Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2208.12516 · Quantum Science and Technology

A fully passive transmitter for decoy-state quantum key distribution

Víctor Zapatero, Wenyuan Wang, Marcos Curty

Published Feb 15, 2023• 24 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract A passive quantum key distribution (QKD) transmitter generates the quantum states prescribed by a QKD protocol at random, combining a fixed quantum mechanism and a post-selection step. By circumventing the use of active optical modulators externally driven by random number generators, passive QKD transmitters offer immunity to modulator side channels and potentially enable higher frequencies of operation. Recently, the first linear optics setup suitable for passive decoy-state QKD has been proposed. In this work, we simplify the prototype and adopt sharply different approaches for BB84 polarization encoding and decoy-state parameter estimation. In particular, our scheme avoids a probabilistic post-selection step that is central to the former proposal. On top of it, we elaborate a simple and tight custom-made security analysis.

DOI
10.1088/2058-9565/acbc46

Related papers

Finite-key security of passive quantum key distribution

Víctor Zapatero, Marcos Curty

The passive approach to quantum key distribution (QKD) eliminates all optical modulators and random number generators from QKD systems reaching an enhanced simplicity, immunity to modulator side channels, and potentially higher repetition rates. In this work, we provide finite-key security bounds for a fully passive decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, considering a recently presented passive QKD source. With our analysis, the attainable secret-key rate is comparable to that of the perfect parameter-estimation limit, in fact differing from the key rate of the active approach by less than one order of magnitude. This demonstrates the practicality of fully passive QKD solutions.

arXiv:2308.02376•Physical Review Applied•Jan 11, 2024•14 citations

Fully Passive Quantum Key Distribution

Wenyuan Wang, Rong Wang, Cheng-Qiu Hu +5 more

We propose a fully passive linear optical quantum key distribution (QKD) source that implements both random decoy-state and encoding choices with postselection only, thus eliminating all side channels in active modulators. Our source is general purpose and can be used in, e.g., BB84, the six-state protocol, and reference-frame-independent QKD. It can even potentially be combined with measurement-device-independent QKD to achieve robustness against side channels in both detectors and modulators. We also perform a proof-of-principle experimental source characterization to show its feasibility.

arXiv:2207.05916•Physical Review Letters•May 31, 2023•60 citations

Fully passive quantum key distribution with parametric down-conversion source

Jia‐Wei Ying, Qi Zhang, Shi‐Pu Gu +3 more

The fully passive source is capable of passively generating decoy states and performing passive encoding simultaneously, avoiding the side-channel risks caused by active modulation operations at the source end, thus effectively enhance the security in quantum key distribution (QKD). Existing fully passive QKD protocol and experiments exploit phase-randomized coherent pulses. In this paper, we propose a fully passive QKD protocol using parametric down-conversion source. The decoy state generation and encoding operation can be carried out passively by parameter down-conversion progress. This protocol has several advantages. First, it can also eliminate all side channels in active modulators. Second, compared with fully passive QKD protocol with phase-randomized coherent pulses, our protocol can significantly increase the key rate and extend the communication distance. Meanwhile, in terms of the transmission rate, our protocol is also closer to that of actively modulated QKD and can achieve fully passive modulation with fewer resources. Moreover, combined with measurement-device-independent (MDI) QKD, this protocol can even potentially achieve robustness against side channels in both detectors and modulators.

arXiv:2502.12651•Feb 18, 2025•1 citation

Passive Decoy-State Quantum Key Distribution with Coherent Light

Marcos Curty, Marc Jofre, Valerio Pruneri +1 more

Signal state preparation in quantum key distribution schemes can be realized using either an active or a passive source. Passive sources might be valuable in some scenarios; for instance, in those experimental setups operating at high transmission rates, since no externally driven element is required. Typical passive transmitters involve parametric down-conversion. More recently, it has been shown that phase-randomized coherent pulses also allow passive generation of decoy states and Bennett–Brassard 1984 (BB84) polarization signals, though the combination of both setups in a single passive source is cumbersome. In this paper, we present a complete passive transmitter that prepares decoy-state BB84 signals using coherent light. Our method employs sum-frequency generation together with linear optical components and classical photodetectors. In the asymptotic limit of an infinite long experiment, the resulting secret key rate (per pulse) is comparable to the one delivered by an active decoy-state BB84 setup with an infinite number of decoy settings.

arXiv:1108.0841•Entropy•Jun 12, 2015•10 citations

Fully passive measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Xiang Wang, Feng-Yu Lu, Ze-Hao Wang +7 more

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDIQKD) can resist all attacks on the detection devices, but there are still some security issues related to the source side. One possible solution is to use the passive protocol to eliminate the side channels introduced by active modulators at the source. Recently, a fully passive QKD protocol was proposed that could simultaneously achieve passive encoding and passive decoy-state modulation using linear optics. In this work, we propose a fully passive MDIQKD scheme that can protect the system from both side channels of source modulators and attacks on the measurement devices, which can significantly improve the implementation security of the QKD systems. We provide a specific passive encoding strategy and a method for decoy-state analysis, followed by simulation results for the secure key rate in the asymptotic scenario. Our work offers a feasible way to improve the implementation security of QKD systems and serves as a reference for achieving passive QKD schemes using realistic devices.

arXiv:2309.07576•Physical Review Applied•Jun 28, 2024•11 citations

Finite-key security analysis of the decoy-state BB84 QKD with passive measurement

