results show up to 11% less solution time and 17% fewer nodes compared to default Gurobi, an off-the-shelf commercial optimization solver.These findings demonstrate the value of hybrid quantum-classical strategies for enhancing exact optimization.
Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) provides a versatile framework for representing NP-hard combinatorial problems, yet existing solvers often face trade-offs among speed, accuracy, and scalability. In this work, we introduce a quantum-inspired solver (QIS) that unites branch-and-bound pruning, continuous gradient-descent refinement, and quantum-inspired heuristics within a fully adaptive control architecture. We benchmark QIS3 against eight state-of-the-art solvers, including genetic algorithms, coherent Ising machines, simulated bifurcation, parallel tempering, simulated annealing, our prior QIS2 version, D-Wave's simulated-annealing (Neal), and Gurobi on three canonical QUBO problem classes: Max-Cut, NAE-3SAT, and Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass problems. Under a uniform runtime budget, QIS3 attains the best solution on nearly all instances, achieving optimality in 94% of max-cut instances. These results establish QIS3 as a robust, high-performance solver that bridges classical exact strategies and quantum-inspired heuristics for scalable QUBO optimization.
We present a method that integrates any quantum algorithm capable of finding solutions to integer linear programs into the Branch-and-Price algorithm, which is regularly used to solve large-scale integer linear programs with a specific structure. The role of the quantum algorithm is to find integer solutions to subproblems appearing in Branch-and-Price. Obtaining optimal or near-optimal integer solutions to these subproblems can increase the quality of solutions and reduce the depth and branching factor of the Branch-and-Price algorithm and hence reduce the overall running time. We investigate the viability of the approach by considering the Tail Assignment problem and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). Here, the master problem is the optimization problem Set Partitioning or its decision version Exact Cover and can be expressed as finding the ground state of an Ising spin glass Hamiltonian. For Exact Cover, our numerical results indicate that the required algorithm depth decreases with the number of feasible solutions for a given success probability of finding a feasible solution. For Set Partitioning, on the other hand, we find that for a given success probability of finding the optimal solution, the required algorithm depth can increase with the number of feasible solutions if the Hamiltonian is balanced poorly, which in the worst case is exponential in the problem size. We therefore address the importance of properly balancing the objective and constraint parts of the Hamiltonian. We empirically find that the approach is viable with QAOA if polynomial algorithm depth can be realized on quantum devices.