Are quantum advantages in discrete manufacturing achievable in the near term? As manufacturing-relevant NISQ algorithms, we identified Quantum Annealing (QA) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for combinatorial optimization as well as Derivative Quantum Circuits (DQC) for solving non-linear PDEs. While there is evidence for QAOA's outperformance, this requires post-NISQ circuit depths. In the case of QA, there is up to now no unquestionable evidence for advantage compared to classical computation. Yet different protocols could lead to finding such instances. Together with a well-chosen quantum feature map, DQC are a promising concept. Further investigations for higher dimensional problems and improvements in training could follow.
Are quantum advantages in discrete manufacturing achievable in the near term? As manufacturing-relevant NISQ algorithms, we identified Quantum Annealing (QA) and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for combinatorial optimization as well as Derivative Quantum Circuits (DQC) for solving non-linear PDEs. While there is evidence for QAOA's outperformance, this requires post-NISQ circuit depths. In the case of QA, there is up to now no unquestionable evidence for advantage compared to classical computation. Yet different protocols could lead to finding such instances. Together with a well-chosen quantum feature map, DQC are a promising concept. Further investigations for higher dimensional problems and improvements in training could follow.
The promise of quantum computing to address complex problems requiring high computational resources has long been hindered by the intrinsic and demanding requirements of quantum hardware development. Nonetheless, the current state of quantum computing, denominated Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era, has introduced algorithms and methods that are able to harness the computational power of current quantum computers with advantages over classical computers (referred to as quantum advantage). Achieving quantum advantage is of particular relevance for the combinatorial optimization domain, since it often implies solving an NP-Hard optimization problem. Moreover, combinatorial problems are highly relevant for practical application areas, such as operations research, or resource allocation problems. Among quantum computing methods, Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQA) have emerged as one of the strongest candidates towards reaching practical applicability of NISQ systems. This paper explores the current state and recent developments of VQAs, emphasizing their applicability to combinatorial optimization. We identify the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) as the leading candidate for these problems. Furthermore, we implement QAOA circuits with varying depths to solve the MaxCut problem on graphs with 10 and 20 nodes, demonstrating the potential and challenges of using VQAs in practical optimization tasks. We release our code, dataset and optimized circuit parameters under https://github.com/DanielFPerez/VQA-for-MaxCut.
The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a method of approximately solving combinatorial optimization problems. While QAOA is developed to solve a broad class of combinatorial optimization problems, it is not clear which classes of problems are best suited for it. One factor in demonstrating quantum advantage is the relationship between a problem instance and the circuit depth required to implement the QAOA method. As errors in NISQ devices increases exponentially with circuit depth, identifying lower bounds on circuit depth can provide insights into when quantum advantage could be feasible. Here, we identify how the structure of problem instances can be used to identify lower bounds for circuit depth for each iteration of QAOA and examine the relationship between problem structure and the circuit depth for a variety of combinatorial optimization problems including MaxCut and MaxIndSet. Specifically, we show how to derive a graph, G, that describes a general combinatorial optimization problem and show that the depth of circuit is at least the chromatic index of G. By looking at the scaling of circuit depth, we argue that MaxCut, MaxIndSet, and some instances of Vertex Covering and Boolean satisifiability problems are suitable for QAOA approaches while Knapsack and Traveling Sales Person problems are not.
In this work, we review quantum approaches to combinatorial optimization, with the aim of bridging theoretical developments and industrial relevance. We first survey the main families of quantum algorithms, including Quantum Annealing, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), Quantum Reinforcement Learning (QRL), and Quantum Generative Modeling (QGM). We then examine the problem classes where quantum technologies currently show evidence of quantum advantage, drawing on established benchmarking initiatives such as QOBLIB, QUARK, QASMBench, and QED-C. These problem classes are subsequently mapped to representative industrial domains, including logistics, finance, and telecommunications. Our analysis indicates that quantum annealing currently exhibits the highest level of operational maturity, while QAOA shows promising potential on NISQ-era hardware. In contrast, QRL and QGM emerge as longer-term research directions with significant potential for future industrial impact.
The major advances in quantum computing over the last few decades have sparked great interest in applying it to solve the most challenging computational problems in a wide variety of areas. One of the most pronounced domains here are optimization problems and a number of algorithmic approaches have been proposed for their solution. For the current noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), and quantum annealing (QA) are the central algorithms for this problem class. The two former can be executed on digital gate-model quantum computers, whereas the latter requires a quantum annealer. Across all hardware architectures and manufactures, the quantum computers available today share the property of being too error-prone to reliably execute involved quantum circuits as they typically arise from quantum optimization algorithms. In order to characterize the limits of existing quantum computers, many component and system level benchmarks have been proposed. However, owing to the complex nature of the errors in quantum systems these benchmark fail to provide predictive power beyond simple quantum circuits and small examples. Application oriented benchmarks have been proposed to remedy this problem, but both, results from real quantum systems as well as use cases beyond constructed academic examples, remain very rare. This paper addresses precisely this gap by considering two industrial relevant use cases: one in the realm of optimizing charging schedules for electric vehicles, the other concerned with the optimization of truck routes. Our central contribution are systematic series of examples derived from these uses cases that we execute on different processors of the gate-based quantum computers of IBM as well as on the quantum annealer of D-Wave.
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) has emerged as a promising approach for solving NP hard combinatorial optimization problems on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. However, its performance is critically dependent on the selection of the circuit depth a parameter that must be specified a priori without clear guidance. In this paper, we introduce a variant of QAOA called dynamic depth Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (DDQAOA) that resolves the challenge of pre selecting a fixed circuit depth. Our method adaptively expands circuit depth, starting from p = 1 and progressing up to p = 10, by transferring learned parameters to deeper circuits based on convergence criteria. We tested this approach on 100 instances of the Constrained Shortest Path Problem (CSPP) at 10 qubit and 16 qubit scales. Our DDQAOA achieved superior approximation ratios and success probabilities with fewer CNOT gate evaluations than the standard QAOA for p = 3, 5, 10, and 15. In particular, while standard QAOA at p = 15 achieved results close to our approach, it used 217% and 159.3% more CNOT gates for 10 qubit and 16 qubit instances, respectively. This demonstrates the performance and practical applicability of DDQAOA to solve combinatorial optimization problems on near term devices.
We investigate and compare the performance of two quantum optimization approaches, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and quantum annealing, applied to the Minimum Vertex Cover (MVC) problem. The problem is encoded as an and Ising model, and experiments are conducted on IBM’s GenericBackendV2 noisy superconducting qubit simulator and the D-Wave Advantage2 quantum annealer. Performance is evaluated in terms of solution quality, measurement probability, and proportion of valid solutions. The results we obtained show that, within our experimental setting, quantum annealing consistently outperforms its classical counterpart on small instances, while QAOA, though currently limited by simulation constraints, shows promising behavior that improves with increasing circuit depth. As problem size grows, both approaches exhibit sensitivity to parameter choices such as the penalty term and graph density, underscoring the need for careful tuning. These findings suggest that while both paradigms hold potential for combinatorial optimization, further advances in hardware capabilities and parameter calibration will be necessary to achieve reliable performance on larger instances.