Akihiro Mizutani, Shun Kawakami, Go Kato

The decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is widely regarded as the de facto standard for practical implementations. On the receiver side, passive basis choice is attractive because it significantly reduces the need for random number generators and eliminates the need for optical modulators. Despite these advantages, a finite-key analytical security proof for the decoy-state BB84 protocol, where the basis is chosen passively with a biased probability, has been lacking. In this work, we present a simple analytical finite-key security proof for this setting, yielding a closed-form secret-key rate formula that can be directly evaluated using experimentally accessible parameters. Numerical simulations show that the key rates of passiveand active-measurement implementations are nearly identical, indicating that passive measurement does not compromise key-generation efficiency in practical QKD systems.

quant-pharXiv:2511.21253•Quantum Science and Technology•Nov 27, 2025•2 citations
Abstract A passive quantum key distribution (QKD) transmitter generates the quantum states prescribed by a QKD protocol at random, combining a fixed quantum mechanism and a post-selection step. By circumventing the use of active optical modulators externally driven by random number generators, passive QKD transmitters offer immunity to modulator side channels and potentially enable higher frequencies of operation. Recently, the first linear optics setup suitable for passive decoy-state QKD has been proposed. In this work, we simplify the prototype and adopt sharply different approaches for BB84 polarization encoding and decoy-state parameter estimation. In particular, our scheme avoids a probabilistic post-selection step that is central to the former proposal. On top of it, we elaborate a simple and tight custom-made security analysis.
The passive approach to quantum key distribution (QKD) eliminates all optical modulators and random number generators from QKD systems reaching an enhanced simplicity, immunity to modulator side channels, and potentially higher repetition rates. In this work, we provide finite-key security bounds for a fully passive decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) protocol, considering a recently presented passive QKD source. With our analysis, the attainable secret-key rate is comparable to that of the perfect parameter-estimation limit, in fact differing from the key rate of the active approach by less than one order of magnitude. This demonstrates the practicality of fully passive QKD solutions.
We propose a fully passive linear optical quantum key distribution (QKD) source that implements both random decoy-state and encoding choices with postselection only, thus eliminating all side channels in active modulators. Our source is general purpose and can be used in, e.g., BB84, the six-state protocol, and reference-frame-independent QKD. It can even potentially be combined with measurement-device-independent QKD to achieve robustness against side channels in both detectors and modulators. We also perform a proof-of-principle experimental source characterization to show its feasibility.
The fully passive source is capable of passively generating decoy states and performing passive encoding simultaneously, avoiding the side-channel risks caused by active modulation operations at the source end, thus effectively enhance the security in quantum key distribution (QKD). Existing fully passive QKD protocol and experiments exploit phase-randomized coherent pulses. In this paper, we propose a fully passive QKD protocol using parametric down-conversion source. The decoy state generation and encoding operation can be carried out passively by parameter down-conversion progress. This protocol has several advantages. First, it can also eliminate all side channels in active modulators. Second, compared with fully passive QKD protocol with phase-randomized coherent pulses, our protocol can significantly increase the key rate and extend the communication distance. Meanwhile, in terms of the transmission rate, our protocol is also closer to that of actively modulated QKD and can achieve fully passive modulation with fewer resources. Moreover, combined with measurement-device-independent (MDI) QKD, this protocol can even potentially achieve robustness against side channels in both detectors and modulators.
Signal state preparation in quantum key distribution schemes can be realized using either an active or a passive source. Passive sources might be valuable in some scenarios; for instance, in those experimental setups operating at high transmission rates, since no externally driven element is required. Typical passive transmitters involve parametric down-conversion. More recently, it has been shown that phase-randomized coherent pulses also allow passive generation of decoy states and Bennett–Brassard 1984 (BB84) polarization signals, though the combination of both setups in a single passive source is cumbersome. In this paper, we present a complete passive transmitter that prepares decoy-state BB84 signals using coherent light. Our method employs sum-frequency generation together with linear optical components and classical photodetectors. In the asymptotic limit of an infinite long experiment, the resulting secret key rate (per pulse) is comparable to the one delivered by an active decoy-state BB84 setup with an infinite number of decoy settings.
Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution (MDIQKD) can resist all attacks on the detection devices, but there are still some security issues related to the source side. One possible solution is to use the passive protocol to eliminate the side channels introduced by active modulators at the source. Recently, a fully passive QKD protocol was proposed that could simultaneously achieve passive encoding and passive decoy-state modulation using linear optics. In this work, we propose a fully passive MDIQKD scheme that can protect the system from both side channels of source modulators and attacks on the measurement devices, which can significantly improve the implementation security of the QKD systems. We provide a specific passive encoding strategy and a method for decoy-state analysis, followed by simulation results for the secure key rate in the asymptotic scenario. Our work offers a feasible way to improve the implementation security of QKD systems and serves as a reference for achieving passive QKD schemes using realistic devices.
The decoy-state Bennett-Brassard 1984 (BB84) quantum key distribution (QKD) protocol is widely regarded as the de facto standard for practical implementations. On the receiver side, passive basis choice is attractive because it significantly reduces the need for random number generators and eliminates the need for optical modulators. Despite these advantages, a finite-key analytical security proof for the decoy-state BB84 protocol, where the basis is chosen passively with a biased probability, has been lacking. In this work, we present a simple analytical finite-key security proof for this setting, yielding a closed-form secret-key rate formula that can be directly evaluated using experimentally accessible parameters. Numerical simulations show that the key rates of passiveand active-measurement implementations are nearly identical, indicating that passive measurement does not compromise key-generation efficiency in practical QKD systems.