Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2209.06242 · Physical Review Letters

Self-Healing of Trotter Error in Digital Adiabatic State Preparation

Lucas K. Kovalsky, F. A. Calderon-Vargas, Matthew Grace, Alicia B Magann, James B. Larsen, Andrew Baczewski, Mohan Sarovar

Published Aug 7, 2023• 30 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Adiabatic time evolution can be used to prepare a complicated quantum many-body state from one that is easier to synthesize and Trotterization can be used to implement such an evolution digitally. The complex interplay between nonadiabaticity and digitization influences the infidelity of this process. We prove that the first-order Trotterization of a complete adiabatic evolution has a cumulative infidelity that scales as O(T^{-2}δt^{2}) instead of O(T^{2}δt^{2}) expected from general Trotter error bounds, where δt is the time step and T is the total time. This result suggests a self-healing mechanism and explains why, despite increasing T, infidelities for fixed-δt digitized evolutions still decrease for a wide variety of Hamiltonians. It also establishes a correspondence between the quantum approximate optimization algorithm and digitized quantum annealing.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.131.060602

Related papers

Nonadiabatic Self-Healing of Trotter Errors in Digitized Counterdiabatic Dynamics

Mara Vizzuso, Gianluca Passarelli, Giovanni Cantele +3 more

Trotter errors in digitized quantum dynamics arise from approximating time-ordered evolution under noncommuting Hamiltonian terms with a product formula. In the adiabatic regime, such errors are known to exhibit long-time self-healing [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{131}, 060602 (2023)], where discretization effects are effectively suppressed. Here we show that self-healing persists at finite evolution times once nonadiabatic errors induced by finite-speed ramps are compensated. Using counterdiabatic driving to cancel diabatic transitions and isolate discretization effects, we study both noninteracting and interacting spin models and characterize the finite-time scaling with the Trotter steps and the total evolution time. In the instantaneous eigenbasis of the driven Hamiltonian, the leading digital error maps to an effective harmonic perturbation whose dominant Fourier component yields an analytic upper bound on the finite-time Trotter error and reveals the phase-cancellation mechanism underlying self-healing. Our results establish finite-time self-healing as a generic feature of digitized counterdiabatic protocols, clarify its mechanism beyond the long-time adiabatic limit, and provide practical guidance for high-fidelity state preparation on gate-based quantum processors.

quant-pharXiv:2512.22636•Physical Review A•Dec 30, 2025•0 citations

Success of digital adiabatic simulation with large Trotter step

Changhao Yi

The simulation of adiabatic evolution has deep connections with adiabatic quantum computation, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and adiabatic state preparation. Here we address the error analysis problem in quantum simulation of adiabatic process using Trotter formulas. We show that with additional conditions, the circuit depth can be linear in simulation time $T$. The improvement comes from the observation that the fidelity error here can't be estimated by the norm distance between evolution operators. This phenomenon is termed the robustness of discretization in digital adiabatic simulation. It can be explained in three steps, from analytical and numerical evidence: (1) The fidelity error should be estimated by applying adiabatic theorem on the effective Hamiltonian instead. (2) Because of the specialty of Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, most adiabatic process is naturally robust against discretization. (3) As the Trotter step gets larger, the spectral gap of effective Hamiltonian tends to close, which results in the failure of digital adiabatic simulation.

arXiv:2107.06404•Physical Review A•Nov 8, 2021•15 citations

Digital adiabatic evolution is universally accurate

Yangyu Lu, Yifei Huang, Dong An +3 more

Adiabatic evolution is a central paradigm in quantum physics. Digital simulations of adiabatic processes are generally regarded as resource-intensive, not only because of the long evolution time required, but also because algorithmic errors typically accumulate throughout the evolution, thereby demanding exceptionally deep circuits to preserve accuracy. This work demonstrates that digital adiabatic evolution is intrinsically accurate and robust to simulation errors. We analyze two Hamiltonian simulation methods—Trotterization and generalized quantum signal processing—and prove that the simulation error does not increase with time. We further show that accurate time-dependent adiabatic evolution can be achieved using only time-independent Hamiltonian-simulation algorithms. Numerical simulations of the adiabatic algorithms for molecular systems and linear equations confirm the theory, revealing that digital adiabatic evolution is substantially more efficient than previously assumed. Remarkably, our estimation for the first-order Trotterization error can be 106 times tighter than previous analyses for the transverse field Ising model even with less than 6 qubits. The findings establish fundamental robustness of digital adiabatic evolution and provide a basis for accurate, efficient implementations on fault-tolerant-and potentially near-term–quantum platforms. In this study, the authors show that digital adiabatic evolution is highly robust to simulation errors. Rather than accumulating, these errors self-cancel and even decrease over time, enabling highly efficient algorithms on near-term and future quantum computers.

arXiv:2510.12237•Nature Communications•May 21, 2026•1 citation

Digital quantum state preparation by nucleation

Jean Paul Sadia, Morten Hjorth-Jensen, Dean Lee +1 more

Quantum state preparation is crucial for quantum algorithms, and improved state preparation methods can reduce resource requirements by orders of magnitude. In this work, we introduce a state preparation method for lattice Hamiltonians on digital quantum computers inspired by nucleation. In our method, the exact ground state of a small lattice Hamiltonian is prepared in a quantum circuit, then a series of growth stages are performed via Trotterized adiabatic evolution to increase the size of the lattice to the desired model. Using the adiabatic theorem and Trotter error bounds, we provide sufficient conditions on the total evolution time and number of Trotter steps required for nucleation to prepare an initial state with desired fidelity. In addition, we introduce optimized nucleation which considers variational optimization on top of the nucleation structure. For a two-dimensional Ising model, we show that optimized nucleation can outperform a current leading method for state preparation on digital quantum computers.

quant-pharXiv:2609.37527•Sep 30, 2026•0 citations

Validity condition for high-fidelity digitized quantum annealing

Alan C. Santos

Digitizing an adiabatic evolution is a strategy able to combine the good performance of gate-based quantum processors with the advantages of adiabatic algorithms, thus providing a hybrid model for efficient quantum information processing. In this work we develop validity conditions for high-fidelity digital adiabatic tasks. To this end, we assume a digitizing process based on the Suzuki-Trotter decomposition, which allows us to introduce a digitized adiabatic theorem. As a consequence of this theorem, we show that the performance of such a hybrid model is limited by the fundamental constraints on the adiabatic theorem validity, even in ideal quantum processors. We argue how our approach predicts the existence of intrinsic nonadiabatic errors reported by Barends et al. [Nature (London) 534, 222 (2016)] through an empirical study of digital annealing. In addition, our approach allows us to explain the existence of a scaling of the number of Suzuki-Trotter blocks for the optimal digital circuit with respect to the optimal adiabatic total evolution time, as reported by Mbeng et al. [Phys. Rev. B 100, 224201 (2019)] through robust numerical analysis of digital annealing. We illustrate our results through two examples of digitized adiabatic algorithms, namely, the two-qubit exact-cover problem and the three-qubit adiabatic factorization of the number 21.

arXiv:2406.16385•Physical Review A•Feb 18, 2025•1 citation

Robustness of Discretization in Digital Adiabatic Simulation

Changhao Yi

The simulation of adiabatic evolution has deep connections with Adiabatic Quantum Computation, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and adiabatic state preparation. Here we address the error analysis problem in quantum simulation of adiabatic process using Trotter formulas. We show that with additional conditions, the circuit depth can be linear in simulation time $T$. The improvement comes from the observation that the fidelity error here can't be estimated by the norm distance between evolution operators. This phenomenon is termed as the robustness of discretization in digital adiabatic simulation. It can be explained in three steps, from analytical and numerical evidence: 1. the fidelity error should be estimated by applying adiabatic theorem on the effective Hamiltonian instead. 2. because of the specialty of Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, most adiabatic process is naturally robust against discretization. 3. as the Trotter step gets larger, the spectral gap of effective Hamiltonian tends to close, which results in the failure of digital adiabatic simulation.

•Jul 13, 2021•1 citation
Adiabatic time evolution can be used to prepare a complicated quantum many-body state from one that is easier to synthesize and Trotterization can be used to implement such an evolution digitally. The complex interplay between nonadiabaticity and digitization influences the infidelity of this process. We prove that the first-order Trotterization of a complete adiabatic evolution has a cumulative infidelity that scales as O(T^{-2}δt^{2}) instead of O(T^{2}δt^{2}) expected from general Trotter error bounds, where δt is the time step and T is the total time. This result suggests a self-healing mechanism and explains why, despite increasing T, infidelities for fixed-δt digitized evolutions still decrease for a wide variety of Hamiltonians. It also establishes a correspondence between the quantum approximate optimization algorithm and digitized quantum annealing.
Trotter errors in digitized quantum dynamics arise from approximating time-ordered evolution under noncommuting Hamiltonian terms with a product formula. In the adiabatic regime, such errors are known to exhibit long-time self-healing [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{131}, 060602 (2023)], where discretization effects are effectively suppressed. Here we show that self-healing persists at finite evolution times once nonadiabatic errors induced by finite-speed ramps are compensated. Using counterdiabatic driving to cancel diabatic transitions and isolate discretization effects, we study both noninteracting and interacting spin models and characterize the finite-time scaling with the Trotter steps and the total evolution time. In the instantaneous eigenbasis of the driven Hamiltonian, the leading digital error maps to an effective harmonic perturbation whose dominant Fourier component yields an analytic upper bound on the finite-time Trotter error and reveals the phase-cancellation mechanism underlying self-healing. Our results establish finite-time self-healing as a generic feature of digitized counterdiabatic protocols, clarify its mechanism beyond the long-time adiabatic limit, and provide practical guidance for high-fidelity state preparation on gate-based quantum processors.
The simulation of adiabatic evolution has deep connections with adiabatic quantum computation, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and adiabatic state preparation. Here we address the error analysis problem in quantum simulation of adiabatic process using Trotter formulas. We show that with additional conditions, the circuit depth can be linear in simulation time TTT. The improvement comes from the observation that the fidelity error here can't be estimated by the norm distance between evolution operators. This phenomenon is termed the robustness of discretization in digital adiabatic simulation. It can be explained in three steps, from analytical and numerical evidence: (1) The fidelity error should be estimated by applying adiabatic theorem on the effective Hamiltonian instead. (2) Because of the specialty of Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, most adiabatic process is naturally robust against discretization. (3) As the Trotter step gets larger, the spectral gap of effective Hamiltonian tends to close, which results in the failure of digital adiabatic simulation.
Adiabatic evolution is a central paradigm in quantum physics. Digital simulations of adiabatic processes are generally regarded as resource-intensive, not only because of the long evolution time required, but also because algorithmic errors typically accumulate throughout the evolution, thereby demanding exceptionally deep circuits to preserve accuracy. This work demonstrates that digital adiabatic evolution is intrinsically accurate and robust to simulation errors. We analyze two Hamiltonian simulation methods—Trotterization and generalized quantum signal processing—and prove that the simulation error does not increase with time. We further show that accurate time-dependent adiabatic evolution can be achieved using only time-independent Hamiltonian-simulation algorithms. Numerical simulations of the adiabatic algorithms for molecular systems and linear equations confirm the theory, revealing that digital adiabatic evolution is substantially more efficient than previously assumed. Remarkably, our estimation for the first-order Trotterization error can be 106 times tighter than previous analyses for the transverse field Ising model even with less than 6 qubits. The findings establish fundamental robustness of digital adiabatic evolution and provide a basis for accurate, efficient implementations on fault-tolerant-and potentially near-term–quantum platforms. In this study, the authors show that digital adiabatic evolution is highly robust to simulation errors. Rather than accumulating, these errors self-cancel and even decrease over time, enabling highly efficient algorithms on near-term and future quantum computers.
Quantum state preparation is crucial for quantum algorithms, and improved state preparation methods can reduce resource requirements by orders of magnitude. In this work, we introduce a state preparation method for lattice Hamiltonians on digital quantum computers inspired by nucleation. In our method, the exact ground state of a small lattice Hamiltonian is prepared in a quantum circuit, then a series of growth stages are performed via Trotterized adiabatic evolution to increase the size of the lattice to the desired model. Using the adiabatic theorem and Trotter error bounds, we provide sufficient conditions on the total evolution time and number of Trotter steps required for nucleation to prepare an initial state with desired fidelity. In addition, we introduce optimized nucleation which considers variational optimization on top of the nucleation structure. For a two-dimensional Ising model, we show that optimized nucleation can outperform a current leading method for state preparation on digital quantum computers.
Digitizing an adiabatic evolution is a strategy able to combine the good performance of gate-based quantum processors with the advantages of adiabatic algorithms, thus providing a hybrid model for efficient quantum information processing. In this work we develop validity conditions for high-fidelity digital adiabatic tasks. To this end, we assume a digitizing process based on the Suzuki-Trotter decomposition, which allows us to introduce a digitized adiabatic theorem. As a consequence of this theorem, we show that the performance of such a hybrid model is limited by the fundamental constraints on the adiabatic theorem validity, even in ideal quantum processors. We argue how our approach predicts the existence of intrinsic nonadiabatic errors reported by Barends et al. [Nature (London) 534, 222 (2016)] through an empirical study of digital annealing. In addition, our approach allows us to explain the existence of a scaling of the number of Suzuki-Trotter blocks for the optimal digital circuit with respect to the optimal adiabatic total evolution time, as reported by Mbeng et al. [Phys. Rev. B 100, 224201 (2019)] through robust numerical analysis of digital annealing. We illustrate our results through two examples of digitized adiabatic algorithms, namely, the two-qubit exact-cover problem and the three-qubit adiabatic factorization of the number 21.
The simulation of adiabatic evolution has deep connections with Adiabatic Quantum Computation, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and adiabatic state preparation. Here we address the error analysis problem in quantum simulation of adiabatic process using Trotter formulas. We show that with additional conditions, the circuit depth can be linear in simulation time TTT. The improvement comes from the observation that the fidelity error here can't be estimated by the norm distance between evolution operators. This phenomenon is termed as the robustness of discretization in digital adiabatic simulation. It can be explained in three steps, from analytical and numerical evidence: 1. the fidelity error should be estimated by applying adiabatic theorem on the effective Hamiltonian instead. 2. because of the specialty of Riemann-Lebesgue lemma, most adiabatic process is naturally robust against discretization. 3. as the Trotter step gets larger, the spectral gap of effective Hamiltonian tends to close, which results in the failure of digital adiabatic simulation.